Re: Memory subsystem error and freeze on 2.4.0-test12

2000-12-15 Thread Jussi Laako
Rik van Riel wrote: Dec 14 12:33:32 alien kernel: __alloc_pages: 2-order allocation failed. System deadlocked about one minute later. Any idea which part of the kernel deadlocked? Was it the network driver, the VM subsystem, ? I suspect the VM, it's been doing strange things since

2.4.0-test12 kernel BUG at buffer.c:765!

2000-12-15 Thread torben fjerdingstad
Dual pentium, aic7xxx, In the middle of mke2fs'ing /dev/md1 (3x18Gb disks): raid5: resync finished. kernel BUG at buffer.c:765! invalid operand: CPU:1 EIP:0010:[c0131831] EFLAGS: 00010286 eax: 001c ebx: dc043b28 ecx: edx: 0100 esi: c56a3160 edi: c56a3000

Re: ip_defrag is broken (was: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback)

2000-12-15 Thread Jasper Spaans
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 05:50:35PM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: [zap] Oops start flying by when I access via NFS. If you need the actual Oops messages we're gonna have to get someone who can setup a serial console. I captured one on my console, anyone interested please drop me a note.

Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error.

2000-12-15 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Alexander Viro wrote: Just one: any fs that really cares about completion callback is very likely to be picky about the requests ordering. So sync_buffers() is very unlikely to be useful anyway. Somewhat. I guess there are at least two ways to do it. First flush the

2.4.0 + reiserfs + smp

2000-12-15 Thread David D.W. Downey
I've been reading the thread regarding data corruption with 2.4.0-test12, reiserfs, and smp. Unfrotunately I've not seen any resolution announced about this. Is this still an issue or has this been fixed? Right now I've stayed with 2.4.0-test10 + reiserfs and Uni mode while waiting for a

Re: 2.4.0 + reiserfs + smp

2000-12-15 Thread Chris Mason
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, David D.W. Downey wrote: I've been reading the thread regarding data corruption with 2.4.0-test12, reiserfs, and smp. Unfrotunately I've not seen any resolution announced about this. Is this still an issue or has this been fixed? reiserfs and test12 won't play

Re: ip_defrag is broken (was: Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback)

2000-12-15 Thread Tom Leete
"Mohammad A. Haque" wrote: I do the following sudo modprobe iptable_nat Module Size Used by iptable_nat17440 0 (unused) ip_conntrack 19808 1 [iptable_nat] ip_tables 12320 3 [iptable_nat] Oops start flying by when I

Problem: LinuxKernel drivers/block/loop.c (with patch)

2000-12-15 Thread RUBEN JESUS GARCIA HERNANDEZ
[1.] One line summary of the problem: 1. Creating a loop with the loop devices (a-b b-a) makes the device no longer usable. [2.] Full description of the problem/report: 2. When you make a mistake and write losetup options /dev/loopn /dev/loopn and loopn

autofs v4 on 2.2.18 ?

2000-12-15 Thread Richard Ems
Hi all! I posted the following mail to the autofs list but got no answer. Hi! I'm trying to get 2.2.18 running with autofs4 but had no succes till now. I patched 2.2.18 with autofs4-2.2.17-20001023.diff, the patch applied whitout errors. I also compiled and installed autofs-4.0.0pre9.

Re: 2.4.0 + reiserfs + smp

2000-12-15 Thread David D.W. Downey
Thanks Chris. Appreciate the fast getback. On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Chris Mason wrote: On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, David D.W. Downey wrote: I've been reading the thread regarding data corruption with 2.4.0-test12, reiserfs, and smp. Unfrotunately I've not seen any resolution announced

Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit

2000-12-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! For one of our demos, we ran a file server on a remote linux box (that we just had a user account on), mounted it on a kORBit'ized box, and ran programs on SPARC Solaris that accessed the kORBit'ized linux box's file syscalls. If nothing else, it's pretty nifty what you can do in

Re: SysRq behavior

2000-12-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! Just played with this bug. It doesn't kill a login shell but does any app running on it. I just went looking for where "Quit" is printed out. When I press SysRq Quit is printed on the command line. Any ideas? Not a bug. Normally,. PrtSc will generate a ^\, which is the default

Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit

2000-12-15 Thread josef höök
Pavel Machek wrote: Hi! For one of our demos, we ran a file server on a remote linux box (that we just had a user account on), mounted it on a kORBit'ized box, and ran programs on SPARC Solaris that accessed the kORBit'ized linux box's file syscalls. If nothing else, it's pretty nifty

Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit

2000-12-15 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! It was just an example. Basically, you'd be able to do in with just about any language that has ORBit bindings. Ben Ford wrote: Why would you *ever* want to write a device driver in perl??? Precisely... but also, there could be a case where perl would make sense. Consider

Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?

