Having some intermittent problems using my ipw2200 wireless card on
2.6.20-rc2-git1 (may affect earlier versions as well) under Fedora Core
6 i386. It appears that sometimes on bootup the interface gets named
with a junk name like __tmp32284835 and it doesn't show up in ifconfig.
rmmod/insmod
Having some suspend problems on 2.6.20-rc2-git1 with Fedora Core 6.
First of all the normal user interface for hibernate isn't working
properly while it did in 2.6.19. When you select Hibernate it seems to
stop X and go into console mode but somehow doesn't seem to actually
start the process
Hi all!
[ I'm not subscribed to this list so please CC me on your replies. ]
This patch is a reworked version of:
http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0603.3/0990.html
It adds a search dialog to the kernel's make xconfig configuration applet.
Changes in this release include:
1.
Please check the revised patch
YH
[PATCH] x86_64: check_timer with io apic setup before try_apic_pin
add io apic setup before try_apic_pin for check_timer
also add remove_irq_to_pin call in io_apic.c
cc: Andi Kleen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
cc: Eric W. Biederman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by:
Therefore, FUSE probably could have been fixed by judicious use
of copy_{to,from}_user_page() calls instead of adding this new
ad-hoc flush_anon_page() thing.
Probably, but I don't think either interface is perfect.
copy_*_user_page() will double flush the user mapping
(get_user_pages()
Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
mxser_new, fix twice resource releasing
Hi Jiri,
I've noticed the patch(es) and will be happy to test them after the
holidays.
Thank you very much for working on these issues and Happy New Year!
-- Sergei.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 09:23:38PM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 22:46:04 +
iirc, flush_anon_page() was introduced to fix non-working fuse on parisc,
which occurs because fuse wants to use get_user_pages() to read data from
the
However, it's not only FUSE which is suffering - direct-IO also doesn't
work.
for direct-IO the kernel won't touch the data *at all*... (that's the
point ;)
is it still an issue then?
--
if you want to mail me at work (you don't), use arjan (at) linux.intel.com
Test the interaction
David Miller wrote:
...
Can we please not have N different interfaces to the open-firmware
calls so that perhaps powerpc and Sparc have a chance of using this
code too?
The base interface function is callofw(), which is effectively identical
to call_prom_ret() in
31 Ara 2006 Paz 02:47 tarihinde, Adrian Bunk şunları yazmıştı:
[...]
Subject: ALSA: No sound in KDE with intel hda
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/12/30/73
Submitter : Ismail Dönmez [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Status : unknown
Just tried with 2.6.18.6 and aRts still have no sound,
From: Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:10:35 +0100
Therefore, FUSE probably could have been fixed by judicious use
of copy_{to,from}_user_page() calls instead of adding this new
ad-hoc flush_anon_page() thing.
Probably, but I don't think either interface is
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 09:23:18 +
We do this on ARM - if page_mapping() is NULL, we flush the kernel
alias unconditionally. However, we have no view where the user
mapping of that page is, which is where the problem is. Cache lines
remain allocated
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:27:22 +0100
However, it's not only FUSE which is suffering - direct-IO also doesn't
work.
for direct-IO the kernel won't touch the data *at all*... (that's the
point ;)
is it still an issue then?
It can be an
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:27:22AM +0100, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
However, it's not only FUSE which is suffering - direct-IO also doesn't
work.
for direct-IO the kernel won't touch the data *at all*... (that's the
point ;)
Wrong. One word: PIO. We _still_ to this day have no
From: Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sat, 30 Dec 2006 23:36:45 -1000
The base interface function is callofw(), which is effectively identical
to call_prom_ret() in arch/powerpc/kernel/prom_init.c . So it seems
that PowerPC could use it. I suppose I could change the name of
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 01:47:56AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: Arjan van de Ven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:27:22 +0100
However, it's not only FUSE which is suffering - direct-IO also doesn't
work.
for direct-IO the kernel won't touch the data *at all*... (that's
From: Russell King [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 10:00:07 +
I'm willing to do that - and I guess this means we can probably do this
instead of walking the list of VMAs for the shared mapping, thereby
hitting both anonymous and shared mappings with the same code?
That's pretty
Responding to two replies in one email ...
Mitch Bradley wrote:
David Miller wrote:
...
Can we please not have N different interfaces to the open-firmware
calls so that perhaps powerpc and Sparc have a chance of using this
code too?
David,
I helped Mitch do this port, so I'd like to
From: David Kahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:11:53 -0800
All we've done is created a trivial implementation for exporting
the device tree to userland that isn't burdened by the powerpc
and sparc legacy code that's in there now.
So now we'll have _3_ different implementations
Kyungmin Park wrote:
[PATCH] ARM: OMAP: fix MMC workqueue changes
fix OMAP MMC workqueue in recent workqueue change
Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Applied thanks.
In the future, please add a -- after the signed-off-by lines
Philip Langdale wrote:
Hi all,
*snip*
Signed-off-by: Philipl Langdale [EMAIL PROTECTED]
When you have a commit message larger than the patch, you know there is
something wrong. ;)
Please skip the part about MMC at least.
@@ -588,12 +591,15 @@
if (mmc_card_sd(card)) {
David Miller wrote:
From: David Kahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:11:53 -0800
All we've done is created a trivial implementation for exporting
the device tree to userland that isn't burdened by the powerpc
and sparc legacy code that's in there now.
So now we'll have _3_
Robert Hancock wrote:
Having some intermittent problems using my ipw2200 wireless card on
2.6.20-rc2-git1 (may affect earlier versions as well) under Fedora
Core 6 i386. It appears that sometimes on bootup the interface gets
named with a junk name like __tmp32284835 and it doesn't show up in
Darren Salt wrote:
Add a quirk to allow at least some ENE PCI SD card readers to work again
Support for these devices was broken for 2.6.18-rc1 and later by commit
146ad66eac836c0b976c98f428d73e1f6a75270d, which added voltage level support.
This restores the previous behaviour for these
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 01:31 -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
@@ -881,10 +880,18 @@ static void cio_reset_pgm_check_handler(
static int stsch_reset(struct subchannel_id schid, volatile struct schib
*addr)
{
int rc;
+ register struct subchannel_id reg1 asm (1) = schid;
Hi,
On Sunday 31 December 2006 11:49, David Miller wrote:
From: David Kahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:11:53 -0800
All we've done is created a trivial implementation for exporting
the device tree to userland that isn't burdened by the powerpc
and sparc legacy code that's
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 01:31:43AM -0500, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Thu, 28 Dec 2006 11:39:25 +0100, Martin Schwidefsky wrote:
@@ -881,10 +880,18 @@ static void cio_reset_pgm_check_handler(
static int stsch_reset(struct subchannel_id schid, volatile struct
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
This is an experiment on how an SD/MMC card could be used in the MTD layer.
I don't currently have a system set up to test this, so this driver is
completely _untested_ and therefore you should consider it _broken_.
You can get similar functionality by using the
I'm willing to do that - and I guess this means we can probably do this
instead of walking the list of VMAs for the shared mapping, thereby
hitting both anonymous and shared mappings with the same code?
But for the get_user_pages() case there's no point, is there? The VMA
and the virtual
On Fri, 2006-12-22 at 12:59 +0100, Erik Mouw wrote:
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 01:16:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least nVidia *does* actually Get It, they just don't have a choice in
implementing it, because all their current hardware includes patents that
they licensed from other
Hi list,
in http://lkml.org/lkml/2006/5/15/128 I reported a problem with
openpromfs showing both CPUs under the same node name. As I looked today
into /proc/openpromfs - running 2.6.18-1.2798.al3.1smp now - this issue
is fixed.
Any details about this - can you point me to a linux-sparc
On Thu, Dec 21, 2006 at 01:16:15PM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At least nVidia *does* actually Get It, they just don't have a choice in
implementing it, because all their current hardware includes patents that
they licensed from other companies
What makes you think they get it?
In a
On 12/31/06, Mitch Bradley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
diff --git a/arch/i386/kernel/ofw_fs.c b/arch/i386/kernel/ofw_fs.c
new file mode 100644
index 000..30ca359
--- /dev/null
+++ b/arch/i386/kernel/ofw_fs.c
@@ -0,0 +1,261 @@
+/* 1275 in little-endian ASCII (for IEEE 1275 - the Open Firmware
On Sunday, 31 December 2006 09:15, Robert Hancock wrote:
Having some suspend problems on 2.6.20-rc2-git1 with Fedora Core 6.
