In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:35:48 -0500 (EST)
>From: "Mohammad A. Haque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'll be trying in a few hours.
>
> Meanwhile for people wanting the crashes to be fixed, please
> apply this patch.
>
> This was _always_ broken,
In message [EMAIL PROTECTED] you write:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:35:48 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mohammad A. Haque" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be trying in a few hours.
Meanwhile for people wanting the crashes to be fixed, please
apply this patch.
This was _always_ broken, and really
I have a DLink DFE-530TX+ with a RTL8139 and I lock up cold
every once in a while too. 2.4.0-test12-pre3 is the latest
kernel I've tried. The machine is a dual PII450 on a Tyan
Tiger 100 BX board w/ 128MB.
Locks up cold meaning "It's dead Jim". Non sysrq facilities
available and no Oops
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:06:58PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > This was on Cyrix III.
> > Please include the oops information, as well as the /proc/cpuinfo output.
> Also be sure you built Pentium/TSC kernels as Cyrix III is a 686 core without
> the cmov instruction it seems
I did. And built
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:52:22AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
> > This was on Cyrix III.
>
> Please include the oops information, as well as the /proc/cpuinfo output.
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : WinChip ??
> > I also got a hard lockup (but with Oops) while calling the
> > "vendor CPU init" function during system boot.
> >
> > This was on Cyrix III.
> > PS: CC'ed hpa, because he is cpu-detection maintainer and davej,
> >because he added Cyrix III support and might know details ;-)
>
> Please
>
> I have no Realtek-Card and have the same lockup.
>
> I also got a hard lockup (but with Oops) while calling the
> "vendor CPU init" function during system boot.
>
> This was on Cyrix III.
>
> PS: CC'ed hpa, because he is cpu-detection maintainer and davej,
>because he added Cyrix III
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:52:34PM +, Eckhard Jokisch wrote:
> Is it possible that there is something wrong with the 8139too driver?
> ( I also use a card with 8139 chip )
> Or do you use the "old" rtl8139 ? With that I don't have any problems.
> I have an extra machine here where I can do
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:42:58AM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Hmmm, does syslog sending to another machine catch oops? I guess we'll
> find out.
No, I asked for the logs and he didn't receive any of them :-(
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag
"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
>
> I do the following
>
> sudo modprobe iptable_nat
>
> Module Size Used by
> iptable_nat17440 0 (unused)
> ip_conntrack 19808 1 [iptable_nat]
> ip_tables 12320 3 [iptable_nat]
>
> Oops start flying by
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 05:50:35PM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
[zap]
> Oops start flying by when I access via NFS.
>
> If you need the actual Oops messages we're gonna have to get someone
> who can setup a serial console.
I captured one on my console, anyone interested please drop me a
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 05:50:35PM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
[zap]
Oops start flying by when I access via NFS.
If you need the actual Oops messages we're gonna have to get someone
who can setup a serial console.
I captured one on my console, anyone interested please drop me a note.
"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote:
I do the following
sudo modprobe iptable_nat
Module Size Used by
iptable_nat17440 0 (unused)
ip_conntrack 19808 1 [iptable_nat]
ip_tables 12320 3 [iptable_nat]
Oops start flying by when I
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:42:58AM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
Hmmm, does syslog sending to another machine catch oops? I guess we'll
find out.
No, I asked for the logs and he didn't receive any of them :-(
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:52:34PM +, Eckhard Jokisch wrote:
Is it possible that there is something wrong with the 8139too driver?
( I also use a card with 8139 chip )
Or do you use the "old" rtl8139 ? With that I don't have any problems.
I have an extra machine here where I can do all
I have no Realtek-Card and have the same lockup.
I also got a hard lockup (but with Oops) while calling the
"vendor CPU init" function during system boot.
This was on Cyrix III.
PS: CC'ed hpa, because he is cpu-detection maintainer and davej,
because he added Cyrix III support
I also got a hard lockup (but with Oops) while calling the
"vendor CPU init" function during system boot.
This was on Cyrix III.
PS: CC'ed hpa, because he is cpu-detection maintainer and davej,
because he added Cyrix III support and might know details ;-)
Please include the
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:52:22AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
This was on Cyrix III.
Please include the oops information, as well as the /proc/cpuinfo output.
processor : 0
vendor_id : CentaurHauls
cpu family : 6
model : 6
model name : WinChip ??
stepping
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:06:58PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
This was on Cyrix III.
Please include the oops information, as well as the /proc/cpuinfo output.
Also be sure you built Pentium/TSC kernels as Cyrix III is a 686 core without
the cmov instruction it seems
I did. And built with gcc
I have a DLink DFE-530TX+ with a RTL8139 and I lock up cold
every once in a while too. 2.4.0-test12-pre3 is the latest
kernel I've tried. The machine is a dual PII450 on a Tyan
Tiger 100 BX board w/ 128MB.
