On 01/10, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> syzbot is hitting this problem as of linux-next-20190110.
> When a patch will be proposed?
Well. I have already suggested the patch below several times. It won't fix all
problems in this code (I forgot the details but iirc ptracer_exception_found()
is broken too,
On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 3:06 AM Tetsuo Handa
wrote:
> syzbot is hitting this problem as of linux-next-20190110.
> When a patch will be proposed?
Hi! Sorry, this got delayed over the holidays. Let me finish the patch
I was working on and get it published.
Thanks!
--
Kees Cook
Hello, Kees.
syzbot is hitting this problem as of linux-next-20190110.
When a patch will be proposed?
On 2018/10/30 0:05, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> let me change the subject to avoid the confusion with the already confusing
> disccussion about task_is_descendant().
>
> On 10/29, Oleg Nesterov
let me change the subject to avoid the confusion with the already confusing
disccussion about task_is_descendant().
On 10/29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I still think we need a single pid_alive() check and I even sent the patch.
> Attached again at the end.
>
> To clarify, let me repeat that
let me change the subject to avoid the confusion with the already confusing
disccussion about task_is_descendant().
On 10/29, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
>
> I still think we need a single pid_alive() check and I even sent the patch.
> Attached again at the end.
>
> To clarify, let me repeat that
5 matches
Mail list logo