Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi Tony, On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:10:56AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Sebastian Reichel [161214 05:32]: > > Hi Pali & Pavel, > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > > > > [

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi Tony, On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:10:56AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > * Sebastian Reichel [161214 05:32]: > > Hi Pali & Pavel, > > > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > > > > [ 220.249328] Bluetooth:

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

* Sebastian Reichel [161214 07:52]: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:10:56AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Maybe send it so we can merge it as a fix during the early -rc > > cycle? > > Sorry if I was not clear enough: mainline does *not* contain > incorrect DT information. My

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

* Sebastian Reichel [161214 07:52]: > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 07:10:56AM -0800, Tony Lindgren wrote: > > Maybe send it so we can merge it as a fix during the early -rc > > cycle? > > Sorry if I was not clear enough: mainline does *not* contain > incorrect DT information. My bluetooth RFC patches

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

* Sebastian Reichel [161214 05:32]: > Hi Pali & Pavel, > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > > > [ 220.249328] Bluetooth: hci0: Frame reassembly failed (-84) > > > > [ 220.272949] tty ttyO1:

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

* Sebastian Reichel [161214 05:32]: > Hi Pali & Pavel, > > On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > > > [ 220.249328] Bluetooth: hci0: Frame reassembly failed (-84) > > > > [ 220.272949] tty ttyO1: wakeup received: 1

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi Pali & Pavel, On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > > [ 220.249328] Bluetooth: hci0: Frame reassembly failed (-84) > > > [ 220.272949] tty ttyO1: wakeup received: 1 -> 0 > > > [ 221.283477] tty ttyO1: radio packet

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi Pali & Pavel, On Wed, Dec 14, 2016 at 01:53:23PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote: > > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > > [ 220.249328] Bluetooth: hci0: Frame reassembly failed (-84) > > > [ 220.272949] tty ttyO1: wakeup received: 1 -> 0 > > > [ 221.283477] tty ttyO1: radio packet

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi! > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > [ 220.249328] Bluetooth: hci0: Frame reassembly failed (-84) > > [ 220.272949] tty ttyO1: wakeup received: 1 -> 0 > > [ 221.283477] tty ttyO1: radio packet timeout! > > [ 221.283630] enqueue: hu c304cc80 skb cd4a9b40 > > [ 223.363372]

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi! > > [ 220.248596] tty ttyO1: Radio packet sent > > [ 220.249328] Bluetooth: hci0: Frame reassembly failed (-84) > > [ 220.272949] tty ttyO1: wakeup received: 1 -> 0 > > [ 221.283477] tty ttyO1: radio packet timeout! > > [ 221.283630] enqueue: hu c304cc80 skb cd4a9b40 > > [ 223.363372]

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

On Wednesday 19 October 2016 11:25:06 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > [Ccing lists.] > > > Can you push the patch, which gets further than negotiation into > > some git branch available to me? I tried to apply your patch to > > my code, but it did not work for me. > > Ok, I've pushed the branch

Re: partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

On Wednesday 19 October 2016 11:25:06 Pavel Machek wrote: > Hi! > > [Ccing lists.] > > > Can you push the patch, which gets further than negotiation into > > some git branch available to me? I tried to apply your patch to > > my code, but it did not work for me. > > Ok, I've pushed the branch

partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi! [Ccing lists.] > Can you push the patch, which gets further than negotiation into > some git branch available to me? I tried to apply your patch to > my code, but it did not work for me. Ok, I've pushed the branch to kernel.org: git push

partial bluetooth success on n900 [was Re: bluetooth/uart timeout handling]

Hi! [Ccing lists.] > Can you push the patch, which gets further than negotiation into > some git branch available to me? I tried to apply your patch to > my code, but it did not work for me. Ok, I've pushed the branch to kernel.org: git push