Re: rsdl v46 report,numbers,comments

2007-04-25 Thread Con Kolivas
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:26, Mike Mattie wrote: > Hello, > > 0. intro > > I am very happy to report that v46 of RSDL subjectively is much better than > v42. As you (Con Kolivas) might remember from a previous mail I was > experimenting with using nice levels effectively. I have refined these

Re: rsdl v46 report,numbers,comments

2007-04-25 Thread Con Kolivas
On Wednesday 25 April 2007 04:26, Mike Mattie wrote: Hello, 0. intro I am very happy to report that v46 of RSDL subjectively is much better than v42. As you (Con Kolivas) might remember from a previous mail I was experimenting with using nice levels effectively. I have refined these levels

rsdl v46 report,numbers,comments

2007-04-24 Thread Mike Mattie
Hello, 0. intro I am very happy to report that v46 of RSDL subjectively is much better than v42. As you (Con Kolivas) might remember from a previous mail I was experimenting with using nice levels effectively. I have refined these levels to this layout: -2 : clock (ntpd) -1 :

rsdl v46 report,numbers,comments

2007-04-24 Thread Mike Mattie
Hello, 0. intro I am very happy to report that v46 of RSDL subjectively is much better than v42. As you (Con Kolivas) might remember from a previous mail I was experimenting with using nice levels effectively. I have refined these levels to this layout: -2 : clock (ntpd) -1 :