Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] ([EMAIL PROTECTED]):
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 11:24:50 CST, Michael Halcrow said:
While the program is waiting for a keystroke, mount the block device.
Enter a keystroke. The result without the patch is 1, which is a
security violation. This occurs because the
I'm getting your mail!
Check out you code cause if I'm getting your mail, then you're sending
it out to all your customers.
-Alex
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Gmail user
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:42:43 +0100, Sam Ravnborg [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 11:43:59AM +, Russell King
On Wed, Feb 02, 2005 at 09:33:06AM -0600, Brian King wrote:
Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Feb 01, 2005 at 11:35:05AM -0600, Brian King wrote:
If we've done a write to config space while the adapter was blocked,
shouldn't we replay those accesses at this point?
I did not think that was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Why not simply disable CONFIG_GCOV for him, in this case?
Anton presumably turned on CONFIG_GCOV because he wanted to do some profiling...
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
No its a page fault benchmark. Dave Miller has done some kernel compiles
and I have some benchmarks here that I never posted because they do not
show any material change as far as I can see. I will be
Ivan Kokshaysky wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 03:06:11PM +, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
Looks pretty good to me. For clarity, I'd change:
- m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev-bus, 0x18);
+ m7101 = pci_scan_single_device(dev-bus, PCI_DEVFN(3, 0));
No, it's pretty broken regardless of
I am trying to get swsusp working on a 2.6.10 Debian kernel
(2.6.10-1-686, custom compile, enabling only CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND
and leaving CONFIG_PM_STD_PARTITION empty) on this Sony Vaio Z1RSP
Centrino 1.7 Pentium M laptop... without much success. Whenever
I enter swsusp mode, the kernel
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:51:06PM +0100, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
This seems to be minimal fix to get Kylix application back to the
working state... Maybe it is good idea for 2.6.11?
Why does clearing the BSS fail? Are the
Hi!
I found out that vbetool is enough to get me back video after
suspend/resume. Good and thanks! Here's my current version of
video.txt file. If you have any comment, or have machine where S3
works and it is not listed below, please let me know and I'll update
video.txt file.
Matthew wrote:
The reason Paul and I decided that they weren't totally reconcilable is
because of the memory binding side of the CPUSETs code.
Speak for yourself, Matthew ;).
I agree you that the scheduler experts (I'm not one, nor do I aspire to
be one) may well find that it makes sense
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
We also need to try to identify workloads whcih might experience a
regression and test them too. It isn't very hard.
I'd be glad if you could provide some instructions on how exactly to do
that. I have run lmbench, aim9, aim7, unixbench, ubench for a
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jeff Dike wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
Jeff, any objections against adding this change to UML at some point?
No, not at all. I just need to understand what CONFIG_PREEMPT requires of
UML.
Ingo can probably tell you in much more detail. My problem when I tried to
On 2005.02.08, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:23:48PM +0100, Roman Zippel wrote:
Enabling the following in the Makefile should have the same effect:
# For maximum performance (+ possibly random breakage, uncomment
# the following)
#MAKEFLAGS += -rR
aic7xxx
* [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
but what this discussion was about was the _dl_make_stack_executable()
function.
the jury is still out on that one, i just don't have the time and beer
to do the full research that a real exploit writer would do. in
security, unless proven
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:00:20 -0600, Joseph Pingenot
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From Joseph Pingenot on Monday, 07 February, 2005:
Hope that helps.
Did it help any?
Yes, thank you. A patch is forthcoming later tonight.
--
Dmitry
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:20:27PM +0100, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
In my inbox I have a patch that enables SCCS support for all files.
Today it fails for Kconfig files at least.
I guess the kconfig system needs to try to make Kconfig files before
including them ... this works for me, checking a
Hi Jean,
I'm very ignorant about wireless but it doesnt appear to me that Wireless
Extension v17
is a critical feature.
It seems more appropriate to declare it as 2.6 functionality ?
Cheers
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:16:37AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
I did
I have two identical machines [mobo/hardware wise]:
Each machine is a Dell GX1p (500MHZ).
I have two Intel Gigabit NICs, one in each box, hooked up to a GigE
switch.
Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit Ethernet Controller
Ethernet controller: Intel Corp. 82541GI/PI Gigabit
Hi Jean,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in 2.4.x ?
Thanks...
As an ignorant person I have no problems with it.
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:01:16PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Hi Jean,
I'm very ignorant about wireless but it doesnt appear to me that Wireless
Extension v17
is a critical feature.
You are right, it's not critical, and I was already thinking
of not pushing WE-18 to you (the
Hi.
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 03:36, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
I'm keen to see if we can merge Suspend2's freezer implementation after
2.6.11. Does that conflict with any of your intended changes? If it
doesn't, I'll submit a patch for review/merge as quickly as I can.
Freezer is very
[EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
the Makefiles were heavily changed, however, recently (after 2.6.10).
There was a bug in that patch. The fix is:
Index: 2.6.10/arch/um/Makefile
===
--- 2.6.10.orig/arch/um/Makefile2005-02-08
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:51:12PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:01:16PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
Hi Jean,
I'm very ignorant about wireless but it doesnt appear to me that Wireless
Extension v17
is a critical feature.
You are right, it's not
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
http://pax.grsecurity.net/docs/pax-future.txt
To understand the future direction of PaX, let's summarize what we
achieve currently. The goal is to prevent/detect exploiting of
software bugs that allow arbitrary read/write access to the
On Tuesday, 8 of February 2005 20:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
so it is okay, but...
... I could have done it more elegantly. You're right, I've now introduced
a function eat_page() that adds a page to the list of unusable pages and
used it instead of the free_page() here.
Hi!
I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
This seems to be minimal fix to get Kylix application back to the
working state... Maybe it is good idea for 2.6.11?
Why does clearing the BSS fail? Are the program headers bogus?
(readelf -l).
No idea, probably
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 09:22:19AM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
On Mon, 7 Feb 2005 13:20:33 +0100, Vojtech Pavlik [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 08:21:13PM -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
Opening braces should go on the same line as the statement (if (...)
{).
Paul Jackson wrote:
Matthew wrote:
The reason Paul and I decided that they weren't totally reconcilable is
because of the memory binding side of the CPUSETs code.
Speak for yourself, Matthew ;).
I agree you that the scheduler experts (I'm not one, nor do I aspire to
be one) may well find that
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
Sorry to reply a long quiet thread, but I've been trading emails with
Paul Jackson on this subject recently, and I've been unable to convince
either him or myself that merging CPUSETs and CKRM is as easy as I once
believed. I'm still convinced the CPU side is doable, but
On Sat, Feb 05, 2005 at 07:21:54PM +0100, Eric Piel wrote:
Hello,
For now, a bug in the PSX controllers support in gamecon prevents
hot-swapping of such controllers. If a controllers is removed then all
the controllers stop working and cpu usage gets high. The attached patch
(against
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:45 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
was lost on the way. Would you mind pushing that in 2.4.x ?
Hi!
The main change involves the introduction of a new SYNCTHREAD flag. We
use this to avoid deadlocking over processes that are running sys_sync
and siblings. Processes that enter those routines get the flag added,
and it's removed when they exit the sync routine. We then freeze in
Hi.
On Wed, 2005-02-09 at 09:32, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
The main change involves the introduction of a new SYNCTHREAD flag. We
use this to avoid deadlocking over processes that are running sys_sync
and siblings. Processes that enter those routines get the flag added,
and it's
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:24:22PM -0800, David S. Miller wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 16:04:45 -0200
Marcelo Tosatti [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 10:14:36AM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
I did not receive any feedback on this e-mail, so I assume it
Hi!
+static inline void eat_page(void *page) {
Please put { on new line.
Okay, as you can see, I could find very little wrong with this
patch. That hopefully means it is okay ;-). I should still check error
handling, but I guess I'll do it when it is applied because it is hard
to do on a diff.
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
This, on the face of it, seems like a ridiculous possibility as the
chances of that are reverse proportional to the number of bits necessary
to implement the simplest Turing Machine.