2000-12-15 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux. Trademark violation time. It's probably a marketing guy that has no idea about what he is talking about. I've seen good Linux related stuff come from Sun and I hardly can imagine that such

Re: Test12 ll_rw_block error.

2000-12-15 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 02:00:19AM -0500, Alexander Viro wrote: On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Just one: any fs that really cares about completion callback is very likely to be picky about the requests ordering. So sync_buffers() is very unlikely to be useful anyway. In

Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Chmouel Boudjnah
"LA Walsh" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I've seen this setup on RH, SuSE and Mandrake systems. I thought this was somehow normal practice? it's done for us till the 7.2 but next version we gonna to switch to a different headers directory like Debian/RH does... -- MandrakeSoft Inc

IRQ problem? (oops in test12)

2000-12-15 Thread Harley Anderson
Howdy again folks, I have another oops for ya's to look over... Yesterday when I was about to patch and build the new (test12) kernel I found the ominous message: Kernel panic: attempted to kill init! Something like that anyway. No other info, just locked up solid. No real clues on that one

Re: question about tulip patch to set CSR0 for pci 2.0 bus

2000-12-15 Thread Clayton Weaver
SIS 85C496 on Asus sp3 appears to have an equivalent bug (same CSR0 setting fixes kernel deadlocks that occur when using the non-burst-challenged 0x01A08000 setting), so if you're going to catch it with a special case in the pci code, you need to catch that as well as the Saturn II chipset.

2.4.0-test12-pre8: solid lockup

2000-12-15 Thread Frank van Maarseveen
I just had a solid lockup inside X. Just moved the serial mouse, nothing special going on. No caps lock, no ping. gcc -v Reading specs from /usr/lib/gcc-lib/i386-redhat-linux/egcs-2.91.66/specs gcc version egcs-2.91.66 19990314/Linux (egcs-1.1.2 release) Kernel is 2.4.0-test12-pre8 + this

[PATCH] generic_serial's block_til_ready

2000-12-15 Thread Patrick van de Lageweg
Hi Linus, This patch renames the block_til_ready of generic serial to gs_block_til_ready. it helps when other modules have a "static block_til_ready" defined when used older modutils. Patrick diff -u -r linux-2.4.0-test13-pre1.clean/drivers/char/generic_serial.c

[NEW DRIVER] New user space serial port driver

2000-12-15 Thread Patrick van de Lageweg
Hi Linus, Please consider including this user space serial driver. It was writen for the Perle 833 RAS Server but can also be used for other serial devices more appropriately driven from a userspace program. Patrick diff -u -r

[PATCH] atmrefcount

2000-12-15 Thread Patrick van de Lageweg
Hi Linus, This patch contains the fix for the atmrefcount problem (noted as a critical problem in Ted's todo list). Patrick diff -u -r linux-2.4.0-test13-pre1.clean/drivers/atm/ambassador.c linux-2.4.0-test13-pre1.atm-refcount/drivers/atm/ambassador.c ---

[NEW DRIVER] firestream

2000-12-15 Thread Patrick van de Lageweg
Hi Linus, This is the driver for the Fujitsu Firestream atm cards (fs50 and fs155). Please consider including this driver in the tree. Thanks Patrick diff -u -r linux-2.4.0-test13-pre1.clean/Documentation/Configure.help

BOOTP not working in 2.2.18?

2000-12-15 Thread Matt Bernstein
In the file net/ipv4/ipconfig.c is a variable called ic_enabled which is initialised to zero and never set anywhere. a check is made and bootp isn't run if its not set. Setting it to 1 before the check makes it appear to work. [ The user-space bootpc doesn't want to play ball at all these days..

bug: kernel timer added twice ad 000000000110052c.

2000-12-15 Thread Tommy Wu
I got the message as subject when I load the ip_conntrack/iptable_nat modules for kernel 2.4.0-test9 to test12. All have the same problem. I'm running on a UltraSparc machine. (Debian GNU/Linux 2.2 with kernel 2.4). -- Tommy Wu mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?

