"Frdric" == Frdric L W Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Frdric Keith Owens wrote:
Rule 2. Any glibc that has a symlink from
/usr/include/{linux,asm} to /usr/src/linux/include/{linux,asm}
is wrong.
Frdric Such symlinks are created by the user.
Relying on
On Sat, 3 Feb 2001 00:49:26 -0200,
Fr d ric L. W. Meunier [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Keith Owens wrote:
Relying on /usr/include/{linux,asm} always pointing at the
current kernel source is broken as designed.
From glibc 2.2.1 FAQ:
2.17. I have /usr/include/net and /usr/include/scsi as
Ion Badulescu [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
Oh I can see why Hans wants to cut down his bug reporting load. I can also
say from experience it wont work. If you put #error in then everyone will
mail him and complain it doesnt build, if you put #warning in
I'm also getting a ton of these, along with lots of
file corruption. I could handle the timeouts and
rebooting every once in awhile if I didn't also have
the corruption.
Do I have some incorrect IDE parameters?
(using 2.4.0, not 2.4.1)
dual Pentium III 933 MHz (STL2 board)
SAMSUNG 20 GB IDE
On Thu, Jan 04 2001 at 17:49:46 EST, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
I will be adding support for virtual replay for root filesystems to
act as a last-chance way of recovering if you really cannot write to
the root, but journaling filesystems really do expect to be able to
write to the media so
J Sloan writes:
I discovered that lvm seems to have a problem
with compaq raid controllers - the partitions
don't have the normal names like /dev/sda1,
but instead names like /dev/ida/c0d0p1 -
lvm seems to works OK, but lvmdiskscan freaks...
lvmdiskscan -- filling directory cache...
Jeff writes:
I understand that both ext3fs and
reiserfs will try to fix corrupt filesystems (or at least filesystems
with unprocessed log entries) in-place even if they're mounted
read-only. Clearly, virtual replay means more work, but -- just for
fun -- here are some cases in which it
"Keith" == Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
{PB} This was necessary for libc5, but is not correct when
using glibc. Including the kernel header files directly in user
programs usually does not work (see question 3.5). glibc
provides its own net/* and scsi/* header files
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
You can do:
if [ "$CC" = gcc ]; then
echo 'inline void f(unsigned int n){int
i,j=-1;for(i=0;i10j0;i++)if((1ULi)==n)j=i;if(j0)exit(0);}main(){f(64);exit(1);}'
test.c
gcc -O2 -o test test.c
if ./test; then echo "*** Please don't use this
On 3 Feb 2001, Brian May wrote:
"Keith" == Keith Owens [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
{PB} This was necessary for libc5, but is not correct when
using glibc. Including the kernel header files directly in user
programs usually does not work (see question 3.5). glibc
"Brian" == Brian Wellington [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Brian No, it clearly says that glibc contains its own versions of
Brian the net/* and scsi/* files, and that /usr/include/asm and
Brian /usr/include/linux should remain as they were. Since they
Brian were symlinks in libc5
Do not trust the second channel to ATA devices.
Only ATAPI can live there.
I watch it all day long eat my second drives.
The OSB4 is not a pretty thing to play with, and I will have the chance to
fix the CSB5 before it goes final.
Cheers,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Dunlap, Randy wrote:
I'm also
My logs show the following:
xirc2ps_cs.c 1.31 1998/12/09 19:32:55 (dd9jn+kvh)
eth0: Xircom: port 0x300, irq 3, hwaddr 00:80:C7:1E:28:2A
eth0: MII link partner: 0021
eth0: MII selected
eth0: media 10BaseT, silicon revision 4
UDP: short packet: 137/58
NETDEV WATCHDOG: eth0: transmit timed out
Many thanks to all who have suggested to use UNIX domain sockets. That was
my first thought--I just didn't know how to preserve the existing named
interface. And yes, I have consulted several "decent" UNIX programming
books which have led me to the likelihood that what I want to do cannot be
I've now installed 21.6 downloaded from metlab
and all seems to be ok now... well at
least the dell box.. compaq boot sector may
have been blown off for some reason..it won't
boot at all athough this time it's a different
way of being stuck like LI instead of LILO.
I will try ibm box in the
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 11:54:31PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Each time I get a transmit timeout, or UDP: short packet error,
networking on my laptop seems to go down. Reinsertion of the
card temporarily fixes it, and if I leave it long enough it
also fixes itself.
Does the same
While trying to compile a new driver for an 802.11 pci card, I started
work on upgrading the linux-wlan utilites to 2.4.0. Other than the
usual small things (like replacing references to kfree_s with kfree) the
work was going pretty smoothly.
I spent a good hour though, trying to debug one
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 21:28:13 -0800,
Martin Bogomolni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
c02817f0 usb_match_id_R__ver_usb_match_id
The solution was to add the #include linux/modversions.h header
into each of the drivers affected.
Wrong. See http://www.tux.org/lkml/#s8-8
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
I downloaded the pcmcia-cs 3.1.24 package and hand-merged the bugfix(es?)
into 2.4.1's xirc2ps_cs.c. A(n attempt at a) patch to bring 2.4.1
up to pcmcia-cs's version is attached to this email. So far, no
problems, but it'll be at least 48 hours before I can say whether
it happens or not.. This
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Mike Galbraith wrote:
Where exactly do you see the leaks?
(I don't have a solid grip yet.. just starting to seek)
Heh. I figured this must be a nice defenseless little buglet
I could pick on (ramfs is pretty darn simple). Critter might
not be quite as defenseless as I
You know where to get it:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.1-3.diff.gz
Fixes:
1) pskb_expand_tail could corrupt SKB frag lists in some
cases, leading to OOPS
2) Need to check for out of window data even in the
partial packet cases of tcp_data_queue
3)
Hi,
I asked David Hinds to write up an outline of the things that
will be needed to get PCMCIA support cleanly and completely
integrated into the kernel tree.
David has expressed that he'll not be able to participate in
this work. He has his hands full with his day job and his
role as
kernel source is broken as designed. /usr/include/{linux,asm} must be
real directories that are shipped as part of glibc, not symlinks to
some random version of the kernel. Fix /usr/include.
You need to fix the kernel headers too - libc5 doesnt work otherwise
-
To unsubscribe from this
Please, do not do so. That depends on the PACKAGE name and version, and there
is no standard way of versioning a patched gcc.
The -54 is a RH'ism, for example Mandrake Cooker includes patches from
different sources, and gcc is versioned like
werewolf:~# rpm -q gcc
gcc-2.96-0.33mdk
Thats
I'm porting some software to Linux that requires use of a bidirectional,
named pipe. The architecture is as follows: A server creates a named pipe
Pipes are not bidirectional in Linux. We follow traditional non stream
behaviour
/dev/spx". I experiemented with socket-based pipes under
compiler (e.g. on sparc64). This test will barf on gcc-2.96 up to -67 and
Jakub
ehhmm..
didn't barf here with 2.96-70.
Which is correct
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Please read the FAQ at
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile devfsd on my system running RedHat linux 7.0
> (kernel 2.2.16-22). I get the error "RTLD_NEXT" undefined. I am not
> sure where this symbol is defined. Is there anything that I am missing
> on my system.
>
It's a
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:13:45AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > the used board BP6 (abit), apics enabled. non-overclocked. card is a
> >
> > 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> > RTL-8029(AS)
>
> Try 2.4.1ac - that should fix it
ok, downloading the -ac1 patch; I'll
Prasanna P Subash writes:
> I looked at the skb_recv_datagram code and noticed that wait_for_packet is not
> returning an error, even while trying to read a closed socket.
> Anyways here is a patch against 2.4.1 that will fix the issue.