Locks up cold meaning "It's dead Jim". Non sysrq facilities
available and no Oops
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
>Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:35:48 -0500 (EST)
>From: "Mohammad A. Haque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'll be trying in a few hours.
>
> Meanwhile for people wanting the crashes to be fixed, please
> apply this patch.
>
> This was _always_ broken, and really
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 01:48:32AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
>
> Also is it sure that the backtrace involves ip_rcv ? A more likely
> guess is that it happens during the IP_LOCAL_OUT hook, when skb->dev
> isn't set yet, but conntrack already has to already reassemble fragments.
Oh, thanks Andi.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:11:10PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:20:00 +0100
>From: Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>Or is there something wrong with:
>
>- packet arrives in net/ipv4/ip_input.c:ip_rcv()
>- netfilter hook NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING is
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:20:00 +0100
From: Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Or is there something wrong with:
- packet arrives in net/ipv4/ip_input.c:ip_rcv()
- netfilter hook NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING is called
- net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c:ip_conntrack_in() is called
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:55:43AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:07:38 -0800 (PST)
>From: Ion Badulescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm
>leaving for a 3-week vacation in about 50 minutes and I need my
Problem only happens when ip_conntrack is loaded.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> I do the following
>
> sudo modprobe iptable_nat
>
> Module Size Used by
> iptable_nat17440 0 (unused)
> ip_conntrack 19808 1 [iptable_nat]
>
I do the following
sudo modprobe iptable_nat
Module Size Used by
iptable_nat17440 0 (unused)
ip_conntrack 19808 1 [iptable_nat]
ip_tables 12320 3 [iptable_nat]
Oops start flying by when I access via NFS.
If you need the actual
Ion Badulescu wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:15:04 -0500, Mohammad A. Haque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
>
> ip_defrag is broken -- there is an obvious NULL pointer dereference
> in it, introduced in test12. It doesn't hit
Just quick feedback.
Test 1:
Netfilter compiled into kernel. Netfilter configuration options
as modules. Modules loaded. Using NFS, I got Oops (in fact I've
never seen an Oops output infinitely before. Maybe it would have
stopped if I waited.)
Test 2:
Ion Badulescu wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:15:04 -0500, Mohammad A. Haque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
>
> ip_defrag is broken -- there is an obvious NULL pointer dereference
> in it, introduced in test12. It doesn't hit
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:35:48 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mohammad A. Haque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'll be trying in a few hours.
Meanwhile for people wanting the crashes to be fixed, please
apply this patch.
This was _always_ broken, and really what netfilter is doing
should have never
I'll be trying in a few hours.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ion Badulescu wrote:
> On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>
> > If you turn off netfilter, ip_conntrack, etc. does the OOPS still
> > occur?
>
> I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm leaving for
> a 3-week
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:07:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Ion Badulescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm
leaving for a 3-week vacation in about 50 minutes and I need my
firewall functional until then. :-) Maybe other people who have
seen
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
> If you turn off netfilter, ip_conntrack, etc. does the OOPS still
> occur?
I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm leaving for
a 3-week vacation in about 50 minutes and I need my firewall functional
until then. :-) Maybe other
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:52:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Ion Badulescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The oops looks something like this. It was caught on serial
console, and decoded on test11, so it doesn't have translation for
module symbols. It if helps, this box is running ip_conntrack and
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
>Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:38:01 -0800
>From: Ion Badulescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>I won't venture a fix, as I don't know the networking code well
>enough. So far, no networking maintainer has had anything to say
>about this
Date:Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:38:01 -0800
From: Ion Badulescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I won't venture a fix, as I don't know the networking code well
enough. So far, no networking maintainer has had anything to say
about this bug on the list...
Because this is the first most of us
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:15:04 -0500, Mohammad A. Haque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
ip_defrag is broken -- there is an obvious NULL pointer dereference
in it, introduced in test12. It doesn't hit normally, because of
path MTU
Subject: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:31:38 +
From: Eckhard Jokisch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: dep <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Don, 14 Dez 2000, dep wrote:
> On Thursday 14 December 2000 07:15, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> | Were you conn
Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
>
> dep wrote:
> >
> > okay. got it here this morning, too. solid lock -- no dumping out of
> > x, no changing terminals, no mouse, no keyboard.
> >
> > k6-2-550 @ 500; 256mb memory, fic 503a mb with via
On Thursday 14 December 2000 07:15, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
| Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
a conditional yes -- little lan here, d-link dfe-530tx+ (rtl8139) to
dlink hub, di-701 gateway, cable modem. so far as i know, i was
neither sending nor receiving at
Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
dep wrote:
>
> okay. got it here this morning, too. solid lock -- no dumping out of
> x, no changing terminals, no mouse, no keyboard.