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Chris Friesen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
I'm doing some kernel work that will export tuneables to userspace. In
2.4 I would have used /proc/sys/kernel, but now there is /sys, which was
supposed to be for system information.
Hi Marcelo,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:41:46PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
There need to be some unique features in 2.6.X to force people
to upgrade, I guess...
Faster, cleaner, way more elegant, handles intense loads more gracefully,
When a CPU-hungry task freezes another one
Running 2.6.10-ac10 on the STP 1-CPU machines, we don't seem to be able to
complete
a kernbench run without hitting the OOM-killer. ( kernbench is multiple kernel
compiles,
of course ) Machine is 800 mhz PIII with 1GB memory. We reduce memory for some
of the runs.
Typical results:
stp1-001
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
* Esben Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Now I don't really know who I am responding to. But both up()s now
changed to complete()s are in something looking very much like an
interrupt handler. But again, as I said, I didn't analyze the code in
Robert Love [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On Sun, 2005-02-06 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Osterlund wrote:
EIP is a strncpy_from_user+0x33/0x47
...
Call Trace:
getname+0x69/0xa5
sys_open+0x12/0xc6
sysenter_past_esp+0x52/0x75
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:=?iso-8859-1?Q?Pozs=E1r_Bal=E1zs?= [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
Granted, I could override the default order by using a /etc/filesystems
file. But the kernel should have a much more sane default on its own,
namely try vfat
On Tuesday, 8 of February 2005 23:42, Pavel Machek wrote:
Hi!
+static inline void eat_page(void *page) {
Please put { on new line.
Oh, I still tend to forget about this. Corrected in the patch that is
available on the web
Marvell makes a line of host bridge for PPC and MIPS systems. On those
bridges is an i2c controller. This patch adds the driver for that i2c
controller.
Please apply.
Depends on patch submitted by Jean Delvare:
http://archives.andrew.net.au/lm-sensors/msg29405.html
Signed-off-by: Mark A.
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Moore, Eric Dean [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
EBDA - Extended Bios Data Area
Does Linux and various boot loaders(lilo/grub/etc)
having any restrictions on where and how big
memory allocated in EBDA is? Is this
handled for
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
I shot out the last patch too quickly. Having reviewed the mapping one
more time I noticed, that there as the possibility of off-by-one
unmapping, and instead of doing doubtful guesses, if that's the case, I
added a base pointer to scatter_walk,
Martin J. Bligh wrote:
What about your proposed sched domain changes?
Cant sched domains be used handle the CPU groupings and the
existing code in cpusets that handle memory continue as is?
Weren't sched somains supposed to give the scheduler better knowledge
of the CPU groupings afterall ?
sched
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:51:05 -0800 (PST)
Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
We also need to try to identify workloads whcih might experience a
regression and test them too. It isn't very hard.
I'd be glad if you could provide some
Followup to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
By author:Neil Conway [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
Since writing the above, I've been searching for more info. I
downloaded four different versions of grub (GNU Grub Legacy, GNU Grub2,
gentoo and Fedora Core 3). NONE of these showed
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 11:45:31PM +0100, Willy Tarreau wrote:
Hi Marcelo,
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:41:46PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
There need to be some unique features in 2.6.X to force people
to upgrade, I guess...
Faster, cleaner, way more elegant, handles intense
* Michael Halcrow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
[...]. This occurs because the bd_release function will
bd_release(bdev) and set inode-i_security to NULL on the close(fd1).
Hence, we want to place the control at the level of the file struct,
not the inode.
This is basically what I was referring
Hi,
Here is the promised patch. It turns out protocol validation code was
a bit (or rather a byte ;) ) off.
Please let me know if it fixes your touchpad and I believe it would be
nice to have it in 2.6.11.
--
Dmitry
===
[EMAIL
* Michael Halcrow ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
This is the sixth in a series of eight patches to the BSD Secure
Levels LSM. It makes several trivial changes to make the code
consistent.
These are inconsistent with CodingStyle. I'd drop this, and go the
other way (patch is smaller) ala Lindent.
