Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-06-04 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Joachim Deguara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Including 2.6.21.3 in your patch will break ketchup. > > ketchup already breaks with the current rt9 patch. we'll release -rt10 probably later today, which will fix this. (it will be named 2.6.21.3-rt10 and will be against 2.6.21.3) Ing

Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-06-04 Thread Joachim Deguara
On Friday 01 June 2007 18:11:11 Matt Mackall wrote: > On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:01:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > > * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Ingo, > > > >> > > > >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9

Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-06-01 Thread Matt Mackall
On Thu, May 31, 2007 at 10:01:09PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > > * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > >> Ingo, > > >> > > >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to > > >> 2.6.21 but

Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-05-31 Thread K.R. Foley
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ingo Molnar wrote: >>> * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> Ingo, I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3. >>> ye

Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-05-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ingo Molnar wrote: > > * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >> Ingo, > >> > >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to > >> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3. > > > > yes - it includes a

Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-05-31 Thread K.R. Foley
Ingo Molnar wrote: > * K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Ingo, >> >> I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to >> 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3. > > yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3. > > Ingo > So actually it is not re

Re: patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-05-31 Thread Ingo Molnar
* K.R. Foley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Ingo, > > I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to > 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3. yes - it includes all of 2.6.21.3. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 misnamed?

2007-05-31 Thread K.R. Foley
Ingo, I believe that patch-2.6.21.3-rt9 is misnamed. It applies cleanly to 2.6.21 but seems to contain stuff that is already in 2.6.21.3. -- kr - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at http: