[0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
[0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-clnt0 failed with error -22
tee_shm_release() is not invoked on dma shm buffer.
Implement .shutdown() method to handle the release of the buffers
correctly.
More info:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2021 at 2:21 PM Allen Pais wrote:
>
>
>
> >>
> >> [0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
> >> [0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-clnt0 failed with error -22
> >>
> >> tee_shm_release() is not invoked on dma shm buffer.
> >>
> >> Implement .shutdown()
This patch removes unnecessary out of memory message in hinic driver,
fixes the following checkpatch.pl warning:
"WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message"
Signed-off-by: Daode Huang
---
drivers/net/ethernet/huawei/hinic/hinic_hw_api_cmd.c | 8 ++--
drivers/net/ether
On 2021-02-25 14:36:09, Allen Pais wrote:
> From: Allen Pais
>
> The following out of memory errors are seen on kexec reboot
> from the optee core.
>
> [0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
> [0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-clnt0
[0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
[0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-clnt0 failed with error -22
tee_shm_release() is not invoked on dma shm buffer.
Implement .shutdown() method to handle the release of the buffers
correctly.
More info:
On 2021-03-11 6:33 p.m., Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
The sg_proc_seq_show_debug should return -ENOMEM on an
out of memory error rather than -1. Fix this.
Fixes: 94cda6cf2e44 ("scsi: sg: Rework debug info")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
Acked-by: Douglas Gilber
From: Colin Ian King
The sg_proc_seq_show_debug should return -ENOMEM on an
out of memory error rather than -1. Fix this.
Fixes: 94cda6cf2e44 ("scsi: sg: Rework debug info")
Signed-off-by: Colin Ian King
---
drivers/scsi/sg.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
From: Allen Pais
The following out of memory errors are seen on kexec reboot
from the optee core.
[0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
[0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-clnt0 failed with error -22
tee_shm_release() is not invoked on dma shm buffer.
Implement
On Thu, Feb 25, 2021 at 10:06 AM Allen Pais wrote:
>
> From: Allen Pais
>
> The following out of memory errors are seen on kexec reboot
> from the optee core.
>
> [0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
> [0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-cln
From: Allen Pais
The following out of memory errors are seen on kexec reboot
from the optee core.
[0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
[0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-clnt0 failed with error -22
tee_shm_release() is not invoked on dma shm buffer.
Implement
- /*
-* Ask OP-TEE to free all cached shared memory objects to decrease
-* reference counters and also avoid wild pointers in secure world
-* into the old shared memory range.
-*/
- optee_disable_shm_cache(optee);
+ if (shutdown) {
+
On Tue, Feb 23, 2021 at 09:56:13PM +0530, Allen Pais wrote:
>
>
> > > > > - /*
> > > > > - * Ask OP-TEE to free all cached shared memory objects to
> > > > > decrease
> > > > > - * reference counters and also avoid wild pointers in secure
> > > > > world
> > > > > - * into
- /*
-* Ask OP-TEE to free all cached shared memory objects to decrease
-* reference counters and also avoid wild pointers in secure world
-* into the old shared memory range.
-*/
- optee_disable_shm_cache(optee);
+ if (shutdown) {
+
On Mon, Feb 22, 2021 at 06:15:08PM +0530, Allen Pais wrote:
>
> > On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:57:12 +0530, Allen Pais wrote:
> > > - /*
> > > - * Ask OP-TEE to free all cached shared memory objects to decrease
> > > - * reference counters and also avoid wild pointers in secure world
> > > - * into
On Wed, 17 Feb 2021 14:57:12 +0530, Allen Pais wrote:
- /*
-* Ask OP-TEE to free all cached shared memory objects to decrease
-* reference counters and also avoid wild pointers in secure world
-* into the old shared memory range.
-*/
-
From: Allen Pais
The following out of memory errors are seen on kexec reboot
from the optee core.
[0.368428] tee_bnxt_fw optee-clnt0: tee_shm_alloc failed
[0.368461] tee_bnxt_fw: probe of optee-clnt0 failed with error -22
tee_shm_release() is not invoked on dma shm buffer.