>
> k6-2-550 @ 500; 256mb memory, fic 503a mb with via chipset. kernel
> built with gcc-2.95-2
okay. got it here this morning, too. solid lock -- no dumping out of
x, no changing terminals, no mouse, no keyboard.
k6-2-550 @ 500; 256mb memory, fic 503a mb with via chipset. kernel
built with gcc-2.95-2 against glibc-2.2. nothing remarkable underway
-- was composing a message in kmail,
Hmmm, does syslog sending to another machine catch oops? I guess we'll
find out.
Ingo Oeser wrote:
> I have no oops yet of this lockup, because of X, but I'll ask a
> friend of mine, whether the remote logging made it to him and
> send you the results.
--
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 10:48:56PM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> Trace; c0105000
> Trace; c0100191
I locked a Cyrix III machine up on boot and hat these both
elements in my trace, too.
It Oopsed and locked up after the Message: "CPU: Before vendor
init".
I locked up too with another
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 10:48:56PM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
Trace; c0105000 empty_bad_page+0/1000
Trace; c0100191 L6+0/2
I locked a Cyrix III machine up on boot and hat these both
elements in my trace, too.
It Oopsed and locked up after the Message: "CPU: Before vendor
init".
I locked
Hmmm, does syslog sending to another machine catch oops? I guess we'll
find out.
Ingo Oeser wrote:
I have no oops yet of this lockup, because of X, but I'll ask a
friend of mine, whether the remote logging made it to him and
send you the results.
--
okay. got it here this morning, too. solid lock -- no dumping out of
x, no changing terminals, no mouse, no keyboard.
k6-2-550 @ 500; 256mb memory, fic 503a mb with via chipset. kernel
built with gcc-2.95-2 against glibc-2.2. nothing remarkable underway
-- was composing a message in kmail,
Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
dep wrote:
okay. got it here this morning, too. solid lock -- no dumping out of
x, no changing terminals, no mouse, no keyboard.
k6-2-550 @ 500; 256mb memory, fic 503a mb with via chipset. kernel
built with gcc-2.95-2 against
On Thursday 14 December 2000 07:15, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
| Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
a conditional yes -- little lan here, d-link dfe-530tx+ (rtl8139) to
dlink hub, di-701 gateway, cable modem. so far as i know, i was
neither sending nor receiving at
Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
dep wrote:
okay. got it here this morning, too. solid lock -- no dumping out of
x, no changing terminals, no mouse, no keyboard.
k6-2-550 @ 500; 256mb memory, fic 503a mb with via chipset.
Subject: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:31:38 +
From: Eckhard Jokisch [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: dep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Don, 14 Dez 2000, dep wrote:
On Thursday 14 December 2000 07:15, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
| Were you connected to a network or receiving
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:15:04 -0500, Mohammad A. Haque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
ip_defrag is broken -- there is an obvious NULL pointer dereference
in it, introduced in test12. It doesn't hit normally, because of
path MTU discovery,
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:38:01 -0800
From: Ion Badulescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I won't venture a fix, as I don't know the networking code well
enough. So far, no networking maintainer has had anything to say
about this bug on the
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 11:52:29 -0800 (PST)
From: Ion Badulescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The oops looks something like this. It was caught on serial
console, and decoded on test11, so it doesn't have translation for
module symbols. It if helps, this box is running ip_conntrack and
the
Ion Badulescu wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:15:04 -0500, Mohammad A. Haque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
ip_defrag is broken -- there is an obvious NULL pointer dereference
in it, introduced in test12. It doesn't hit normally,
Just quick feedback.
Test 1:
Netfilter compiled into kernel. Netfilter configuration options
as modules. Modules loaded. Using NFS, I got Oops (in fact I've
never seen an Oops output infinitely before. Maybe it would have
stopped if I waited.)
Test 2:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
If you turn off netfilter, ip_conntrack, etc. does the OOPS still
occur?
I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm leaving for
a 3-week vacation in about 50 minutes and I need my firewall functional
until then. :-) Maybe other
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:07:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Ion Badulescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm
leaving for a 3-week vacation in about 50 minutes and I need my
firewall functional until then. :-) Maybe other people who have
seen
Ion Badulescu wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000 07:15:04 -0500, Mohammad A. Haque [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Were you connected to a network or receiving/sending anything?
ip_defrag is broken -- there is an obvious NULL pointer dereference
in it, introduced in test12. It doesn't hit normally,
I'll be trying in a few hours.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Ion Badulescu wrote:
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, David S. Miller wrote:
If you turn off netfilter, ip_conntrack, etc. does the OOPS still
occur?
