On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 04:43:46PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 29/01/21 10:14, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
Please delete unneeded context from mails when replying. Doing this
makes it much easier to find your reply in the message, helping ensure
it won't be missed by people
On Sat, 2021-01-30 at 16:43 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 29/01/21 10:14, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:10 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark
Il 29/01/21 10:14, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:10 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
Note that the events the API currently has are expected to be for
the
On Thu, 2021-01-28 at 12:10 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > Note that the events the API currently has are expected to be for
> > > the
> > > actual error conditions, not
On Thu, Jan 28, 2021 at 09:23:08AM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > Note that the events the API currently has are expected to be for the
> > actual error conditions, not for the warning ones - indicating that
> > the
> > voltage is out of
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 16:32 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:34:46PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
> wrote:
> > Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > > I can only speak for BD9576MUF - which has two limits for
> > > monitored
> > > entity
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 03:34:46PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > I can only speak for BD9576MUF - which has two limits for monitored
> > entity (temperature/voltage). One limit being 'warning' limit (or
> > 'detection' as data-sheet
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 15:34 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
> > Hello Mark,
> >
>
> Hey Matti, hey Mark!
>
> > Nice to hear from you. :)
> >
> > On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:27 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at
Il 27/01/21 13:56, Matti Vaittinen ha scritto:
Hello Mark,
Hey Matti, hey Mark!
Nice to hear from you. :)
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:27 +, Mark Brown wrote:
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:01:55PM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
Anyways - I was wondering if this is common thing amongst many
Hello Mark,
Nice to hear from you. :)
On Wed, 2021-01-27 at 12:27 +, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:01:55PM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
>
> > Anyways - I was wondering if this is common thing amongst many
> > PMICs?
> > If yes - then, perhaps some generally useful
On Wed, Jan 27, 2021 at 12:01:55PM +, Vaittinen, Matti wrote:
> Anyways - I was wondering if this is common thing amongst many PMICs?
> If yes - then, perhaps some generally useful regulator helper could be
> added to help implementing the IRQ disabling + scheduling worker to
> check status
Hi dee Ho peeps,
I just noticed the
390af53e04114f790d60b63802a4de9d815ade03 ("regulator: qcom-labibb:
Implement short-circuit and over-current IRQs")
in regulator tree. No worries - I haven't hit any problem with it :]
I've been working with ROHM BD9576MUF - which implements wa
Short-Circuit Protection (SCP) and Over-Current Protection (OCP) are
very important for regulators like LAB and IBB, which are designed to
provide from very small to relatively big amounts of current to the
device (normally, a display).
Now that this regulator supports both voltage setting and
Short-Circuit Protection (SCP) and Over-Current Protection (OCP) are
very important for regulators like LAB and IBB, which are designed to
provide from very small to relatively big amounts of current to the
device (normally, a display).
Now that this regulator supports both voltage setting and
Il 15/01/21 06:31, Bjorn Andersson ha scritto:
On Wed 13 Jan 13:42 CST 2021, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
Short-Circuit Protection (SCP) and Over-Current Protection (OCP) are
very important for regulators like LAB and IBB, which are designed to
provide from very small to relatively big
On Wed 13 Jan 13:42 CST 2021, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Short-Circuit Protection (SCP) and Over-Current Protection (OCP) are
> very important for regulators like LAB and IBB, which are designed to
> provide from very small to relatively big amounts of current to the
> device (normally,
Short-Circuit Protection (SCP) and Over-Current Protection (OCP) are
very important for regulators like LAB and IBB, which are designed to
provide from very small to relatively big amounts of current to the
device (normally, a display).
Now that this regulator supports both voltage setting and
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 06:49:53PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> I would go for keeping the current binding for the aforementioned reasons.
> Before I go on sending a V2, I would like to know your opinion.
> Do you agree?
Sure.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
Il 12/01/21 18:29, Mark Brown ha scritto:
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:06:18PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
...which was already a requirement before I touched it.
Now, this leaves two options here:
1. Keep the of_get_irq way, or
2. Move the interrupts, change the documentation
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 10:06:18PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> ...which was already a requirement before I touched it.
> Now, this leaves two options here:
> 1. Keep the of_get_irq way, or
> 2. Move the interrupts, change the documentation (currently, only
> pmi8998.dtsi) and also
Il 11/01/21 20:23, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
Il 11/01/21 20:14, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
Il 11/01/21 14:57, Mark Brown ha scritto:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 02:29:19PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
wrote:
+ /* If the regulator is not enabled, this is a fake
Il 11/01/21 20:14, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno ha scritto:
Il 11/01/21 14:57, Mark Brown ha scritto:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 02:29:19PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
wrote:
+ /* If the regulator is not enabled, this is a fake event */
+ if (!ops->is_enabled(vreg->rdev))
+
Il 11/01/21 14:57, Mark Brown ha scritto:
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 02:29:19PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
+ /* If the regulator is not enabled, this is a fake event */
+ if (!ops->is_enabled(vreg->rdev))
+ return 0;
Or handling the interrupt raced with a
On Sat, Jan 09, 2021 at 02:29:19PM +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> + /* If the regulator is not enabled, this is a fake event */
> + if (!ops->is_enabled(vreg->rdev))
> + return 0;
Or handling the interrupt raced with a disable initiated from elsewhere.
Does the
Short-Circuit Protection (SCP) and Over-Current Protection (OCP) are
very important for regulators like LAB and IBB, which are designed to
provide from very small to relatively big amounts of current to the
device (normally, a display).
Now that this regulator supports both voltage setting and
25 matches
Mail list logo
