On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 21:44, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I submitted a fix for this a while ago, I think ..
> > interruptible_sleep_on()'s are broken ..
>
> sleep_on() is a fundamentally broken interface, it only works on UP -
> but there it _does_ rely
On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 12:45:52PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Can you guys re-send the scripts you wrote? They probably need some
> updating for the new semantics. Sorry about that ;(
I've been off email this weekend, so have fallen a bit behind here.
I'll forgo updating my stuff, since it lo
make defconfig give the following error on ppc (gcc-4):
arch/ppc/syslib/open_pic.c:36: error: static declaration of âOpenPICâ
follows non-static declaration
arch/ppc/syslib/open_pic_defs.h:175: error: previous declaration of
âOpenPICâ was here
The following patch solves it.
Signed-Off-By: Beno
On Monday 11 April 2005 15:58, Martin Waitz wrote:
> Docbook: use custom stylesheet
>
> With the custom stylesheet, functions are rendered using ANSI-C syntax
> and xmlto is a bit quieter.
Definitely better. Still remains (anything with more than 1 argument):
=
Hi,
On Monday, 11 of April 2005 12:37, Oliver Neukum wrote:
> Am Sonntag, 10. April 2005 22:14 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> > Hi!
> >
> > > > Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > > What is the point in doing so after they've rested on the disk for
> > > > > ages?
> > > >
> > > > The point is not physical ac
make defconfig give the following error on ppc (gcc-4):
arch/ppc/kernel/time.c:92: error: static declaration of âtime_offsetâ
follows non-static declaration
include/linux/timex.h:236: error: previous declaration of âtime_offsetâ
was here
The following patch solves it (time_offset is declared in t
On Monday 11 April 2005 13:45, Nick Piggin wrote:
>
> No luck yet (on SMP i386). How many disks are you using in each
> raid1 array? You are using one array for swap, and one mounted as
> ext3 for the working area of the `stress` program, right?
>
Right. I'm using two Seagate ATA133 disks (ide
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 09:29 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 14:51, Lee Revell wrote:
> > On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:38 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > > I submitted a fix for this a while ago, I think ..
> > > interruptible_sleep_on()'s are broken ..
> >
> > I saw the fix in -st
Hi!
> > I'd like to retain ability to read suspend image in any order (so that
> > code can be reused for swap encryption, etc).
>
> This is not possible with cipher block chaining as used right now. One
> would have to use a non-random iv set needs to set for every page. And
> this leads to exac
Gene Heskett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Every disk system I have ever delt with, has as a default, (and I've
> walked around in a couple of them at the assembly language level) the
> assumption that if track 0 is to be formatted, then the whole device
> is assumed to be needing formatted, and ev
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:34:19AM -0700, Roland Dreier wrote:
> Troy> How is memory pinning handled? (I haven't had time to read
> Troy> all the code, so please excuse my ignorance of something
> Troy> obvious).
>
> The userspace library calls mlock() and then the kernel does
> get_us
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 06:12:22PM +0200, Marco Colombo wrote:
> [I'm not subscribed, so this in not a real reply - sorry if it breaks
> threading somehow.]
>
> Sven Luther wrote:
> > The ftp-master are the ones reviewing the licencing problems, and they
> are the
> > ones handling the infrastruc
Is it true that only kernel drivers and modules can cause a "kernel panic"?
I mean, is it possible for an user level application to be the cause of
a "kernel panic"? If it is, which kind of operations can do that?
Thanks in advance
--
Sauro Salomoni
Ztec
www.ztec.com.br
smime.p7s
Description: S
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 14:51, Lee Revell wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 13:38 -0700, Daniel Walker wrote:
> > I submitted a fix for this a while ago, I think ..
> > interruptible_sleep_on()'s are broken ..
>
> I saw the fix in -stable, but it does not seem to be in 2.6.12-rc2.
I didn't know it w
Pavel Machek wrote:
> I'd like to retain ability to read suspend image in any order (so that
> code can be reused for swap encryption, etc).
