Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Zheng Liu
On 04/04/2013 12:46 AM, Christian Kujau wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 15:02, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: >> Good news big endian cpu owners >> Please try following patches(second is most important): >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233396/ >> http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233397/ >> I hope

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:46:56 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 15:02, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > Good news big endian cpu owners > > Please try following patches(second is most important): > > http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233396/ > >

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:53:49 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:52:06 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov > wrote: > Non-text part: multipart/mixed > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 02:05,

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Zheng Liu
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:52:06 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov > wrote: > Non-text part: multipart/mixed > > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau > > wrote: > > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 02:05, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > >

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:52:06 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau > wrote: > > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 02:05, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > > Please drop that patch and collect logs with a kernel which > > > has

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau wrote: > On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 02:05, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > Please drop that patch and collect logs with a kernel which > > has only 0001-enable-ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST-V2.patch patch applied Ok I have found at least one issue. Please

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 02:05, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: Please drop that patch and collect logs with a kernel which has only 0001-enable-ES_AGGRESSIVE_TEST-V2.patch patch applied Ok I have found at least one

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:52:06 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov dmonak...@openvz.org wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 02:05, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: Please drop that patch and collect logs

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Zheng Liu
On Wed, Apr 03, 2013 at 01:53:49PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:52:06 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov dmonak...@openvz.org wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 13:53:49 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov dmonak...@openvz.org wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed On Wed, 03 Apr 2013 12:52:06 +0400, Dmitry Monakhov dmonak...@openvz.org wrote: Non-text part: multipart/mixed On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 09:46:56 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 15:02, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: Good news big endian cpu owners Please try following patches(second is most important): http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233396/

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-03 Thread Zheng Liu
On 04/04/2013 12:46 AM, Christian Kujau wrote: On Wed, 3 Apr 2013 at 15:02, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: Good news big endian cpu owners Please try following patches(second is most important): http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233396/ http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/233397/ I hope this should

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:35:29 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 at 13:47, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > So you just do bunch of writes/mmap to fallocated area. > > The only guess I have is that some bug in extent status tree > > > > Please run test with a patch which was

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:07:37 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 at 20:33, Zheng Liu wrote: > > Could you please revert your tree to this commit (3a225670), and try > > again. I want to make sure that the regression won't be fixed until now > > or it is introduced after this

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 09:58:46 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau wrote: > On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 at 13:47, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > > Unfortunately it is like a regression which we missed > > due to s390x and ppc is not well tested. > > :-( > > > Ohh that is sad. Unfortunately I can't reproduce this on my

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Zheng Liu
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:47:44PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: > On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 23:15:07 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > my machine (PowerBook G4) just crashed and the only thing netconsole was > > able to transmit was: > > > > [ cut here

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 23:15:07 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau wrote: > Hi, > > my machine (PowerBook G4) just crashed and the only thing netconsole was > able to transmit was: > > [ cut here ] > kernel BUG at /usr/local/src/linux-git/fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! > > But

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 23:15:07 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: Hi, my machine (PowerBook G4) just crashed and the only thing netconsole was able to transmit was: [ cut here ] kernel BUG at /usr/local/src/linux-git/fs/ext4/inode.c:1591!

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Zheng Liu
On Tue, Apr 02, 2013 at 01:47:44PM +0400, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: On Mon, 1 Apr 2013 23:15:07 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: Hi, my machine (PowerBook G4) just crashed and the only thing netconsole was able to transmit was: [ cut here

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 09:58:46 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 at 13:47, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: Unfortunately it is like a regression which we missed due to s390x and ppc is not well tested. :-( Ohh that is sad. Unfortunately I can't reproduce

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 12:07:37 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 at 20:33, Zheng Liu wrote: Could you please revert your tree to this commit (3a225670), and try again. I want to make sure that the regression won't be fixed until now or it is

Re: s390x: kernel BUG at fs/ext4/inode.c:1591! (powerpc too!)

2013-04-02 Thread Dmitry Monakhov
On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 14:35:29 -0700 (PDT), Christian Kujau li...@nerdbynature.de wrote: On Tue, 2 Apr 2013 at 13:47, Dmitry Monakhov wrote: So you just do bunch of writes/mmap to fallocated area. The only guess I have is that some bug in extent status tree Please run test with a patch