On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 09:29 -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:01:01PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> > It's obviously possible that some samples build with that configuration, but
> > building against another arch'es kernel headers just seems like it's asking
> > for
On Fri, Jul 31, 2015 at 05:01:01PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote:
> It's obviously possible that some samples build with that configuration, but
> building against another arch'es kernel headers just seems like it's asking
> for
> trouble. Even if we can build the samples, they will never run corr
On Thu, 2015-07-30 at 16:23 +0200, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> > On 2015-07-29 12:31 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> >> wrote:
> >>> Hi David,
> >>>
> >>> Does it make sens
On Fri, 2015-07-31 at 09:55 +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:32:05 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
> >
> > Well, it only shows up when we cross compile for mips. It does not
> > seem to be showing up for any other arch (and we cover ~10 of them).
> > Nor does i
Hi Paul,
On Thu, 30 Jul 2015 11:32:05 -0400 Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
>
> Well, it only shows up when we cross compile for mips. It does not
> seem to be showing up for any other arch (and we cover ~10 of them).
> Nor does it show up for x86 builds. Also note that the main linux-next
> build machi
On 2015-07-30 10:23 AM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
>> On 2015-07-29 12:31 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paul Gortmaker
>>> wrote:
Hi David,
Does it make sense to build this sam
Hi
On Thu, Jul 30, 2015 at 3:50 PM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> On 2015-07-29 12:31 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paul Gortmaker
>> wrote:
>>> Hi David,
>>>
>>> Does it make sense to build this sample when cross compiling?
>>>
>>> The reason I ask is that it
On 2015-07-29 12:31 PM, David Herrmann wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paul Gortmaker
> wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Does it make sense to build this sample when cross compiling?
>>
>> The reason I ask is that it has been breaking the linux-next build of
>> allmodconfig for a while
On Wed, 2015-07-29 at 12:19 -0400, Paul Gortmaker wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Does it make sense to build this sample when cross compiling?
>
> The reason I ask is that it has been breaking the linux-next build of
> allmodconfig for a while now, with:
>
> HOSTCC samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers
> sampl
Hi
On Wed, Jul 29, 2015 at 6:19 PM, Paul Gortmaker
wrote:
> Hi David,
>
> Does it make sense to build this sample when cross compiling?
>
> The reason I ask is that it has been breaking the linux-next build of
> allmodconfig for a while now, with:
>
> HOSTCC samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers
> sampl
Hi David,
Does it make sense to build this sample when cross compiling?
The reason I ask is that it has been breaking the linux-next build of
allmodconfig for a while now, with:
HOSTCC samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers
samples/kdbus/kdbus-workers.c: In function ‘prime_new’:
samples/kdbus/kdbus-work
11 matches
Mail list logo
