On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 11:48:40AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>
> Does your .config file have CONFIG_APM=y? Otherwise, that's your problem
> right there (since your old laptop doesn't appear to have ACPI.)
no CONFIG_APM and yes, this is my problem.
A very hard way to figure this out,
and too m
On Monday, 1 October 2007 19:55, Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > On Saturday, 29 September 2007 22:47, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> >> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
> >>
> >>> -static void
> >>> -acpi_power_off (void)
> >>> -{
> >>> - printk("%s called\n",__FUNCTION__);
> >>>
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Saturday, 29 September 2007 22:47, Bill Davidsen wrote:
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
-static void
-acpi_power_off (void)
-{
- printk("%s called\n",__FUNCTION__);
- /* Some SMP machines only can poweroff in boot CPU */
- set_cpus_allowed(current, cpum
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> Hi Peter,
>
> On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
>> I start again with a fresh tree and better controlled experiments.
>
> now the result of bisection seems to be consistent.
>
> The last good commit is
> f2d98ae63dc64dedb00499289e13a50677f771f9
On Saturday, 29 September 2007 22:47, Bill Davidsen wrote:
> Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
>
> > -static void
> > -acpi_power_off (void)
> > -{
> > - printk("%s called\n",__FUNCTION__);
> > - /* Some SMP machines only can poweroff in boot CPU */
> > - set_cpus_allowed(current, cpuma
Alexey Starikovskiy wrote:
-static void
-acpi_power_off (void)
-{
- printk("%s called\n",__FUNCTION__);
- /* Some SMP machines only can poweroff in boot CPU */
- set_cpus_allowed(current, cpumask_of_cpu(0));
ACPI in kernel 2.6.12 did disable non-boot cpus too in powe_off.
Later
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 08:07:21PM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
>
> Now I try the things written in
> http://marc.info/[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have dumped a memory region which is my understanding what you want
to see. The difference between the good and the bad case is only
the patch
"4fd0
Hi Peter,
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 11:35:53AM +0200, Wolfgang Erig wrote:
>
> I start again with a fresh tree and better controlled experiments.
now the result of bisection seems to be consistent.
The last good commit is
f2d98ae63dc64dedb00499289e13a50677f771f9 Linker script for the new x86 setup
Mark Lord wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
$ git bisect good Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[62607313
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[626073132b381684c4983e0d9
On Sat, Sep 29, 2007 at 01:30:33AM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Both are bad.
> > Two different systems and two different bisections.
> > I sent the last step of each.
>
> >>> $ git bisect good
> >>> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
> >>> [626073132b38168
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 06:11:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
> >
> > 2.6.22 succeeded
> > 2.6.23-rc8 failed
> >
> > $ git bisect good
> > Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
> > [626073132b
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> Both are bad.
> Two different systems and two different bisections.
> I sent the last step of each.
>>> $ git bisect good
>>> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
>>> [626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine
>>> for new x86 set
Both are bad.
Two different systems and two different bisections.
I sent the last step of each.
On Fri, Sep 28, 2007 at 08:05:15PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > the latest kernel does not power off my system.
> >
> > 2.6.22 succeeded
> > 2.6.23-rc8 failed
>
Hi,
This is known issue.
Please try latest rc8-git2, it should contain the fix.
Regards,
Alex.
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my system.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[f216cc3748a3a22c2b993
My apologies for the two bogus addresses in the "To" of my previous
message. Script error, won't happen again.
Frans Pop
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> the latest kernel does not power off my system.
This is a known regression in rc8. See this mail and thread for details:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/9/25/239
The issue has already been fixed in Linus' git tree.
Please try again with that, or apply the patches included in the
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
>
> 2.6.22 succeeded
> 2.6.23-rc8 failed
>
> $ git bisect good
> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
> [626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine
> for new x86 setup
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the latest kernel does not power off my system.
>
> 2.6.22 succeeded
> 2.6.23-rc8 failed
>
> $ git bisect bad
> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
> [f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2] ACPI: suspend: consolidate
> handling of Sx states.
>
>
Wolfgang Erig wrote:
> Hi,
>
> the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
>
> 2.6.22 succeeded
> 2.6.23-rc8 failed
>
> $ git bisect good
> Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
> [626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine
> for new x86 setup
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my old laptop.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect good
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[626073132b381684c4983e0d911e9aceb32e2cbc] Assembly header and main routine for
new x86 setup code
Which more info is needed?
Wolfgang
Hi,
the latest kernel does not power off my system.
2.6.22 succeeded
2.6.23-rc8 failed
$ git bisect bad
Bisecting: 0 revisions left to test after this
[f216cc3748a3a22c2b99390fddcdafa0583791a2] ACPI: suspend: consolidate handling
of Sx states.
Which more info is needed?
Wolfgang
-
To unsub
22 matches
Mail list logo
