On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 09:25, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 09:37 -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
I have to say, this whole thread has been pretty damn worthless in
general in my not-so-humble opinion.
This thread has really gone OT, but
EFI support in x86-64?
Is EFI only support IA64?
Is acpi in EFI?
YH
On 7/14/05, Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jul 2005 20:52:58 -0700
yhlu [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andi,
How do yo think about make x86-64 kernel support openfirmware interface?
I don't like it. We
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 14:08 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
Audio did show slightly larger max latencies but nothing that would be of
significance.
On video, maximum latencies are only slightly larger at HZ 250, all the
desired cpu was achieved, but the average latency and number of missed
This patch fixes a microcode lockup in my CD-ROM adapters when a blank
CD is inserted. However, do not try to burn CDs yet! I'm pretty sure
that trying it will end in coasters.
- Fix a few cases where we were unable to resynchronize with replies
for previous commands. The main thing is to
On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 05:45:58AM +0200, Jesper Juhl wrote:
On 7/16/05, Nicholas Hans Simmonds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
While I'm not qualified to comment on the implementation I do have a
few small codingstyle comments :-)
diff --git a/fs/read_write.c b/fs/read_write.c
---
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, David Gibson wrote:
I'm still not at all sure what you're getting at. Do you mean the
demand-allocation patches which were floating around at some point - I
gather they're important for doing sensible NUMA allocation of
hugepages. They have a small overlap with the COW
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Lee Revell wrote:
On Fri, 2005-07-15 at 14:08 +1000, Con Kolivas wrote:
Audio did show slightly larger max latencies but nothing that would be of
significance.
On video, maximum latencies are only slightly larger at HZ 250, all the
desired cpu was achieved, but
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, Jesper Juhl wrote:
It's buggy, that I know. setting kernel_hz (the new boot parameter) to
250 causes my system clock to run at something like 4-5 times normal
speed
4 times normal. You don't actually make the timer interrupt happen at
250Hz, so the timer will be
Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, in this case, the whinging resulted in
finding a _real_ bug and locating why your ports
weren't being found. So I guess it's
good for something.
Indeed! The old kernel didn't have such an advantage.
Can you mail me a diff of the changes you made
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005 00:27:48 +0200 Andi Kleen wrote:
Some oprofile listings from a few of the test runs would be also nice.
That is in the works. We will upload profile data. I'm having problem
with oprofile on some versions of kernel and that is being investigated
right now.
If
Tejun Heo wrote:
Daniel McNeil wrote:
This patch relaxes the direct i/o alignment check so that user addresses
do not have to be a multiple of the device block size.
I've done some preliminary testing and it mostly works on an ext3
file system on a ide disk. I have seen trouble when the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2005 at 07:04:38PM +0530, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I ma newbie to compactflash driver , I am using mpc862 PPC processor
on my custom board having 64mb ram running linuxppc-2.4.18 kernel .
i am using Sandisk Extreme CF 1GB which is 133x high speed, but
found the performance
On Thursday 14 July 2005 21:35, Andrew Haninger wrote:
Hello.
I'm using Linux Kernel 2.6.12.2 plus suspend 2.1.9.9 and acpi-20050408
with the hibernate-1.10 script. My machine is a Shuttle SK43G which
has a VIA KM400 chipset with an Athlon XP CPU.
Suspension seems to work well. However,
On Thu, Jul 14, 2005 at 07:00:11PM -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Fri, 15 Jul 2005, David Gibson wrote:
Well, the COW patch implements a fault handler, obviously. What
specifically where you thinking about?
About a fault handler of course and about surrounding scalability issues.
I
Daniel McNeil wrote:
On Thu, 2005-07-14 at 16:16, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
How does your patch ensures that we meet the driver alignment
restrictions ? Like you said, you need atleast even byte alignment
for IDE etc..
And also, are there any restrictions on how much the minimum IO
size has to
601 - 615 of 615 matches
Mail list logo
