Hi Jordan,
We have exactly the same problem but in our case it depends on the
following three conditions: 1, kernel 2.4 (2.2 is fine), 2, windows ip
header compression turned on, 3, a free internet access provider in
Holland called 'Wish' (which seemes to stand for 'I Wish I had
Russell King writes:
The following patch fixes these warnings:
Thanks, applied.
Later,
David S. Miller
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Russell King writes:
With CONFIG_SYSCTL=n, I get the following warnings:
sysctl_net_ipv4.c:50: warning: `tcp_retr1_max' defined but not used
sysctl_net_ipv4.c:52: warning: `ip_local_port_range_min' defined but not used
sysctl_net_ipv4.c:53: warning: `ip_local_port_range_max' defined
Usual spot:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/davem/zerocopy-2.4.2-2.diff.gz
Changes since last installment:
1) More errors in TCP receive queue collapser are discovered and
fixed.
2) Several URG handling details on receive side are made more
consistent and sane.
3)
I just wrote:
I just had a clever idea - on a single-level index you put the header
and index data in block 0, and put the directory data in the first
indirect block (11 sparse blocks, instead of 511).
To clarify (with wonderful ASCII art), an un-indexed directory would have
data blocks like:
H. Peter Anvin wrote:
Martin Mares wrote:
Hello!
True. Note too, though, that on a filesystem (which we are, after all,
talking about), if you assume a large linear space you have to create a
file, which means you need to multiply the cost of all random-access
operations
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 10:09:29AM +0200, Catalin BOIE wrote:
Hi, guys!
I want to report a problem.
I have an Athlon 900MHz / 256 MB RAM, chipset: VIA VT82c686B, IBM
harddrive (IBM-DTLA-307030).
At first I tried kernel 2.2.16:
- hdparm -u1 -d1 -X69 /dev/hda = I get 36MB/s
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Neil Brown wrote:
On Sunday February 18, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Neil, all,
The nfs daemons run holding the global kernel lock. They still hold
this lock over calls to file_op's read and write.
[snip]
Dropping the kernel lock around read and write in
Hi all,
I found that sunhme.c doesn't check ioremap() return value and doesn't
call iounmap() on module unload. Attached patch (for 2.4.1-ac20) should fix it,
compiles clearly, but untested (I have no such hardware).
Best regards.
--
Andrey Panin| Embedded systems software
The box is a Dell Lattitude CP laptop (P233 96meg ram). I've been doing
IrDA work using 2.4.1-ac20. I was debugging some problems in my code(user
space) when my vim froze (other VTs were fine). I killed the process and
the kernel oopsed. Unfortunatly, I haven't been able to reproduce it.
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 05:06:12 +
From: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike A. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Linux Kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Re: Incorrect module init message..
Hi!
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 10:12:25PM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Christoph Hellwig]
It would be really good to have something devfs-like just for LVM in
setups that don't use LVM, so we could avoid mounting root read/write
^^^devfs?
Yes...
for device-creation.
There is probably just some miscoordination between the kernel
mainteiners, but anyway. The 3c59x driver shipped with all
official 2.4.x kernels lacks the 'medialock' feature.
The result on 3c900 10M/combo cards can be unpleasant:
kernel log fills up quickly and only reboot helps.
However,
Which -ac series patch does this match up with or superceed
ie should this be considered superior to -ac19 ?
I'll be merging most of the 2.4.2 changes if there are any I dont have with
Linus for the next -ac which will be a 2.4.2-ac1 and thus somewhat shorter
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
and the transmitter is unrestricted, what happens?
Does it have to do with TCP_FORMAL_WINDOW (eg. automatically reduce window
size to zero when queue backs up?)
Read RFC1122. Basically your guess is right. The sender sends data, and gets
back acks saying 'window 0'. It will then do
We can take page faults in interrupt handlers in 2.4 so I had to use a
spinlock, but that sounds the same
We can? Woah, please explain.
vmalloc does a lazy load of the tlb. That can lead to the exception table
being walked on an IRQ
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
We can take page faults in interrupt handlers in 2.4 so I had to use a
spinlock, but that sounds the same
Umm? The above doesn't really make sense.