Implement
0 Cinnamon.
elias@elias-5600X:~$ grub-install --version
grub-install (GRUB) 2.04-1ubuntu26.7
Thanks,
Elias
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:38 AM David Hildenbrand wrote:
>
> On 07.12.20 10:16, Elias Carter wrote:
> > I just compiled and installed 5.10 RC 7 and got a message from grub2:
>
On 07.12.20 10:16, Elias Carter wrote:
> I just compiled and installed 5.10 RC 7 and got a message from grub2:
> "out of memory, press any key to continue" shortly followed by a
> kernel panic (see attached screenshot).
>
> The 5.4.0-56-generic kernel from Ubuntu
Resending grub config since that appeared to be mangled by my mail client:
On Mon, Dec 7, 2020 at 1:16 AM Elias Carter wrote:
>
> I just compiled and installed 5.10 RC 7 and got a message from grub2:
> "out of memory, press any key to continue" shortly followed by a
> kern
Failure of dma_alloc_coherent will already throw a error message,
so addition message is really redundant here. Remove it!
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/slimbus/qcom-ngd-ctrl.c
From: Leon Romanovsky
Once GCOV fails to duplicate information, the following error is
printed:
gcov: could not save data for
'/home/leonro/src/kernel/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/std_types.gcda' (out of
memory)
In the event of out-of-memory such prints are seen for almost every kernel
file
.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/sound.git for-next
Thanks!
[1/1] ASoC: qcom: add missing out of memory check on drvdata->clks allocation
commit: a467f2f8ad5f9a21f92b3fa6ad2aac90fa7054fe
All being well this means that it will be integrated into the linux-next
tree (usually sometime
On 8/19/2020 9:31 PM, Colin King wrote:
From: Colin Ian King
Currently drvdata->clks is not being checked for an allocation failure,
leading to potential null pointer dereferencing. Fix this by adding a
check and returning -ENOMEM if an error occurred.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null
From: Colin Ian King
Currently drvdata->clks is not being checked for an allocation failure,
leading to potential null pointer dereferencing. Fix this by adding a
check and returning -ENOMEM if an error occurred.
Addresses-Coverity: ("Dereference null return value")
Fixes: 1220f6a76e77 ("ASoC:
gracefully closing napi poll routine with correct
> invocation of napi_complete_done.
>
> This was reproduced with artificially failing the allocation of skb to
> simulate an "out of memory" error case and check that traffic does
> not get stuck.
> --- a/drivers/net/ether
th correct
invocation of napi_complete_done.
This was reproduced with artificially failing the allocation of skb to
simulate an "out of memory" error case and check that traffic does
not get stuck.
Fixes: 970a2e9864b0 ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Vector operations")
Signed-off-by: Igor R
th correct
invocation of napi_complete_done.
This was reproduced with artificially failing the allocation of skb to
simulate an "out of memory" error case and check that traffic does
not get stuck.
Fixes: 970a2e9864b0 ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Vector operations")
Signed-off-by: Igor R
th correct
invocation of napi_complete_done.
This was reproduced with artificially failing the allocation of skb to
simulate an "out of memory" error case and check that traffic does
not get stuck.
Fixes: 970a2e9864b0 ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Vector operations")
Signed-off-by: Igor R
th correct
invocation of napi_complete_done.
This was reproduced with artificially failing the allocation of skb to
simulate an "out of memory" error case and check that traffic does
not get stuck.
Fixes: 970a2e9864b0 ("net: ethernet: aquantia: Vector operations")
Signed-off-by: Igor R
Factor out the repeated device memory address calculation into
a helper.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Ralph Campbell
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nouveau_dmem.c | 42 +++---
1 file changed, 17 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Weihang Li
Users should be informed if HNS driver failed to allocate memory for
descriptor when handling hw errors. This patch solve above issues.
Signed-off-by: Weihang Li
Signed-off-by: Peng Li
Signed-off-by: Huazhong Tan
---
drivers/net/ethernet/hisilicon/hns3/hns3pf/hclge_err.c |
On Monday, May 27, 2019 2:27:51 PM CEST Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> There is no need to print an error message if kstrdup() fails, as the
> memory allocation core already takes care of that.
>
> Note that commit 59d84ca8c46a93ad ("PM / OPP / clk: Remove unnecessary
> OOM message") already removed
On Mon, 27 May 2019 14:29:58 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven
wrote:
> There is no need to print an error message and backtrace if
> kmalloc_node() fails, as the memory allocation core already takes care
> of that.