2000-12-15 Thread Jon 'maddog' Hall, Executive Director, Linux International
[Warning: Highly controversial topic ahead. Messenger does not want to be shot] This does bring up an interesting situation. The Linux community keeps saying that "Linux is a re-implementation of Unix." This gets X/Open all pissed off at us, because Linux has not passed the qualification test

[lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Ed Tomlinson
Alan Cox wrote: slrnpull --expire on a news-spool of about 600 Mb in 200,000 files gave a lot of 'trying_to_free..' errors. 2.2.18 + VM-global, booted with mem=32M: slrnpull --expire on the same spool worked fine. I think Andrea just earned his official God status ;) I have

Re: USB-related Oops in test12

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 02:29:40PM +, Adam Huffman wrote: Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address 000c *pde = Oops: CPU:0 EIP:0010:[d086734b] Using defaults from ksymoops -t elf32-i386 -a i386 EFLAGS: 00010246 eax: ebx:

Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?

2000-12-15 Thread Rik van Riel
On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Rob Landley wrote: Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux. Trademark violation time. The article's here: http://linuxtoday.com/news_story.php3?ltsn=2000-12-14-020-04-NW-CY Quick quote: When asked

ATAPI: audio CD still stops on (fast forward, 2.4.0-test12)

2000-12-15 Thread Stanislav Brabec
Jens Axboe wrote, SatNov 4,2000,15:18:45GMT): On Fri, Nov 03 2000, Stanislav Brabec wrote: Description: On 2.4.0-pre9 and 2.4.0-pre10: Playing of some audio CD's stops in nearly regular places. Also pressing in CD software panel in nearly all cases ends by stop. Known problem, patch

Re: test12: eth0 trasmit timed out after one hour uptime

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:01:29PM -0800, Joseph Cheek wrote: Dec 13 14:51:46 sanfrancisco kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out Dec 13 14:51:46 sanfrancisco kernel: eth0: transmit timed out, tx_status 00 status e680. Dec 13 14:51:46 sanfrancisco kernel: Flags; bus-master 1,

Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:42:58AM -0500, Mohammad A. Haque wrote: Hmmm, does syslog sending to another machine catch oops? I guess we'll find out. No, I asked for the logs and he didn't receive any of them :-( Regards Ingo Oeser -- 10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag

Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Werner Almesberger
Alexander Viro wrote: In the situation above they should have -Iwherever_the_tree_lives/include in CFLAGS. Always had to. No links, no pain in ass, no interference with userland compiles. As long as there's a standard location for "wherever_the_tree_lives", this is fine. In most cases, the

Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?

2000-12-15 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:54:21PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux. Trademark violation time. It's probably a marketing guy that has no idea about what he is talking about. I've seen

Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 11:17:11PM +, Alan Cox wrote: Andrea - can we have the core VM changes you did without adopting the change in semaphore semantics for file system locking which will give third party fs maintainers headaches and doesnt match 2.4 behaviour either ? The changes in

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Stephen Frost
* Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then timer handling makes it limp along). Possibly related datapoint: after several days of uptime, my 2.4.0-test10pre? machine went

system freeze on 2.4.0-test10 or greater

2000-12-15 Thread Patrizio Bruno
My machine randomly freeze, apparently without a reason and i cannot reproduce the problem. P. - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze Italy tel +39 05520351 fax +39 0552478143 PGP

Re: system freeze on 2.4.0-test10 or greater

2000-12-15 Thread Patrizio Bruno
My machine randomly freeze, apparently without a reason and i cannot reproduce the problem. P. In my previous mail I forgot my machine specs - Patrizio Bruno DADA spa / Ed-IT Development Staff Borgo degli Albizi 37/r 50122 Firenze

Re: bug: kernel timer added twice ad 000000000110052c.

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:24:58PM +0800, Tommy Wu wrote: I got the message as subject when I load the ip_conntrack/iptable_nat modules for kernel 2.4.0-test9 to test12. All have the same problem. Don't do that. Recompile the modules _ALWAYS_ along with the kernel you compile and use.