We can take a page fault on the kernel region with the lazy page
directory filling, but that code will just set the PGD entry and exit
If you want stability, run the real Linus 2.4. If you want all the
I think the key word is actually probably 'predictability'. The Linus tree
is conservative. (IMHO too conservative and probably in his not conservative
enough 8))
really minor bug fixes and more of the experimental code, run
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Tigran Aivazian wrote:
So, one would normally expect this to mean an SMP board rather than
multiple processors, _HOWEVER_, I can imagine a very clever MP-aware BIOS
implementation which detects that there are many processors and prepares
MP floating config table and does
TCP _requires_ the remote end ack every 2nd frame regardless of progress.
um, I thought the spec says that ACK every 2nd segment is a SHOULD not a
MUST?
Yes its a SHOULD in RFC1122, but in any normal environment pretty much a
must and I know of no stack significantly violating it.
After I posted the URL in the comments on tonight's Slashdot article on "Making
Software Suck Less", I thought I should incorporate some of the comments people
had made about my article over the past few weeks:
Using Test Suites to Validate the Linux Kernel
Hi,
The following piece of code in ll_rw_block() aims to limit the number of
locked buffers by making processes throttle on IO if the number of on
flight requests is bigger than a high watermaker. IO will only start
again if we're under a low watermark.
if
Hello everybody,
looking through the sources I found several pieces like
lib/vsprintf.c, line 111:
const char *digits="0123456789abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwxyz";
As tested with egcs-2.91.60 even with -O3 there is a difference
between
const char
Hi Linus,
Hi LKML people,
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:19:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article 97230a$16k$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
allocate blocks one at a time. Make the blocksize something nice and
big, not just 4kB or 8kB or something.
Btw, this
Building with gcc-2.96:
In file included from /usr/src/linux/include/linux/raid/md.h:50,
from init/main.c:24:
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/raid/md_k.h: In function `pers_to_level':
/usr/src/linux/include/linux/raid/md_k.h:41: warning: control reaches end of non
-void function
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:52:51AM -0600, Peter Samuelson wrote:
[Peter Samuelson]
How often do you run MAKEDEV or vgscan?
[Christoph Hellwig]
On every bootup, _before_ doing mount -a
A mere 'vgchange -ay' works fine for *my* boot processes. Is there a
particular reason to do
Alan Cox wrote:
I think the key word is actually probably 'predictability'. The Linus tree
is conservative. (IMHO too conservative and probably in his not conservative
enough 8))
Hmm, given that there are several patches in your tree that never seem
to make it to Linus' tree, would it make
Hmm, given that there are several patches in your tree that never seem
to make it to Linus' tree, would it make sense to flag patches that
should go into 2.4 as "Not for Alan; Linus _please_ pick it up" (and to
keep on pushing until Linus does) ?
Im trying to push stuff to Linus in a
Hello!
I want to report a constant problem I'm having with the loopback block driver
in the new releases of the 2.4.x series of the Linux kernel.
The problem is that when that when trying to use a loop device the process
hangs (whether it is mount/mke2fs, etc, but not losetup). And it can't be
Rebuilt the kernel using using 2.4.1 + patch-2.4.1-ac20 :
Initial state is good, and now ping works. However, if I run IPTRAF, then
the card grinds to a halt after receiving about 2.6 Mbytes on try 1, then
11 Mbytes on try 2, after which it will neither receive or transmit :-(
After this the
Good morning,
I did a comparison between 2.4 and 2.2.18 (+ Andrea's patches), using the
respective latest SuSE kernels, but the results should apply to the versions
in general.
Situation: SAP R/3 + SAP DB + benchmark driver running on a single node 4 CPU
SMP machine, tuned down to 1GB of RAM.
On Wed, 7 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
report got ignored). After running for 4 days I got many, many oopses.
They were trigerred by xscreensaver, and some other X-related apps.
After dopping to runlevel 3, the system seemed O.K. Nothing unusual in
graphics: Riva TNT2
That makes it harder
From: Daniel Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 08:24:08 +0100
Content-Type: text/plain
Is it worth it? Well, it means you lose an index entry from each
directory block, thus reducing your fanout at each node of the tree by a
worse case of 0.7% in the worst
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ok, the patch looks huge (it's a meg and a half compressed, 6+ megs
uncompressed), but most of the patch by far is S/390 updates and the new
Cris architecture.
I get this while compiling 2.4.2:
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/src/linux/include -Wall
Could someone make sure IBM's latest ServeRAID drivers
get merged into the mainstream kernel? The standard
kernel sources contain a hopelessly outdated version.