> Pavel
This is not possible with cipher block chaining as used right now. One
would have to us
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 03:53, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> ok, i've added this patch to the -45-00 release. It's looking good on my
> testsystems so far, but it will need some more testing i guess.
Yes, I ran the PI test, and just let the system run .. So it could use
more extensive testing..
Daniel
[I'm not subscribed, so this in not a real reply - sorry if it breaks
threading somehow.]
Sven Luther wrote:
> The ftp-master are the ones reviewing the licencing problems, and they
are the
> ones handling the infrastructure, and putting their responsability on the
> stake. If they feel that some
Docbook: use custom stylesheet
With the custom stylesheet, functions are rendered using ANSI-C syntax
and xmlto is a bit quieter.
Signed-off-by: Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/DocBook/Makefile |3 ++-
Documentation/DocBook/stylesheet.xsl |5 +
2 files chang
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Was it really neccessary to include "union u"? I don't like its name,
Here comes the patch with this reverted. I'm now using casts when
'abusing' the space for encryption. Furthermore the iv set up in the tfm
is used instead of the local copy.
--
Andreas Steinmetz
Andreas Steinmetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> +If you want to store your suspend image encrypted with a temporary
> +key to prevent data gathering after resume you must compile
> +crypto and the aes algorithm into the kernel - modules won't work
> +as they cannot be loaded at resume time.
Can't
hoi :)
the following two patches fix some problems noticed by Alexey.
I still have to look harder at the stylesheets to get nicely linked
function lists in the toc.
@Andrew: lets test the xmlto converter in -mm a little bit longer.
Should I keep sending relative patches or replacement patches?
I
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 11 of April 2005 01:17, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
>
>>Pavel,
>>during testing of the encrypted swsusp_image on x86_64 I did get an Oops
>>from time to time at memcpy+11 called from swsusp_save+1090 which turns
>>out to be the memcpy in copy_data_pages(
* Petr Baudis:
>> Almost certainly, v3 will be incompatible with v2 because it adds
>> further restrictions. This means that your proposal would result in
>> software which is not redistributable by third parties.
>
> Hmm, what would be actually the point in introducing further
> restrictions? An
DocBook: fix html link
The start page for each book has changed from book1.html to index.html.
Update our generated links acocrdingly.
Signed-off-by: Martin Waitz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
Documentation/DocBook/Makefile |2 +-
1 files changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
Index: linux-docbo
Hi Alan!
Thanks for the info
Am Montag 11. April 2005 17:36 schrieb Alan Cox:
> It makes little difference as the attacker can replace the kernel and
> reboot.
> Anyway they can flash erase your video card bios, your IDE firmware,
> your BIOS
> and far more just as easily.
Yes, but a new video-c
Bodo Eggert wrote:
> Andreas Steinmetz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>+If you want to store your suspend image encrypted with a temporary
>>+key to prevent data gathering after resume you must compile
>>+crypto and the aes algorithm into the kernel - modules won't work
>>+as they cannot be load
On 2005-04-11, Linus Torvalds wrote:
>I'm inclined to go with GPLv2 just because it's the most common one [...]
You may want to use a file from GPL'ed monotone that
implements a substantial diff optimization described in the August
1989 paper by Sun Wu, Udi Manber and Gene Myers ("An O(NP)
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> if a repository is corrupted then it pretty much needs to be dropped
> anyway.
I disagree. Yes, the thing is designed to be replicated, so most of the
time the easiest thing to do is to just rsync with another copy.
But dammit, I don't want to jus
Troy> How is memory pinning handled? (I haven't had time to read
Troy> all the code, so please excuse my ignorance of something
Troy> obvious).
The userspace library calls mlock() and then the kernel does
get_user_pages().
