Jason Gunthorpe [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've run into the following weird behavior on my system with 2.4.0. I have
the following code:
Apt I guess ? It has a very strange behavior when backgrounded...
if (fork() == 0)
{
int Flags,dummy;
if ((Flags =
Hello:
Suppose for a moment, that I have an in-kernel daemon, listening
on a TCP socket, and that the said daemon is interested to
know when connection becomes established. To that end it
puts something into sk-state_change. However, when connection
is established, state_chenge is not called (in
Seems like anytime I first startup mozilla I end up with something
like:
ps afx | grep mozilla
680 ttyp6S 0:00 | \_ grep mozilla
660 tty1 S 0:00 \_ /bin/sh /other2/mozilla/run-mozilla.sh
664 tty1 S 0:01 \_
Hi
Kernel 2.2.19 downloaded from www.kernel.org sometimes when I boot from lilo
reports after "uncompressing linux ..." and blank line shows "crc error"
and halts. I looked at the sources and found that this means that uncompressed
kernel has bad crc. I tried compile it under debian potato (gcc
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Still experimenting with my SDT-9000... tried connecting it to another
controller
(2940AU in place of 2904, sorry but I've only Adaptec stuff :). Same
problem.
Tried with another tape (even with an old DDS-2 tape). Same. Even tried
another
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It seems that the tape is written incorrectly. I wrote some large file
(300MB)
and read it back four time. The read copies are all the same. They differ
from the original only in 32 consecutive
Andre Hedrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote:
Actually we could do the same thing they did for errno, i.e.
#define jiffies get_jiffies()
extern unsigned get_jiffies(void);
No, not really. HZ still defines the units of jiffies and most all
Hi,
well, it happened again !
Just before complete hang I gathered some data -
(sorry for being it long)
[root@ls203 /root]# hwclock --show
Thu Apr 12 20:13:20 2001 0.089248 seconds
[root@ls203 /root]#
[root@ls203 /root]#
[root@ls203 /root]# date
Thu Apr 12 19:34:32 CEST 2001
[root@ls203
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:54:13PM -0600, Steven Cole wrote:
CONFIG_CPU_ARM610
CONFIG_CPU_ARM710
CONFIG_CPU_ARM720T
CONFIG_CPU_ARM920T
CONFIG_CPU_SA110
The last patch I sent Alan (-ac3 iirc) had the relevent entries in for
these.
--
Russell King
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 01:31:46PM -0400, David L. Parsley wrote:
real pretty. If you've got union mounting patches for testing, I'd be
interested. ;-)
/me is interested, too. And yes, I have nearly the same problem ;-)
Regards
Ingo Oeser
--
10.+11.03.2001 - 3. Chemnitzer LinuxTag
Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
information is minimal on that page.
I just bought one of these babies and I should probably return it
Andre Hedrick wrote:
Sorry, but http://www.linux-ide.org/ clearly states that nothing below a
given line supports hardware/bios-soft raid.
Promise are clearly being less than helpful here and that is not your fault.
However as far as I can see everyone who has a FastTrak which is "stuck"
in
"Eric W. Biederman" wrote:
Andre Hedrick [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote:
Actually we could do the same thing they did for errno, i.e.
#define jiffies get_jiffies()
extern unsigned get_jiffies(void);
No, not really. HZ still defines
Can you elaborate on what you had to modify ?
I just added AHC_ULTRA to the features of 7850
AHC_AIC7850_FE= AHC_SPIOCAP|AHC_AUTOPAUSE|AHC_TARGETMODE|AHC_ULTRA,
What's the PCI id of the card you are using ?
I'm not at home. If I remember right, it reported exactly the ID
of
IIRC the problem with implementing asynchronous *disk* I/O in Linux today is
that the filesystem code assumes synchronous I/O operations that block the
whole process/thread. So implementing "real" asynch I/O (without the
overhead of creating a process context for each operation) would require
Ben Greear wrote:
Bret Indrelee wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote:
Bret Indrelee wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote:
Bret Indrelee wrote:
Keep all timers in a sorted double-linked list. Do the insert
intelligently, adding it from
Hi out there,
I have a problem using my MO-Drive under kernel 2.4.3. I have several disks
formated with a VFAT filesystem. Under kernel 2.2.19 everything works fine.
Under kernel 2.4.3 I cannot write anything to the disk without hanging the
complete system so that I have to use the reset
Hello.