> Please feel free to flame me about the patch :)
oops, I forgot to send this to linux-kernel as well...
- Original Message -
From: "Nicholas Knight" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "David D.W. Downey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:24 AM
Subject: Re: VT82C686A corruption with 2.4.x
> - Original Message -
>
On 01-Feb-2001 Roeland Th. Jansen wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 03:38:28PM -0600, Mark Orr wrote:
>> I dont like to be the sort of person who, when people report problems,
>> fires back "it works fine here!"...but...just as a point of reference,
>> I have a Hayes ESP too -- it's connected to
"H. Peter Anvin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> What happened with this being a management tool for shared memory
> segments?!
Unfortunately we lost this ability in the 2.4.0-test series. SYSV shm
now works only on an internal mounted instance and does not link the
directory entry to the deleted
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 07:32:55PM -0800, Mike Castle wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 12:19:56AM +, Alan Chandler wrote:
> > I now find myself confused with the new approach.
>
> try "man -k disc" and compare the output with "man -k disk"
>
> Since nearly all of the utilities refer to
I know I've seen this in the past, but the answer slips my mind and I
can't find anything in the archives.
I've just set up a box w/ an aic7xxx card. The boot drive hangs off
that card. During installation, the boot drive is sda. Lilo contains
"root=/dev/sda8".
I compiled a new kernel
"David S. Miller" wrote:
>
> ...
> Finally, please do some tests on loopback. It is usually a great
> way to get "pure software overhead" measurements of our TCP stack.
Here we are. TCP and NFS/UDP over lo.
Machine is a dual-PII. I didn't bother running CPU utilisation
testing while
Hi *,
i just backported the 2.4.x serial.c changes to enable MAGIC_SYSRQ via
serial console
on 2.2.18. Patch is working ok so far, i have included it here, maybe it
is useful for
someone. You need to enable CONFIG_SERIAL_CONSOLE && CONFIG_MAGIC_SYSRQ
to use it.
To trigger MAGIC_SYSRQ send a
Peter Samuelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
|> [Admin Mailing Lists]
|> > i have no bits directory
|>
|> Really? What version of libc, and on what Linux distro? I thought all
|> versions of glibc2 had /usr/include/bits/.
No, it was introduced in glibc 2.0.5.
Andreas.
--
Andreas Schwab
"Michael B. Trausch" wrote:
[...]
> DevFSd provides symlinks as follows:
>
> /dev/ttyS0 = /dev/tts/0
> /dev/tty0 = /dev/vc/0
> /dev/pty* = /dev/pty/*
>
> Until programs use the new names (e.g., init should tell getty to use
> /dev/vc/0 instead of /dev/tty0), and
I want to install on a RAID volume controlled by a Mylex 170.
Built an image of a 2.4.1 with DAC960/DAC1100 "compiled in" and copied
it over vmlinuz on a Red Hat 7 boot diskette (boot.img).
I entered this at the boot prompt
boot: linux root=/dev/rd/c0d0
DAC960 appears to detect correctly the
Hi!
Kernel 2.4.1-ac1 doesn't boot on a vaio c1ve (crusoe). I boot a kernel
via the usb floppy drive, and it ends with:
...
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
POSIX conformance testing by UNIFIX
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd98e, last bus=0
PCI: Using configuration type 1
PCI: Probing
> Here it hangs hard. It used to boot with 2.4.0 and 2.4.1-prex Should I
> try to determine which patch made the fatal change? Should I send my
That would be great.
Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body
Hello,
with ReiserFS support in 2.4.1 I have decided to give it a try.
I created a filesystem on a spare partition, mounted it as /mnt,
and tried to use it. The kernel crashed - I am able to reproduce it
with the following steps:
- boot linux with init=/bin/bash
- [optional]
Hi Alan,
> > Here it hangs hard. It used to boot with 2.4.0 and 2.4.1-prex Should I
> > try to determine which patch made the fatal change? Should I send my
>
> That would be great.