IBM do not seem to actively submit their work, so that's
why I am asking.
You can find version 4.50 at
(Or turn off minix partitions)
diff -u --new-file --recursive --exclude-from /usr/src/exclude
linux.vanilla/include/linux/genhd.h linux.ac/include/linux/genhd.h
--- linux.vanilla/include/linux/genhd.h Thu Jan 4 22:50:47 2001
+++ linux.ac/include/linux/genhd.h Thu Feb 22 10:24:06 2001
@@
Could someone make sure IBM's latest ServeRAID drivers
get merged into the mainstream kernel? The standard
kernel sources contain a hopelessly outdated version.
4.50 has the same Linux kernel code as the stuff merged. The newer stuff is
firmware only it seems
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Thu, Feb 22 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The following piece of code in ll_rw_block() aims to limit the number of
locked buffers by making processes throttle on IO if the number of on
flight requests is bigger than a high watermaker. IO will only start
again if we're under a low watermark.
"Adam Sampson wrote:"
I get this while compiling 2.4.2:
msdos.c:403: `MINIX_PARTITION' undeclared (first use in this function)
msdos.c:403: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
msdos.c:403: for each function it appears in.)
msdos.c:406: `MINIX_NR_SUBPARTITIONS' undeclared
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Neil Brown) writes:
I am looking forward to seeing lots of downloads and absolutely no
problem reports but is seems unlikely.
Alan Cox has suggested that these changes may not be appropriate for
2.4, so we might have to wait for 2.5 to see them on kernel.org, but
we
Hi,
With CONFIG_SYSCTL=n, I get the following warnings:
sysctl_net_ipv4.c:50: warning: `tcp_retr1_max' defined but not used
sysctl_net_ipv4.c:52: warning: `ip_local_port_range_min' defined but not used
sysctl_net_ipv4.c:53: warning: `ip_local_port_range_max' defined but not used
These are
Hi !
I'm running 2.4.x or 2.2.19 (2.4.x is fine but I experienced a bad Oops using
my hamradio packet radio system with it ... and nobody seems interested by my
reports .. sniff).
I would like to change my HDD.
My motherboard is a Asus P5A with a K6-2 500 (overcloked to 550hz .. in test).
The
Hi,
In 2.4.2 with CONFIG_SYSCTL=n, I'm seeing the following warnings
while compiling af_unix.c:
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/v2.4/linux-p720t/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
-fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe -mapcs-32 -march=armv4 -mtune=arm7tdmi
-mshort-load-bytes -msoft-float
Hi,
After having tried to thrash out what exactly is the kernel
interface for telldir/seekdir w.r.t. the existence of negative offsets
with the glibc people, I've finally found a way to work within the
current scheme.
The problem at hand is that we currently would like to support the
Well, here's the whole situtation...
Compiled 2.4.2 and reboot forcing fsck. No errors.
Tried mounting a cd image via loopback to see if loopback was working
again. Mount hangs. Reboot command stalled waiting for filesystems to
unmount. Force with alt-sysreq-s,u,b. Booted w/o any errors.
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.2-ac1
o Merge Linus 2.4.2 tree
| We now have disagreeing ymfpci fixes. I've kept the ones
| I tested for now.
o Back out sr.c change(me)
o Fix moxa smartio driver
Hey,
is there any documentation , how the software watchdog is implemented ?
I'm particularly interested in programming the IO-APIC. What do I have
to do that the PIT gets rerouted so that it triggers an NMI.
Thanks in advance.
Michael Peter
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
"Markus" == Markus Germeier [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Markus Tell me if I can provide you with further data to nail down
Markus this bug.
Alan forwarded a patch to me from DaveM which fixed it for me.
Markus Jes: I thought about your information that ssh connections do
Markus not show this
Hi all,
I did some further investigation and found the following:
It seems to me that this is a linux - solaris problem. I have no
problems with AIX 4.1.4, IRIX 6.5 or WIN2K. However all solaris boxes
I have access to (2.6, 7, 8, sparc and intel) give me a "connection
closed" after 2h, which is
Andrey Panin writes:
I found that sunhme.c doesn't check ioremap() return value and doesn't
call iounmap() on module unload. Attached patch (for 2.4.1-ac20) should fix it,
compiles clearly, but untested (I have no such hardware).
Thanks I've applied this patch.
