Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I suggest putting it into futex.c, and make it an inline function
> > which takes "u32 __user *".
>
> Agreed, except we've traditionally just made it "int __user *".
The type signatures in futex.c are a bit mixed up - most places say
"int __user *" but sys_futex() says
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Telemaque Ndizihiwe wrote:
>
> This Patch replaces "(2 * HZ)" with "DATA_TIMEOUT" which is defined as
> #define DATA_TIMEOUT (2 * HZ)
> in /drivers/usb/atm/speedtch.c in kernel 2.6.10.
Your patches are white-space damaged due to linewrap (and possibly other
issues,
Guillaume Thouvenin wrote:
On Tue, 2005-02-22 at 23:20 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
Kaigai Kohei <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The common agreement for the method of dealing with process aggregation
has not been constructed yet, I understood. And, we will not able to
integrate each process aggregation
d.c wrote:
El Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:34:23 -0500 (EST),
"Sean" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
BK already feeds patches out at the head, surely if it's as powerful as
you think, it could feed a free SCM too for your non-bk friends in the
community.
Who cares, really?
1) Linux was never supposed to
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
>
> Did something change recently in the VM that made copy_pte_range and
> clear_page_range a lot more expensive? I noticed a reference in the
> "Page Table Iterators" thread to excessive overhead introduced by
> aggressive page freeing. That sure looks
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 06:49:46PM +, Jamie Lokier wrote:
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > > I suggest putting it into futex.c, and make it an inline function
> > > which takes "u32 __user *".
> >
> > Agreed, except we've traditionally just made it "int __user *".
>
> The type signatures in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hello
I have read a post in lkml.org that states that the problem experienced in
rc3 has gone (1). That is not the case for me.
My audio device is
:00:1f.5 Multimedia audio controller: Intel Corp. 82801DB/DBL/DBM
(ICH4/ICH4-L/ICH4-M) AC'97 Audio Controller (rev 01)
On Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:11:05 +0100, Pavel Machek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> Table of known working systems:
>
> Model hack (or "how to do it")
> --
> IBM TP R32 / Type 2658-MMG
Hi,
Here goes the second pre of v2.4.30.
It contains a bunch of important networking fixes, most noticeably the brlocks
rework.
Plus USB fixes, megaraid2 driver update, JFS update, amongst others.
Read the changelog for detailed information
Summary of changes from v2.4.30-pre1 to
On Mon, Feb 21, 2005 at 02:06:18PM +0100, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
> Alan Cox wrote:
> >On Llu, 2005-02-07 at 09:29, Charles-Edouard Ruault wrote:
> >>- Why is the generic timer using this address ? isn't it reserving a too
> >>wide portion of IO ports ? Should it be modified for this board
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:16 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> >
> > Did something change recently in the VM that made copy_pte_range and
> > clear_page_range a lot more expensive? I noticed a reference in the
> > "Page Table Iterators" thread to excessive
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:58:45AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:13 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl:
>
> > diff -NurpP --minimal
> > linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01/arch/sparc64/solaris/fs.c
> >
> >
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:16 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > I'm just about to test this patch below: please give it a try: thanks...
I'm very sorry, there's two things wrong with that version: _must_
increment addr before breaking out, and better to
This BK push includes additional hardware support, but that's only
because it's (a) obviously low impact and (b) it was in the queue.
Far more important are:
1) API additions, to fix a severe bug: advanced drivers such as AHCI
were directly bitbanging --non-existent-- PCI IDE registers,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas S. Iversen) wrote:
>
> > OK, so we're looking for the buffer_head for block 101 and the first
> > buffer_head which is attached to the page represents block 100. So the
> > next buffer_head _should_ represent block 101. Please print it out:
>
> Not quite the same, but
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 20:06 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 19:16 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > >
> > > I'm just about to test this patch below: please give it a try: thanks...
>
> I'm very sorry, there's two things wrong with that
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> when trying to mount /var.
> (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
> They are usually hda, hdb, and hdc.
>
> MAKEDEV hdq did not help. Looking
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 04:26:58PM +0100, Sven Geggus wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> looks like xfsdumpis broken with recent 2.6.11-rc Kernels. 2.6.11-rc4 is the
> one I tried.