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 18:30 -0500, James Morris wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
I shot out the last patch too quickly. Having reviewed the mapping one
more time I noticed, that there as the possibility of off-by-one
unmapping, and instead of doing doubtful guesses, if
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:37:15 -0800
Jean Tourrilhes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
It was sent to netdev :
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=linux-netdevm=110747857226852w=2
Resend it to netdev instead, please.
If nobody responds, it means the networking maintainers simply
are backlogged and
Hi,
I ran into this while playing with jprobes in 2.6.10.
I tried to install jprobe handler on a invalid address,
I get OOPS. I was hoping for a error check and a graceful
exit rather than kernel Oops.
Thanks,
Badari
plant jprobe at c01836b0, handler addr a080
Unable to
Hi,
just a minor thing
+static int __devinit
+mv64xxx_i2c_init(void)
+{
+ return driver_register(mv64xxx_i2c_driver);
+}
__init
+static void __devexit
+mv64xxx_i2c_exit(void)
+{
+ driver_unregister(mv64xxx_i2c_driver);
+ return;
+}
__exit
these functions relate
On Mon, 2005-02-07 at 22:26 -0500, Xiuduan Fang wrote:
Hi,
I am trying to beat the I/O bottleneck so as to speed up bulk data transfers
in high speed network. It seems that the system call sendfile() can help to
reduce CPU utilization and speedup data transfers. But I have one question
As best as I can figure out, CKRM is a fair share scheduler with a
gussied up more modular architecture, so that the components to track
usage, control (throttle) tasks, and classify tasks are separate
plugins.
I'm not an expert on CKRM, so I'll leave the refuting (or notrefuting)
of your
Roman,
I suspect the most of the folks on LKML are sick and tired of
this particular thread. Could you (and Larry) please take this
off-line, please? Everyone who has an opinion on this matter is not
likely to change their minds, so continued rehashing of old arguments
is just noise
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005, Fruhwirth Clemens wrote:
You can't call kmap() in softirq context (why was it even trying?):
Why not? What's the alternative, then?
It can sleep in map_new_virtual().
The alternative is to use atomic kmaps. For this code, unless you can
point to something concrete in
* Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
As commented yesterday, I was going to release a few more hooks for some
*critical* syscalls, this one adds a hook to sys_chmod(), and makes us
able to apply checks and logics before releasing the operation to
sys_chmod().
This is
Hi all,
1 more interesting observation regarding my executable file problem.
If I copy an executable say prac from ext2 fs to my encrypted fs as prac1,
prac1 doesnt run on the encrypted fs. but, if I make another copy, from prac1
to normal ext2 fs, as prac2, then the prac2 executes
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 07:14:27PM -0500, Vineet Joglekar wrote:
Hi all,
1 more interesting observation regarding my executable file problem.
If I copy an executable say prac from ext2 fs to my encrypted fs as prac1,
prac1 doesnt run on the encrypted fs. but, if I make another
Matthew wrote:
I should have been more clear that CKRM and CPUSETs (seem) to
be unreconcilable. Sched_domains and CPUSETs (seem) to have some potential
functionality overlap that leads me to (still) believe there is hope to
integrate these two systems.
Aha - now we're getting somewhere.
Shailabh wrote:
Well, I'm not sure I want to minutely examine Paul's choice of words !
You're a wise man ;).
Rereading the earlier posts on the thread, I'd agree. There are some
similarities in our interfaces but not enough to warrant a merger.
As I said ... a wise man !
--
Can you do a simple test?
Connect the two box to the same switch. ( No other box should be on the
physical bus)
1. Send packets from BoxA --- BoxB ( Record the stats)
2. Send packets from BoxB --- BoxA(Record the stats)
3. Send packets simultaneously from BoxB-BoxA and
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
just a minor thing
+static int __devinit
+mv64xxx_i2c_init(void)
+{
+ return driver_register(mv64xxx_i2c_driver);
+}
__init
+static void __devexit
+mv64xxx_i2c_exit(void)
+{
+ driver_unregister(mv64xxx_i2c_driver);
+ return;
+}
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 12:06:14PM -0500, jon ross wrote:
I have an app with a small fixed memory footprint that does a lot of
random reads from a large file. I thought if I added more memory to
the machine the VM would do more caching of the disk, but added memory
does not seem to make any
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 04:41:46PM -0200, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 01:51:12PM -0800, Jean Tourrilhes wrote:
You are right, it's not critical, and I was already thinking
of not pushing WE-18 to you (the WPA update). I'll stop updating 2.4.X
with respect to
Hi,
if I run xawtv [1] and then do a grep -r toto /usr, my system
quickly freeze. If there isn't any xawv running nothing happen. I don't
try to use xawtv with grab mode (port 54) because I don't want to loose
data by crashing again my / fs.
