Alexander Viro wrote:
>
> On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
>
> > known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
> > 2.4.4
>
> Different issue. Missing lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() in kill_super()
> appeared in -pre6 and was fixed in -ac2 or so. -ac5
Alexander Viro wrote:
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
2.4.4
Different issue. Missing lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() in kill_super()
appeared in -pre6 and was fixed in -ac2 or so. -ac5 apparently had
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
> known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
> 2.4.4
Different issue. Missing lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() in kill_super()
appeared in -pre6 and was fixed in -ac2 or so. -ac5 apparently had
introduced something new, that
known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
2.4.4
Hans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> > Alan Cox wrote:
> > >
> > > > I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> > > > line
Looks like -ac6 has fixed this problem :)
--
Leszek.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS --
-- speaking just for myself...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
> /dev/hda10/space1 reiserfsdefaults 1 2
/dev/sdb1 /var/log/LOGS reiserfs defaults 0 0
> strace umount /space1:
>
> open("/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_TIME", O_RDONLY) = 3
> fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2441, ...}) = 0
> old_mmap(NULL, 2441, PROT_READ,
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >
> > > I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> > > line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
> > > be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully
/dev/hda10/space1 reiserfsdefaults 1 2
/dev/sdb1 /var/log/LOGS reiserfs defaults 0 0
strace umount /space1:
open(/usr/lib/locale/en_US/LC_TIME, O_RDONLY) = 3
fstat64(3, {st_mode=S_IFREG|0644, st_size=2441, ...}) = 0
old_mmap(NULL, 2441, PROT_READ, MAP_PRIVATE,
Looks like -ac6 has fixed this problem :)
--
Leszek.
-- [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2:480/33.7 -- REAL programmers use INTEGERS --
-- speaking just for myself...
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More
known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
2.4.4
Hans
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, May 31, 2001 at 05:04:50PM -0500, Jordan wrote:
Alan Cox wrote:
I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
line for the
On Fri, 1 Jun 2001, Hans Reiser wrote:
known VFS bug, ask viro for details, 2.4.5 is not stable because of it, use
2.4.4
Different issue. Missing lock_kernel()/unlock_kernel() in kill_super()
appeared in -pre6 and was fixed in -ac2 or so. -ac5 apparently had
introduced something new, that
Alan Cox wrote:
>
> > I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
> > line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
> > be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully anything
> > anybody can share with me about this. I
Alan Cox wrote:
I'm staying on 2.4.5-ac5 for whatever it's worth (putting my life on the
line for the community? kidding...) and will report anything new. I will
be on the lookout for later ac patches, 2.4.6 ... and hopefully anything
anybody can share with me about this. I hope we'll
14 matches
Mail list logo