>
> Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
It does boot. :-) Is there something I can do now?
All,
I updated the Cisco local directors in front of this email cluster. ECN
should work now, let me know if you have any further troubles.
Adelphia isn't a bad ISP, we are just a little to big for our own good
sometimes, and getting in touch with the right people to solve problems like
this
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> int
> main(int argc, const char* argv[])
> {
> int retval;
> int sockets[2];
> char buf[1];
>
> retval = socketpair(PF_UNIX, SOCK_DGRAM, 0, sockets);
> if (retval != 0)
> {
> perror("socketpair");
> exit(1);
> }
>
On 2 Feb 01 at 3:35, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> On Fri, 2 Feb 2001 01:37:28 +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> > On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > > * NMI watchdog cleanups: mark setup_apic_nmi_watchdog() as __init,
> > > fix the K7 init code to not leave any perfctr MSR uninitialised,
Georg Nikodym ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Also, RH7's /etc/rc.sysinit can already start devfsd automatically
> with the following line:
>
> [ -e /dev/.devfsd -a -x /sbin/devfsd ] && /sbin/devfsd /dev
>
> So, all you have to do is create an empty file /dev/.devfsd
That file is created by
This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
reiserfs Makefile.
Hans
Jan Kasprzak wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> with ReiserFS support in 2.4.1 I have decided to give it a try.
> I created a filesystem on a spare partition, mounted it as /mnt,
> and
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:13:45AM +, Alan Cox wrote:
> > the used board BP6 (abit), apics enabled. non-overclocked. card is a
> >
> > 00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd.
> > RTL-8029(AS)
>
> Try 2.4.1ac - that should fix it
ok, it doesn't crash (the first test)
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 03:44:07AM -0600, Mark Orr wrote:
> Well that surely shouldnt happen...I use minicom all the time (I still
> call BBSes), and havent had any crashes. I can quit/disconnect, or
> quit/stay connected and it works okay. I've even got it set up to
> use 23bps, which is
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 09:25:08PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> > No. Just allow passing the multiple of the devices blocksize over
> > ll_rw_block.
>
> That was just one example: you need the sub-ios just as much when
> you split up an IO over stripe boundaries in LVM or raid0, for
>
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 10:07:44PM +, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> No. I want something good for zero-copy IO in general, but a lot of
> that concerns the problem of interacting with the user, and the basic
> center of that interaction in 99% of the interesting cases is either a
> user VM
On Thu, Feb 01, 2001 at 11:18:56PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > A kiobuf is 124 bytes, a buffer_head 96. And a buffer_head is additionally
> > used for caching data, a kiobuf not.
>
> Go measure the cost of a distant cache miss, then
Recompile with pre 2.96.
John
> Hello,
>
> with ReiserFS support in 2.4.1 I have decided to give it a try.
> I created a filesystem on a spare partition, mounted it as /mnt,
> and tried to use it. The kernel crashed - I am able to reproduce it
> with the following steps:
>
> -
Hans Reiser wrote:
: This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
: reiserfs Makefile.
:
OK, thanks. It works with older compiler (altough I use gcc 2.96
for a long time for compiling various 2.[34] kernels without problem).
-Yenya
--
\ Jan "Yenya"
> " " == Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Much the same story. Big increase in sendfile() efficiency,
> small drop in send() and NFS unchanged.
This is normal. The server doesn't do zero copy reads, but instead
copies from the page cache into an NFS-specific buffer
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Your latest patch passes all my testing.
>
> 2.4.1+irq-whacker+netperf:APIC dies instantly
> 2.4.1+irq-whacker+netperf+patch: 8 million interrupts, then I got bored.
Linus, would you please apply the following patch for 2.4.2? The idea of
> This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
> reiserfs Makefile.
What makes you think its gcc 2.96 ?
If the person concerned can clarify what they built with (2.96-69 or
egcs-1.1.2 (kgcc)), that would be useful.