>
> ...
>
> --- a/lib/cpumask.c
> +++ b/lib/cpumask.c
> @@ -114,13 +114,6 @@ bool
On 5/28/19 5:54 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 13:23 -0700, tip-bot for Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
> []
>> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle
>> *fwnode, int size,
>>
>>
On Tue, 2019-05-28 at 13:23 -0700, tip-bot for Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
[]
> @@ -139,7 +139,7 @@ struct irq_domain *__irq_domain_add(struct fwnode_handle
> *fwnode, int size,
>
> domain = kzalloc_node(sizeof(*domain) +
/irqdomain: Remove WARN_ON() on out-of-memory condition
There is no need to print a backtrace when memory allocation fails, as
the memory allocation core already takes care of that.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner
Cc: Marc Zyngier
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r
There is no need to print an error message and backtrace if
kmalloc_node() fails, as the memory allocation core already takes care
of that.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
lib/cpumask.c | 7 ---
1 file changed, 7 deletions(-)
diff --git a/lib/cpumask.c b/lib/cpumask.c
index
There is no need to print an error message if kstrdup() fails, as the
memory allocation core already takes care of that.
Note that commit 59d84ca8c46a93ad ("PM / OPP / clk: Remove unnecessary
OOM message") already removed similar error messages, but this one was
forgotten.
Signed-off-by: Geert
There is no need to print error messages if kcalloc() or
alloc_cpumask_var() fail, as the memory allocation core already takes
care of that.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
drivers/base/arch_topology.c | 5 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git
There is no need to print error messages if kzalloc() or
ioremap_nocache() fail, as the memory allocation core already takes care
of that.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
Reviewed-by: Simon Horman
---
v2:
- Add Reviewed-by,
- s/devm_kzalloc/kzalloc/ in patch description, reword.
---
There is no need to print a backtrace when memory allocation fails, as
the memory allocation core already takes care of that.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c
4.20-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alexei Naberezhnov
commit 483cbbeddd5fe2c80fd4141ff0748fa06c4ff146 upstream.
This fixes the case when md array assembly fails because of raid cache recovery
unable to allocate a stripe,
4.19-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alexei Naberezhnov
commit 483cbbeddd5fe2c80fd4141ff0748fa06c4ff146 upstream.
This fixes the case when md array assembly fails because of raid cache recovery
unable to allocate a stripe,
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Alexei Naberezhnov
commit 483cbbeddd5fe2c80fd4141ff0748fa06c4ff146 upstream.
This fixes the case when md array assembly fails because of raid cache recovery
unable to allocate a stripe,
The subject is too long.
On Mon, Dec 24, 2018 at 08:11:28AM -0800, Prathamesh Deshpande wrote:
> This patch removes unnecessary out of memory warning
> message from wlan-ng prism2fw.c file.
>
> Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Deshpande
> ---
> drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw
This patch removes unnecessary out of memory warning
message from wlan-ng prism2fw.c file.
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Deshpande
---
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
b/drivers/staging
This patch removes unnecessary out of memory warning
message from wlan-ng prism2fw.c file.
Signed-off-by: Prathamesh Deshpande
---
drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c | 1 -
1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
b/drivers/staging/wlan-ng/prism2fw.c
index
riday, November 09, 2018 at 5:08 PM
>>>>> From: "Waiman Long"
>>>>> To: "Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
>>>>> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
>>>>> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
>
riday, November 09, 2018 at 5:08 PM
>>>>> From: "Waiman Long"
>>>>> To: "Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
>>>>> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
>>>>> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
>
"Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
>>>> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
>>>> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
>>>> (Google)" , "Zhong Jiang"
>>>> Subject: Re: ODEBUG: Out of memory. OD
"Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
>>>> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
>>>> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
>>>> (Google)" , "Zhong Jiang"
>>>> Subject: Re: ODEBUG: Out of memory. OD
ot; , "Thomas Gleixner"
> >> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
> >> (Google)" , "Zhong Jiang"
> >> Subject: Re: ODEBUG: Out of memory. ODEBUG disabled
> >>
> >> On 11/09/2018 04:51 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> >>>
ot; , "Thomas Gleixner"
> >> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
> >> (Google)" , "Zhong Jiang"
> >> Subject: Re: ODEBUG: Out of memory. ODEBUG disabled
> >>
> >> On 11/09/2018 04:51 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
> >>>
On 11/09/2018 08:45 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 at 5:08 PM
>> From: "Waiman Long"
>> To: "Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
>> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
>> , "Arnd Bergmann" , &q
On 11/09/2018 08:45 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 at 5:08 PM
>> From: "Waiman Long"
>> To: "Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
>> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
>> , "Arnd Bergmann" , &q
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 at 5:08 PM
> From: "Waiman Long"
> To: "Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
> (Google)" , "Zhong Jiang&
> Sent: Friday, November 09, 2018 at 5:08 PM
> From: "Waiman Long"
> To: "Qian Cai" , "Yang Shi"
> Cc: "open list" , "Thomas Gleixner"
> , "Arnd Bergmann" , "Joel Fernandes
> (Google)" , "Zhong Jiang&
33fd1f2) causes object debugging
>>> always running out of memory.
