stack/routing kernel modification - consult needed

2005-03-02 Thread Zdenek Radouch
I committed to a fairly complex project to run on Linux while assuming that the Linux stack implementation would provide equivalent functionality to that of the BSD-style stacks I am familiar with. At this point, quite far down the design path, I looked at what I thought would be trivial details

stack/routing kernel modification - consult needed

2005-03-02 Thread Zdenek Radouch
I committed to a fairly complex project to run on Linux while assuming that the Linux stack implementation would provide equivalent functionality to that of the BSD-style stacks I am familiar with. At this point, quite far down the design path, I looked at what I thought would be trivial details

Re: routing kernel

2000-09-17 Thread Horst von Brand
Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said: > I had been using 2.0.35preX for like 630 days and it worked > relatively fine. I'd suggest getting the latest 2.0.x (there is a pre-series too). Otherwise, your userland would probably need a lot of upgrading. Or get one of the micro-distributions

Re: routing kernel

2000-09-17 Thread Mo McKinlay
> I'm looking for good support for both routing as well as NAT. > I heard the 2.0.x is one of the best kernels in terms of > VM management, what might matter considering the router is to > be P75 w/ 16mb ram. I run a trio of 486 DX2/66s each with 16mb ram and 500mb HDs

routing kernel

2000-09-17 Thread Adam
Hello, I was wondering what would be most recommended as routing kernel. I had been using 2.0.35preX for like 630 days and it worked relatively fine. Now, I'm wondering what would be next best kernel I would want to put there? Should I use latest 2.0.X