I've certainly done the Reiserfs testing I
> > Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
>
> It does boot. :-) Is there something I can do now?
Ok that means its something in my patches.
Time to do some patch searching. I see two probable candidates - the local apic
code and the pci changes.
Does 2.4.1 with the following patch
> Hans Reiser wrote:
> : This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
> : reiserfs Makefile.
> :
> OK, thanks. It works with older compiler (altough I use gcc 2.96
> for a long time for compiling various 2.[34] kernels without problem).
Ok which 2.96
Hi...
Fredrik Vraalsen wrote:
>
> This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with
> DVD playback in OMS (Open Media System). With the stock 2.4.1 kernel
> OMS will only play up to a certain point on the DVD before it complains
> about no more data left on input (basically
Hello,
Szymon Polom wrote:
> Fredrik Vraalsen wrote:
> >
> > This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with
> > DVD playback in OMS (Open Media System). With the stock 2.4.1 kernel
> > OMS will only play up to a certain point on the DVD before it complains
> > about no
Mike Harrold <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>My understanding (going back to the 80s) is that the correct term is
>disc. "disk" is short for diskette. (discette would be pronounced as
>"dissect" (think miscellaneous), so "diskette" was used instead.
No, this isn't right. "Disk" was used for hard
Hi Alan,
> > > Firstly however does 2.4.1 (Linus) boot ?
> >
> > It does boot. :-) Is there something I can do now?
>
> Ok that means its something in my patches.
>
> Time to do some patch searching. I see two probable candidates - the
> local apic code and the pci changes.
>
> Does 2.4.1
Alan Cox wrote:
: > Hans Reiser wrote:
: >: This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and complain, in the
: >: reiserfs Makefile.
: >:
: > OK, thanks. It works with older compiler (altough I use gcc 2.96
: > for a long time for compiling various 2.[34] kernels without
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> That problem solved by compiling the correct SCSI driver into
> the kernel. Now it is the problem with input console. It says
> Unable to open Input console. This is after mounting VFS.
Same thing ... you haven't compiled in a console driver.
I
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
>
> Linus,
>
> There is a significative amount of people who use sard's additional block
> layer statistics (I'm one of them). It would be nice to have it in the
> official free.
Definitely.
Cheers
Chris
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the
Run the following script (It's been tried on linux-2.2.x and linux-2.4.x):
#!/bin/sh
cd /tmp
mkdir x
cd x
mkdir x y z
strace -etrace=rename,mkdir,rmdir,chmod mv x z
echo -
chmod -w y
strace -etrace=rename,mkdir,rmdir,chmod mv y z
The output:
rename("x", "z/x") = 0
I must say that I dont know what the standards say, but...
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 01:28:28PM +, David Howells wrote:
> (1) Linux can't rename directories that are marked as read-only. This is
> strange because the directories actually being modified _do_ have write
> permission.
Hi,
I just thought I'd pass piece of information this to those of you who have
done work on the kernel. Attached is a PNG image of the CPU usage graph on
one of my most loaded webservers over the past four weeks. It shows the
HUGE difference in CPU consumption from the now old 2.2+ kernel;
On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 10:09:21 Drew Bertola wrote:
>
> I know I've seen this in the past, but the answer slips my mind and I
> can't find anything in the archives.
>
> I've just set up a box w/ an aic7xxx card. The boot drive hangs off
> that card. During installation, the boot drive is sda.
> 2.4.1. rebuilt here and with a floodping towards my machine causes a
> hard crash where nothing works anymore.
I'm currently running 2.4.1 with Maciej's patch-2.4.0-io_apic-4. Additionally,
I disabled focus_processor in apic.c to get rid of some network delays. Flood
pings both from and to
- Original Message -
From: "David Ford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Michael J. Dikkema" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:58 PM
Subject: Re: 2.4.1 - can't read root fs (devfs maybe?)