Later,
David S. Miller
This message was apparently intended to be sent to the list.
[]s, Roger...
- Forwarded message from Pozsar Balazs [EMAIL PROTECTED] -
From: Pozsar Balazs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Rogerio Brito [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [patch] VIA 4.2x driver for 2.2 kernels
Date:
Hi,
I wrote a patch against 2.2.18 and 2.4.1 to have the kernel generate random
PIDs.
You can find it at http://vanheusden.com/Linux/security.php3 (amongst other
patches).
Beware: pretty much experimental and likely to make your linux-pc perform
like a
win95 platform.
Greetings,
Folkert van
Linux-2.4.2 does not have IPv6 support ???
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, dean gaudet wrote:
2.2.18 and 2.4 apparently have a patch called "arpfilter"
integrated which should allow you to:
# sysctl -w net.ipv4.conf.all.arpfilter=1
to get much stricter behaviour regarding ARP replies.
hmm, so i'm working with a 2.4.1-ac20-TUX-P5
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Can you guys test this patch, and let me know if it fixes Via audio
problems on your kernel?
It should apply against 2.4.1 or 2.4.1-acXX kernels.
high!
I tried to apply this patch to clean 2.4.1 and to 2.4.1-ac20, which has
the same via82cxxx_audio.c
Hi!
2.4.2 oopsed after several seconds. Just after launching ax25 related stuff.
Here is the raw Oops :
--
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address fffc
printing eip:
c0113cf3
*pde = 1063
*pde =
OOps = 0
EIP: 0010:[c0113cf3]
EFLAGS:
Now that people are discussing the right hash function to use,
and the amount of space taken by filenames in various schemes,
I wondered how these things are on a random machine.
Here some statistics.
Andries
--
Statistics on a
Then I tried kernel 2.4.1. I issued exactly the same hdparm command.
i got in syslog the message: "ide0: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not
functional"!
I had the same problem.
Add
append="ide0=ata66 ide1=ata66 ide0=autotune ide1=autotune hda=autotune
hdb=autotune hdc=autotune"
to lilo.conf.
Linux-2.4.2 does not have IPv6 support ???
Linux 2.2 and 2.4 have IPv6
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:38:48PM +0100, Ricardo Galli wrote:
Then I tried kernel 2.4.1. I issued exactly the same hdparm command.
i got in syslog the message: "ide0: Speed warnings UDMA 3/4/5 is not
functional"!
I had the same problem.
Add
append="ide0=ata66 ide1=ata66 ide0=autotune
Hello, I am trying to find the reason for very, very poor network
performance with sustained data transfers on Linux 2.4.1. I found
a work-around, but don't think user-mode code should have to provide
such work-arounds.
In the following, with Linux 2.4.1, on a dedicated 100/Base
link:
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
A rather incomprehensible message, so let's flesh this out a bit.
Basically the problem occurs when patching linux/fs/reiserfs/namei.c It
can't find it, presumably due to an error in 2.4.1, where it appears to
me
I messed up my subscription to this list yesterday so any answer to my question
didn't reach me (I looked through the archive up to 20:50 yesterday).
Now as I read my question again I decided to add some more details.
But when reading the buffer isn't allocated
This is of course rubbish. I meant
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
2.4.2-ac1
o Merge Linus 2.4.2 tree
...
Hi Alan,
is it possible that you send a list of all the changes in 2.4.2ac1
compared to plain 2.4.2?
Thanks in advance
Adrian
--
Nicht weil die
On Wednesday, February 21, 2001 07:30:47 PM -0800 Linus Torvalds
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Daniel Phillips wrote:
I'd love to hear the results from R5, as that seems to be the reiserfs
favourite, and I'm trying it out in 2.4.2 because it was so easy to plug
in..
4.50 has the same Linux kernel code as the stuff merged. The newer stuff is
firmware only it seems
The Linux kernel code comes with version 4.20. I count 128 lines of
"diff -u" output on ips.c and 44 on ips.h. It also looks like both
versions have different patches applied to them.
-
To
Christoph Baumann wrote:
is to do this in steps of PAGE_SIZE. What I'm looking for is a kernel routine
to force the mapping of previous unmapped pages. Browsing through the source
in mm/ I found make_pages_present(). Could this be the solution? I hadn't the
Have you already looked at
Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
You know all about this stuff, so probably I am mistaken.
