RE: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-26 Thread Marc Fleischmann
et-devel; linux-scsi Cc: Andy Grover; Nicholas A. Bellinger; James Bottomley; targetcli-fb-de...@lists.fedorahosted.org; linux-kernel Subject: Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed On Friday 26 July 2013 09:01 AM, Andy Grover wrote: > > It's one thing to claim a prerogative of &

Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-26 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
On Friday 26 July 2013 09:01 AM, Andy Grover wrote: > > It's one thing to claim a prerogative of "upstream", but for this to > make sense, there needs to be an actual community around the upstream. > And if there's going to be submissions for review, then there needs to > be someone in charge of th

Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-25 Thread Andy Grover
On 07/24/2013 06:19 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: Because -fb has had close to zero peer review, and you've not solicited much input (none from us) before making significant changes to rtslib/targetcli over the past 1 1/2 years. For your own private tree this wouldn't matter. However, for a

Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-24 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 17:06 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > On 07/24/2013 01:54 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > Yes, which is why I've been accepting his kernel patches the entire time > > that user-space has been forked into -fb. Now that the user-space code > > has been relicensed as promised,

Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-24 Thread Andy Grover
On 07/24/2013 01:54 PM, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: Yes, which is why I've been accepting his kernel patches the entire time that user-space has been forked into -fb. Now that the user-space code has been relicensed as promised, there is no longer any reason for a separate -fb fork to exist. T

Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-24 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 13:21 -0700, James Bottomley wrote: > On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 13:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:27 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > > > Hi Nick, > > > > > > I just wanted to let you know that I finally received permission from > > > all contribu

Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-24 Thread James Bottomley
On Wed, 2013-07-24 at 13:09 -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:27 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > > Hi Nick, > > > > I just wanted to let you know that I finally received permission from > > all contributors, and have matched RisingTide's relicensing of targetcli > > and

Re: targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-24 Thread Nicholas A. Bellinger
On Tue, 2013-07-23 at 23:27 -0700, Andy Grover wrote: > Hi Nick, > > I just wanted to let you know that I finally received permission from > all contributors, and have matched RisingTide's relicensing of targetcli > and its dependencies to Apache 2.0, by relicensing the additional > contributio

targetcli -fb now also Apache 2.0 licensed

2013-07-23 Thread Andy Grover
Hi Nick, I just wanted to let you know that I finally received permission from all contributors, and have matched RisingTide's relicensing of targetcli and its dependencies to Apache 2.0, by relicensing the additional contributions in the targetcli-fb branch under the same license. I'm not q