Troy> The old mellanox drivers used to have a hack to call
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > > to construct the combo blob later on, we do have to unpack sched.c (and
> > > if it's already a combo-blob that is not cached then we'd have to unpack
> > > all parents until we arrive at some ful
> > 3) No other user should have access to files under the mount, not
> > even root[5]
>
> > [5] Obviously root cannot be restricted, but accidental access to
> > private data is still a good idea. E.g. root squashing by NFS servers
> > has a similar affect.
>
> Could you explain a little
On Sun, 10 Apr 2005 16:38:00 -0700 (PDT) Linus Torvalds wrote:
|
|
| On Sun, 10 Apr 2005, Paul Jackson wrote:
| >
| > Useful explanation - thanks, Linus.
|
| Hey. You're welcome. Especially when you create good documentation for
| this thing.
|
| Because:
|
| > Is this picture and descriptio
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 11:21:45AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> må den 11.04.2005 Klokka 16:41 (+0200) skreiv Jakob Oestergaard:
>
> > > That can mean either that the server is dropping fragments, or that the
> > > client is dropping the replies. Can you generate a similar tcpdump on
> > > the
* Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > to construct the combo blob later on, we do have to unpack sched.c (and
> > if it's already a combo-blob that is not cached then we'd have to unpack
> > all parents until we arrive at some full blob).
>
> I really don't want to have this. Having
On Llu, 2005-04-04 at 18:42, Jonas Diemer wrote:
> I figured there could be a kernel compiled-in option that will make the
> kernel
> lock all drives found during bootup. then, a malicous program would need to
> install a different kernel in order to harm the drive, which would be much
> more s
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:43:32PM +0200, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
> 3) No other user should have access to files under the mount, not
> even root[5]
> [5] Obviously root cannot be restricted, but accidental access to
> private data is still a good idea. E.g. root squashing by NFS servers
> h
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> to construct the combo blob later on, we do have to unpack sched.c (and
> if it's already a combo-blob that is not cached then we'd have to unpack
> all parents until we arrive at some full blob).
I really don't want to have this. Having chains of d
* Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> here are some stats: of the last 34160 files modified in the Linux
> kernel tree in the past 1 year, the file sizes total to 1 GB, and the
> average file-size per file committed is 31220 bytes. The changes
> themselves amount to:
>
> 22404 files cha
On Maw, 2005-04-05 at 09:49, Martin Egholm Nielsen wrote:
> As I can see, the patch never made it in 2.4.x, right?!
> So, I would like a diff - if still possible :-)
I submitted it ages ago but it was rejected and punted to 2.6. The 2.4
support is available in Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3, so you ca
here are some stats: of the last 34160 files modified in the Linux
kernel tree in the past 1 year, the file sizes total to 1 GB, and the
average file-size per file committed is 31220 bytes. The changes
themselves amount to:
22404 files changed, 1996494 insertions(+), 1396644 deletions(-)
(th
Hello,
I've encountered the strangest problem yet in my linux career...I'll just
explain my setup, what happens, and what solved the problem and you can decide
if you are more interested after that...
* Company firewall 2.6.8.1 ip-address 1.2.3.4 with priv net 192.168.1
* Home firewall 2.6.11.6
mà den 11.04.2005 Klokka 16:41 (+0200) skreiv Jakob Oestergaard:
> > That can mean either that the server is dropping fragments, or that the
> > client is dropping the replies. Can you generate a similar tcpdump on
> > the server?
>
> Certainly; http://unthought.net/sparrow.dmp.bz2
So, it looks
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 12:48:34AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> kernel-rcupdatec-make-the-exports-export_symbol_gpl.patch
> add-deprecated_for_modules.patch
> add-deprecated_for_modules-fix.patch
> deprecate-synchronize_kernel-gpl-replacement.patch
> deprecate-synchronize_kernel-gpl-replacement-fix.
* Paul Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm ... I have this strong sense that I am about 2 hours away from
> smacking my forehead and groaning "Duh - so that's what Ingo meant!"
>
> However, one must play out one's destiny.
>
> Could you provide an example scenario, which results in the cr
Hi,
Please find the patch below to fix Oops! in unregister_kprobe().