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 11:09:35PM +0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
BTW if that cursed socket is still alive, try to make the experiment
with filling window on it. It must stuck, or my theory is completely wrong.
Filling the socket via writing to pty (controlled by sshd), I found
On Thu, Apr 12, 2001 at 09:04:28PM -0700, Andre Hedrick wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, george anzinger wrote:
Actually we could do the same thing they did for errno, i.e.
#define jiffies get_jiffies()
extern unsigned get_jiffies(void);
No, not really. HZ still defines the units of
jeff garzik wrote:
Frank Jacobberger wrote:
Jeff,
I noticed the following on boot with 2.4.4-pre1:
kernel: eth0: Too much work at interrupt, IntrStatus=0x0001.
What is this saying to me :)
How often does this
Jrn Nettingsmeier wrote:
i'm seeing this, too.
forgot to mention: i'm running 2.4.4-pre2 here. problem persists.
--
Jrn Nettingsmeier
home://Kurfrstenstr.49.45138.Essen.Germany
phone://+49.201.491621
http://www.folkwang-hochschule.de/~nettings/
http://www.linuxdj.com/audio/lad/
-
Hi, All
I am tring to read a device driver .
at first everyting is fine, when I include kernel/fs.h , a series parse error
appears.
error disappear because of header files of linux, Does anyone meet the same
question , or know how to solve it ?
Thanks a lot
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Friday, 13 April 2001, at 08:56:23 +0200,
Jan Gregor wrote:
Hi
Kernel 2.2.19 downloaded from www.kernel.org sometimes when I boot from lilo
reports after "uncompressing linux ..." and blank line shows "crc error"
and halts.
[...]
Same behavior here, as I reported some days ago on this
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 10:00:32AM +0200, Dennis Bjorklund wrote:
Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
information is minimal on that page.
The first attempt at mounting a disc in my Traxdata CDR drive after boot always
fails. From the second on, everything works flawlessly.
Current setup is 2.2.18 kernel + 6.1.11-2.2.18 patch, but I've been experiencing
this behaviour since I bought the adapter (around 2.2.12 or so).
aic7xxx gets
We're looking at making a set of security checkers. Does anyone have
suggestions for good things to go after in addition to the usual
copy_*_user and buffer overrun bugs? For example, are there any
documents that describe the rules for when/how 'capable' is supposed to
be used?
Thanks for any
Hi all,
I have problems with slab management:
While trying to unload a module and destroying cache memory that was
previously allocated
(kmem_cache_destroy routine), I get the following message: "can't free
all objects..."
Then I will get a Oops if I try to reload the module...
How can I be
[1.] One line summary of the problem: Can't mount 2048 hardware sectors SCSI disk on
2.4 kernel.
[2.] Full description of the problem/report:
I have SCSI optical disk drive. It's supports 512 and 2048 bytes hardware
sectors media.
In 2.2.19 kernel, I can use both 512/2048 hardware sectors
Hi,
I reported the same problem a while ago. The suggestion was to stick to 2.2.19 for
the time being. 2048 byte/sector support is broken in 2.4.
Yokota Hiroshi wrote:
[1.] One line summary of the problem: Can't mount 2048 hardware sectors SCSI disk on
2.4 kernel.
[2.] Full description of
george anzinger wrote:
Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers? Insertion
is log(n) and finding the one with the least time is O(1), ie pop off the
front It can be implemented in an array which should help cache
coherency and all those other things they talked
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
So the /* old gcc */ part should probably be enabled based on a define for the
old compiler. The right ifdef seems to be:
#if __GNUC__ == 2 __GNUC_MINOR__ 95
The current GCC supports the old syntax and will do so for a while yet,
so perhaps this is not
Hello,
I was expecting to receive some replies to my last desperate messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg35446.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg36591.html
My machine is dyeing in add_timer(). It seems to happen only on SMP
Hi,
I've successfully set up SW-RAID0 with Kernel 2.4.3 and Raidtools 0.9.
I did this to increase the performance of my HD, but nothig happens.
The hdparm results:
hdparm -t /dev/md0 : 20.25 MB/sec
hdparm -t /dev/hda : 20.51 MB/sec
hdaprm -t /dev/hdc : 20.71 MB/sec
I thougt the performnace of
Hi Dawson,
Excellent project.