First of all the normal user interface for hibernate isn't working
properly while it did in 2.6.19. When you select Hibernate it seems to
stop X and go into console
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 09:54 +0100, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On Dec 27 2006 17:10, Pavel Machek wrote:
Was just wondering if the _var_ in kfree(_var_) could be set to
NULL after its freed. It may solve the problem of accessing some
freed memory as the kernel will crash since _var_ was set to
i don't see how that can be true, given that most of the definitions
of the clear_page() macro are simply invocations of memset(). see for
yourself:
*MOST*. Not all.
For example an SSE version will at least assume 16 byte alignment, etc
etc.
What about an if (adress 15) { memset } else
A trio of fixes for miscellaneous problems, that don't affect usage
under normal .configs and usage. However they do need fixing.
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
KVM does kmalloc() in an atomic section while having preemption disabled
via vcpu_load(). Fix this by moving the -*_msr setup from the
vcpu_setup method to the vcpu_create method.
(This is also a small speedup for setting up a vcpu, which can in theory
be
From: Ingo Molnar [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Index: linux-2.6/drivers/kvm/vmx.c
===
--- linux-2.6.orig/drivers/kvm/vmx.c
+++ linux-2.6/drivers/kvm/vmx.c
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@ static void
From: Yoshimi Ichiyanagi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
If we load the wrong arch module, it leaves behind kvm_arch_ops set, which
prevents loading of the correct arch module later.
Fix be not setting kvm_arch_ops until we're sure it's good.
Signed-off-by: Yoshimi Ichiyanagi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by:
From: Dor Laor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The current interrupt injection mechanism might delay an interrupt under
the following circumstances:
- if injection fails because the guest is not interruptible (rflags.IF clear,
or after a 'mov ss' or 'sti' instruction). Userspace can check rflags,
but
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 04:45:21PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 03:23:42PM -0600, Larry Finger wrote:
Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sun, Dec 17, 2006 at 03:15:28PM -0500, Aaron Sethman wrote:
Just was loading the bcm43xx module and got the following oops.
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 14:39 +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
i don't see how that can be true, given that most of the definitions
of the clear_page() macro are simply invocations of memset(). see for
yourself:
*MOST*. Not all.
For example an SSE version will at least assume 16 byte
On Saturday 30 December 2006 16:59, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
I have compiled GCC 3.4.6 and compiled 2.6.19 with an identical config
using this compiler (but the same binutils), and will report back if it
crashes. My bet is that it won't, however.
Still fine after 24 hours. Linux 2.6.19,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:55:58PM +1100, Nick Piggin wrote:
This bug was only introduced in 2.6.19, due to a change that caused pte
no, Linus said that with 2.6.19 it's easier to trigger this bug...
So if your corruption is years old, then it must be something else.
Maybe it is hidden by a
Adrian Bunk wrote:
To avoid any misunderstandings:
This wasn't in any way meant against you personally.
And in this case you were right, it was the same bug.
My answer was based on experiences like one during 2.6.19-rc where we
had 4 bug reports for a regression with a patch
Changes from kvm-8:
- API documentation (James Jacobsson)
- More stabilization fixes (Yoshimi Ichiyanagi, Ingo Molnar, Nguyen Anh
Quynh)
- Interactivity improvements (Dor Laor)
http://kvm.sourceforge.net
--
error compiling committee.c: too many arguments to function
-
To unsubscribe from
On Dec 30 2006 15:38, Mitch Bradley wrote:
Request for comments.
It is similar in some respect to fs/proc/proc_devtree.c , but does
not use procfs, nor does it require an intermediate layer of code
to create a flattened representation of the device tree.
NB: openpromfs does not use procfs
On Wed, 20 Dec 2006, Al Viro wrote:
On Wed, Dec 20, 2006 at 05:50:11PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I don't see any problems with changing struct kstat. There would be
reservations against changing inode.i_ino though.