Please let me know if you any issues.
Thanks
Prasanna
kernel oops! when unregister_kprobe() is called on a non-registered
kprobe. This patch fixes the above problem by checking if the probe exists
before unregistering.
Signed
Some nlmsg alignment cleanups. Documentation module cleanups.
Thanks, Thomas.
Signed-off-by: Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
* looking for [EMAIL PROTECTED]/connector--main--0--patch-47 to compare with
* comparing to [EMAIL PROTECTED]/connector--main--0--patch-47
M cn_test.c
M connector.c
Hmmm ... I have this strong sense that I am about 2 hours away from
smacking my forehead and groaning "Duh - so that's what Ingo meant!"
However, one must play out one's destiny.
Could you provide an example scenario, which results in the creation of
a combo-blob?
The best I can come up with is
We're having a bit of a disagreement with Christoph Hellwig about the
way FUSE does (or should do) permission checking. Comments (either
way) are appreciated.
Here's my side of the story:
FUSE (filesystem in userspace) is designed to allow mounting an FS by
non-privileged users (it can also be u
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:35:25AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
> må den 11.04.2005 Klokka 15:47 (+0200) skreiv Jakob Oestergaard:
>
> > Certainly;
> >
> > http://unthought.net/binary.dmp.bz2
> >
> > I got an 'invalid snaplen' with the 9 you suggested, the above dump
> > is done with 9000 -
mà den 11.04.2005 Klokka 15:47 (+0200) skreiv Jakob Oestergaard:
> Certainly;
>
> http://unthought.net/binary.dmp.bz2
>
> I got an 'invalid snaplen' with the 9 you suggested, the above dump
> is done with 9000 - if you need another snaplen please just let me know.
So, the RPC itself looks g
Adrian,
./drivers/char/mwave/Makefile also references Paul's email
address, at least in v2.4.
Applied, thanks.
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 01:15:45AM +0200, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> Both maintainer email addresses are bouncing and the web address is no
> longer valid.
>
> Seems to be a good time to r
> In particular, the memory pinning code in in uverbs_mem.c could stand
> a looking over. In addition, a sanity check of the write()-based
> scheme for passing commands into the kernel in uverbs_main.c and
> uverbs_cmd.c is probably worthwhile.
How is memory pinning handled? (I haven't had time t
> Andreas is right, his patches are needed.
>
> Currently, if your laptop is stolen after resume, they can still data
> in swsusp image.
Which shows that swsusp is a security risk if you have sensitive data in
RAM. A thief stealing a running computer can get access to memory
contents much more ea
Followup to: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
By author:Christopher Li <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>
> There is one problem though. How about the SHA1 hash collision?
> Even the chance is very remote, you don't want to lose some data do due
> to "software" error. I think it is OK th
Hello,
here goes git-pasky-0.3, my set of patches and scripts upon
Linus' git, aimed at human usability and to an extent a SCM-like usage.
If you already have a previous git-pasky version, just git pull pasky
to get it (but see below!!!). Otherwise, you can get it from:
http://pask
On Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 08:35:39AM -0400, Trond Myklebust wrote:
...
> That certainly shouldn't be the case (and isn't on any of my setups). Is
> the behaviour identical same on both the PIII and the Opteron systems?
The dual opteron is the nfs server
The dual athlon is the 2.4 nfs client
The du
Michael Poole wrote:
Copyright law only _explicitly_ grants a monopoly on preparation of
derivative works. However, it is trivial, and overwhelmingly common,
for a copyright owner to grant a license to create a derivative work
that is conditional on how the licensee agrees to distribute (or not
di
Humberto Massa writes:
> David Schwartz wrote:
>
>> > On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 08:07:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
>>
>>
>> >> The way you stop someone from distributing part of your work is
>> >> by arguing that the work they are distributing is a derivative
>> >> work of your work and they ha
* Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-04-11 16:59
> + size = NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(*msg) + msg->len);
> +
> + skb = alloc_skb(size, gfp_mask);
> + if (!skb) {
> + printk(KERN_ERR "Failed to allocate new skb with size=%u.\n",
> size);
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
Richard B. Johnson wrote:
Shouldn't it just be:
#define mach_reboot_fixup(x)
|___ Nothing here.