Can I suggest that you check for signedness issues? A typical signature of
a signedness problem is:
int i = get_from_userspace_somehow();
/* Sanity check i */
if (i MAX_LEN_FOR_I)
goto bad_bad_out;
/* Bug here!! i can be negative! */
I suspect you find a lot
I think it makes the most sense to keep jiffie as a simple unsigned
int. If we leave drivers, and other code as is they can deal with
single word (32 bit) values and get reasonable results. If we make HZ
too high (say 10,000 to get micro second resolution) we will start
limiting the max
On Wed, Apr 11, 2001 at 09:32:36PM -0500, Troy Benjegerdes wrote:
There are some improvements in the latest 2.4 test patch, 2.4.3-pre8. I
would be very interested in hearing feedback on that. I finally got two
test cards, FA311 and FA312, so I can work on it a bit too.
Okay, I finally
Great HZ always defines units of jiffies, but that is worthless if there
is not a ruleset that tells me a value to divide by to return it to a
specific quantity of time.
HZ obviously.
Alan
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
The Makefile system is expecting the YACC variable to be defined; a
straightforward workaround is then to define:
export YACC="`which bison` -y"
Umm
[root@irongate linux.ac]# which yacc
/usr/bin/yacc
/usr/bin/which: no bison in
(/usr/local/bin:/bin:/usr/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin:/usr/X11R6/bin)
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 12:39:39PM +0200, Jamie Lokier wrote:
Christoph Hellwig wrote:
So the /* old gcc */ part should probably be enabled based on a define for the
old compiler. The right ifdef seems to be:
#if __GNUC__ == 2 __GNUC_MINOR__ 95
The current GCC supports the old
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:20:56AM -0400, Mark Salisbury wrote:
inner loop, i.e. interrupt timer code should never have to convert from some
real time value into number of decrementer ticks in order to set up the next
interrupt as that requires devides (and 64 bit ones at that) in a tickless
On Wed, Apr 11 2001, Ian Eure wrote:
i get this message when it panics:
-- snip --
loop: setting 534781920 bs for 07:86
Kernel panic: Invalid blocksize passed to set_blocksize
-- snip --
Ahm, how are you setting your loop device up? The above is completely
bogus.
--
Jens Axboe
-
To
these are covered in IEEE P100.13, D9 September 1997 AD212. it is available
from IEEE for a "nominal" fee.
they are 4 defined subsets of POSIX that are deemed appropriate for real-time
systems.
unfortunately, the sub in subset is a small delta from the full set.
the subsets are:
Hi,
i recently met with a new (Unisys) keyboard, which have (among 'normal'
windows keys) 3 more keys on top of arrows, labeled by pictures as
halfsun, halfmoon, and power switch. Following patch adds 'support' for them
(or at least gets rid of 'unknown scancode' messages), but beacuse i am
new
I have a problem using my MO-Drive under kernel 2.4.3. I have several disks
formated with a VFAT filesystem. Under kernel 2.2.19 everything works fine.
Under kernel 2.4.3 I cannot write anything to the disk without hanging the
complete system so that I have to use the reset button. For
Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
information is minimal on that page.
What annoys me is that we've known about the problem for _ages_.
These are the things, that one of the German links[1] suggest
(translated only, because I'm not the IDE guy ;-)):
- PCI Delay Transaction = 0 (off) (Register 0x70, Bit 1)
- PCI Master Read Caching = 0 (off) (Register 0x70, Bit 2)
- PCI Latency = 0 (values between 0 and 32
back down to 2.2.19, and you'll find you can read your tapes. From what
Andre explains, the HP Colorado 7/14 and 10/20 aren't completely compliant
with standards. If you run 2.2.19 and the ide patches, you'll have the
same problems.
On Fri, 13 Apr 2001, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Hi,
Upgraded to
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Here might be one of the resons for the trouble with VIA chipsets:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/3/18267.html
Some DMA error corrupting data, sounds like a really nasty bug. The
information is minimal on that page.
What annoys me is that
Is this problem likely to affect 2.2.X? I have a VIA-based board on
order (Tyan Trinity) and I don't plan to run 2.4 on it anytime soon
(it's upgrading a stock RH6.2 box).
Am I safe if I stay in PIO mode?
I have received exactly zero reports of 2.2 problems, and as the 2.2 maintainer
I
On Friday 13 April 2001 00:45, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
On Thursday 12 April 2001 22:03, Alexander Viro wrote:
If you are talking about "unused" from the slab POV - _ouch_. Looks like
extremely bad fragmentation ;-/ It's surprising, and if that's thte case
I'd like to see more details.
