Markus wrote:
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
do... would be nice.
Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
not being able to use a current kernel.
I already
Markus wrote:
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
do... would be nice.
Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
not being able to use a current kernel.
I already
On Dec 8, 2007 4:25 AM, Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
> everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a "Process 9246 detached",
> nothing else is printed or written in the log.
You could try an ltrace instead, and see if
On Dec 8, 2007 4:25 AM, Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a Process 9246 detached,
nothing else is printed or written in the log.
You could try an ltrace instead, and see if it's one
Well, after that I tried to verify that 22 is really fine.
Unfortunatelly under heavy load its the same... even with .19 (the
oldes kernel I have still installed)
I just noticed it, because its harder to produce it on .22 and before.
You guys tuned the kernel so it was easier.
So it must be
Well, no I am not the same markus. And I found that before, but I
thought it was something about cfs and imo that made it into linus-tree
in .23 not .22.
But I should perhaps try to change my name, perhaps that fixes it -.-
Markus
PS: am currently doing a bisect, thats really bad: third bisect
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 13:12:14 +0100
Markus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I try that, but it will take a lot of time!
>
> Markus
This problem remembers me something...
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Markus wrote:
> Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
> everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a "Process 9246 detached",
> nothing else is printed or written in the log.
>
> Markus
Hallo Markus
Whenever the
Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a "Process 9246 detached",
nothing else is printed or written in the log.
Markus
> On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
>
> > Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional
I try that, but it will take a lot of time!
Markus
> fre, 07 12 2007 kl. 23:52 +0100, skrev Markus:
> > Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
> > produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
> > do... would be nice.
> > Or a hit, in what
I try that, but it will take a lot of time!
Markus
fre, 07 12 2007 kl. 23:52 +0100, skrev Markus:
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
do... would be nice.
Or a hit, in what direction I
On Sat, Dec 08, 2007 at 01:25:21PM +0100, Markus wrote:
Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a Process 9246 detached,
nothing else is printed or written in the log.
Markus
Hallo Markus
Whenever the connection to
Well, just tried it. Started a dozen konquerors and attached strace to
everyone. When one disapeared, I only got a Process 9246 detached,
nothing else is printed or written in the log.
Markus
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages
On Sat, 8 Dec 2007 13:12:14 +0100
Markus [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I try that, but it will take a lot of time!
Markus
This problem remembers me something...
Well, no I am not the same markus. And I found that before, but I
thought it was something about cfs and imo that made it into linus-tree
in .23 not .22.
But I should perhaps try to change my name, perhaps that fixes it -.-
Markus
PS: am currently doing a bisect, thats really bad: third bisect
Well, after that I tried to verify that 22 is really fine.
Unfortunatelly under heavy load its the same... even with .19 (the
oldes kernel I have still installed)
I just noticed it, because its harder to produce it on .22 and before.
You guys tuned the kernel so it was easier.
So it must be
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
> Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
> produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
> do... would be nice.
> Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
> not being able to use a
fre, 07 12 2007 kl. 23:52 +0100, skrev Markus:
> Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
> produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
> do... would be nice.
> Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
> not being
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
do... would be nice.
Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
not being able to use a current kernel.
I already rebuild the whole
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
> Hi again!
>
> The memtest ran 14 passes (~10h) without an error.
>
> I now have a 2.6.24-rc4 with some debug-options turned on, waiting for
> something to happen... can I just leave it untill a window disappears
> or do I need to manually enable something
Hi again!
The memtest ran 14 passes (~10h) without an error.
I now have a 2.6.24-rc4 with some debug-options turned on, waiting for
something to happen... can I just leave it untill a window disappears
or do I need to manually enable something or run some user-space app?!
Markus
--
To
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
Hi again!
The memtest ran 14 passes (~10h) without an error.
I now have a 2.6.24-rc4 with some debug-options turned on, waiting for
something to happen... can I just leave it untill a window disappears
or do I need to manually enable something or run
Hi again!
The memtest ran 14 passes (~10h) without an error.
I now have a 2.6.24-rc4 with some debug-options turned on, waiting for
something to happen... can I just leave it untill a window disappears
or do I need to manually enable something or run some user-space app?!
Markus
--
To
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
do... would be nice.
Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
not being able to use a current kernel.
I already rebuild the whole
On Fri, 7 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
do... would be nice.
Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
not being able to use a
fre, 07 12 2007 kl. 23:52 +0100, skrev Markus:
Well, now some windows vanished, but no additional messages were
produced by kernel. When somebody could tell what I exactly need to
do... would be nice.
Or a hit, in what direction I should look. Because its really nasty to
not being able to
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2007 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
> On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
>
> > Just forgot to mention:
> > dmesg gives nothing (/var/log/messages)
> > the global X log aswell
> >
> > and in the users .xsession-errors I have:
> > amarokapp: Fatal IO error: client killed
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
> Just forgot to mention:
> dmesg gives nothing (/var/log/messages)
> the global X log aswell
>
> and in the users .xsession-errors I have:
> amarokapp: Fatal IO error: client killed
> kdesktop: Fatal IO error: client killed
> konqueror: Fatal IO error: client
Just forgot to mention:
dmesg gives nothing (/var/log/messages)
the global X log aswell
and in the users .xsession-errors I have:
amarokapp: Fatal IO error: client killed
kdesktop: Fatal IO error: client killed
konqueror: Fatal IO error: client killed
The application 'xchat' lost its connection
Hello!
Excuse my bad english, I am no native speaker. And please CC me, as I am
not subscribed!
I am running an amd64 system with a stable gentoo. Today I upgraded to
the kernel 2.6.22 and noticed many programs to disappear.
I use a kde desktop (3.5.7) and when amarok or kmail crash, normaly
Just forgot to mention:
dmesg gives nothing (/var/log/messages)
the global X log aswell
and in the users .xsession-errors I have:
amarokapp: Fatal IO error: client killed
kdesktop: Fatal IO error: client killed
konqueror: Fatal IO error: client killed
The application 'xchat' lost its connection
Hello!
Excuse my bad english, I am no native speaker. And please CC me, as I am
not subscribed!
I am running an amd64 system with a stable gentoo. Today I upgraded to
the kernel 2.6.22 and noticed many programs to disappear.
I use a kde desktop (3.5.7) and when amarok or kmail crash, normaly
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
Just forgot to mention:
dmesg gives nothing (/var/log/messages)
the global X log aswell
and in the users .xsession-errors I have:
amarokapp: Fatal IO error: client killed
kdesktop: Fatal IO error: client killed
konqueror: Fatal IO error: client killed
Am Donnerstag, 6. Dezember 2007 schrieb Guennadi Liakhovetski:
On Thu, 6 Dec 2007, Markus wrote:
Just forgot to mention:
dmesg gives nothing (/var/log/messages)
the global X log aswell
and in the users .xsession-errors I have:
amarokapp: Fatal IO error: client killed
kdesktop:
34 matches
Mail list logo