Dear Wrongbot,
No.
-hpa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info a
At Sun, 10 Apr 2005 01:12:11 +0200,
Adrian Bunk wrote:
>
> This patch removes some dead code found by the Coverity checker.
>
> Signed-off-by: Adrian Bunk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Applied to ALSA tree. Thanks!
Takashi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the
Pavel Machek wrote:
> Hi!
>
>
>>The following patch adds the core functionality for the encrypted
>>suspend image.
>
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SWSUSP_ENCRYPT
> +static struct crypto_tfm *crypto_init(int mode)
> +{
> + struct crypto_tfm *tfm;
> + int len;
> +
> + tfm = crypto_alloc_tf
Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Monday, 11 of April 2005 01:17, Andreas Steinmetz wrote:
>
>>Pavel,
>>during testing of the encrypted swsusp_image on x86_64 I did get an Oops
>>from time to time at memcpy+11 called from swsusp_save+1090 which turns
>>out to be the memcpy in copy_data_pages(
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>>The following patch adds the core functionality for the encrypted
>>>suspend image.
>>
>>[Please inline patches, it makes it easier to comment on them.]
Aiyeeh - good ole Mozilla tends to reformat things when inlining...
>>You seem to reuse same key/iv for all the bloc
On Monday 11 April 2005 03:38, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> * Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > So anything that got modified in just one tree obviously merges to
> > that version. Any file that got modified in two trees will end up just
> > being passed to the "merge" program. See "man merge"
I handled this issue by precaching all my files (15MB),
from my readonly root filesystem.
find / -type f |
grep -v ^/boot | #kernel is > 1MB and never read so don't put in cache
while read file; do
dd bs=32k if="$file" of=/dev/null 2>/dev/null
done
Pádraig.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send
Hi,
On Thu, 2005-04-07 at 16:51, Stephen C. Tweedie wrote:
> I'm currently running with the buffer-trace debug patch, on 2.4, with a
> custom patch to put every buffer jbd ever sees onto a per-superblock
> list, and remove it only when the bh is destroyed in
> put_unused_buffer_head(). At unmoun
/*/
Kernel Connector.
/*/
Kernel connector - new netlink based userspace <-> kernel space easy to use
communication module.
Connector driver adds possibility to connect various agents using
netlink based network.
One
Nick Piggin wrote:
The common theme seems to be: try_to_free_pages, swap_writepage,
mempool_alloc, down/down_failed in .text.lock.md. Next I would suspect
md/raid1 - maybe some deadlock in an uncommon memory allocation
failure path?
I'll see if I can reproduce it here.
No luck yet (on SMP i386). Ho
> + cmd->request->flags |= REQ_SOFTBARRIER;
> +
> + spin_lock_irqsave(q->queue_lock, flags);
> + blk_requeue_request(q, cmd->request);
> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(q->queue_lock, flags);
>
> scsi_run_queue(q);
This exact code sequence is duplicated in the previous patch, mayb
On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Riley, Dave, Peter, i386 boot/workaround maintainers,
I'm resending this patch (from March 28).
This patch incorporates the suggestions from the previous thread and also
switches to using pci_get_device since pci_find_device is
mà den 11.04.2005 Klokka 09:48 (+0200) skreiv Jakob Oestergaard:
> tcp with timeo=600 causes retransmits (as seen with nfsstat) to drop to
> zero.
Good.
> File Block Num Seq ReadRand Read Seq Write Rand Write
> DirSize Size Thr Rate (CPU%) Rate (CPU%) Rate (CPU%) Ra
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi Riley, Dave, Peter, i386 boot/workaround maintainers,
I'm resending this patch (from March 28).