From
Forgot to mention that reverting to the driver too
the version in ac3 cures the problem I am seeing.
Ed
On Friday 13 April 2001 00:50, Ed Tomlinson wrote:
Upgraded to ac5 tonight. It stalled shortly after start a
program to suck news. Looking at a serial console I see
hundreds of the above
Alan Cox [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
(But since the X server shouldn't have the ability to corrupt the
kernel's process list, there has to be a problem in the kernel
somewhere)
The X server has enough priviledge to corrupt anything. Its unlikely to and
I do agree they two are likely to
Have you tried using the normal UHCI driver, instead of the UHCI
Alternate Driver (JE)? I know the "alternate" one is default from
Linus, but it's incompatible with the usb-visor driver. The
maintainer said he'd patch the docs to clear up the confusion, but it
hasn't shown up in the
Ok, I see this has started to interfere with the bug tracking process so
I'll kill it now (I seriously thought it was already dead).
Yep it was an april fools joke.
for the record:
2 offers for help;
1 post asking me if I mounted a scratch monkey( heh);
1 email begging me to abandon
does anyone know of a linux supported, pci SDSL card? I see a couple that are windows
based, but nothing on those and linux...thanks in advance. --gabe
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Hi,
I don't know if this is a problem with my hardware setup or config
settings or what, but whenever I try to run a 2.4.x kernel on my machine
with k7 optimizations the computer will never fully boot and seems to
give random errors about being "unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is this problem likely to affect 2.2.X? I have a VIA-based board on
order (Tyan Trinity) and I don't plan to run 2.4 on it anytime soon
(it's upgrading a stock RH6.2 box).
Am I safe if I stay in PIO mode?
I have received exactly zero reports of
Several of us on the list had the same/similar problems. AFAIK the only
fix at this point is to run w/ no more than K6 optimizations.
Check the archives for
- Only 10 MB/sec with via 82c686b (towards the end of the thread)
- thunderbird 1.2G + kk266 + 2.4.x oops
It seems to be something wierd
I have built this as a module due to the RedHat system I use (to be
consistent). I found that the xircom_cb driver works fine as a module
except for when using dhcp for dynamic ip address. If I set the ip address
of the network card to a static ip number it work fine. Yet if I choose to
use the
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 08:46:14AM -0400, Mark Salisbury wrote:
these are covered in IEEE P100.13, D9 September 1997 AD212. it is available
from IEEE for a "nominal" fee.
they are 4 defined subsets of POSIX that are deemed appropriate for real-time
systems.
unfortunately, the sub in
settings or what, but whenever I try to run a 2.4.x kernel on my machine
with k7 optimizations the computer will never fully boot and seems to
give random errors about being "unable to handle kernel NULL pointer
dereference at virtual address " and other errors.
I run the K7
I have found the bottleneck in the CML2 configurator's startup time
and nailed it. On my laptop, the time to read in and commit the i386
defconfig has dropped from 12 seconds to less than 2. This fix will be
in the next release; expect it late today or tomorrow.
--
a
Mark Hahn schrieb:
hdparm -t /dev/md0 : 20.25 MB/sec
hdparm -t /dev/hda : 20.51 MB/sec
hdaprm -t /dev/hdc : 20.71 MB/sec
md0 is composed of partitions located where on hda and hdc?
also, what's your CPU?
This is my raidtab file:
raiddev /dev/md0
raid-level
On the iwill mobo? (I haven't heard of this problem on other
motherboards.)
I'll grab the latest -ac today and give it a try this evening.
(Just for reference, the system is the Iwill kk266, 1.2G tbird, 512M
pc133, ata66 drive - everything has AMD-approved stickers and nothing is
overclocked.)
Mark Salisbury wrote:
I think it makes the most sense to keep jiffie as a simple unsigned
int. If we leave drivers, and other code as is they can deal with
single word (32 bit) values and get reasonable results. If we make HZ
too high (say 10,000 to get micro second resolution) we
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, the 2.2 distributed with Mandrake 7.2 works fine ... :)
Hmmm... 32 CONSECUTIVE bytes are a very peculiar error. What can it be?
Still experimenting...