Re: test12: eth0 trasmit timed out after one hour uptime

2000-12-15 Thread Andrew Morton
Ingo Oeser wrote: On Wed, Dec 13, 2000 at 03:01:29PM -0800, Joseph Cheek wrote: Dec 13 14:51:46 sanfrancisco kernel: NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out ... I have this too since testX-Kernels are released. I use a "3Com Corporation 3c905B 100BaseTX [Cyclone] (rev 24)"

Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Kurt Roeckx
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:14:04AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: In article [EMAIL PROTECTED], LA Walsh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Which works because in a normal compile environment they have /usr/include in their include path and /usr/include/linux points to the directory under

Re: 2.4.0-test12 randomly hangs up

2000-12-15 Thread a . airaghi
Here too. :(( My CPU: Pentium 150 (NO overclock). 64 MB RAM. Linux freeze (no keyboard, no disk activity) 5-10 minutes after I load X. No freezing with other 2.4.0-testxx kernels. Please note: I'm not subscribed. Ciao Ale -- Alessandro Airaghi | e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Oliver Xymoron
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Stephen Frost wrote: * Oliver Xymoron ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: On Thu, 14 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: A 100ms delay sounds like some interrupt shut up or similar (and then timer handling makes it limp along). Possibly related datapoint: after several

Re: bug: kernel timer added twice ad 000000000110052c.

2000-12-15 Thread Tommy Wu
Ingo Oeser ¼g¹D: I got the message as subject when I load the ip_conntrack/iptable_nat modules for kernel 2.4.0-test9 to test12. All have the same problem. Don't do that. Recompile the modules _ALWAYS_ along with the kernel you compile and use. Yes, I do that everytime, but it

Re: Question about RTC interrupts on i386

2000-12-15 Thread richardj_moore
You can get some interesting side effects if you incease the clock speed. I'm not saying that Linux will suffer, but I have seen problems on other Intel based systems - it all depends on what you do with the clock interrupt. Increasing the seed will give a finer grained pre-emption

[Q] Remote serial ports?

2000-12-15 Thread Jens Petersohn
Hi all, I have an application in which it would be useful to have access to remote serial ports as if they where local ports. Machine A has several serial ports on it connected to various special types of devices in a locked machine room. Developers on workstation B wants to execute an

ext3-0.0.5d questions

2000-12-15 Thread Douglas J. Hunley
I just took the plunge and converted all my drives to EXT3. I've now got a _lot_ of questions. Is there a FAQ? Web documentation? Mailing list? Thanks! -- Douglas J. Hunley (Linux User #174778) http://hunley.homeip.net/ Ambivalent? Well, yes and no. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line

Re: Question about RTC interrupts on i386

2000-12-15 Thread David Woodhouse
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said: I'm not sure there's any particular advantage to the TOD clock on IRQ 8. It means that IRQ0 is free to be used for the PC speaker driver :) -- dwmw2 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Dana Lacoste
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:14:04AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: It's the version that's in cvs, I just did an cvs update. It's been in it for ages. If it's wrong, someone *please* correct it. I think this is the important part. This subject has come up quite a few times in the past

Re: ext3-0.0.5d questions

2000-12-15 Thread David Weinehall
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:15:05AM -0500, Douglas J. Hunley wrote: I just took the plunge and converted all my drives to EXT3. I've now got a _lot_ of questions. Is there a FAQ? Web documentation? Mailing list? A tip for next time you decide to do something akin to this: Read FAQ's,

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Tom Rini
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point I'll make a pre2 that is worth announcing. Does this mean other arches will have a

[OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 15 Dec 00 at 10:23, Dana Lacoste wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:14:04AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: It's the version that's in cvs, I just did an cvs update. It's been in it for ages. If it's wrong, someone *please* correct it. I think this is the important part. This

Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Dana Lacoste
Maybe you did not notice, but for months we have /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include, which points to kernel headers, and which should be used for compiling out-of-tree kernel modules (i.e. latest vmware uses this). What about the case where I'm compiling for a kernel that I'm not running

Re: ext3-0.0.5d questions

2000-12-15 Thread Douglas J. Hunley
David Weinehall wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 10:15:05AM -0500, Douglas J. Hunley wrote: I just took the plunge and converted all my drives to EXT3. I've now got a _lot_ of questions. Is there a FAQ? Web documentation? Mailing list? A tip for next time you decide to do something akin

Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Petr Vandrovec
On 15 Dec 00 at 11:00, Dana Lacoste wrote: Maybe you did not notice, but for months we have /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include, which points to kernel headers, and which should be used for compiling out-of-tree kernel modules (i.e. latest vmware uses this). What about the case where