This patch incorporates the suggestions from the previous thread and also
switches to using pci_get_device since pci_find_device is deprecated, and
made some of the variable
On Apr 11, 2005 1:38 PM, kus Kusche Klaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So the question is, what exactly is the IDE priority?
> Is the PIO transfer done in the IRQ handler or in a bh?
in the IRQ handler
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a mess
David Schwartz wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 09, 2005 at 08:07:03PM -0700, David Schwartz wrote:
>> The way you stop someone from distributing part of your work is
>> by arguing that the work they are distributing is a derivative
>> work of your work and they had no right to *make* it in the first
>> place
Giuseppe Bilotta wrote:
On Fri, 08 Apr 2005 20:42:17 +0200, Josselin Mouette wrote:
Every book in my book shelf is software?
If you digitalize it, yes.
AFAIK software only refers to programs, not to arbitrary sequences of
bytes. An MP3 file isn't "software". Although it surely isn't
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 19:10, Mingming Cao wrote:
> > It still needs to be done under locking to prevent us from expanding
> > over the next window, though. And having to take and drop a spinlock a
> > dozen times or more just to find out that there are no usable free
> > blocks in the curren
Adrian Bunk wrote:
Even RedHat with a stronger financial background than Debian considered
the MP3 patents being serious enough to remove MP3 support.
Actually, they did it to spite the patent holders.
[]s
Massa
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the bo
Glenn Maynard wrote:
I've heard the claim, several times, that that creating a derivative
work requires creative input, that linking stuff together with "ld" is
completely uncreative, therefore no derivative work is created. (I'm
not sure if you're making (here or elsewhere) that claim, but it see
>From the three sources of multi-millisecond latency in my experiments
(console messages to dead serial console, USB I/O, CF Card bulk read),
I've analyzed one:
The latency of around 70 milliseconds in low-priority RT processes
when running a "dd if=/dev/hda of=/dev/null" in parallel (where hda
i
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-04-08 at 18:14, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
> I get OOPs in log_do_checkpoint() while using ext3 quotas.
> Is this anyway related to what you are working on ?
>
> Unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
>
Doesn't look like it, no. If we underst
> > > > The following patch adds the core functionality for the encrypted
> > > > suspend image.
> > > [Please inline patches, it makes it easier to comment on them.]
> > > You seem to reuse same key/iv for all the blocks. I'm no crypto
> > > expert, but I think that is seriously wrong... You proba
i think all of the 'repository size' and 'bandwidth' concerns could be
solved via a new (and pretty much simple and transparent) object type:
the 'combo-blob'.
Summary:
This is a space/bandwidth-efficient blob that 'includes' arbitrary
portions of (one, two, or more) simple blobs by
Hello,
> On Mon, 2005-04-04 at 10:04, Jan Kara wrote:
>
> > In log_do_checkpoint() we go through the t_checkpoint_list of a
> > transaction and call __flush_buffer() on each buffer. Suppose there is
> > just one buffer on the list and it is dirty. __flush_buffer() sees it and
> > puts it to a
On Mon, 2005-04-11 at 12:45 +0200, Thomas Graf wrote:
> * Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-04-11 09:22
> > On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Graf ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> > wrote:
> > > + size = NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(*msg) + msg->len);
> > > +
> > > + skb = alloc_skb(
> I get OOPs in log_do_checkpoint() while using ext3 quotas.
> Is this anyway related to what you are working on ?
Nope, it does not seem to be the same problem. In theory it could be a
bug Stephen fixed some time ago - could you try to reproduce the problem
with 2.6.12-rc2 (it contains the fix)
Hi!
> The following patch adds the core functionality for the encrypted
> suspend image.
+#ifdef CONFIG_SWSUSP_ENCRYPT
+static struct crypto_tfm *crypto_init(int mode)
+{
+ struct crypto_tfm *tfm;
+ int len;
+
+ tfm = crypto_alloc_tfm(CIPHER, CRYPTO_TFM_MODE_CBC);
+ if(!tf
Hi!