So filesystems that have 64bit inodes will need a specialized
getattr()
Hi,
The following messages keeps popping up when CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y:
init[1]: segfault at 8118c110 rip 8118c110 rsp 7fff9a9d14d8
error 15
init[1]: segfault at 8118c110 rip 8118c110 rsp 7fff9a9d14d8
error 15
init[1]: segfault at 8118c110 rip
On Thu, 2006-12-21 at 09:01 +, Linux Kernel Mailing List wrote:
Gitweb:
http://git.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=f334b60b43a0927f4ab1187cbdb4582f5227c3b1
Commit: f334b60b43a0927f4ab1187cbdb4582f5227c3b1
Parent:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:17AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
From: David Kahn [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 02:11:53 -0800
All we've done is created a trivial implementation for exporting
the device tree to userland that isn't burdened by the powerpc
and sparc legacy code
On Sunday, 31 December 2006 14:27, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
On Sunday, 31 December 2006 09:15, Robert Hancock wrote:
Having some suspend problems on 2.6.20-rc2-git1 with Fedora Core 6.
First of all the normal user interface for hibernate isn't working
properly while it did in 2.6.19. When
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 04:59:35PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006 04:14, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006 04:02, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006 02:41, Zhang, Yanmin wrote:
[snip]
Here's a
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:29:15PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Saturday 30 December 2006 17:21, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:59:35 +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
I've eliminated 2.6.19.1 as the culprit, and also tried
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 14:39 +0100, Folkert van Heusden wrote:
i don't see how that can be true, given that most of the definitions
of the clear_page() macro are simply invocations of memset(). see for
yourself:
*MOST*. Not all.
For
On Sunday 31 December 2006 16:28, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:29:15PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Saturday 30 December 2006 17:21, Chuck Ebbert wrote:
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sat, 30 Dec 2006 16:59:35 +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
I've
From: Daniel Marjamäki
This has been tested by me.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Marjamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.20-rc2/net/core/flow.c2006-12-27 09:59:56.0 +0100
+++ linux/net/core/flow.c 2006-12-31 18:26:06.0 +0100
@@ -144,29 +144,16 @@ typedef u32 flow_compare_t;
On Sunday 31 December 2006 16:27, Adrian Bunk wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 04:59:35PM +, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006 04:14, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006 04:02, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Thursday 28 December 2006
Why don't you release source? To protect the intellectual property.
Well, duh! That's why everyone holds back source. So allow me to
translate..
That IP story is for the most part not even credible. If they were worried
about software IP they would release hardware docs and let us get on
I demand that Pierre Ossman may or may not have written...
Darren Salt wrote:
Add a quirk to allow at least some ENE PCI SD card readers to work again
Support for these devices was broken for 2.6.18-rc1 and later by commit
146ad66eac836c0b976c98f428d73e1f6a75270d, which added voltage level
Add a quirk to allow ENE PCI SD card readers to work again
Support for these devices was broken for 2.6.18-rc1 and later by commit
146ad66eac836c0b976c98f428d73e1f6a75270d, which added voltage level support.
This restores the previous behaviour for these devices by ensuring that when
the voltage
I have the source code for a vendor written driver that is targeted at
2.6.9. It includes this and then proceeds to manipulate files from the
driver.
asmlinkage _syscall3(int,write,int,fd,const char *,buf,off_t,count)
asmlinkage _syscall3(int,read,int,fd,char *,buf,off_t,count)
asmlinkage
Whoopie from ThinkWiki just sent me an email, calling my attention to the
fact that the patch you submitted is in fact different from the one I
merged... something I should have triple-verified. It appears the t60p has
the bay in a different ACPI node than some other *60 ThinkPads. Either
that,
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 01:24:53PM +0100, Miklos Szeredi wrote:
I'm willing to do that - and I guess this means we can probably do this
instead of walking the list of VMAs for the shared mapping, thereby
hitting both anonymous and shared mappings with the same code?
But for the
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:32:18 +0100, Pierre Ossman wrote:
Arnd Bergmann wrote:
I'm a complete MTD noob, but what uses does the MTD layer have besides
JFFS2. If it's none, than this advantage isn't that big of a deal.
AFAIK MTD is for device where erase is need to managed in software :
arjan, you and i actually agree on this. i fully accept that the idea
of a clear_page() call might or should have extra semantics,
compared to the more simple and direct memset(...,0,PAGE_SIZE) call
(such as alignment requirements, for example). my observation is
simply that this is not
I am getting this error when I try to compile 2.6.19 and 2.6.19.1.
I ran make mrproper and make menuconfig then ran make and got the below
error.