However, my copy of SFF8020-r2.6 everywhere has
"Sense 02 ASC 3A: Medium not present" without giving
subcodes to distinguish Tray Open from No Disc.
So, it seems to me that drives
In list.kernel.owner, you wrote:
I want to report a constant problem I'm having with the loopback block driver
in the new releases of the 2.4.x series of the Linux kernel.
Pick up the loop patches from Axboe at :
*.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/axboe/patches/
I solved all my problems
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 05:38:53PM +0100, Norbert Roos wrote:
Christoph Baumann wrote:
is to do this in steps of PAGE_SIZE. What I'm looking for is a kernel routine
to force the mapping of previous unmapped pages. Browsing through the source
in mm/ I found make_pages_present(). Could
Hello,
I am listed as one of the authors of linux in the CREDITS file distributed
with the kernel. As I've moved, I ask you to change my adress as follows.
Old:
N: Kai Petzke
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: http://physik.tu-berlin.de/~wpp
P: 1024/B42868C1 D9 59 B9 98 BB 93 05 38 2E 3E 31 79 C3 65
There's nothing wrong with the mailing list. Pavel, please set your clock
correctly :-)
Tim
On Thu, Feb 22, 2001 at 04:45:15AM -0500, Mike A. Harris wrote:
On Sat, 1 Jan 2000, Pavel Machek wrote:
Date: Sat, 1 Jan 2000 05:06:12 +
From: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike A. Harris
Hi Tim,
thanks for answering. However, I found the problem for my laptop. It was due
to the broken /etc/sysconfig/apm-scripts/... in RH7.0 that was always executing
the xlock and xcreensaver on suspend. Correcting this script and not running
this xlock stuff the interrupt lost problem
Daniel writes:
All references to "." and ".." are now intercepted and never reach the
filesystem level.
Ted writes:
From: Daniel Phillips [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll leave that up to somebody else - we now have two alternatives, the
100%, no-compromise INCOMPAT solution, and the
Hello,
I plan to make a few changes to 3c90x.c (Ethhernet driver) located at
/usr/src/linux-2.2.16/drivers/net, in RH7. Since the correspondent
object file 3c90x.o resides in /lib/modules/2.2.16-20/net, I ask: how
shall I proceed in order to have the C file properly compiled and placed
in the
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Ingo Oeser wrote:
On Wed, Feb 21, 2001 at 09:19:45PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
In article 97230a$16k$[EMAIL PROTECTED],
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
allocate blocks one at a time. Make the blocksize something nice and
big, not just 4kB or 8kB or
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Marcus Ramos wrote:
Hello,
I plan to make a few changes to 3c90x.c (Ethhernet driver) located at
/usr/src/linux-2.2.16/drivers/net, in RH7. Since the correspondent
object file 3c90x.o resides in /lib/modules/2.2.16-20/net, I ask: how
shall I proceed in order to have
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
Mike Galbraith wrote:
On Wed, 21 Feb 2001, Adam Schrotenboer wrote:
A rather incomprehensible message, so let's flesh this out a bit.
Basically the problem occurs when patching linux/fs/reiserfs/namei.c It
can't find it,
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Marcus Ramos wrote:
Hello,
I plan to make a few changes to 3c90x.c (Ethhernet driver) located at
/usr/src/linux-2.2.16/drivers/net, in RH7. Since the correspondent
object file 3c90x.o resides in /lib/modules/2.2.16-20/net, I ask: how
shall I proceed in order to have
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Tim Wright wrote:
Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2001 10:01:32 -0800
From: Tim Wright [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Mike A. Harris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED],
Linux Kernel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Subject: Wrong data
Alan Cox wrote:
TCP _requires_ the remote end ack every 2nd frame regardless of progress.
um, I thought the spec says that ACK every 2nd segment is a SHOULD not a
MUST?
Yes its a SHOULD in RFC1122, but in any normal environment pretty much a
must and I know of no stack
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jes Sorensen wrote:
Alan forwarded a patch to me from DaveM which fixed it for me.
Jes, could you forward it here as well?
The problems I were seeing were much more than every 2 hrs, more like
every 10-15 mins. Anyway it seems it got fixed.