> > > The following patch adds the core functionality for the encrypted
> > > suspend image.
> > [Please inline patches, it makes it easier to comment on them.]
> > You seem to reuse same key/iv for all the blocks. I'm no crypto
> > expert, but I think that is seriously wrong... You probably s
Hi!
> during testing of the encrypted swsusp_image on x86_64 I did get an Oops
> from time to time at memcpy+11 called from swsusp_save+1090 which turns
> out to be the memcpy in copy_data_pages() of swsusp.c.
> The Oops is caused by a NULL pointer (I don't remember if it was source
> or destinati
Hi!
> > > No, XFS is my root filesystem. :( (Now that I think about it, would
> > > modularizing XFS and using an initrd be OK?)
> >
> > Yes, loading xfs from initrd should help. [At least it did during
> > suse9.3 testing.]
>
> Once I modularized xfs and switched to using an initrd, the problem
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:40:00AM CEST, I got a letter
where Florian Weimer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> * Ingo Molnar:
>
> > is there any fundamental problem with going with v2 right now, and then
> > once v3 is out and assuming it looks ok, all newly copyrightable bits
>
* Evgeniy Polyakov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> 2005-04-11 09:22
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 09:27:27PM +0200, Thomas Graf ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
> wrote:
> > + size = NLMSG_SPACE(sizeof(*msg) + msg->len);
> > +
> > + skb = alloc_skb(size, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > + if (!skb) {
> > + pri
When a process running with RT priority dumps core,
I get the following BUG:
Apr 11 13:44:23 OF455 kern.err kernel: BUG: rtc2:833 RT task
yield()-ing!
Apr 11 13:44:23 OF455 kern.warn kernel: [] yield+0x61/0x70
(8)
Apr 11 13:44:23 OF455 kern.warn kernel: []
coredump_wait+0x79/0xc0 (20)
Apr 11 13:
Am Sonntag, 10. April 2005 22:14 schrieb Pavel Machek:
> Hi!
>
> > > Oliver Neukum wrote:
> > > > What is the point in doing so after they've rested on the disk for ages?
> > >
> > > The point is not physical access to the disk but data gathering after
> > > resume or reboot.
> >
> > After resum
> > The following patch adds the core functionality for the encrypted
> > suspend image.
> [Please inline patches, it makes it easier to comment on them.]
> You seem to reuse same key/iv for all the blocks. I'm no crypto
> expert, but I think that is seriously wrong... You probably should use
> blo
Andrew Morton wrote:
bk-cifs.patch
This breaks the build on mips, ppc64, sparc, sparc64 with the
following error (defconfig, compared to mm2):
CC [M] fs/cifs/misc.o
fs/cifs/misc.c: In function `cifs_convertUCSpath':
fs/cifs/misc.c:546: error: case label does not reduce to an integer constant
fs/
Hi!
> The following patch adds the core functionality for the encrypted
> suspend image.
[Please inline patches, it makes it easier to comment on them.]
You seem to reuse same key/iv for all the blocks. I'm no crypto
expert, but I think that is seriously wrong... You probably should use
block nu
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 10:50:51AM CEST, I got a letter
where Ingo Molnar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
>
> * Petr Baudis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon Linus'
> > git, aimed at human usability an
Thanks Maneesh for your comments. Please find
the patch below.
> [..]
> > Assumption : If a user has already inserted a probe using old
> > register_kprobe()
> > routine, and later wants to insert another probe at the same address using
> > register_multiprobe() routine, then register_multiprobe(
Dear diary, on Mon, Apr 11, 2005 at 04:46:42AM CEST, I got a letter
where Daniel Barkalow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> told me that...
> On Mon, 11 Apr 2005, Petr Baudis wrote:
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > here goes git-pasky-0.2, my set of patches and scripts upon
> > Linus' git, aimed at human usability and
201 - 300 of 336 matches
Mail list logo