I once ran into a problem with 32-byte errors appearing in files, and
later, in memory. I eventually
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 01:47:30PM +0200, Andreas Peter wrote:
Hi,
I've successfully set up SW-RAID0 with Kernel 2.4.3 and Raidtools 0.9.
I did this to increase the performance of my HD, but nothig happens.
The hdparm results:
hdparm -t /dev/md0 : 20.25 MB/sec
hdparm -t /dev/hda : 20.51
On Fri, Apr 13, 2001 at 05:36:55PM +0200, Andreas Peter wrote:
Mark Hahn schrieb:
hdparm -t /dev/md0 : 20.25 MB/sec
hdparm -t /dev/hda : 20.51 MB/sec
hdaprm -t /dev/hdc : 20.71 MB/sec
md0 is composed of partitions located where on hda and hdc?
also, what's your CPU?
This is my
Jamie Lokier wrote:
george anzinger wrote:
Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers? Insertion
is log(n) and finding the one with the least time is O(1), ie pop off the
front It can be implemented in an array which should help cache
coherency and all
On the iwill mobo? (I haven't heard of this problem on other
motherboards.)
Im not using an Iwill board. I'm using an AMD751/756 based board and an old
'Uncle Fester' reference board.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers? Insertion
is log(n) and finding the one with the least time is O(1), ie pop off the
front It can be implemented in an array which should help cache
coherency and all those other
Am Freitag, 13. April 2001 18:07 schrieb David Rees:
Cconfig and setup looks OK.
What happens if your run hdparm -t /dev/hda and /dev/hdc at the same time?
Good idea!
The performance is only ~11MB/sec per disk
There is a bottleneck somewhere...
Andreas
--
Andreas Peter *** [EMAIL
Am Freitag, 13. April 2001 18:01 schrieb Jakob stergaard:
I can't say much about this... It looks like your setup is perfectly
allright, and the performance *should* go up. Instead it looks like you
get a small performance drop from using the RAID. Most odd.
Do you have more controllers
Dear kernel gurus,
I cannot compile since -ac4 or -ac5 with same config, but it is _not_ related
to the problems reported earlier (rwsem and OLD_GCC).
It is a rwsem problem though, but look:
--8x---snip
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/glc/build/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2
First you are wrong by assuming that setting current-counter=0
will guarantee that the child runs first. In an SMP it only means
that this might initiate another recalculate and could run from
there in parallel with the child.
Actually quickly looking at the source code here.
You don't have to
I was expecting to receive some replies to my last desperate messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg35446.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg36591.html
If you don't receive an answer, then it either indicates that the bug is
too
I was expecting to receive some replies to my last desperate messages:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg35446.html"http://www.mail-archive.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg35446.html
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg36591.html"http://www.mail-archive.com/
[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg36591.html
Maybe someone can see which is the
David Rees wrote:
What happens if your run hdparm -t /dev/hda and /dev/hdc at the same time?
Try 'hdparm -tT' with simultaneous /dev/hda3 and /dev/hdc3. This gives you
a baseline on the actual partitions involved.
rgds,
tim.
--
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe
Mircea Damian wrote:
Hello,
I was expecting to receive some replies to my last desperate messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg35446.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg36591.html
My machine is dyeing in add_timer(). It seems
I'm running RedHat 7.0.91 (Wolverine) Kernel 2.4.1-0.1.9
I'm writing a device driver for Industry Pak modules that plug into an
Industry Pak carrier which plugs into the PCI bus. I'm currently using an
Acromag APC8620 carrier which can take up to five IP modules. The IP
modules I'm using are
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Andre Hedrick wrote:
However as far as I can see everyone who has a FastTrak which is "stuck"
in RAID mode[1] would be happy if it worked as a normal IDE controller
in Linux, which is (usually?) not the case - eg on the MSI board where
only the first
Followup to: 061f01c0c3d8$c34e8870$[EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:"David E. Weekly" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
This is the first time I remember seeing a Yacc file in the Linux kernel
source code, but I'm young and stupid.
Since the default Makefile mapping for .y
My device shows up in /proc/iomem even before I load my device driver,
indicating that the pci subsystem mapped it into the kernel pages. But bar0
Actually the addresses you see there are physical bus addresses not neccessarily
and on x86 quite likely not actually mapped.
Why didn't the pci
Hi,
I've wrote this driver for my Maxi Radio Fm 2 card.
I hope it can be usefull for somebody.
This card uses a GemTek chip, but the GemTek driver wasn't working very well :
the card was left uninitialized, and so it didn't mute.