I've seen IRC sessions
I have two boxes that I immediately
tried upgrading the OS on. In both
cases I use a script to automate the
build with a saved off .config file.
simplified ..
untar linux tar ball
cp config.blat linux/.config
cd linux
make oldconfig
make menuconfig
cp .config ../config.blat
make bzImage
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Jens Axboe wrote:
On Thu, Feb 22 2001, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
The following piece of code in ll_rw_block() aims to limit the number of
locked buffers by making processes throttle on IO if the number of on
flight requests is bigger than a high watermaker. IO will
Hi Heitzso,
On the other box I have yet to get a
successful build (using a .config that
runs 2.4.2-pre4 fine). ld complains
about a missing binary file.
ld: cannot open binary: no such file or directory
ld is not complaining about a missing file.
The problem is with the version of ld you
The problem is with the version of ld you use. Some versions
are using
ld --oformat and other versions ld -oformat
This is quite a recent issue. So check the version of you linker.
You can solve the problem changing :
./arch/i386/boot/Makefile: $(LD) -Ttext 0x0 -s -oformat
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 13:55:28 -0500,
Heitzso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
ld: cannot open binary: no such file or directory
Binutils incompatibility. Linus, please apply.
Index: 2.1/arch/i386/boot/Makefile
--- 2.1/arch/i386/boot/Makefile Fri, 05 Jan 2001 13:42:29 +1100 kaos
Hi,
Using the pdc202xx version 0.30 driver for a Promise 20265
chip under the 2.4.0 kernel I'm getting file system
corruptions. Whats odd though is that e2fsck can't correct
the corrupted file systems. Here is the setup :-
Hardware: AMD Athlon
Asus A7V motherboard
Via Apollo
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Alan Cox wrote:
three Netgear NICs and am experiencing considerable trouble with the=20
combination:
Kernel 2.4.[01]:ifconfig shows that the card see's traffic on t=
he=20
network, but does not transmit anything (no response to ping).
Use a current
See:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/2/17107.html
IBM withdrew the proposal.
mordy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ
In reply to message
From: Lazarus Long [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (BUG) 3c509b and kernel 2.4.x
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2001 12:13:59 -0800
(Replying to my own message. :-/ )
Non-modular support for 3Com EtherLinkIII cards, specifically the ISA
3c509b, worked fine in kernel 2.2.18.
I hate to pollute your mailboxes with stuff that almost certainly
doesn't concern you, but my ISP went down for about 6-7 hours yesterday
after I posted this.. sigh So, um, if you couldn't get in - please try
again!
(Sorry to the rest of ya'..)
- Words by Jay Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] [010221
I am getting NFS errors/warnings
VFS: Mounted root (nfs filesystem).
Freeing unused kernel memory: 196k freed
nfs_refresh_inode: inode number mismatch
expected (0x806/0x6246a), got (0x806/0x62b48)
^/var/run/utmp
^/var/log/wtmp**
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Daniel Phillips) wrote on 20.02.01 in
01022020011905.18944@gimli:
But the current hash function is just a place holder, waiting for
an better version based on some solid theory. I currently favor the
idea of using crc32 as the default hash function, but I welcome
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Martin Mares) wrote on 22.02.01 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
One could avoid this, but it would mean designing the whole filesystem in a
completely different way -- merge all directories to a single gigantic
hash table and use (directory ID,file name) as a key, but we were
Hi,
Gigabyte (and/or AMI and/or VIA) decided that it is not worth
of effort to create full mptable and since version F5a for 6VXD7
they do not report PCI interrupts as 16-19, but only as traditional
0-15 (and they do not report them as conforms/conforms, but as
active-lo/level).
For now
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001, Adrian Bunk wrote:
Hi Alan,
is it possible that you send a list of all the changes in 2.4.2ac1
compared to plain 2.4.2?
I doubt Alan has time for requests like this (but more power to him, if
he does)...
His patch is diff'd against 2.4.2, so just look at the patch. I
[1.] One line summary of the problem:
(Seemingly) random file system corruption
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
The other day, I downloaded the latest version (at the time) of the kernel:
2.4.1. I had made the kernel a couple times, and had done "make distclean" a
couple times.
If it's a VALinux computer, contact them.
They've made some progress in tracking different eepro100 problems.
Andrey
On Mon, Feb 19, 2001 at 08:32:07PM +0200, Ionut Dumitrache wrote:
The integrated LAN on Intel boards with i815 chipset
apparently is not fully supported. In
Any suggestions would be aprreciated. Symbolic reference problem.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at
1 - 100 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
