On 02/18/2014 04:01 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
> kswapd") caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
> lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
>
> That testcase simply
On 02/18/2014 04:01 PM, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd) caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
That testcase simply looks
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:56:10PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > >
> > > You say it's already been tested for months but it would be nice if the
> > > workload that generated this thread was also tested.
> >
>
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:56:10PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:44:57AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
... snip ...
>
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:56:10PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:44:57AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
... snip ...
I missed
On Tue, 18 Mar 2014, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
On Sat, Mar 15, 2014 at 08:56:10PM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
You say it's already been tested for months but it would be nice if the
workload that generated this thread was also tested.
Yes indeed:
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:44:57AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning
On Fri, 14 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:44:57AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:44:57AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
> > > kswapd") caused a big
On Thu, Mar 13, 2014 at 05:44:57AM -0700, Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd) caused a big performance
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:54:47PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
> > kswapd") caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
> >
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
> > kswapd") caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
> > lru-file-readonce testcase
On Wed, 12 Mar 2014, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd) caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
lru-file-readonce testcase on a system
On Wed, Mar 12, 2014 at 04:54:47PM +, Mel Gorman wrote:
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd) caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
lru-file-readonce
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
> kswapd") caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
> lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
>
> That
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd) caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
That testcase
ping...
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
> kswapd") caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
> lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
ping...
On Tue, Feb 18, 2014 at 04:01:22PM +0800, Yuanhan Liu wrote:
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd) caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
That
Hi,
Commit e82e0561("mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd") caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
That testcase simply looks like this:
truncate -s 1T
Hi,
Commit e82e0561(mm: vmscan: obey proportional scanning requirements for
kswapd) caused a big performance regression(73%) for vm-scalability/
lru-file-readonce testcase on a system with 256G memory without swap.
That testcase simply looks like this:
truncate -s 1T /tmp/vm-scalability.img
20 matches
Mail list logo