I retry it and I arrived to get some log (see the
On Wed, 19 Jan 2005 10:17:15 +0100
Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This patch removes xfrm_export.c and moves the EXPORT_SYMBOL{,_GPL}'s to
the files where the actual functions are.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied, thanks Adrian.
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 13:41, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
There need to be some unique features in 2.6.X to force people
to upgrade, I guess...
Faster, cleaner, way more elegant, handles intense loads more gracefully,
handles highmem decently, LSM/SELinux, etc, etc...
Please *think*
Message below meant for Marcelo!
(sorry rest!)
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 20:09, kernel wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 13:41, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
There need to be some unique features in 2.6.X to force people
to upgrade, I guess...
Faster, cleaner, way more elegant, handles intense
On Tue, 08 Feb 2005 17:32:11 -0700, Mark A. Greer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
Hi,
just a minor thing
+static int __devinit
+mv64xxx_i2c_init(void)
+{
+ return driver_register(mv64xxx_i2c_driver);
+}
__init
+static void __devexit
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 05:20:06PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
+3: movl %eax,(%ecx)
...
+3: movl %eax,(%ecx)
+4: movl %edx,4(%ecx)
...
+ .long 3b,bad_put_user
+ .long 4b,bad_put_user
The first 3 gets lost.
r~
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 05:20:06PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
+#define __put_user_8(x, ptr) __asm__ __volatile__(call __put_user_8:=A
(__ret_pu):0 ((typeof(*(ptr)))(x)), c (ptr))
This is not constrained enough. The compiler could choose to put the
return value in edx. You want
__asm__
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:51:36PM +0300, Alexander Y. Fomichev wrote:
G' day
It looks like XFS broken somewhere in 2.6.11-rc1,
sadly i can't sand right bugreport, some facts only.
Upgrade to 2.6.11-rc2 makes fcron non-working for me in case of
crontabs directory is placed on XFS
Hi,
rc3 vanilla oopses within 2 or 3 hours of heavy io load (rdiff-backup of ide
disk
(reiserfs3) to usb-storage (reiserfs3 on dm-crypt) and listening to internet
radio in
parallel). This is 100% reproducable here.
Usually there occur 4 or 5 of very similar looking oopses within 3 hours
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 02:57:07PM -0800, cliff white wrote:
Running 2.6.10-ac10 on the STP 1-CPU machines, we don't seem to be able to
complete
a kernbench run without hitting the OOM-killer. ( kernbench is multiple
kernel compiles,
of course ) Machine is 800 mhz PIII with 1GB memory. We
On Sun, Feb 06, 2005 at 11:18:18AM +0100, Armin Schindler wrote:
Hi Adrian,
Hi Armin,
thanks for the proposed patch.
Making the functions static is a good idea, I will check and test this.
Removing some functions, especially from io.* and di.* is not good. These
functions are mainly used
* Jean Tourrilhes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The first is the handling of spyoffset which is potentially
unsafe. Unfortunately, the fix involve some API/infrastructure change,
so is not transparent. Fortunately drivers are clever enough to not
trigger this bug.
The second is a
Since more than half a year ago, drivers/scsi/hosts.h gives a warning,
so it seems to be time to remove it.
Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.11-rc3-mm1-full/drivers/scsi/hosts.h 2004-12-24
22:34:30.0 +0100
+++ /dev/null 2004-11-25 03:16:25.0
Quoting Burton Windle [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Make sure your CPU type is set correctly.
CONFIG_MK6=y
It is.
