On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:52:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2016 8:41:22 PM CEST Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>Hi Fengguang,
>
>I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
>was
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:52:32PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday, July 18, 2016 8:41:22 PM CEST Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>Hi Fengguang,
>
>I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
>was
On Monday, July 18, 2016 8:41:22 PM CEST Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >Hi Fengguang,
> >
> >I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
> >was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for
On Monday, July 18, 2016 8:41:22 PM CEST Fengguang Wu wrote:
> Hi Arnd,
>
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> >Hi Fengguang,
> >
> >I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
> >was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for
On Monday, July 18, 2016 8:29:47 PM CEST Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >- setting CONFIG_OF_ALL_DTBS will catch all files, not just the
> > ones that are built by default for the set of configurations you
> > have. It's possible to simply override this on the command line,
> > using "make
On Monday, July 18, 2016 8:29:47 PM CEST Fengguang Wu wrote:
> >- setting CONFIG_OF_ALL_DTBS will catch all files, not just the
> > ones that are built by default for the set of configurations you
> > have. It's possible to simply override this on the command line,
> > using "make
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Hi Fengguang,
I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for "make dtbs",
and I wonder if this is something that could be checked by the
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Hi Fengguang,
I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for "make dtbs",
and I wonder if this is something that could be checked by the
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Hi Fengguang,
I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for "make dtbs",
and I wonder if this is something that could be checked by the
Hi Arnd,
On Mon, Jul 18, 2016 at 02:01:17PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
Hi Fengguang,
I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for "make dtbs",
and I wonder if this is something that could be checked by the
Hi Fengguang,
I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for "make dtbs",
and I wonder if this is something that could be checked by the kbuild
test robot so we catch it earlier.
There are parts of this:
-
Hi Fengguang,
I've recently run into a number of cases in which I pulled a branch that
was building fine with "make vmlinux", but that failed for "make dtbs",
and I wonder if this is something that could be checked by the kbuild
test robot so we catch it earlier.
There are parts of this:
-
12 matches
Mail list logo