>> May you please paste the detail failure log?
> I assume you mean dmesg.
>
> Here is the dmesg for 64 CPUs,
> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/BnhvXXhn7k/
>>> I have to boot the kernel with only
33fd1f2) causes object debugging
>>> always running out of memory.
>> May you please paste the detail failure log?
> I assume you mean dmesg.
>
> Here is the dmesg for 64 CPUs,
> https://paste.ubuntu.com/p/BnhvXXhn7k/
>>> I have to boot the kernel with only
On 11/9/18 1:51 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 9, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
On 11/9/18 1:36 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
always running out of memory.
May you
On 11/9/18 1:51 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
On Nov 9, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
On 11/9/18 1:36 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
always running out of memory.
May you
> On Nov 9, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/9/18 1:36 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>> It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
>> booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
>> always running out of
> On Nov 9, 2018, at 4:42 PM, Yang Shi wrote:
>
>
>
> On 11/9/18 1:36 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
>> It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
>> booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
>> always running out of
On 11/9/18 1:36 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
always running out of memory.
May you please paste the detail failure log?
I have to boot the kernel with only 16 CPUs
On 11/9/18 1:36 PM, Qian Cai wrote:
It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
always running out of memory.
May you please paste the detail failure log?
I have to boot the kernel with only 16 CPUs
It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
always running out of memory.
I have to boot the kernel with only 16 CPUs instead (nr_cpus=16)
to make it work. Is it expected that object debugging is not going
It is a bit annoying on this aarch64 server with 64 CPUs that is
booting the latest mainline (3541833fd1f2) causes object debugging
always running out of memory.
I have to boot the kernel with only 16 CPUs instead (nr_cpus=16)
to make it work. Is it expected that object debugging is not going
3.16.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
commit 5c60300d68da32ca77f7f978039dc72bfc78b06b upstream.
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the error handl
3.16.60-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin"
commit 5c60300d68da32ca77f7f978039dc72bfc78b06b upstream.
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the error handl
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christophe JAILLET
[ Upstream commit 839c42273617787318da7baf6151d553108f5e17 ]
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christophe JAILLET
[ Upstream commit 839c42273617787318da7baf6151d553108f5e17 ]
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christophe JAILLET
[ Upstream commit 839c42273617787318da7baf6151d553108f5e17 ]
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Christophe JAILLET
[ Upstream commit 839c42273617787318da7baf6151d553108f5e17 ]
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
commit 5c60300d68da32ca77f7f978039dc72bfc78b06b upstream.
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the
4.14-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
commit 5c60300d68da32ca77f7f978039dc72bfc78b06b upstream.
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the error handling is
out of spec
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael S. Tsirkin <m...@redhat.com>
commit 5c60300d68da32ca77f7f978039dc72bfc78b06b upstream.
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the
4.16-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
--
From: Michael S. Tsirkin
commit 5c60300d68da32ca77f7f978039dc72bfc78b06b upstream.
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the error handling is
out of spec
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the error handling is
out of spec: it calls del_vqs without bothering
to reset the device first.
To fix, call the full cleanup function in this case.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin &l
When out of memory and we can't add ctrl vq buffers,
probe fails. Unfortunately the error handling is
out of spec: it calls del_vqs without bothering
to reset the device first.
To fix, call the full cleanup function in this case.