Here's the latest config filtered through grep ^C
CONFIG_X86=y
CONFIG_MMU=y
CONFIG_UID16=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_ISA_DMA=y
CONFIG_GENERIC_IOMAP=y
CONFIG_EXPERIMENTAL=y
CONFIG_CLEAN_COMPILE=y
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 08:09:04PM -0500, kernel wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-08 at 13:41, Marcelo Tosatti wrote:
There need to be some unique features in 2.6.X to force people
to upgrade, I guess...
Faster, cleaner, way more elegant, handles intense loads more gracefully,
handles
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
I don't know how many years it was before people decided to
give up on the emacs vs. vi wars, but can we please put a more hasty
end to the bk license flamewars? Many thanks,
It's not really the same, if it would be just about personal
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:51:29PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
* Jean Tourrilhes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
The first is the handling of spyoffset which is potentially
unsafe. Unfortunately, the fix involve some API/infrastructure change,
so is not transparent. Fortunately drivers are
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
The first 3 gets lost.
Thanks. So here's v3 (which also removes the now stale __put_user_check()
macro).
Andrew - do you want to put it in -mm?
Linus
---
# This is a BitKeeper generated diff -Nru style patch.
#
# ChangeSet
#
Stephen Hemminger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:51:06 +0100
Pavel Machek [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
I wonder if reverting the patch will restore the old behaviour?
This seems to be minimal fix to get Kylix application back to the
working state... Maybe it is
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Richard Henderson wrote:
On Mon, Feb 07, 2005 at 05:20:06PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
+#define __put_user_8(x, ptr) __asm__ __volatile__(call __put_user_8:=A
(__ret_pu):0 ((typeof(*(ptr)))(x)), c (ptr))
This is not constrained enough. The compiler could choose
* Jean Tourrilhes ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 05:51:29PM -0800, Chris Wright wrote:
Hmm, having ability to read kernel data is not so nice.
It's not like you can read any arbitrary address, exploiting
such a flaw is in my mind theoritical. Let's not overblow
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 03:05:18 +0100 (CET), Roman Zippel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The current problem is more serious and I want that bk users to understand
that. A large part of kernel history is currently practically locked into
bk. bk isn't doing what I need, so naturally I'm looking for
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew - do you want to put it in -mm?
I'll take patches from anyone ;)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Linus Torvalds wrote:
Hmm.. I always thought A was the _pairing_ of %eax/%edx, not eax or
edx?
Ahh. Some testing shows that gcc really seems to think of it as eax or
edx, ie you can do
asm(uglee %0 %1: :a (1), A (2));
and it will output
movl$1,
A patch of PlugSched-3.0 against a 2.6.10 kernel with
ckrm-e17.2610.patch and cpu.ckrm-e17.v10.patch already applied is
available for download from:
http://prdownloads.sourceforge.net/cpuse/plugsched-3.0%2Bckrm-E17-for-2.6.10.patch?download
and a patchset and series file are available in at
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:27:08PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
That brings up another issue: if I don't care which registers a 64-bit
value goes into, can I get the low reg and high reg names some way?
Nope. We never needed one in the i386 backend itself, so we never
added anything like
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Andrew Morton wrote:
I'll take patches from anyone ;)
You'll never live it down. Once you get a name for being easy, you'll
always be known as Andrew patch-ho Morton.
Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the
On Tue, Feb 08, 2005 at 06:16:15PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I'd happily use your version, but I thought that some versions of gcc
require that input output registers cannot overlap, and would refuse to do
that thing? But if you tell me differently..
No, you're thinking of
asm( :
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jon Smirl wrote:
Larry has said he will do the work you want if you pay him.
Usually I'm all for giving the benefit of the doubt, but in this case I'd
prefer to know exactly, what I would get for the money.
But as I said by now I know enough about this that I can do
On Wed, 9 Feb 2005 03:35:37 +0100 (CET), Roman Zippel
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, 8 Feb 2005, Jon Smirl wrote:
Larry has said he will do the work you want if you pay him.
Usually I'm all for giving the benefit of the doubt, but in this case I'd
prefer to know exactly, what I
401 - 500 of 532 matches
Mail list logo
