Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-03-07 Thread Roland McGrath
> On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 06:35:31PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > Looking at mainline x86_64 ptrace code I think hole for u_debugreg[4] > > > and [5] is also needed. > > > > It's not. The utrace_regset for the debugregs already has that behavior > > for those two words, so mapping all 8 uare

Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-02-21 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Sat, Feb 17, 2007 at 06:35:31PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > Looking at mainline x86_64 ptrace code I think hole for u_debugreg[4] > > and [5] is also needed. > > It's not. The utrace_regset for the debugregs already has that behavior > for those two words, so mapping all 8 uarea words to t

Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-02-17 Thread Roland McGrath
> Looking at mainline x86_64 ptrace code I think hole for u_debugreg[4] > and [5] is also needed. It's not. The utrace_regset for the debugregs already has that behavior for those two words, so mapping all 8 uarea words to the regset is fine. Thanks, Roland - To unsubscribe from this list: send

Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-02-15 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 04:05:30PM +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote: > On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:36:34PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > > 2. The following proggie renders box unusable in ~10 seconds (but not > > >mainline kernel where Ctrl+C will kill process). > > > > I haven't been able to rep

Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-02-13 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:36:34PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > We're aware of two regressions compared to mainline if ptrace is utrace: > > Thanks very much for bringing these to my attention. > > > 1) zero holes for PTRACE_PEEKUSR vanished. > > I've fixed this in the current patches. Looking

Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-02-13 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
On Mon, Feb 12, 2007 at 01:36:34PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote: > > 2. The following proggie renders box unusable in ~10 seconds (but not > >mainline kernel where Ctrl+C will kill process). > > I haven't been able to reproduce this so far on my test machine. I got > bored after about 10 minute

Re: utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-02-12 Thread Roland McGrath
> We're aware of two regressions compared to mainline if ptrace is utrace: Thanks very much for bringing these to my attention. > 1) zero holes for PTRACE_PEEKUSR vanished. I've fixed this in the current patches. > 2. The following proggie renders box unusable in ~10 seconds (but not >mainl

utrace regressions (was: -mm merge plans for 2.6.21)

2007-02-12 Thread Alexey Dobriyan
> utrace-utrace-tracehook.patch > utrace-utrace-tracehook-ia64.patch > utrace-utrace-tracehook-sparc64.patch > utrace-utrace-tracehook-s390.patch > utrace-utrace-regset.patch > utrace-utrace-regset-ia64.patch > utrace-utrace-regset-sparc64.patch > utrace-utrace-regset-s390.patch > utrace-utrace-cor