Re: Signal 11

2000-12-15 Thread Theodore Y. Ts'o
Date:Fri, 15 Dec 2000 01:09:29 + (GMT) From: Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] oWe tell vendors to build RPMv3 , glibc 2.1.x Curious HOW do you tell vendors?? When they ask. More usefully Dan Quinlann and most vendors put together a recommended set of things to

Re: New patches for 2.2.18pre24 raw IO (fix for bounce buffer copy)

2000-12-15 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi, On Fri, Dec 08, 2000 at 01:06:33PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Mon, Dec 04, 2000 at 08:50:04PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote: I have pushed another set of raw IO patches out, this time to fix a This fix is missing: --- rawio-sct/mm/memory.c.~1~ Fri Dec 8 03:05:01 2000 +++

Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Eli Carter
Dana Lacoste wrote: Maybe you did not notice, but for months we have /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include, which points to kernel headers, and which should be used for compiling out-of-tree kernel modules (i.e. latest vmware uses this). What about the case where I'm compiling for a

Re: mm-context[NR_CPUS] and pci fix check [was Re: Alpha SCSI error on 2.4.0-test11]

2000-12-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 08:14:44PM +0100, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Fri, Dec 01, 2000 at 10:19:44AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: I would instead suggest to declare 'context' to be of an arch-specific defined type, much like "thread_struct" is. I agree, [..] Here it is:

2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-15 Thread Mike Black
include/linux/signal.h There's a couple like this -- isn't this case statement upside down??? extern inline void siginitset(sigset_t *set, unsigned long mask) { set-sig[0] = mask; switch (_NSIG_WORDS) { default: memset(set-sig[1], 0,

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 11:29:28AM -0500, Mike Black wrote: include/linux/signal.h There's a couple like this -- isn't this case statement upside down??? extern inline void siginitset(sigset_t *set, unsigned long mask) { set-sig[0] = mask; switch (_NSIG_WORDS) {

New patches for 2.2.18 raw IO (fix for fault retry)

2000-12-15 Thread Stephen C. Tweedie
Hi all, OK, this now assembles the full outstanding set of raw IO fixes for the final 2.2.18 kernel, both with and without the 4G bigmem patches. The only changes since the last 2.2.18pre24 release are the addition of a minor bugfix (possible failures when retrying after getting colliding

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Tom Rini wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 03:31:54PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: I'm hoping that most of the fall-out from switching over exclusively to the new-style Makefiles will be over in a day or two, at which point I'll make a pre2 that is worth announcing.

Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread ferret
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Werner Almesberger wrote: Alexander Viro wrote: In the situation above they should have -Iwherever_the_tree_lives/include in CFLAGS. Always had to. No links, no pain in ass, no interference with userland compiles. As long as there's a standard location for

Re: BOOTP not working in 2.2.18?

2000-12-15 Thread Matt Bernstein
OK this means you need "ip=::bootp" on your command-line. I didn't spot it documented anywhere :-( and it wasn't obvious the default behaviour had changed until I browsed patch-2.2.18 rather than the patched file. I'd still like the userspace bootpc to do the job though. It just grumbles

Re: ANNOUNCE: Linux Kernel ORB: kORBit

2000-12-15 Thread Chris Lattner
For one of our demos, we ran a file server on a remote linux box (that we just had a user account on), mounted it on a kORBit'ized box, and ran programs on SPARC Solaris that accessed the kORBit'ized linux box's file syscalls. If nothing else, it's pretty nifty what you can do in little

Re: mm-context[NR_CPUS] and pci fix check [was Re: Alpha SCSI error on 2.4.0-test11]

2000-12-15 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 16:46:26 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] This one breaks all archs but i386 and alpha. If some arch maintainer likes me to update its arch blindly implementing mm_arch structure as an `unsigned long context' and fixing up the miscompilation I

driver disk

2000-12-15 Thread hiren_mehta
Hi All, Can somebody tell me how to create a driver disk for redhat linux or send me a URL where I can find the information on this ? On redhat linux I started installation using "export mode" so that I can use my own driver to install the linux on the hard disks connected to my SCSI adapter and

Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread ferret
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Petr Vandrovec wrote: On 15 Dec 00 at 10:23, Dana Lacoste wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:14:04AM +, Miquel van Smoorenburg wrote: It's the version that's in cvs, I just did an cvs update. It's been in it for ages. If it's wrong, someone *please*