> "Michael J. Dikkema" wrote:
>
> > I went from 2.4.0 to
- Original Message -
From: "Roeland Th. Jansen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:16 PM
Subject: hard crashes 2.4.0/1 with NE2K stuff
> 2.4.1. rebuilt here and with a floodping towards my machine causes a
> hard crash where nothing works
Hi,
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 12:51:35PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> >
> > If I have a page vector with a single offset/length pair, I can build
> > a new header with the same vector and modified offset/length to split
> > the vector in two without copying it.
>
> You just say in the
On Thu, Feb 01 2001, Fredrik Vraalsen wrote:
>
> This is a small patch to Linux kernel 2.4.1 that fixes a problem with
> DVD playback in OMS (Open Media System). With the stock 2.4.1 kernel
> OMS will only play up to a certain point on the DVD before it complains
> about no more data left on
Oh you English people,
why do you do it so complicated?
We even don't need a kernel locale.
Take the nominations as they are, color/colour,
disk/disc/diskette/floppy, etc.
And if you write by yourself, do it as you spell it.
I'd even write it German if I wasn't used to speak
fully English
>If these 3 drives are on the adaptec aha-2940UW, I get an oops (reply for
>oops as I have to do it again and capture it) and the system locks (in
>interrupt handler, not syncing) when the copy completes. I did a timed cp
>the first time and it took 3.5 minutes and crashed as soon as I got the
On Fri, 2 Feb 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Thanks applied, guess we need another work-around for buggy changers...
>
> --
> Jens Axboe
To quote my friend, about comments agreeing with Hale Landis.
WHY!!! are you still supporting junk? ;-)
Cheers,
Andre Hedrick
Linux ATA Development
ASL
Michael Pacey wrote:
> On Fri, 02 Feb 2001 10:09:21 Drew Bertola wrote:
> >
> > I know I've seen this in the past, but the answer slips my mind and I
> > can't find anything in the archives.
> >
> > I've just set up a box w/ an aic7xxx card. The boot drive hangs off
> > that card. During
Mikael,
I've forgotten to cc you when sending Ingo my patch-2.4.0-ac12-upapic-19
fixes a few days ago, my apologies. Since the two patches conflict with
each other, I've merged them together and provide the result below.
Please check if it is fine for you.
I'm unsure about the K7_NMI_EVENT
> "M" == Meunier writes:
M> Not true. I'm pretty sure /dev/.devfsd is only created when you
M> mount devfs at boot time or via mount -t devfs devfs /dev in your
M> system initialization script. Creating /dev/.devfsd with touch
M> defeats the purpose of /etc/rc.sysinit example.
Right
Paul Flinders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> > Looks like TUX caught MS's attention:
> > http://www.spec.org/osg/web99/results/res2000q4/web99-20001211-00082.html
> >
> > Anyone know if their method of achieveing this is as flexible as TUX, or is
> > their "SWC 3.0"
On Jan 29 2001, Dylan Griffiths wrote:
> The VIA KT133 chipset exhibits the following bugs under Linux 2.2.17 and
> 2.4.0:
> 1) PS/2 mouse cursor randomly jumps to upper right hand corner of screen and
> locks for a bit
> 2) Detects a maximum of 64mb of ram, unless worked around by the "mem="
>
On Fri, Feb 02, 2001 at 02:52:16PM +0100, Frank de Lange wrote:
> I'm currently running 2.4.1 with Maciej's patch-2.4.0-io_apic-4. Additionally,
> I disabled focus_processor in apic.c to get rid of some network delays. Flood
> pings both from and to this system do not cause any problems, other
> > Does 2.4.1 with the following patch applied still boot
>
> No, it doesn't boot anymore (hangs at probing pci hardware again).