I didn't wrote a patch for the GemTek driver because the
I'm using kernel 2.4.3 and 2.4.3-ac5, mobo is ASUS A7V with
BIOS 1007. I use usb-uhci.
I've been getting a ton of these messages (below) lately
when I move my MS optical mouse. Sometimes it settles down
and stops for a long while, but I can make the messages
start up again simply by lifting
a couple questions below...
-Original Message-
From: Alan Cox
Sent: Friday, April 13, 2001 14:47
To: Friedrich Steven E CONT CNIN
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: device driver questions
My device shows up
Hi,
Any particular reasons why a stock 2.4.3 kernel doesn't have mm.h and
pgalloc.h in sync on Alpha. This is what I get :
# make boot
gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/redhat/linux/include -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe
-mno-fp-regs -ffixed-8 -mcpu=ev5
On 12 Apr 2001, Philippe Troin wrote:
Apt I guess ? It has a very strange behavior when backgrounded...
Not really, just want it tries to run dpkg it hangs.
The last read was after the process was forgrounded. The read waits
forever, the non-block flag seems to have gone missing. It is
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Rod Stewart wrote:
On Thu, 12 Apr 2001, Andrew Morton wrote:
Rod Stewart wrote:
Hello,
Using the 8139too driver, 0.9.15c, we have noticed that we get a defunct
thread for each device we have; if the driver is built into the
Jamie Lokier wrote:
Daniel Phillips wrote:
ls already can't handle the directories I'm working with on a regular
basis. It's broken and needs to be fixed. A merge sort using log n
temporary files is not hard to write.
ls -U | sort
should do the trick.
Um, yep. Now ls should do
Andreas Dilger wrote:
Daniel writes:
Are you going to go to a COMPAT flag before final release? This is
pretty much needed for e2fsck to be able to detect/correct indexes.
I will if I know what the exact semantics are. I have only an
approximate idea of how this works and I'd
Doru Petrescu wrote:
also I don't understand how a race condition can occour since all
functions that play with the lists has a spin_lock() arround them.
Maybe is not someting wrong in the timers, maybe some other part of the
kernel is doing the bad thing.
Yes. All it takes is this:
"Adam J. Richter" [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[...]
It turned out that the particular unix-like system on which
these benchmarks were taken had a version of fork that did not run
the child first. As it was explained to me then, most of the time,
the child process from a fork will do
What's the PCI id of the card you are using?
Bus 1, device 3, function 0:
Class 0100: PCI device 9004:5078 (rev 3).
IRQ 24.
Master Capable. Latency=32. Min Gnt=4.Max Lat=4.
I/O at 0x1800 [0x18ff].
Non-prefetchable 32 bit memory at 0x80881000 [0x80881fff].
Horst von Brand wrote:
Ben Greear [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
[...]
Wouldn't a heap be a good data structure for a list of timers? Insertion
is log(n) and finding the one with the least time is O(1), ie pop off the
front It can be implemented in an array which should help cache
`pmd_alloc'
/usr/src/redhat/linux/include/linux/mm.h:412: previous declaration of
`pmd_alloc'
make: *** [init/main.o] Error 1
2.4.1 compiled fine, and as far as I can see, some changes has been made
to mm.h since then. I think these changes was followed up by i386, ppc,
s390 and
Brian Gerst wrote:
Mircea Damian wrote:
Hello,
I was expecting to receive some replies to my last desperate messages:
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg35446.html
http://www.mail-archive.com/linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org/msg36591.html
My machine is
* Alan Cox ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) uttered:
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/alan/2.4/
one of the problems i've been having so far with the 2.4.3 series is the
fact that USB appears to be futzed. It just doesn't want to work right.
Also, I compile a lot of things as modules and
My fstab:
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdrom iso9660
noauto,user,ro 0 0
/dev/cdrom /mnt/cdmac hfs
noauto,user,ro 0 0
I insert an apple cd (hfs) and mount /mnt/cdmac
If I type eject /mnt/cdrom the cd momes out but
df shows it's
That would be great!
finally someone is coming to the rescue
do you have the source files or are you going to work from scratch?
Erik
Arjan van de Ven schreef:
In article [EMAIL PROTECTED] you wrote:
Andre Hedrick wrote:
However as far as I can see everyone who has a FastTrak which
1 - 100 of 333 matches
Mail list logo
