Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC 5/6]clean cpu state after hotremove CPU

2005-04-05 Thread Nathan Lynch
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:55:06AM +0800, Li Shaohua wrote: On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote: No. It should make zero difference to the scheduler whether the play dead cpu hotplug or physical hotplug is being used. Keeping some fields like 'cpu_load' are meanless for a

Re: [PATCH] add a clear_pages function to clear pages of higher order

2005-04-05 Thread David Mosberger
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:33:59 -0700 (PDT), Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Christoph Which benchmark would you recommend for this? I don't know about recommend, but I think SPECweb, SPECjbb, the-UNIX-multi-user-benchmark-whose-name-I-keep-forgetting, and in general anything that

Re: [RFC] Add support for semaphore-like structure with support for asynchronous I/O

2005-04-05 Thread Suparna Bhattacharya
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:46:41AM -0400, Benjamin LaHaise wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 01:56:35PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: IOW: the current semaphore implementations really all need to die, and be replaced by a single generic version to which it is actually practical to add new

Re: [PATCH] add a clear_pages function to clear pages of higher order

2005-04-05 Thread Gerrit Huizenga
On Tue, 05 Apr 2005 21:48:22 PDT, David Mosberger wrote: On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:33:59 -0700 (PDT), Christoph Lameter [EMAIL PROTECTED] said: Christoph Which benchmark would you recommend for this? I don't know about recommend, but I think SPECweb, SPECjbb,

Re: [RFC] Add support for semaphore-like structure with support for asynchronous I/O

2005-04-05 Thread hui
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:20:57PM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote: ty den 05.04.2005 Klokka 11:46 (-0400) skreiv Benjamin LaHaise: I can see that goal, but I don't think introducing iosems is the right way to acheive it. Instead (and I'll start tackling this), how about factoring out the

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 compile error in mmx.c

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew James Wade
On April 5, 2005 09:22 pm, Berck E. Nash wrote: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1 fails to build for me with the following error: arch/i386/lib/mmx.c:374: error: conflicting types for `mmx_clear_page' include/asm/mmx.h:11: error: previous declaration of `mmx_clear_page' make[1]: *** [arch/i386/lib/mmx.o] Error

Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies

2005-04-05 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 06:13 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can trigger latencies up to ~1.1 ms with a CVS checkout. It looks like inside ext3_try_to_allocate_with_rsv, we spend a long time in this loop: ext3_test_allocatable

chelsio build failure

2005-04-05 Thread Dave Jones
building this sucker as a module caused grief. drivers/net/chelsio/cxgb2.c:113: error: `__mod_pci_device_table' aliased to external symbol `t1_pci_tbl'. This seems to do the trick. (untested beyond compile) Signed-off-by: Dave Jones [EMAIL PROTECTED] Dave ---

Re: [patch 1/5] sched: remove degenerate domains

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: This is Suresh's patch with some modifications. Remove degenerate scheduler domains during the sched-domain init. actually, i'd suggest to not do this patch. The point of booting with a CONFIG_NUMA kernel on a non-NUMA box is mostly for testing, and

Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2/5 The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL. We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify no

Re: [patch 2/5] sched: NULL domains

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 2/5 The previous patch fixed the last 2 places that directly access a runqueue's sched-domain and assume it cannot be NULL. We can now use a NULL domain instead of a dummy domain to signify no balancing is to happen. No functional changes.

Re: [patch 3/5] sched: multilevel sbe and sbf

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 3/5 The fundamental problem that Suresh has with balance on exec and fork is that it only tries to balance the top level domain with the flag set. This was worked around by removing degenerate domains, but is still a problem if people want to start

2.6.12-rc2: random oops on nmi_watchdog=1

2005-04-05 Thread Akinobu Mita
With nmi_watchdog=1, I got random Oopses (Unable to handle kernel paging request, not by the NMI oopser) from many processes. It is not happend with -rc1. The following change fixes this problem. but I'm not familiar with these area. If anyone wants more information, let me know. ---

Re: ext3 allocate-with-reservation latencies

2005-04-05 Thread Mingming Cao
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 06:13 +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Lee Revell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I can trigger latencies up to ~1.1 ms with a CVS checkout. It looks like inside ext3_try_to_allocate_with_rsv, we spend a long time in this loop: We have not modify the reservation create

[PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

2005-04-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
This allows the i386 architecture to be built on a system with a biarch compiler that defaults to x86-64, merely by specifying ARCH=i386. As previously discussed, this uses the equivalent logic to the ppc port. -hpa Signed-Off-By: H. Peter Anvin [EMAIL PROTECTED] Index:

Re: [PATCH scsi-misc-2.6 08/13] scsi: move request preps in other places into prep_fn()

2005-04-05 Thread Tejun Heo
Hello, James. James Bottomley wrote: On Fri, 2005-04-01 at 14:25 +0900, Tejun Heo wrote: Ah.. with later requeue path consolidation patches, all requests get their sense buffer cleared during requeueing, which, IMHO, is more logical. Moving scsi_init_cmd_errh() should come after the patch.

Hello

2005-04-05 Thread patrick Dekeledi
Dear friend, I am Patrick Umtanta, an accountant with the ministry of Energy and natural resources South Africa, presently we discovered the sum of 19.6 million British pounds sterling, floating in our suspense Account. This money as a matter of fact was an over invoiced Contract payment

Re: [PATCH] configfs, a filesystem for userspace-driven kernel object configuration

2005-04-05 Thread Matt Mackall
On Sun, Apr 03, 2005 at 12:57:28PM -0700, Joel Becker wrote: Folks, I humbly submit configfs. With configfs, a configfs config_item is created via an explicit userspace operation: mkdir(2). It is destroyed via rmdir(2). The attributes appear at mkdir(2) time, and can be read or

Re: Crash during boot for 2.6.12-rc2.

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
James Morris [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: n Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Andrew Morton wrote: I got this on a dual P4 Xeon with HT. If anyone wants more information, let me know. .config, please.. # # Automatically generated make config: don't edit # Linux kernel version:

Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs

2005-04-05 Thread Andi Kleen
Paul Jackson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: We already expose the SLIT table node distances (using SN2 specific /proc files today, others are working on an arch-neutral mechanism). There is already an arch neutral mechanism in sysfs, see /sys/devices/system/node/node*/distance That should be

crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
the crashes below happen when PAGEALLOC is enabled. It's this instruction: movb OLDSS(%esp), %ah OLDSS is 0x38, esp is f4f83fc8, OLDSS(%esp) is thus f4f84000, which correctly creates the PAGEALLOC pagefault. esp is off by 4 bytes? it could be the ESP-16-bit-corruption patch causing

Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS

2005-04-05 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:05 -0400, James Morris wrote: Evgeniy, Please send networking patches to [EMAIL PROTECTED] It was sent there two times. Your connector code (under drivers/connector) is now in the -mm tree and as far as I can tell, has not received any review from the network

Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: the crashes below happen when PAGEALLOC is enabled. It's this instruction: movb OLDSS(%esp), %ah OLDSS is 0x38, esp is f4f83fc8, OLDSS(%esp) is thus f4f84000, which correctly creates the PAGEALLOC pagefault. esp is off by 4 bytes? it

Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS

2005-04-05 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:10 -0400, James Morris wrote: On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, James Morris wrote: A few questions: Also, please allow cn_add_callback() allow it to be passed a NULL callback function, so the caller doesn't pass in a dummy function and your code doesn't waste time dealing

Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: it could be the ESP-16-bit-corruption patch causing this, or it could be an already existing latent bug getting triggered now: normally only iret accesses the OLDSS, and we fix any iret faults up, but now that we explicitly access %esp the esp bug

Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Do you have nmis enabled? yeah ... call do_nmi - jmp restore_all + jmp restore_nocheck and i was about to take a closer look at the NMI path :-) Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in

[patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc2-V0.7.44-00

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
i have released the -V0.7.44-00 Real-Time Preemption patch, which can be downloaded from the usual place: http://redhat.com/~mingo/realtime-preempt/ this is a merge of -43-08 to 2.6.12-rc2. http://kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v2.6/linux-2.6.11.tar.bz2

Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Akinobu Mita [EMAIL PROTECTED] With nmi_watchdog=1, I got random Oopses (Unable to handle kernel paging request, not by the NMI oopser) from many processes. It is not happend with -rc1. The following change fixes this problem. this

Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS

2005-04-05 Thread Herbert Xu
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:03:16AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: I received comments and feature requests from Herbert Xu and Jamal Hadi Salim, almost all were successfully resolved. Please do not construe my involvement in these threads as endorsement for this system. In fact to this day

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Dave Airlie
- Nobody said anything about the PM resume and DRI behaviour in 2.6.12-rc1-mm4. So it's all perfect now? Well the DRI is, both reports of bugs have been fixed :-), the bug should be closed on bugs.kernel.org I think, and it looks rock solid on my box both FC3 and Debian sarge.. Dave. - To

Re: [patch] sched: auto-tune migration costs

2005-04-05 Thread Paul Jackson
Andi wrote: There is already an arch neutral mechanism in sysfs, see /sys/devices/system/node/node*/distance Excellent - thank-you. But of course SLIT doesn't know anything about cache latencies. Of course. Though SLIT does know about basic node distances, which tend to correlate with cache

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-05 Thread Oleg Nesterov
Oleg Nesterov: o x86: fix ESP corruption CPU bug (take 2) I don't even absolutely understand what this patch does :) I only send a very minor fix on top of Stas Sergeev's patch. Oleg. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL

Re: iomapping a big endian area

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 04:17:45PM -0500, James Bottomley wrote: OK, I sent the patch off to Andrew. To complete the original problem, the attached is the patch that uses it in the parisc lasi driver (although, actually, it sets up 53c700 to work everywhere including BE on a LE system). I

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Nick Piggin
Andrew Morton wrote: +sched-remove-unnecessary-sched-domains.patch +sched-improve-pinned-task-handling-again.patch [snip] CPU scheduler updates It is no problem that you picked these up for testing. But don't merge them yet, please. Suresh's underlying problem with the unnecessary sched domains

Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: * Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: From: Akinobu Mita [EMAIL PROTECTED] With nmi_watchdog=1, I got random Oopses (Unable to handle kernel paging request, not by the NMI oopser) from many processes. It is not happend with -rc1.

Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS

2005-04-05 Thread Evgeniy Polyakov
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:10 -0400, Herbert Xu wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:03:16AM +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: I received comments and feature requests from Herbert Xu and Jamal Hadi Salim, almost all were successfully resolved. Please do not construe my involvement in these threads

Re: [PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

2005-04-05 Thread Stephen Rothwell
On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:44:09 -0700 David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. Probably because very few programs pass sigevents into the kernel ... - memset(event, 0, sizeof(*event)); + memset(event, 0, sizeof(*event)); Blush :-) --

Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs: cleanup asn1.c

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:59:32PM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote: Hi Steve, More fs/cifs/ cleanups for you. This time for asn1.c Btw, shouldn't asn1.c move to lib/? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More

[BOOTMEM] bad physical address convertions.

2005-04-05 Thread Franck Bui-Huu
Hi, I'm porting linux on an embedded system based on MIPS proc. I've encountered several problems and one of these is related to the physical memory which doesn't start to 0. This is actually not a big issue if code that makes physical address convertions uses the appropriate macros that do the

Re: [PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 11:14:16PM -0700, H. Peter Anvin wrote: This allows the i386 architecture to be built on a system with a biarch compiler that defaults to x86-64, merely by specifying ARCH=i386. As previously discussed, this uses the equivalent logic to the ppc port. Given that the

Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs: cleanup asn1.c

2005-04-05 Thread Jesper Juhl
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Date: Tue, 5 Apr 2005 08:35:59 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Jesper Juhl [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Steve French [EMAIL PROTECTED], Steven French [EMAIL PROTECTED], linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] cifs:

Re: iomapping a big endian area

2005-04-05 Thread Russell King
On Sat, Apr 02, 2005 at 09:40:39PM -0600, James Bottomley wrote: On Sun, 2005-04-03 at 04:10 +0100, Matthew Wilcox wrote: SPARC64 can do it in the PTEs, but we just use raw physical addresses in our I/O accessors, and in those load/store instructions we can specify the endianness.