I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm leaving for
a 3-week vacation in
Date:Thu, 14 Dec 2000 10:38:01 -0800
From: Ion Badulescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I won't venture a fix, as I don't know the networking code well
enough. So far, no networking maintainer has had anything to say
about this bug on the list...
Because this is the first most of us
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:35:48 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mohammad A. Haque" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be trying in a few hours.
Meanwhile for people wanting the crashes to be fixed, please
apply this patch.
This was _always_ broken, and really what netfilter is doing
should have never worked.
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:55:43AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 12:07:38 -0800 (PST)
From: Ion Badulescu [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm afraid I won't be able to answer this question, since I'm
leaving for a 3-week vacation in about 50 minutes and I need my
I do the following
sudo modprobe iptable_nat
Module Size Used by
iptable_nat17440 0 (unused)
ip_conntrack 19808 1 [iptable_nat]
ip_tables 12320 3 [iptable_nat]
Oops start flying by when I access via NFS.
If you need the actual
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:20:00 +0100
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or is there something wrong with:
- packet arrives in net/ipv4/ip_input.c:ip_rcv()
- netfilter hook NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING is called
- net/ipv4/netfilter/ip_conntrack_core.c:ip_conntrack_in() is called
-
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 04:11:10PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:20:00 +0100
From: Harald Welte [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Or is there something wrong with:
- packet arrives in net/ipv4/ip_input.c:ip_rcv()
- netfilter hook NF_IP_PRE_ROUTING is called
-
Problem only happens when ip_conntrack is loaded.
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
I do the following
sudo modprobe iptable_nat
Module Size Used by
iptable_nat17440 0 (unused)
ip_conntrack 19808 1 [iptable_nat]
ip_tables
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 01:48:32AM +0100, Andi Kleen wrote:
Also is it sure that the backtrace involves ip_rcv ? A more likely
guess is that it happens during the IP_LOCAL_OUT hook, when skb-dev
isn't set yet, but conntrack already has to already reassemble fragments.
Oh, thanks Andi. This
"David S. Miller" wrote:
Date: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 15:35:48 -0500 (EST)
From: "Mohammad A. Haque" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll be trying in a few hours.
Meanwhile for people wanting the crashes to be fixed, please
apply this patch.
This was _always_ broken, and really what netfilter
Here we go folks. I hope I got everything right. The only place I have a
doubt is the 0010: part of EIP. I couldn't read what I wrote there.
Looks like it's ip fragment related?
ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.0-test11. Options used
-V (default)
-K (specified)
-L (specified)
-o
Ok, got locked up. Dropped me into kdb and I was able to write down the
oops after doing a ss on btp 0.
I'll try to have something posted in an hour.
On Wed, 13 Dec 2000, Mohammad A. Haque wrote:
> At first I thought it was just me when I reported the lockups I was
> having with test12 earlier
On Wednesday 13 December 2000 19:29, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
| > I downloaded the full test12 and have lockups after using X
| > (upstream version 4.0.1Z) 15-45 mins. For me, SysRq+u works, but
| > if I then press SysRq+b, nothing happens. There are no signs in
| > the syslog.
|
| I should add
Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Mohammad A. Haque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> > Those of you who are having lockups, was test12 compiled from a patched
> > tree that you've previously compiled?
>
> I downloaded the full test12 and have lockups after using X (upstream
>
"Mohammad A. Haque" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Those of you who are having lockups, was test12 compiled from a patched
> tree that you've previously compiled?
I downloaded the full test12 and have lockups after using X (upstream
version 4.0.1Z) 15-45 mins. For me, SysRq+u works, but if I
"Mohammad A. Haque" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Those of you who are having lockups, was test12 compiled from a patched
tree that you've previously compiled?
I downloaded the full test12 and have lockups after using X (upstream
version 4.0.1Z) 15-45 mins. For me, SysRq+u works, but if I then
Mikael Djurfeldt [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
"Mohammad A. Haque" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Those of you who are having lockups, was test12 compiled from a patched
tree that you've previously compiled?
I downloaded the full test12 and have lockups after using X (upstream
version 4.0.1Z)
On Wednesday 13 December 2000 19:29, Mikael Djurfeldt wrote:
| I downloaded the full test12 and have lockups after using X
| (upstream version 4.0.1Z) 15-45 mins. For me, SysRq+u works, but
| if I then press SysRq+b, nothing happens. There are no signs in
| the syslog.
|
| I should add
Here we go folks. I hope I got everything right. The only place I have a
doubt is the 0010: part of EIP. I couldn't read what I wrote there.
Looks like it's ip fragment related?
ksymoops 0.7c on i686 2.4.0-test11. Options used
-V (default)
-K (specified)
-L (specified)
-o
79 matches
Mail list logo