Cc: sta...@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 05:52:52PM -0700, Andrew Duggan wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2018 07:03 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
> > error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently al
On Mon, Apr 02, 2018 at 05:52:52PM -0700, Andrew Duggan wrote:
>
> On 04/02/2018 07:03 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> > When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
> > error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently al
Hi Christophe JAILLET.
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 7.5278)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126,
v4.15.15: Build OK!
Hi Christophe JAILLET.
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed by the -stable helper bot and determined
to be a high probability candidate for -stable trees. (score: 7.5278)
The bot has tested the following trees: v4.15.15, v4.14.32, v4.9.92, v4.4.126,
v4.15.15: Build OK!
On 04/02/2018 07:03 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently allocated
memory.
Propagate the error code returned by 'rmi_spi_manage_pools()' instead.
Yep
On 04/02/2018 07:03 AM, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently allocated
memory.
Propagate the error code returned by 'rmi_spi_manage_pools()' instead.
Yep
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently allocated
memory.
Propagate the error code returned by 'rmi_spi_manage_pools()' instead.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET <christophe.jail...@wanadoo
When extending the rmi_spi buffers, we must check that no out of memory
error occurs, otherwise we may access data above the currently allocated
memory.
Propagate the error code returned by 'rmi_spi_manage_pools()' instead.
Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
---
drivers/input/rmi4/rmi_spi.c | 7
You should CC maintainer to get an answer
On Fri 23-03-18 19:40:08, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/01/29 2:58, syzbot wrote:
> > This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
> > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
> > Direct all questions to syzkal...@googlegroups.com.
> >
> >
You should CC maintainer to get an answer
On Fri 23-03-18 19:40:08, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> On 2018/01/29 2:58, syzbot wrote:
> > This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
> > See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
> > Direct all questions to syzkal...@googlegroups.com.
> >
> >
On 2018/01/29 2:58, syzbot wrote:
> This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
> Direct all questions to syzkal...@googlegroups.com.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
> If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix
On 2018/01/29 2:58, syzbot wrote:
> This bug is generated by a dumb bot. It may contain errors.
> See https://goo.gl/tpsmEJ for details.
> Direct all questions to syzkal...@googlegroups.com.
>
> syzbot will keep track of this bug report.
> If you forgot to add the Reported-by tag, once the fix
This patch removes the unnecessary out of memory message fixing the
following checkpatch.pl warning in usbpipe.c:
WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
Signed-off-by: Dileep Sankhla <sankhla.dilee...@gmail.com>
---
Change in v2:
- changed commit message
---
drivers/staging/
This patch removes the unnecessary out of memory message fixing the
following checkpatch.pl warning in usbpipe.c:
WARNING: Possible unnecessary 'out of memory' message
Signed-off-by: Dileep Sankhla
---
Change in v2:
- changed commit message
---
drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c | 3 ---
1 file
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 09:46:18PM +0530, Dileep Sankhla wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dileep Sankhla
The subject is too long and you need to have a changelog.
regards,
dan carpenter
On Sat, Feb 10, 2018 at 09:46:18PM +0530, Dileep Sankhla wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Dileep Sankhla
The subject is too long and you need to have a changelog.
regards,
dan carpenter
Signed-off-by: Dileep Sankhla
---
drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c
index 273176386a51..5bbc56f8779e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c
Signed-off-by: Dileep Sankhla
---
drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c | 3 ---
1 file changed, 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c
index 273176386a51..5bbc56f8779e 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/usbpipe.c
+++
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:06:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
> Subject: net/netfilter/x_tables.c: remove size check
>
> Back in 2002 vmalloc used to BUG on too large sizes. We are much better
> behaved these days and vmalloc simply returns NULL for those.
On Wed, Feb 07, 2018 at 11:06:42AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> From: Michal Hocko
> Subject: net/netfilter/x_tables.c: remove size check
>
> Back in 2002 vmalloc used to BUG on too large sizes. We are much better
> behaved these days and vmalloc simply returns NULL for those. Remove the
>
On Wed, 7 Feb 2018 18:44:39 +0100 Pablo Neira Ayuso wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 09:19:16AM +0100, Michal Hocko wrote:
> [...]
> > Yeah, we do not BUG but rather fail instead. See __vmalloc_node_range.
> > My excavation tools pointed me to "VM: Rework vmalloc
1 - 100 of 719 matches
Mail list logo