On Thursday 15 June 2017 10:34:27 Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 14-06-17 21:36:45, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> > > >
On Thursday 15 June 2017 10:34:27 Jan Kara wrote:
> On Wed 14-06-17 21:36:45, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> > > >
On Wed 14-06-17 21:36:45, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
> > >
> > > It is
On Wed 14-06-17 21:36:45, Pali Rohár wrote:
> On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> > > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
> > >
> > > It is
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
> >
> > It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which
On Tuesday 13 June 2017 14:59:55 Jan Kara wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> > Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> > https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
> >
> > It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which
Hi,
On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
>
> It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which have
> block size different from disk sector size and also
Hi,
On Mon 12-06-17 22:40:14, Pali Rohár wrote:
> Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
> https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
>
> It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which have
> block size different from disk sector size and also
Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which have
block size different from disk sector size and also different from 2048.
But should not detection on 4K native
Hi! I found that following UDF patch was included into linus tree:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/9524557/
It is really a good improvement to recognize UDF file system which have
block size different from disk sector size and also different from 2048.
But should not detection on 4K native
On Wed 18-01-17 19:39:35, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET
> when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes
> (bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE)
> IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were
On Wed 18-01-17 19:39:35, Fabian Frederick wrote:
> udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET
> when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes
> (bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE)
> IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were
udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET
when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes
(bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE)
IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were required or resulted in
"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad
udf_fill_super() used udf_parse_options() to flag UDF_FLAG_BLOCKSIZE_SET
when blocksize was specified otherwise used 512 bytes
(bdev_logical_block_size) and 2048 bytes (UDF_DEFAULT_BLOCKSIZE)
IOW both 1024 and 4096 specifications were required or resulted in
"mount: wrong fs type, bad option, bad
14 matches
Mail list logo