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/i386/Kconfig
CHK include/linux/version.h
UPD include/linux/version.h
/bin/sh:
On Sat, 16 Dec 2006 23:17:00 +0100 (CET), Jiri Slaby wrote:
tty_wakeup cleanup
- remove wake_up_interruptible(tty-write_wait) surrounding
tty_wakup(tty);
- substitute tty-ldisc.write_wakeup(tty) + wake_up() by tty_wakeup(tty);
Signed-off-by: Jiri Slaby [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Acked-by:
On 12/31/06, Robin Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting this error when I try to compile 2.6.19 and 2.6.19.1.
I ran make mrproper and make menuconfig then ran make and got the below
error.
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
scripts/kconfig/conf -s arch/i386/Kconfig
CHK
I demand that I definitely did write...
Add a quirk to allow ENE PCI SD card readers to work again
Support for these devices was broken for 2.6.18-rc1 and later by commit
146ad66eac836c0b976c98f428d73e1f6a75270d, which added voltage level
support.
This restores the previous behaviour for
Hello,
I'm testing KVM on a Core2 CPU. I'm running kernel 2.6.20-git (pulled
few hours ago), configured with SMP and PREEMPT.
I'm hitting 2 different warnings:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: kvm/7726
caller is vmx_create_vcpu+0x9/0x2f [kvm_intel]
[b01ccbc8]
Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Hello,
I'm testing KVM on a Core2 CPU. I'm running kernel 2.6.20-git (pulled
few hours ago), configured with SMP and PREEMPT.
I'm hitting 2 different warnings:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001] code: kvm/7726
caller is vmx_create_vcpu+0x9/0x2f
On 12/31/06, Avi Kivity [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Luca Tettamanti wrote:
Hello,
I'm testing KVM on a Core2 CPU. I'm running kernel 2.6.20-git (pulled
few hours ago), configured with SMP and PREEMPT.
I'm hitting 2 different warnings:
BUG: using smp_processor_id() in preemptible [0001]
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:04:14PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
fair enough. *technically*, not every call of the form
memset(ptr,0,PAGE_SIZE) necessarily represents an address that's on
a page boundary. but, *realistically*, i'm guessing most of them do.
just grabbing a random example
On Mon, 1 Jan 2007, Paul Mundt wrote:
On Sat, Dec 30, 2006 at 06:04:14PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
fair enough. *technically*, not every call of the form
memset(ptr,0,PAGE_SIZE) necessarily represents an address that's on
a page boundary. but, *realistically*, i'm guessing most of
I made all the changes Pekka suggested, except:
+ security = strncmp(propname, security-, 9) == 0;
+ len = 0;
Redundant assignment, no?
+ if (!security)
+ (void)callofw(getproplen, 2, 1, node,
propname, len);
That
Add an explanation for defining multi-line macros using the ({ })
notation to CodingStyle.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
diff --git a/Documentation/CodingStyle b/Documentation/CodingStyle
index 9069189..1d0ddb8 100644
--- a/Documentation/CodingStyle
+++
Based on earlier discussion, I'm sending a refresh of the generic GPIO
patch, with several (ARM based) implementations in separate patches:
Hi Dave,
I'm very interested in seeing an abstraction for gpios. Over the last
several months, I've been working on getting Linux running on my phone
-
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:32:25PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Generally, inline functions are preferable to macros resembling
functions.
This should be stressed, IMHO. We have too many macros which have no
reason to live.
-Macros with multiple statements should be enclosed in a do -
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 23:04 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi,
The following messages keeps popping up when CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y:
init[1]: segfault at 8118c110 rip 8118c110 rsp
7fff9a9d14d8 error 15
init[1]: segfault at 8118c110 rip 8118c110 rsp
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:32:25PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
Generally, inline functions are preferable to macros resembling
functions.
This should be stressed, IMHO. We have too many macros which have no
reason to live.
-Macros with
On 31.12.2006 [17:37:05 +0100], Daniel Marjam?ki wrote:
From: Daniel Marjamäki
This has been tested by me.
Signed-off-by: Daniel Marjamäki [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--- linux-2.6.20-rc2/net/core/flow.c 2006-12-27 09:59:56.0 +0100
+++ linux/net/core/flow.c 2006-12-31 18:26:06.0
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
there would appear to be *lots* of cases where the ({ }) notation is
used when nothing is being returned. i'm not sure you can be that
adamant about that distinction at this point.
