Rob Hussey wrote:
> On 9/15/07, ポール・ロラン Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Hi Eric,
>>
>> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:30:14 +0200
>> Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Rob Hussey wrote:
>>>
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rob Hussey wrote:
On 9/15/07, ポール・ロラン Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:30:14 +0200
Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Hussey wrote:
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Valette wrote:
Johannes Berg wrote:
> On Sa, 2007-09-15 at 21:00 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
>
>
>> I came to this conclusion too. But I would have preferred to have
>> #define subsys_exit(fn) modules_exit(fn)
>>
>> in the case of a module and nop in the non module case...
>>
>
>
On Sa, 2007-09-15 at 21:00 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
> I came to this conclusion too. But I would have preferred to have
> #define subsys_exit(fn) modules_exit(fn)
>
> in the case of a module and nop in the non module case...
module_exit is a no-op anyway in the
On Sa, 2007-09-15 at 21:00 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
I came to this conclusion too. But I would have preferred to have
#define subsys_exit(fn) modules_exit(fn)
in the case of a module and nop in the non module case...
module_exit is a no-op anyway in the non-modular
Johannes Berg wrote:
On Sa, 2007-09-15 at 21:00 +0200, Eric Valette wrote:
I came to this conclusion too. But I would have preferred to have
#define subsys_exit(fn) modules_exit(fn)
in the case of a module and nop in the non module case...
module_exit is a
On 9/15/07, ポール・ロラン Paul Rolland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:30:14 +0200
> Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Rob Hussey wrote:
> > > On 9/15/07, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> Eric Valette wrote:
> > >>
> >
> > Thanks for your help:
Paul Rolland (ポール・ロラン) wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>> Now I have two side questions:
>> - the code is no more symetric "subsys_initcall" -> "module_exit".
>> Do not know if it is "normal" but I love symmetry in code :-). Did not test
>> it still works as a module...
> Symmetry is not broken, as we
Hi Eric,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:30:14 +0200
Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rob Hussey wrote:
> > On 9/15/07, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >> Eric Valette wrote:
> >>
>
> Thanks for your help: it does indeed fix the problem.
Nice it works for you too !
> Now I have two
Rob Hussey wrote:
> On 9/15/07, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Eric Valette wrote:
>>
>>> I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
>> Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
>> posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at least, we are
Hi Rob,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:28:36 -0400
"Rob Hussey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 9/15/07, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Eric Valette wrote:
> >
> > > I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
> >
> > Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Valette wrote:
>
> > I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
>
> Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
> posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at least, we are at least two
> to have
Hi Eric,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:27:30 +0200
Eric Valette <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric Valette wrote:
>
> > I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
>
> Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
> posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at
Eric Valette wrote:
> I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at least, we are at least two
to have the crash.
-- eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
First let me start by a thanks: it was the last piece of my P5W de luxe
machine based that has not its driver from stock kernel.
It works like a charm when used as a module:
lsusb
Bus 005 Device 001: ID :
Bus 003 Device 001: ID :
Bus 004 Device 001: ID :
Bus 002 Device
First let me start by a thanks: it was the last piece of my P5W de luxe
machine based that has not its driver from stock kernel.
It works like a charm when used as a module:
lsusb
Bus 005 Device 001: ID :
Bus 003 Device 001: ID :
Bus 004 Device 001: ID :
Bus 002 Device
Eric Valette wrote:
I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at least, we are at least two
to have the crash.
-- eric
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Hi Eric,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 16:27:30 +0200
Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Valette wrote:
I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at least, we
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Valette wrote:
I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at least, we are at least two
to have the
Hi Rob,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 12:28:36 -0400
Rob Hussey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Valette wrote:
I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
Rob Hussey wrote:
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Valette wrote:
I can probably take a picture of the backtrace if you want.
Just saw that just above my message in the LKML web interface, someone
posted a backtrace. Mine is different but at least, we are at least two
Hi Eric,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:30:14 +0200
Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Hussey wrote:
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Valette wrote:
Thanks for your help: it does indeed fix the problem.
Nice it works for you too !
Now I have two side questions:
Paul Rolland (ポール・ロラン) wrote:
Hi Eric,
Now I have two side questions:
- the code is no more symetric subsys_initcall - module_exit.
Do not know if it is normal but I love symmetry in code :-). Did not test
it still works as a module...
Symmetry is not broken, as we have :
#define
On 9/15/07, ポール・ロラン Paul Rolland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Eric,
On Sat, 15 Sep 2007 20:30:14 +0200
Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Rob Hussey wrote:
On 9/15/07, Eric Valette [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Eric Valette wrote:
Thanks for your help: it does indeed fix the
24 matches
Mail list logo