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Brice Goglin
Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ Hi Andrew, printk timing seems broken. It always shows [ 0.00] on my Compaq Evo N600c. dmesg and config attached. - Nobody said anything about the PM resume and DRI behaviour in

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:05:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: +officially-deprecate-register_ioctl32_conversion.patch deprecate a compat function (mainly affects DRI) Those DRI callers aren't in mainline but introduced in bk-drm.patch, looks like the DRI folks need beating with a big

Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00

2005-04-05 Thread Zwane Mwaikambo
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Esben Nielsen wrote: I'm sure a lot of the yield() users could be converted to schedule_timeout(), some of the users i saw were for low memory conditions where we want other tasks to make progress and complete so that we a bit more free memory. Easy, but damn

Re: [RFC 1/6]SEP initialization rework

2005-04-05 Thread Zwane Mwaikambo
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 03:10, Zwane Mwaikambo wrote: On Mon, 4 Apr 2005, Li Shaohua wrote: linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/smpboot.c |6 ++ linux-2.6.11-root/arch/i386/kernel/sysenter.c | 10 ++

Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this fixed my crashes too. spoke too soon - they still trigger even with the patch applied. the patch below fixes the crash, it was related to CONFIG_PREEMPT. Ingo -- fix entry.S crash with PREEMPT+PAGEALLOC Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar

Re: [PATCH]: Fix get_compat_sigevent()

2005-04-05 Thread David S. Miller
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005 17:37:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 22:44:09 -0700 David S. Miller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I have no idea how a bug like this lasted so long. Probably because very few programs pass sigevents into the kernel ... Perhaps, but

Re: [patch] inotify for 2.6.11

2005-04-05 Thread Prakash Punnoor
Hi, I am having a little trouble with inotify 0.22. Previous version worked w/o trouble (even with nvidia and nvsound loaded) with 2.6.12-rc1-kb2 and gamin Now I use 2.6.12-rc2 with inotify 0.22 and got this after a few minutes of uptime (compiling some stuff): Apr 5 09:40:43 tachyon Unable to

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Nick Piggin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton wrote: +sched-remove-unnecessary-sched-domains.patch +sched-improve-pinned-task-handling-again.patch [snip] CPU scheduler updates It is no problem that you picked these up for testing. But don't merge them yet, please. almost

Re: Linux 2.6.12-rc2

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Oleg Nesterov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Oleg Nesterov: o x86: fix ESP corruption CPU bug (take 2) I don't even absolutely understand what this patch does :) I only send a very minor fix on top of Stas Sergeev's patch. I'm suspecting a problem in the reporting scripts. The patch had:

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Brice Goglin
Andrew Morton a écrit : Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ Hi Andrew, printk timing seems broken. It always shows [ 0.00] on my Compaq Evo N600c. What sort of CPU does that

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton a écrit : Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ Hi Andrew, printk timing seems broken. It always shows [

Re: Netlink Connector / CBUS

2005-04-05 Thread Guillaume Thouvenin
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:34 +0400, Evgeniy Polyakov wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 01:10 -0400, Herbert Xu wrote: In fact to this day I still don't understand what problems this thing is meant to solve. Hmm, what else can I add to my words? May be checking the size of the code needed to

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Brice Goglin
Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ - Nobody said anything about the PM resume and DRI behaviour in 2.6.12-rc1-mm4. So it's all perfect now? I'm sorry, I did not follow this PM resume broken thread. But, suspend to

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: (btw, could you please add to all patches who's responsible for them, bk-audit.patch doesn't tell) It's supposed to, but if I have to fix rejects and refresh the patch, I lose that info. Right now, bk-audit stomps on bk-ia64, so we lost the info.

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
bk-audit.patch This introduces various AUDIT_ARCH numerical constants, which is a blatantly stupid idea. We already have a way to uniquely identify architectures, and that's the ELF headers, no need for another parallel namespace. (btw, could you please add to all patches who's responsible

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Andrew Morton
Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ Hi Andrew, printk timing seems broken. It always shows [ 0.00] on my Compaq Evo N600c. What sort of CPU does that thing have?

