> There is no way for a human being to remember the complete list of
> functions with sanity checks and which don't have sanity checks.
I understand also this software development challenge.
> Markus has introduced quite a few bugs as well
I have only found other opinions about specific update
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:06:55PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
> Julia, do you have any particular objection to this specific patch? I didn't
> see
> a reason to prevent it going in.
I hate these patches...
We're saying "these functions have sanity checks so let's pass nonsense
values to them,
> Julia, do you have any particular objection to this specific patch?
> I didn't see a reason to prevent it going in.
Thanks for your interest around this concrete update suggestion.
* Would you like to distinguish the consequences a bit more
for results from the application of the semantic
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:13:10PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> >
> >
> > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >
> > > >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> > > >
> > > > What script was used ?
> > >
> > > A
On Fri, 26 Jun 2015, Darren Hart wrote:
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:13:10PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
What script was used ?
A semantic patch approach which I
Julia, do you have any particular objection to this specific patch?
I didn't see a reason to prevent it going in.
Thanks for your interest around this concrete update suggestion.
* Would you like to distinguish the consequences a bit more
for results from the application of the semantic
On Fri, Jun 26, 2015 at 04:06:55PM -0700, Darren Hart wrote:
Julia, do you have any particular objection to this specific patch? I didn't
see
a reason to prevent it going in.
I hate these patches...
We're saying these functions have sanity checks so let's pass nonsense
values to them, it's
There is no way for a human being to remember the complete list of
functions with sanity checks and which don't have sanity checks.
I understand also this software development challenge.
Markus has introduced quite a few bugs as well
I have only found other opinions about specific update
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:13:10PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
>
> > >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> > >
> > > What script was used ?
> >
> > A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in
On Thu, Nov 27, 2014 at 07:13:10PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
What script was used ?
A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in March
is in action
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> >> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
> >
> > What script was used ?
>
> A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in March
> is in action on my software development system for a while.
>
>
> > Is it
On Mon, 24 Nov 2014, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
What script was used ?
A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in March
is in action on my software development system for a while.
Is it in
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:40:22PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:30:29 +0100
>
> The backlight_device_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
> and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
>
>
>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>
> What script was used ?
A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in March
is in action on my software development system for a while.
> Is it in scripts/coccinelle ?
Not yet.
I hope that the involved
Hi Markus,
Le lundi 24 novembre 2014, 20:40:22 SF Markus Elfring a écrit :
> From: Markus Elfring
> Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:30:29 +0100
>
> The backlight_device_unregister() function tests whether its argument is
> NULL and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not
>
From: Markus Elfring
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:30:29 +0100
The backlight_device_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
Signed-off-by: Markus
From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:30:29 +0100
The backlight_device_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the call is not needed.
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle
Hi Markus,
Le lundi 24 novembre 2014, 20:40:22 SF Markus Elfring a écrit :
From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:30:29 +0100
The backlight_device_unregister() function tests whether its argument is
NULL and then returns immediately. Thus the test
This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
What script was used ?
A semantic patch approach which I published on the mailing lists in March
is in action on my software development system for a while.
Is it in scripts/coccinelle ?
Not yet.
I hope that the involved update
On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 08:40:22PM +0100, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
From: Markus Elfring elfr...@users.sourceforge.net
Date: Mon, 24 Nov 2014 20:30:29 +0100
The backlight_device_unregister() function tests whether its argument is NULL
and then returns immediately. Thus the test around the
20 matches
Mail list logo