>
> Strange enough ist does seem to work _sometimes_, but it does not work
> most of the time.
>
> If it does not work I just
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
> >
> >
> > - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> > down a bit.
> >
>
> I am having
Folks,
This group was instrumental in helping me get my first-ever
linux/PCI-bus device driver working last year, and I'm back for
some more help if you are willing.
I have a PCI card that generates an interrupt when it completes
a DMA transfer to
* Jeremy Fitzhardinge ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Valgrind is critically dependent on getting siginfo with its synchronous
> (caused by an instruction fault) signals; if it gets, say, a SIGSEGV
> which doesn't have siginfo, it must terminate ASAP because it really
> can't make any more progress
2.6.11-rc4 built with gcc-3.4.3 works fine on my eMac.
Building with gcc-4.0.0 (20050220) however gives me a kernel
with dead USB, and thus no keyboard or mouse, but everything
else seems to be working.
A diff between dmesg on the two kernels has an interesting nugget:
---
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 20:06 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, your patch fixes the copy_pte_range latency.
>
> Great, if the previous patch fixed that latency then this new one
> will too, no need to report on that; but please get rid of the old
> patch before it leaks too many of your
Hi All,
I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp. The server
crashes every few days. When I examine /var/log/messages,
I find the following line just before the crash:
Feb 22 23:50:35 hostname kernel: [ cut here ]
Feb 22 23:50:35
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Alan Kilian wrote:
callpci_enable_device(dev)
... before you use the IRQ in dev->irq.
The reported IRQ is bogus until you make that
call. It's a reported BUG, probably won't
ever get fixed because it's considered a
feature.
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 21:57, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> This BK push includes additional hardware support, but that's only
> because it's (a) obviously low impact and (b) it was in the queue.
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ahci.c
> +static u8 ahci_check_err(struct ata_port
Kaigai Kohei wrote:
Hi, Thanks for your comments.
>> I think there are two issues about system accounting framework.
>>
>> Issue: 1) How to define the appropriate unit for accounting ?
>> Current BSD-accountiong make a collection per process accounting
>> information.
>> CSA make
¿Le gustaría que su empresa, producto o servicio llegara a mas de 190,000
personas con correo electrónico de forma directa, económica y Efectiva?.
¿Le gustaría darle a sus clientes un servicio totalmente personalizado e
interactivo a través de su correo electrónico?
¿Le gustaría aumentar el
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> Please replace by new patch below, which I'm now running through lmbench.
That second patch seems fine, and I see no lmbench regression from it.
Hugh
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:41 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
> The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp. The server
> crashes every few days. When I examine /var/log/messages,
> I find the following line just before the crash:
>
> Feb 22
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > >
> > > Thanks, your patch fixes the copy_pte_range latency.
>
> clear_page_range is also problematic.
Yes, I saw that from your other traces too. I know there are plans
to improve clear_page_range during 2.6.12, but I didn't realize that
it had
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:42:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if
IRQ races during change of mtu
- NAPI poll must be enabled prior to IRQ activation or the IRQ handler
will not know what to do with an incoming packet;
- rtl8169_down() needs to try twice to sync with the IRQ handler when
it is not issued under !netif_running() protection.
Both changes make
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 23:45, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > +static void qs_ata_setup_port(struct ata_ioports *port, unsigned long base)
> > +{
> > + port->cmd_addr =
>
> > + port->error_addr=
>
> > + port->status_addr =
>
> > + port->altstatus_addr=
>
>
I finally had some time to debug this one a little more
thoroughly. On two different machines (Shuttle SB61G1) I
get the same results, so I do not believe it is bad hardware...
The bug is as follows:
I have 1 4-port tulip NIC in the machine. If I generate traffic
between two interfaces, it runs
While working on a driver for z85230 based board I noticed what looks
like it could be a problem. If the interrupt handler is handling an
interrupt on port b and an interrupt comes in for port a, it seems to me
that the port b handler would be called instead of the port a handler,
and possibly
Rogério Brito wrote:
On Feb 20 2005, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
My linux laptop says:
irq 5: nobody cared!