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:07:55PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: Current code makes perfect sense if you put a 'break;' after the last Current code makes perfect sense also without the break. I guess that's a strict check to try to catch bugs, but calling it "deprecated" is wrong, it should

Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Werner Almesberger
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Just out of curiosity, what would happen with redirection if your source tree for 'the currently running kernel' version happens to be configured for a different 'the currently running kernel', perhaps a machine of a foreign arch that you are cross-compiling for? Two

Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Thu, Dec 14, 2000 at 06:52:34PM +, Eckhard Jokisch wrote: Is it possible that there is something wrong with the 8139too driver? ( I also use a card with 8139 chip ) Or do you use the "old" rtl8139 ? With that I don't have any problems. I have an extra machine here where I can do all

Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Cox
figure out what else from this series can be put into 19pre. Believe the major changes left in the aa series are bigmem and lvm. I would love to see lvm officially in 2.2... lvm, 4Gb support, raid 0.90... to be honest by the time that sort of stuff would get integrated (except maybe the

Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback

2000-12-15 Thread H. Peter Anvin
I have no Realtek-Card and have the same lockup. I also got a hard lockup (but with Oops) while calling the "vendor CPU init" function during system boot. This was on Cyrix III. PS: CC'ed hpa, because he is cpu-detection maintainer and davej, because he added Cyrix III support

Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Cox
The changes in semaphore semantics are necessary to fix the spurious out of memory with MAP_SHARED mappings and they came together with the removal of the always-asynchronous kpiod. While it's certainly possible to remove it I don't think removing the fix for MAP_SHARED stuff is a good idea.

mmap'ing IO memory on i386

2000-12-15 Thread Anders Torger
I'm writing an ALSA sound card driver, for a card that does not support DMA, thus the CPU need to do the copying to and from the onboard buffer. ALSA allows for optional mmap'd access, that is accessing the in memory dma buffer directly from user space. However, for this card that does not

Re: [OT] Re: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:31:57AM -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Maybe you did not notice, but for months we have /lib/modules/`uname -r`/build/include, which points to kernel headers, and which should be used for compiling out-of-tree kernel modules (i.e. latest vmware uses this).

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-15 Thread Franz Sirl
At 18:43 15.12.00, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:07:55PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: Current code makes perfect sense if you put a 'break;' after the last Current code makes perfect sense also without the break. I guess that's a strict check to try to catch bugs, but

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Cox
Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of bugs ;). So you want drivers/gsc again ? I assumed you dropped it as you

Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Cox
I also got a hard lockup (but with Oops) while calling the "vendor CPU init" function during system boot. This was on Cyrix III. PS: CC'ed hpa, because he is cpu-detection maintainer and davej, because he added Cyrix III support and might know details ;-) Please include the

Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?

2000-12-15 Thread Igmar Palsenberg
When asked by a reporter why Sun's new clustering software was restricted to Solaris and not available on Linux, McNealy's aggravation seemed to peak. "You people just don't get it, do you? All Linux applications run on Solaris, which is our implementation of Linux. Now ask the

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Alan Cox wrote: Sparc is already sync'ed in my tree, and I'd love for other architectures to synch up too (but if it takes a while it's not a major disaster - I actually much prefer bugs that cause build failures over other kinds of bugs ;). So you want

RE: Linus's include file strategy redux

2000-12-15 Thread LA Walsh
From: Werner Almesberger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] I think there are three possible directions wrt visibility of kernel headers: - non at all - anything that needs kernel headers needs to provide them itself - kernel-specific extentions only; libc is self-contained, but user

Re: Is there a Linux trademark issue with sun?

