Re: question about do_IRQ + 4k stacks

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:14:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > It checks for both process context (system call or kernel thread) or > interrupt context (nested irqs) stack overflows. ok, thanks. so we really only have 3k stacks rather than 4k stacks, right? if any code exceeds 3k stacks

Re: question about do_IRQ + 4k stacks

On Wed, Mar 30, 2005 at 09:14:22PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It checks for both process context (system call or kernel thread) or interrupt context (nested irqs) stack overflows. ok, thanks. so we really only have 3k stacks rather than 4k stacks, right? if any code exceeds 3k stacks

Re: question about do_IRQ + 4k stacks

Terence Ripperda wrote: I'm investigating some 4k stack issues with our driver, and I noticed this ordering in do_IRQ: asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs regs) { ... #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW /* Debugging check for stack overflow: is there less than 1KB free? */

question about do_IRQ + 4k stacks

I'm investigating some 4k stack issues with our driver, and I noticed this ordering in do_IRQ: asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs regs) { ... #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW /* Debugging check for stack overflow: is there less than 1KB free? */ { ...

question about do_IRQ + 4k stacks

I'm investigating some 4k stack issues with our driver, and I noticed this ordering in do_IRQ: asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs regs) { ... #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW /* Debugging check for stack overflow: is there less than 1KB free? */ { ...

Re: question about do_IRQ + 4k stacks

Terence Ripperda wrote: I'm investigating some 4k stack issues with our driver, and I noticed this ordering in do_IRQ: asmlinkage unsigned int do_IRQ(struct pt_regs regs) { ... #ifdef CONFIG_DEBUG_STACKOVERFLOW /* Debugging check for stack overflow: is there less than 1KB free? */