I've been cleaning out my inbox and found this patch hasn't made it into
mainline yet.
There were a couple of versions of the patch in this thread. Please
re-submit the final version with the associated acks. And not within
this thread.
Patches that are added to replies in threads seldom get appl
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
wrote:
> * Jovi Zhang [2012-07-18 19:38:27]:
>
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
>> wrote:
>> > The patch looks good,
>> >
>> > Can you modify the description a bit. However you are free to ignore
>> > these comments. After k
* Jovi Zhang [2012-07-18 19:38:27]:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
> wrote:
> > The patch looks good,
> >
> > Can you modify the description a bit. However you are free to ignore
> > these comments. After knowing your response, I will ack the patch.
> >
> > I would probabl
On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 7:07 PM, Srikar Dronamraju
wrote:
> The patch looks good,
>
> Can you modify the description a bit. However you are free to ignore
> these comments. After knowing your response, I will ack the patch.
>
> I would probably put this as:
>
> The subject could be
> tracing: Ver
g
>> > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:16:23 +0800
>> > Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: checking probe event include directory
>> >
>> > Currently below command run successful:
>> > $ echo 'p /bin:0x4245c0' > /sys/kernel/debug/tracing/uprobe_events
>
* Frederic Weisbecker [2012-07-17 12:59:39]:
> On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:12:28PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> > From 16ed13ee9098ae01705e8456005d1ad6d9909128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Jovi Zhang
> > Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:16:23 +0800
> > Subject: [PATCH] u
On Tue, Jul 17, 2012 at 06:12:28PM +0800, Jovi Zhang wrote:
> From 16ed13ee9098ae01705e8456005d1ad6d9909128 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Jovi Zhang
> Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2012 01:16:23 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] uprobe: checking probe event include directory
>
> Currently
7 matches
Mail list logo