(...)
Does anyone care? :-)
Well, I'm getting similar stack traces with my system and those are sure
scary, but it seems that my e-mails to the list are simply ignored,
unfortunately.
I
Factor out some code
Signed-off-by: Francois Romieu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
diff -puN drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 drivers/net/r8169.c
--- a/drivers/net/r8169.c~r8169-460 2005-02-23 21:35:28.715271999 +0100
+++ b/drivers/net/r8169.c 2005-02-23 21:35:28.720271177 +0100
@@ -495,6 +495,13 @@
Hi,
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 07:20:09PM +0100, Brice Goglin wrote:
> Andrew Morton a écrit :
> >ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
> I can't get PCMCIA to work anymore since rc4-mm1.
> It was working great with rc4 and rc3-mm1.
>
> PCMCIA
On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:28:58PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
> to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
> are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386 (multiple
> boxes), x86-64, and
Thanks. All this stuff was minor, so I'll wait until 2.6.11 release to
update.
I forwarded the qstor stuff to maintainer Mark Lord.
Jeff
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
Alexey Dobriyan schrieb:
> On Wednesday 23 February 2005 21:57, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>>+ addr = sg_dma_address(sg);
>>+ *(u64 *)prd = cpu_to_le64(addr);
>
>
> *(__le64 *) prd
>
>
>>+ prd += sizeof(u64);
>
>
>>+ len = sg_dma_len(sg);
>>+
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 01:42:33AM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
>...
> Changes since 2.6.11-rc3-mm1:
>...
> bk-kbuild.patch
>...
This adds -Wno-pointer-sign to the main Makefile a second time.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
>
> I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
> The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp.
I can't really speak for Fedora RC3 kernels,
perhaps there's some special patch in there that happens to
trigger it for you, but certainly there have been
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
Also, it was a pretty good thing from them this piece of work.
Think that they investors may dislike the model they followed when the
merge happened, anyways, and as an example, I pretty ignore those
patents claims,for example, think that Type Enforcement
Adrian Bunk writes:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 04:28:58PM +0100, Mikael Pettersson wrote:
> > Here is a preliminary set of patches to allow gcc-4.0 (20050130)
> > to compile the 2.4.30-pre1 kernel. I make no claim that the patches
> > are complete, but they have been tested successfully on i386
Thanks for finding that.
Ack! I did a quick merge of my well-tested patches with the cputime_t
stuff, and apparently didn't do quite as much testing as I thought I did.
There was a little query/replace error in my per-process-itimer-cpu patch
now in -mm. Your patch is necessary but not
Wichert Akkerman wrote:
Previously Jeff Garzik wrote:
You should add this to your procmailrc :)
# Nuke duplicate messages
:0 Wh: msgid.lock
| $FORMAIL -D 32768 msgid.cache
That has the nasty side-effect of spreading messages for a single
discussion amongst many different mailboxes depending on
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:41 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
Hi All,
I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp. The server
crashes every few days. When I examine /var/log/messages,
I find the following line just before the crash:
Feb 22 23:50:35 hostname
Hello!
I once again tried reiserfs, this time on my ibook:
ei ~ # mkreiserfs -V
mkreiserfs 3.6.19 (2003 www.namesys.com)
ei ~ # uname -a
Linux ei 2.6.10 #5 Sun Feb 6 17:26:47 CET 2005 ppc 750CXe PowerBook4,1 GNU/Linux
If I tar xf $big_tar (speaking about the gcc-source), my system hangs:
-
> The problem arises from code touching the union in alloc_posix_timer()
> which makes firing go non-zero. When firing is checked in
> posix_cpu_timer_set() it will be positive causing an infinite loop.
>
> So either the below fix or preferably move the INIT_LIST_HEAD(x) from
>
Linux 2.6 (mm tree) Compile Statistics (gcc 3.4.1)
Web page with links to complete details:
http://developer.osdl.org/cherry/compile/
KernelbzImage bzImage bzImage modules bzImage modules
(defconfig) (allno) (allyes) (allyes) (allmod) (allmod)
---
Remove the sparse warnings about using plain integer as NULL pointer in
the following files:
arch/i386/oprofile/backtrace.c
drivers/char/isicom.c
drivers/char/drm/radeon_state.c
drivers/mtd/maps/nettel.c
drivers/net/wireless/prism54/isl_ioctl.c
drivers/serial/8250_early.c
fs/reiserfs/namei.c
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Olof Johansson wrote:
>
> How's this? I went with get_val_no_fault(), since it isn't really a
> get_user.*() any more (ptr being passed in), and no_paging is a little
> misleading (not all faults are due to paging).