Re: [PATCH] biarch compiler support for i386

2005-04-05 Thread H. Peter Anvin
Christoph Hellwig wrote: Given that the same logic applies to various other ports maybe it should go into a common Makefile fragment? Alas, the *details* are different for each architecture. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Ingo Molnar
* Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ Hi Andrew, printk timing seems broken. It always shows [ 0.00] on my Compaq Evo N600c. could you send the full bootlog (starting

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Reuben Farrelly
Hi, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ - x86 NMI handling seems to be bust in 2.6.12-rc2. Try using `nmi_watchdog=0' if you experience weird crashes. - The possible kernel-timer related hangs might possibly be fixed. We

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Ian Campbell
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: I am only saying that the tg3.c and other file are under the GPL, and that the firmware included in it is *NOT* intented to be under the GPL, so why not say it explicitly ? I don't think anyone here has disagreed. What almost everyone has

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Brice Goglin
Ingo Molnar a écrit : * Brice Goglin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Andrew Morton a écrit : ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ Hi Andrew, printk timing seems broken. It always shows [ 0.00] on my Compaq Evo N600c. could you send the full

Re: Use of C99 int types

2005-04-05 Thread Renate Meijer
On Apr 4, 2005, at 10:57 PM, Al Viro wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 10:30:52PM +0200, Renate Meijer wrote: When used improperly. The #define Al Viro objected to, is objectionable. It's highly misleading, as Mr. Viro pointed out. I fail to see where he made comments on stdint.h as such. Comments on

Re: 2.6.12-rc1-mm4 crash while mounting a reiserfs3 filesystem

2005-04-05 Thread Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
On Apr 3, 2005 11:56 PM, Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Mathieu Bérard [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, I get a 100% reproductible oops while booting linux 2.6.12-rc1-mm4. (Everyting run smoothly using 2.6.11-mm1) It seems to be related with mounting a reiserfs3 filesystem. It

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Rafael J. Wysocki
Hi, On Tuesday, 5 of April 2005 09:05, Andrew Morton wrote: ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.12-rc2/2.6.12-rc2-mm1/ - x86 NMI handling seems to be bust in 2.6.12-rc2. Try using `nmi_watchdog=0' if you experience weird crashes. - The possible

Re: Overcommit_memory logic fails when swap is off

2005-04-05 Thread Martin Egholm Nielsen
Hello there, After 2½ year I stumbled over this thread: On Wed, 2002-08-21 at 13:23, Alan Cox wrote: 2.5 propses including the ability to set the %age between the 0% of mode 3, the 50 of mode 2 and upwards to things relevant in some embedded system cases. So for 2.6 you will be able to tune it in

2.6.12-rc2 compile error in drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c

2005-04-05 Thread Ben Castricum
2.6.12-rc1 compiles and runs perfectly. gcc version 2.95.3 20010315 (release) CC [M] drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.o In file included from drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.c:63: include/linux/usb_cdc.h:117: field `bDetailData' has incomplete type make[3]: *** [drivers/usb/class/cdc-acm.o] Error 1

Re: [ACPI] Re: [RFC 5/6]clean cpu state after hotremove CPU

2005-04-05 Thread Li Shaohua
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:33, Nathan Lynch wrote: I don't understand why this is needed at all. It looks like a fair amount of code from do_exit is being duplicated here. Yes, exactly. Someone who understand do_exit please help clean up the code. I'd like to remove the idle thread,

Re: [PATCH 00/04] Load keyspan firmware with hotplug

2005-04-05 Thread Kay Sievers
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:51 -0500, Dmitry Torokhov wrote: On Monday 04 April 2005 23:23, Jan Harkes wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 12:17:46PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: On Mon, Apr 04, 2005 at 08:27:53PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote: Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware,

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:19:24AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: I am only saying that the tg3.c and other file are under the GPL, and that the firmware included in it is *NOT* intented to be under the GPL, so why not say it explicitly ?

