On 17/04/2019 16:30, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Apr 17, 2019, at 10:43 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>
>> - On Apr 17, 2019, at 6:37 AM, richard earnshaw richard.earns...@arm.com
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On 16/04/2019 14:39, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
- On Apr 17, 2019, at 10:43 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> - On Apr 17, 2019, at 6:37 AM, richard earnshaw richard.earns...@arm.com
> wrote:
>
>> On 16/04/2019 14:39, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>>> - On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>>>
- On Apr 17, 2019, at 6:37 AM, richard earnshaw richard.earns...@arm.com
wrote:
> On 16/04/2019 14:39, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>>
>>> - On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:30 AM, peter maydell
On 16/04/2019 14:39, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>
>> - On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:30 AM, peter maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 14:11, Mathieu Desnoyers
>>>
- On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:37 AM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> - On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:30 AM, peter maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 14:11, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> - On Apr 11, 2019, at 3:55 PM, peter
- On Apr 15, 2019, at 9:30 AM, peter maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
> On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 14:11, Mathieu Desnoyers
> wrote:
>>
>> - On Apr 11, 2019, at 3:55 PM, peter maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
>> wrote:
>>
>> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 18:51, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> >
On Mon, 15 Apr 2019 at 14:11, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
>
> - On Apr 11, 2019, at 3:55 PM, peter maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org
> wrote:
>
> > On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 18:51, Mathieu Desnoyers
> > wrote:
> >> * This translates to the following instruction pattern in the T16
> >>
- On Apr 11, 2019, at 8:24 AM, Florian Weimer fwei...@redhat.com wrote:
> * Mathieu Desnoyers:
>
>> /*
>> * TODO: document trap instruction objdump output on each sub-architecture
>> * instruction sets, as well as instruction set extensions.
>> */
>> #define RSEQ_SIG 0x
>
> Will
- On Apr 11, 2019, at 3:55 PM, peter maydell peter.mayd...@linaro.org wrote:
> On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 18:51, Mathieu Desnoyers
> wrote:
>> - On Apr 11, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
>> > Peter suggests that anything of the form 0xe7fxdefx should trap in both
On Thu, 11 Apr 2019 at 18:51, Mathieu Desnoyers
wrote:
> - On Apr 11, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
> > Peter suggests that anything of the form 0xe7fxdefx should trap in both A32
> > and T32, although it does assemble to UDF; B in T16. I'm not sure we
> > should
- On Apr 11, 2019, at 12:42 PM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
> Hi Mathieu,
>
> On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:29:19PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
>> - On Apr 9, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
>> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
>> > We are about to include the code
Hi Mathieu,
On Wed, Apr 10, 2019 at 04:29:19PM -0400, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote:
> - On Apr 9, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
> mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> > We are about to include the code signature required prior to restartable
> > sequences abort handlers into glibc, which
* Mathieu Desnoyers:
> /*
> * TODO: document trap instruction objdump output on each sub-architecture
> * instruction sets, as well as instruction set extensions.
> */
> #define RSEQ_SIG 0x
Will RSEQ_SIG actually be needed at run time outside the rseq
implementation library (whether
- On Apr 9, 2019, at 3:32 PM, Mathieu Desnoyers
mathieu.desnoy...@efficios.com wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
> We are about to include the code signature required prior to restartable
> sequences abort handlers into glibc, which will make this ABI choice final.
> We need architecture maintainer input
Hi Will,
We are about to include the code signature required prior to restartable
sequences abort handlers into glibc, which will make this ABI choice final.
We need architecture maintainer input on that signature value.
That code signature is placed before each abort handler, so the kernel can
15 matches
Mail list logo