Applied with minor cosmetic changes. I'm like a dog who
Hi,
I am trying to get bochs to use tun/tap on x86_64, strace reveals the
following problem:
open("/dev/net/tun", O_RDWR)= 7
ioctl(7, TUNSETIFF, 0x7fffe6c0) = -1 EINVAL (Invalid argument)
I wonder if this a tun/tap or a bochs problem. Any clues?
Tom
--
T h o m a s Z e
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 16:45 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
> > On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 15:41 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
> >> Hi All,
> >>
> >> I recently installed Fedora RC3 on a new server.
> >> The kernel is 2.6.10-1.741_FC3smp. The server
> >> crashes every few days. When I examine
Dominik Brodowski a écrit :
+pcmcia-bridge-resource-management-fix.patch
is responsible for this "no resource available" message, because the other
ones relate to other areas.
Yes, good catch, reverting it makes PCMCIA work again.
Let me know if you want me to test some patches.
Thanks,
Brice
-
To
> But not all cases could be accounted in that way. If you
> report back that memtest86 ran cleanly...
Hugh,
Nothing to do with the 'problem' in this thread, but an aside that is perhaps
relevant.
On my main gateway, I couldn't get any kernel greater than 2.6.4 to run
without an 'oops' after
Prakash> If I am not totally mistaken this is not gcc4 friendly
Prakash> code. (lvalue thing...)
Actually you misread the code slightly. It's a little subtle, but
code like
*(__le32 *)prd = cpu_to_le32(len);
is not using a cast as an lvalue. It's dereferencing a cast
Roland Dreier schrieb:
> Prakash> If I am not totally mistaken this is not gcc4 friendly
> Prakash> code. (lvalue thing...)
>
> Actually you misread the code slightly. It's a little subtle, but
> code like
>
> *(__le32 *)prd = cpu_to_le32(len);
>
> is not using a cast as an
El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 13:37 -0800, Crispin Cowan escribió:
> Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
> You are confused. It is Secure Computing Corporation that holds patents
> that threaten SELinux
> http://www.securecomputing.com/pdf/Statement_of_Assurance.pdf
>
> Immunix has never
From: Mickey Stein
Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk11, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc
rawhide from 19Feb DL)
gcc 4.0.x cvs seems to dislike "include/linux/i2c.h file" and others
due to a current gcc 4.0.x change having to do with
array declarations.
Example error msg:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct "root=" boot option
Kernel
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 20:53 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> > Please replace by new patch below, which I'm now running through lmbench.
>
> That second patch seems fine, and I see no lmbench regression from it.
Should go into 2.6.11, right?
Lee
-
To
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 21:03 +, Hugh Dickins wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Thanks, your patch fixes the copy_pte_range latency.
> >
> > clear_page_range is also problematic.
>
> Yes, I saw that from your other traces too.
Heh, sorry, that one was a dupe...
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 13:37 -0800, Crispin Cowan escribió:
Lorenzo Hernández García-Hierro wrote:
You are confused. It is Secure Computing Corporation that holds patents
that threaten SELinux
Something has caused the page at offset 51 (block 102) to have buffer_heads
for blocks 128 and 129 attached to it.
Ok.
I'd be suspecting that the sector remapping is the cause of the problem.
How is it implemented?
Quite simple actually. You're most welcome to see the code, but I have
just done
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> :
[...]
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which are 2.6.11
> material, please tell me.
Any chance to convince the alien who took control of Jeff's libata queue to
push:
r8169: synchronization and balancing when the device is closed
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Dick Johnson wrote:
>
> callpci_enable_device(dev)
> ... before you use the IRQ in dev->irq.
>
> The reported IRQ is bogus until you make that
> call. It's a reported BUG, probably won't
> ever get fixed because it's considered a
>
El mié, 23-02-2005 a las 14:07 -0800, Crispin Cowan escribió:
> If that is what you meant, then we had no issue.
>
> It looked like you were referring to Immunix because, in the quoted
> text, one paragraph only discussed Immunix (by name) and then the
> subsequent paragraph just said "them"
> + page = pfn_to_page(p >> PAGE_SHIFT);
> + /*
> + * On ia64 if a page has been mapped somewhere as
> + * uncached, then it must also be accessed uncached
> + * by the kernel or data corruption may occur
> + */
> +#ifdef
Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
when trying to mount /var.
(I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and an IDE cdrom on another.)
They are usually hda, hdb, and hdc.
MAKEDEV
On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone has patches in here which
- Original Message -
From: "Hugh Dickins" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ammar T. Al-Sayegh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 4:31 PM
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
Any suggestion on what else I can do to
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 09:37:53AM -0700, Steven Cole wrote:
> I copied a working .config from an earlier kernel(-rc3), and ran make
> oldconfig, answering most of the new questions 'n'.
Then you get into trouble with stuff under CONFIG_EMBEDDED. Answering
'n' turns off stock functionality.
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 09:45:37AM -0500, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> ty den 22.02.2005 Klokka 13:12 (+0100) skreiv Herbert Poetzl:
>
> > diff -NurpP --minimal
> > linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01/fs/namei.c
> > linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01/fs/namei.c
> > ---
- Original Message -
From: "Arjan van de Ven" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ammar T. Al-Sayegh" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2005 5:01 PM
Subject: Re: kernel BUG at mm/rmap.c:483!
On Wed, 2005-02-23 at 16:45 -0500, Ammar T. Al-Sayegh wrote:
> On Wed, 2005-02-23 at
Hi!
On the Linux router I'm running, I use the ipt_owner iptables module,
and since a few kernel versions back, I've begun getting kernel panics
in the ipt_owner module.
Unfortunately, the start of it coincided with a CPU upgrade of the
router, so at first I thought it was a hardware failure.
Steven Cole wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and 2.6.11-rc4-mm1 I get the following:
VFS: Cannot open root device "301" or unknown-block(3,1)
Please append a correct "root="
Not the most clever subject, I agree :)
hell, i'm not sure if this is a KERNEL bug. but it definitely is an
annoyance, so...
distro is slackware 10.
i have a small script i run every time i connect to the internet (and i
connect via dial-up when )
this is one command in the script:
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:10:49PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>
> ;
> ; Bind Mount Extensions
> ;
> ; This part adds support for the RDONLY, NOATIME and NODIRATIME
> ; vfsmount flags, propagates those options into loopback (bind)
> ; mounts and displays them properly in show_vfsmnt()/proc
> "Alan" == Alan Kilian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Alan> kernel: SSE: Found a DeCypher card. kernel: ACPI: PCI
Alan> interrupt :13:03.0[A] -> GSI 36 (level, low) -> IRQ 217
If ACPI has set this device up to use interrupt 217, why are you
registering it on IRQ 5?
--
Dr Peter
On Tue, Feb 22, 2005 at 01:11:29PM +0100, Herbert Poetzl wrote:
>
>
> ;
> ; Bind Mount Extensions
> ;
> ; This part adds the required checks for touch_atime() to allow
> ; for vfsmount based NOATIME and NODIRATIME
> ; autofs4 update_atime is the only exception (ignored on purpose)
and that
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 03:03:33PM -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Andrew Morton wrote:
> > > Steven Cole <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > >> I am having trouble getting recent -mm kernels to boot on my test box.
> > >> For 2.6.11-rc3-mm2 and
> +++
> linux-2.6.11-rc4-bme0.06-bm0.01-at0.01-cc0.01-co0.01-xa0.01-ro0.01/fs/ext2/ioctl.c
> 2005-02-19 06:32:05 +0100
> @@ -29,7 +29,8 @@ int ext2_ioctl (struct inode * inode, st
> case EXT2_IOC_SETFLAGS: {
> unsigned int oldflags;
>
> - if
Hello-
We have hit a defect where an exiting xterm process will hang. This is running
on a 2-cpu IA-64 box. We have a multithreaded application, where one thread
is SCHED_FIFO and is running with priority 98, and the other thread is just
a normal SCHED_OTHER thread. The SCHED_FIFO thread is in
"Thomas S. Iversen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I'd be suspecting that the sector remapping is the cause of the problem.