IMHO, the main point of CodingStyle is to
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 22:09:03 +0200 Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
there would appear to be *lots* of cases where the ({ }) notation is
used when nothing is being returned. i'm not sure you can be that
adamant about that
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 10:27:26AM -0800, David Brown wrote:
On 12/31/06, Robin Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting this error when I try to compile 2.6.19 and 2.6.19.1.
I ran make mrproper and make menuconfig then ran make and got the below
error.
HOSTLD scripts/kconfig/conf
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, Muli Ben-Yehuda wrote:
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:48PM -0500, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
there would appear to be *lots* of cases where the ({ }) notation
is used when nothing is being returned. i'm not sure you can be
that adamant about that distinction at this
From: Miklos Szeredi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 13:24:53 +0100
I'm willing to do that - and I guess this means we can probably do this
instead of walking the list of VMAs for the shared mapping, thereby
hitting both anonymous and shared mappings with the same code?
But for
That fixed the problem.
Thanks
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 10:27 -0800, David Brown wrote:
On 12/31/06, Robin Cook [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I am getting this error when I try to compile 2.6.19 and 2.6.19.1.
I ran make mrproper and make menuconfig then ran make and got the below
error.
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:45:09 -0800 Daniel Walker wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 23:04 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi,
The following messages keeps popping up when CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y:
init[1]: segfault at 8118c110 rip 8118c110 rsp
7fff9a9d14d8 error 15
Simplify a number of code snippets in source and header files to use
the kernel.h container_of() macro.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
and while we're at it, everybody can stop re-inventing the
container_of() macro. :-)
drivers/net/ppp_generic.c|2 +-
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006, David Miller wrote:
Even in the ptrace() case, you do want to flush all the other VMA's
that might be out there with an aliased cached copy in the cpu cache.
I don't think that's necessarily true.
If the same page is cached differently (and virtually) in multiple
From: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:12:26 +0100 (MET)
BUT, the eeprom utility may be used to modify values, and if used, I
would like to see ofwfs show the updated value. openpromfs does it
today:
15:09 ares:/proc/openprom/options # cat oem-banner?
false
15:09
From: Christoph Hellwig [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 15:41:03 +
On Sun, Dec 31, 2006 at 02:49:17AM -0800, David Miller wrote:
Am I the only person who sees something very wrong with this?
No, I completely agree with you on this.
If firmworks really wants to have a
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 12:43 -0800, Randy Dunlap wrote:
On Sun, 31 Dec 2006 11:45:09 -0800 Daniel Walker wrote:
On Sun, 2006-12-31 at 23:04 +0800, Fengguang Wu wrote:
Hi,
The following messages keeps popping up when CONFIG_PROFILE_LIKELY=y:
init[1]: segfault at
From: Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Sun, 31 Dec 2006 12:58:45 -0800 (PST)
So there really is two different cases here:
- flush the cache as seen by A PARTICULAR virtual mapping.
This is ptrace, but it's other things like unmap page from this VM
too.
- flush the cache
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 17:12 +0200, Benny Halevy wrote:
As an example, some file systems encode hint information into the filehandle
and the hints may change over time, another example is encoding parent
information into the filehandle and then handles
Trond Myklebust wrote:
On Thu, 2006-12-28 at 15:07 -0500, Halevy, Benny wrote:
Mikulas Patocka wrote:
BTW. how does (or how should?) NFS client deal with cache coherency if
filehandles for the same file differ?
Trond can probably answer this better than me...
As I read it,
On 12/28/06, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Lyon wrote:
Hi,
My system is gigabyte ds3 motherboard with onboard SATA JMicron
20360/20363 AHCI Controller (rev 02), drive connected is WDC
WD740ADFD-00 20.0, I am running 2.6.18.6 32 bit, under heavy i/o I get
the following messaegs:
On Dec 31 2006 12:45, David Miller wrote:
From: Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED]
BUT, the eeprom utility may be used to modify values, and if used, I
would like to see ofwfs show the updated value. openpromfs does it
today:
15:09 ares:/proc/openprom/options # cat oem-banner?
false
15:09
1 - 100 of 273 matches
Mail list logo