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Dave Airlie
On Apr 5, 2005 5:44 PM, Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 12:05:24AM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: +officially-deprecate-register_ioctl32_conversion.patch deprecate a compat function (mainly affects DRI) Those DRI callers aren't in mainline but introduced

[IrDA] Oops with NULL deref in irda_device_set_media_busy

2005-04-05 Thread Michal Rokos
Hello, I've problems with IrDA - when debug is off, I'm getting oops for obvious reason... (I don't have a log, this is just rewrite from screen: EIP: irda_device_set_media_busy+0x15/0x40 [irda] ali_ircc_sir_receive+0x4a/0x70 ali_ircc_sir_interrupt+0x66/0x70 ali_ircc_interrupt+0x5e/0x80 . )

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Paul Mackerras
Christoph Hellwig writes: Those DRI callers aren't in mainline but introduced in bk-drm.patch, looks like the DRI folks need beating with a big stick.. Settle down Christoph, the compat_ioctl method is less than 3 months old, has only been in one official 2.6.x release, and isn't documented at

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 07:11:26PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: Christoph Hellwig writes: Those DRI callers aren't in mainline but introduced in bk-drm.patch, looks like the DRI folks need beating with a big stick.. Settle down Christoph, the compat_ioctl method is less than 3 months

Re: Use of C99 int types

2005-04-05 Thread Renate Meijer
On Apr 4, 2005, at 11:49 PM, Kyle Moffett wrote: On Apr 04, 2005, at 17:25, Richard B. Johnson wrote: I don't find stdint.h in the kernel source (up to 2.6.11). Is this going to be a new addition? Uhh, no. stdint.h is part of glibc, not the kernel. It would be very helpful to start using the

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Paul Mackerras
Dave Airlie writes: Paulus these look like your patches care to update them with the new method of doing stuff.. What are we going to do about the DRM CVS? Change it to the new way and break everyone running 2.6.10 or earlier, or leave it at the old way that will work for people with distro

Re: [patch] inotify 0.22

2005-04-05 Thread Martin Schlemmer
On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 16:02 -0400, Robert Love wrote: Hi, Below, find inotify 0.22, against 2.6.12-rc1. Will this be included in mainline anytime soon? Kernel side seems to be working great, and I think all issues was addressed. The only real issues currently is with the gamin backend, but

Re: [linux-pm] Re: [RFC] Driver States

2005-04-05 Thread Pavel Machek
Hi! You have a few things here that can easily conflict, and that will be developed at different paces. I like the direction that it's going, but how do you intend to do it gradually. I.e. what to do first? I think the first step would be for us to all agree on a design, whether it be

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Dave Airlie
Paulus these look like your patches care to update them with the new method of doing stuff.. What are we going to do about the DRM CVS? Change it to the new way and break everyone running 2.6.10 or earlier, or leave it at the old way that will work for people with distro kernels, and

Re: [patch] Real-Time Preemption, -RT-2.6.12-rc1-V0.7.43-00

2005-04-05 Thread Esben Nielsen
On Tue, 5 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote: * Esben Nielsen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Now the question is, who will fix it? Preferably the maintainers, but I don't know how much of a priority this is to them. I don't have the time now to look at this and understand enough about the code

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Btw, some more comments on the 32bit compat code in drm: - instead of set_fs co and passing kernel addresses to drm_ioctl please use compat_alloc_user_space() - this: +ifeq ($(CONFIG_COMPAT),y) +drm-objs+= drm_ioc32.o +radeon-objs += radeon_ioc32.o +endif should be written as

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 10:32 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:19:24AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 23:19 +0200, Sven Luther wrote: I am only saying that the tg3.c and other file are under the GPL, and that the firmware included in it is *NOT*

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:49:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: I don't think you did get a rejection, a few people said that _they_ weren't going to do it, but if you want to then go ahead. I think people are just fed up of people bringing up the issue and then failing to do anything about it

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 19:20 +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: Dave Airlie writes: Paulus these look like your patches care to update them with the new method of doing stuff.. What are we going to do about the DRM CVS? Change it to the new way and break everyone running 2.6.10 or earlier, or

Re: [PATCH 00/04] Load keyspan firmware with hotplug

2005-04-05 Thread Marcel Holtmann
Hi Jan, Mmm, probably that 2001 discussion about the keyspan firmware, right ? http://lists.debian.org/debian-legal/2001/04/msg00145.html Can you summarize the conclusion of the thread, or what you did get from it, please ? That people didn't like the

