On Wed, 27 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:40:48AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> > This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
> > 4.1-rc2.
> >
>
> Vince, should I still be running fast_repro99.sh ? Or is there another
> preferred way to
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:40:48AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
> This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
> 4.1-rc2.
>
Vince, should I still be running fast_repro99.sh ? Or is there another
preferred way to start the beast?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:40:48AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
4.1-rc2.
Vince, should I still be running fast_repro99.sh ? Or is there another
preferred way to start the beast?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Wed, 27 May 2015, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Fri, May 08, 2015 at 12:40:48AM -0400, Vince Weaver wrote:
This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
4.1-rc2.
Vince, should I still be running fast_repro99.sh ? Or is there another
preferred way to start the
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Stephane Eranian wrote:
> Vince,
>
> On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
> >
> >
> > This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
> > 4.1-rc2.
> >
> > The backtrace is complex enough I'm not really sure what's going on here.
> >
> > The
On Fri, 8 May 2015, Stephane Eranian wrote:
Vince,
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Vince Weaver vincent.wea...@maine.edu wrote:
This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
4.1-rc2.
The backtrace is complex enough I'm not really sure what's going on here.
Vince,
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Vince Weaver wrote:
>
>
> This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
> 4.1-rc2.
>
> The backtrace is complex enough I'm not really sure what's going on here.
>
> The fuzzer has been having weird issues where it's been getting
>
Vince,
On Thu, May 7, 2015 at 9:40 PM, Vince Weaver vincent.wea...@maine.edu wrote:
This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
4.1-rc2.
The backtrace is complex enough I'm not really sure what's going on here.
The fuzzer has been having weird issues where it's been
This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
4.1-rc2.
The backtrace is complex enough I'm not really sure what's going on here.
The fuzzer has been having weird issues where it's been getting
overflow signals from invalid fds. This seems to happen
when an overflow
This is a new one I think, I hit it on the haswell machine running
4.1-rc2.
The backtrace is complex enough I'm not really sure what's going on here.
The fuzzer has been having weird issues where it's been getting
overflow signals from invalid fds. This seems to happen
when an overflow
10 matches
Mail list logo