2000-12-15 Thread Larry McVoy
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 08:15:41PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:54:21PM +0100, Igmar Palsenberg wrote: Heads up everybody. Scott McNealy has apparently been calling Solaris Sun's implementation of Linux. Trademark violation time. It's

Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:52:22AM -0800, H. Peter Anvin wrote: This was on Cyrix III. Please include the oops information, as well as the /proc/cpuinfo output. processor : 0 vendor_id : CentaurHauls cpu family : 6 model : 6 model name : WinChip ?? stepping

Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback

2000-12-15 Thread Ingo Oeser
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:06:58PM +, Alan Cox wrote: This was on Cyrix III. Please include the oops information, as well as the /proc/cpuinfo output. Also be sure you built Pentium/TSC kernels as Cyrix III is a 686 core without the cmov instruction it seems I did. And built with gcc

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Alexander Viro
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I decided that it's not worth it. Umm... Linus, how about a bunch of fixes I've sent to you several times

Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 05:57:18PM +, Alan Cox wrote: How hard is it to seperate losing kpiod (optimisation) from the MAP_SHARED changes ? I am assuming they are two seperate issues, possibly wrongly Losing kpiod isn't an optimization ;(. Losing kpiod is the MAP_SHARED bugfix. The

Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Mark Symonds
- Original Message - From: "Alan Cox" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: "Mark Symonds" [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, December 14, 2000 1:57 AM Subject: Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18 Hihi, Box A will randomly lock without warning and box B will die and start

Re: mm-context[NR_CPUS] and pci fix check [was Re: Alpha SCSI error on 2.4.0-test11]

2000-12-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 09:11:31AM -0800, David S. Miller wrote: Can you name the mm_struct member "context" [..] I got you was proposing that but once we change it I preferred to use a generic mm_arch structure (not just a context field) to have a more generic interface in the long run.

Re: mm-context[NR_CPUS] and pci fix check [was Re: Alpha SCSI error on 2.4.0-test11]

2000-12-15 Thread David S. Miller
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 18:55:28 +0100 From: Andrea Arcangeli [EMAIL PROTECTED] I'm aware this way all ports actively using `mm-context' needs to be changed but the change is certainly a no-brainer... OK? My problem is that I don't want to typedef it to a structure, this will

Re: test13-pre1 changelog

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Cox
I really dropped it because I was getting too many patches, and I don't realistically think it's a 2.4.0 issue (neither do you, I bet), so I decided that it's not worth it. Ok. Not a problem. I'll leave it until post 2.4.0 - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-15 Thread Richard B. Johnson
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Franz Sirl wrote: At 18:43 15.12.00, Andrea Arcangeli wrote: On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 12:07:55PM -0500, Richard B. Johnson wrote: Current code makes perfect sense if you put a 'break;' after the last Current code makes perfect sense also without the break. I guess

yenta, pm, ioremap(!) problems (was: PCI irq routing..)

2000-12-15 Thread Martin Diehl
On Thu, 7 Dec 2000, Linus Torvalds wrote: Ok, definitely needs some more work. Thanks for testing - I have no hardware where this is needed. Well, so I've tried to go on since my box has this "feature". Seems I finally got the thing tracked down to several issues with mutual influence and

Re: [lkml]Re: VM problems still in 2.2.18

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Cox
o don't wait I/O completion to avoid deadlocking on the i_sem o swap_out returns 1 and memory balancing code so thinks we did progress in freeing memory and goes to allocate memory from the freelist without waiting I/O completion o repeat N times the above so the

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-15 Thread Alan Cox
void foo() { extern int a; if(a) goto a; return; a: printf("%d\n", a); } Both examples allow an extern declaration inside a function scope which is also contrary to any (even old) 'C' standards. 'extern'

Re: test12 lockups -- need feedback

2000-12-15 Thread mike
I have a DLink DFE-530TX+ with a RTL8139 and I lock up cold every once in a while too. 2.4.0-test12-pre3 is the latest kernel I've tried. The machine is a dual PII450 on a Tyan Tiger 100 BX board w/ 128MB. Locks up cold meaning "It's dead Jim". Non sysrq facilities available and no Oops

Re: 2.2.18 signal.h

2000-12-15 Thread Andrea Arcangeli
On Fri, Dec 15, 2000 at 06:59:24PM +0100, Franz Sirl wrote: It's required by ISO C, and since that's the standard now, gcc spits out a warning. Just adding a ; is enough and already done for most stuff in 2.4.0-test12. I'm not complaining gcc folks, I just dislike the new behaviour in

Re: yenta, pm, ioremap(!) problems (was: PCI irq routing..)

2000-12-15 Thread Linus Torvalds
On Fri, 15 Dec 2000, Martin Diehl wrote: 3) The TI1131 is apparently not PCI PM 1.0 compliant. At least it seems it has been replaced by the 12xx series at the moment some major player required PCI PM 1.0 to get his "Designed for ..." label in '98 ;-) So I had to add some code to save and

  1   2   3   4   >