On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 21:13 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> As I suspected, the one-shot code wasn't very well tested and I'd be
> the one to debug this thing on sparc64 :-)
>
> When a timer exceeds the timer period, the one-shot handling code does
> the following loop:
>
> for (;;) {
>
As I suspected, the one-shot code wasn't very well tested and I'd be
the one to debug this thing on sparc64 :-)
When a timer exceeds the timer period, the one-shot handling code does
the following loop:
for (;;) {
ktime_t next = ktime_add(dev->next_event, tick_period);
From: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 16:53:27 -0800
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 16:34 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > + .shift = 16,
> >
> > These shift selections all seem rather arbitrary.
> >
> > If it's not an arbitrary selection, it would be nice to have some
>
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 16:34 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:51:18 -0800
>
> > Yea. I actually have some in-progress patches from Peter Keilty that
> > convert ia64 and sparc64 time_interpolators to clocksources, then
> > removes the ti
From: john stultz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 11:51:18 -0800
> Yea. I actually have some in-progress patches from Peter Keilty that
> convert ia64 and sparc64 time_interpolators to clocksources, then
> removes the time_interpolator code.
>
> The ia64 conversion is more complicated
john stultz wrote:
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:55 -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:56:18 +0100
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:25 -0800, David Miller wrote:
Yes, all you need is to omit the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC flag when y
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:55 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:56:18 +0100
>
> > On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:25 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > > Yes, all you need is to omit the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC flag when you
> > > > register yo
From: Thomas Gleixner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 10:56:18 +0100
> On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:25 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > > Yes, all you need is to omit the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC flag when you
> > > register your device.
> >
> > Thanks a lot Thomas.
> >
> > I noticed while d
David,
On Fri, 2007-02-23 at 01:25 -0800, David Miller wrote:
> > Yes, all you need is to omit the CLOCK_EVT_FEAT_PERIODIC flag when you
> > register your device.
>
> Thanks a lot Thomas.
>
> I noticed while doing this work that the generic clock code is
> incompatible with the time interpolat
9 matches
Mail list logo