> > How is it implemented?
>
> Quite simple actually. You're most welcome to see the code, but I have
> just done a test like the one below. Never mind the performance
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 11:36:50PM +0100, Laurent Riffard wrote:
> Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a ?crit :
> >Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >>when trying to mount /var.
> >>(I have two IDE disks on the
On Wed, Feb 23, 2005 at 05:57:14PM -0500, linux-os wrote:
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Mickey Stein wrote:
>
> >From: Mickey Stein
> >Versions: linux-2.6.11-rc4-bk11, gcc4 (GCC) 4.0.0 20050217 (latest fc
> >rawhide from 19Feb DL)
> >
> >gcc 4.0.x cvs seems to dislike "include/linux/i2c.h file" and
> Alan> kernel: SSE: Found a DeCypher card. kernel: ACPI: PCI
> Alan> interrupt :13:03.0[A] -> GSI 36 (level, low) -> IRQ 217
>
> If ACPI has set this device up to use interrupt 217, why are you
> registering it on IRQ 5?
>
Peter,
Maybe that's it.
I ask the
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 17:38, J.A. Magallon wrote:
>
> On 02.23, Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
> >
> >
> > - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> > down a
Ed Tomlinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> It does not seem to be finding the keyboard at all...
Can you confirm that Linus's tree is OK? You'd best use the patch
at http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.5/testing/cset/ to make sure you
have the latest stuff.
-
To unsubscribe from this
linux-os wrote:
Trying to run an old server with a new kernel. A connection
fails with "interrupted system call" as soon as a client
attempts to connect. A trap in the code to continue
works, but subsequent send() and recv() calls fail in
the same way.
Anybody know how to mask that SIGIO (or
Minor patch for new 2.6.xx sata_qstor driver attached,
as per Alexey's fine-toothed comb! :)
Signed-off-by: Mark Lord <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cheers
--
Mark Lord
Real-Time Remedies Inc.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux/drivers/scsi/sata_qstor.c.orig2005-02-16 20:31:57.0
-0500
+++
Hugh Dickins wrote:
On Wed, 23 Feb 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
Thanks, your patch fixes the copy_pte_range latency.
clear_page_range is also problematic.
Yes, I saw that from your other traces too. I know there are plans
to improve clear_page_range during 2.6.12, but I didn't realize that
it had
Alan Kilian wrote:
kernel: SSE: Found a DeCypher card.
kernel: ACPI: PCI interrupt :13:03.0[A] -> GSI 36 (level, low) ->
IRQ 217
The first message is in my driver after pci_find_device()
The second is from when I do pci_enable_device(dev);
Can you decode the
Chris Wright wrote:
>It's not quite inexplicable. It means that task has hit its limit for
>pending signals ;-) But I agree, this should be fixed. I think I had
>tested this with broken test cases, thanks for catching.
>
>
It's particularly confusing for users, because it's a per-user limit
Gene Heskett wrote:
Greetings;
Motherboard is a biostar with nforce2 chipset, 2800xp cpu, gig of ram.
I've recently made the observation that while I can view 30fps video
from my firewire equipt movie camera with a minimal cpu hit of 2-3%,
but viewing the video from a webcam on a usb 1.1 circuit
Laurent Riffard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Le 23.02.2005 21:12, Andrew Morton a écrit :
> > Helge Hafting <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>This kernel came up, but my boot script complained about no /dev/hdb3
> >> when trying to mount /var.
> >> (I have two IDE disks on the same cable, and
On Wednesday 23 February 2005 04:42, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.11-rc4/2.6.11-rc4-mm1/
>
>
> - Various fixes and updates all over the place. Things seem to have slowed
> down a bit.
>
> - Last, final, ultimate call: if anyone
401 - 500 of 634 matches
Mail list logo