Re: [RFC] shared subtrees

2005-04-05 Thread Ram
On Sun, 2005-01-16 at 22:11, Al Viro wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 01:42:09PM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 06:06:56PM +, Al Viro wrote: On Sun, Jan 16, 2005 at 11:02:13AM -0500, J. Bruce Fields wrote: On Thu, Jan 13, 2005 at 10:18:51PM +, Al Viro wrote:

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 07:44:38PM +1000, Paul Mackerras wrote: Christoph Hellwig writes: - the magic CONFIG_COMPAT changes for SHM handles should only be done when a module is set. CONFIG_COMPAT is set for mostly 64bit systems that can run 32bit code and drm shouldn't behave

Re: forkbombing Linux distributions

2005-04-05 Thread Natanael Copa
On Thu, 2005-03-31 at 12:11 -0500, Lee Revell wrote: Didn't you ever look up what a ulimit is? ofcourse i did. I just think that ulimit (or other userspace tools) should be used to *raise* the limit if you need more. Not the reverse. If you consider your distro's default ulimits unreasonable,

Re: crash in entry.S restore_all, 2.6.12-rc2, x86, PAGEALLOC

2005-04-05 Thread Mikael Pettersson
Ingo Molnar writes: * Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: this fixed my crashes too. spoke too soon - they still trigger even with the patch applied. the patch below fixes the crash, it was related to CONFIG_PREEMPT. Ingo -- fix entry.S crash with

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Paul Mackerras
Christoph Hellwig writes: Please make it a module option so it doesn't regress everyone for your specific needs. Sorry, I don't follow you. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] More majordomo info at

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Paul Mackerras
Christoph Hellwig writes: It's documented where the other filesystem entry points are documented. Which is? $ grep -r compat_ioctl Documentation Documentation/filesystems/Locking: long (*compat_ioctl) (struct file *, unsigned int, unsigned long);

pktcddvd - immediate crash

2005-04-05 Thread Soeren Sonnenburg
Hi all, I wonder whether anyone could use the pktcddvd device without killing random jobs (due to sudden out of memory or better memory leaks in pktcddvd) and finally a complete freeze of the machine ? To reproduce just create an udf filesystem on some dvdrw, mount it rw and copy some large file

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Arjan van de Ven
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:11 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:49:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: I don't think you did get a rejection, a few people said that _they_ weren't going to do it, but if you want to then go ahead. I think people are just fed up of people

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Ian Campbell
On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:11 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:49:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: I don't think you did get a rejection, a few people said that _they_ weren't going to do it, but if you want to then go ahead. I think people are just fed up of people

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Christoph Hellwig
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 11:28:07AM +0200, Arjan van de Ven wrote: I think they will be accepted if they first introduce a transition period where tg3 will do request_firmware() and only use the built-in firmware if that fails. Fine with me. Second step is to make the built-in firmware a

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Sven Luther
Hello Jeff, ... If i can believe what i see in : http://linux.bkbits.net:8080/linux-2.6/anno/drivers/net/[EMAIL PROTECTED]|src/|src/drivers|src/drivers/net|related/drivers/net/tg3.c|[EMAIL PROTECTED] (which may or may not be correct and complete, since i am not really familiar with bk and

Re: non-free firmware in kernel modules, aggregation and unclear copyright notice.

2005-04-05 Thread Sven Luther
On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 10:30:47AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 11:11 +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Apr 05, 2005 at 09:49:25AM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote: I don't think you did get a rejection, a few people said that _they_ weren't going to do it, but if you

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Paul Mackerras
Christoph Hellwig writes: E.g. on my ia64 box CONFIG_COMPAT is set because I have support compiled in for running i386 apps. But I don't want dri to hand out 32bit handles everywhere just because of that, because I most certainly won't be running i386 OpenGL apps. The handle for a _DRM_SHM

Re: 2.6.12-rc2-mm1

2005-04-05 Thread Dave Airlie
E.g. on my ia64 box CONFIG_COMPAT is set because I have support compiled in for running i386 apps. But I don't want dri to hand out 32bit handles everywhere just because of that, because I most certainly won't be running i386 OpenGL apps. It doesn't actually matter what size the handles

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >