Am Montag, 14. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:58:22 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
> > Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> > > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
> > > > When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
> > > >
Am Montag, 14. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:58:22 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:58:22 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> > On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
> > > When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
> > > 2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64
On Sat, 5 May 2007 16:58:22 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel port
doesn't work right. If I "cat some_asciifile >/dev/lp0" the output on my
Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel port
doesn't work right. If I cat some_asciifile /dev/lp0 the output on my
Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
> > When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
> > 2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel
> > port doesn't work right. If I "cat
Am Donnerstag, 3. Mai 2007 schrieb Randy Dunlap:
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel
port doesn't work right. If I cat some_asciifile
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
> When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
> 2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel port
> doesn't work right. If I "cat some_asciifile >/dev/lp0" the output on my
> Epson Stylus
On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 20:40:23 +0200 Markus Koßmann wrote:
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel port
doesn't work right. If I cat some_asciifile /dev/lp0 the output on my
Epson Stylus Color
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel port
doesn't work right. If I "cat some_asciifile >/dev/lp0" the output on my
Epson Stylus Color 880 is unreadable. "cat /dev/zero >/dev/lp0" creates
When using either the unpatched 2.6.21_rc5 or SUSEs patched
2.6.21_rc6_git3-20070410174235 on a SUSE-10.2 x86_64 system the parallel port
doesn't work right. If I cat some_asciifile /dev/lp0 the output on my
Epson Stylus Color 880 is unreadable. cat /dev/zero /dev/lp0 creates
random
12 matches
Mail list logo