On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 11:17:19PM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> > Hi Ramon,
> >
> > On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:05:15PM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> >> I've noticed that it's not supported.
> >> Is it on purpose ?
> >
> > Yes. The 32bit load add
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:34 PM, Baruch Siach wrote:
> Hi Ramon,
>
> On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:05:15PM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
>> I've noticed that it's not supported.
>> Is it on purpose ?
>
> Yes. The 32bit load address in the uImage header in pretty limited when
> applied to 64bit ARM64. Ev
Hi Ramon,
On Thu, May 24, 2018 at 10:05:15PM +0300, Ramon Fried wrote:
> I've noticed that it's not supported.
> Is it on purpose ?
Yes. The 32bit load address in the uImage header in pretty limited when
applied to 64bit ARM64. Even for ARM zImage is the preferred kernel format for
quite some t
Hi.
I've noticed that it's not supported.
Is it on purpose ?
If not I'll be happy to add support for: make uImage
for arm64 targets.
Warm regards,
Ramon.
4 matches
Mail list logo