> I hope this helps. :-)
Excellent. That means I have a good handle on the problem. It also means I
know which bits to not send Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this
Hi,
I tried to run ISDN STAC compression on my 2.4.0 kernel. It compiled fine
but once I dialed in and started to use STAC compression it gave me a big
fat oops. I mailed Andre Beck ([EMAIL PROTECTED]), the author of
isdn_lzscomp.c (available at www.isdn4linux.de) if this was a known problem,
On Friday, February 02, 2001 12:26:52 PM + Alan Cox
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This is why our next patch will detect the use of gcc 2.96, and
>> complain, in the reiserfs Makefile.
>
> What makes you think its gcc 2.96 ?
>
We have had many reports of exactly this symlink problem, and
> > What makes you think its gcc 2.96 ?
>
> We have had many reports of exactly this symlink problem, and each time it
> was a redhat user with a gcc 2.96, and switching to kgcc fixed it. We have
> one report (now two with Alan's) that 2.96-69 does not show this crash.
Ok. That would make
> > > > eth0: memprobe, Can't find memory at 0xc!
I get the same memprobe error. Haven't bothered with it for some time as I
had problems getting the IBMMCASCSI recognized in 2.4.x but that seems to
have been fixed now.
>I have patches that I believe fix this, but their own my box at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
>
> What we really need is the ability to
> echo en_US/en_GB > /proc/sys/kernel/locale
> so you can choose the one you want.
>
Heh. But you don't need the explicit tags in the en_GB version.
--
dwmw2
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Random quick poking
Does this fix the ramfs problem in -ac ?
--- fs/ramfs/inode.c~ Wed Jan 31 22:02:16 2001
+++ fs/ramfs/inode.cFri Feb 2 14:51:47 2001
@@ -174,7 +174,6 @@
inode->i_blocks += IBLOCKS_PER_PAGE;
rsb->free_pages--;
hi,
I have a D-Link DFE-530TX Rev A, PCI ethernet card, but it refuses
to work.
I have looked at http://www.scyld.com/network/index.html#pci
which sugests using the via-rhine driver.
I did this and compiled it into the kernel. It detects it at boot (via-
rhine v1.08-LK1.1.6 8/9/2000 Donald
I've started cleaning up mpparse.c/ioapic.c for the addition of acpi
support, but I got stuck in the mess of global variables.
What's the purpose of of the irq_2_pin in io_apic.c?
I assume that I overlook something, but afaics the code allows one
physical interrupt source (e.g. INTA from device
Maciej W. Rozycki writes:
> I've forgotten to cc you when sending Ingo my patch-2.4.0-ac12-upapic-19
> fixes a few days ago, my apologies. Since the two patches conflict with
> each other, I've merged them together and provide the result below.
> Please check if it is fine for you.
Looks
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Andre Hedrick wrote:
> Sorry, but the ALI code was written based upon ix86 :-(
> Where were you guys during 2.3.X development?
We had lots of problems with the few 2.3.x kernels we downloaded; and R
effort was needed elsewhere.
Would it help if a UP1100 was somehow made
> From: Rogerio Brito [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> While I don't have problems with the Duron above, I do have a
> 486 here with 8MB of memory that I intend to use as a router
> for my local LAN, but 2.4.0 only recognizes 7MB, while 2.2.18
> recognizes all 8MB. Under
Jan Kasprzak wrote:
: :
: : 2.96-69 should be ok (thats the one I've been using without trouble). The
: : original one with RH 7.0 off the CD does miscompile a few kernel things.
:
: It is the original one. I'll try with the -69:
:
With 2.96-69 the reiserfs seems to work well.
> : It is the original one. I'll try with the -69:
> :
> With 2.96-69 the reiserfs seems to work well.
> Sorry for the confusion, I forgot to upgrade the gcc on my machine.
Excellent. Im just glad to know its a fixed bug.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
(apologies in case anybody should get this twice - was catched by the DUL
blocker again. Seems time to change my mail routing anyway...)
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> > Probably I've missed this because the last time I hit such a thing was
> > when my ob800 bios mapped the cardbus
201 - 300 of 460 matches
Mail list logo
