On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 2:43 PM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 02:10:32PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> > wrote:
>> >> Hi Al,
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 01:43:40PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> It *is* broken. For now leave override_creds() as in your variant, but
> we really want to deal with that crap eventually.
>
> > Okay, so ->open() is a file op, and file ops should use file->f_cred,
> > but how are we going to enforce th
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 02:10:32PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> > wrote:
> >> Hi Al,
> >>
> >> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
> >>>
> >>> ... and now it even build
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 9:25 AM, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi Al,
>>
>> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
>>>
>>> ... and now it even builds. Said that, I would really like to hear
>>> something
>>> from you - I can d
On Wed, Jul 18, 2018 at 5:29 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Al,
>
> On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
>>
>> ... and now it even builds. Said that, I would really like to hear something
>> from you - I can duplicate the entire overlayfs-next and merge it into
>> my #for-next and
Hi Al,
On Wed, 18 Jul 2018 03:56:37 +0100 Al Viro wrote:
>
> ... and now it even builds. Said that, I would really like to hear something
> from you - I can duplicate the entire overlayfs-next and merge it into
> my #for-next and ask Steven to use that instead of your tree, but I very
> much dis
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 04:53:37PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 08:05:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:43 AM Al Viro wrote:
> > >
> > > A question regarding the customs in such situations - are previous
> > > Reviewed-by/Acked-by normally kept acro
On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 08:05:26AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 12, 2018 at 5:43 AM Al Viro wrote:
> >
> > A question regarding the customs in such situations - are previous
> > Reviewed-by/Acked-by normally kept across rebases like that?
>
> Yeah, unless there were big changes, kee
8 matches
Mail list logo