On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:10:07PM -0700, Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > Well, it can be uninterruptible sleep, but why?
> > It is not allowed to return to userspace until transaction is completed,
> > so having uninterruptible sleep will result in exactly same lost of
> > signals.
> Well, it can be uninterruptible sleep, but why?
> It is not allowed to return to userspace until transaction is completed,
> so having uninterruptible sleep will result in exactly same lost of
> signals.
Delay, not loss.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 09:24:39PM +0400, Oleg Nesterov ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> drivers/w1/slaves/w1_therm.c:w1_therm_read_bin()
>
> while (tm) {
> tm = msleep_interruptible(tm);
> if (signal_pending(current))
> flush_signals(current);
drivers/w1/slaves/w1_therm.c:w1_therm_read_bin()
while (tm) {
tm = msleep_interruptible(tm);
if (signal_pending(current))
flush_signals(current);
}
current is user-space task, yes?
this looks just wrong, could you please exp
4 matches
Mail list logo
