Remove the few remaining traces of the interrupt-related SA_ flags,
which were scheduled for official deletion in September of 2007,
anyway.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
there's little point in leaving this cruft in the tree since there
were only two instances of the
On Mon, 14 May 2007 19:29:12 +0200 (MEST)
Jan Engelhardt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 13 2007 12:48, James Bottomley wrote:
Why does ATA select SCSI anyway? Surely PATA doesn't require it?
That's a bit offtopic and to the wrong list.
libata-pata does require SCSI ...
And in the
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
Sure, we don't allow that. Except for xfsprogs in 2.6.1, procps in
2.6.4, oprofile in 2.6.13 and udev in 2.6.19, of course.
And we really complained about it! The oprofile thing should be fixed,
btw, and yeah,if udev breaks any more, I'll have to
I was curious why my firewall box never spins down its disk.
Given it rarely writes stuff to logs, it's odd that it always
seems to have something to write out.
killing syslogd, and enabling /proc/sys/vm/block_dump
gets me a periodic spew in /proc/kmsg like..
7[2695397.99] kjournald(366):
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:10:02 +0200
Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The time keeping code move to kernel/time/timekeeping.c broke the
clocksource resume logic patch. Fix it up and move the
clocksource_resume() call to the appropriate place.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner [EMAIL
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:38 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 498ff31..c5d7775 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++ b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
@@
Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 14:57 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
(14:49:52:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
(14:49:56:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 / -t
ext2 -o remount,rw
(14:50:37:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount
James Bottomley wrote:
No, I'm proposing this for 2.6.22-rc1 ... Andi has already said he won't
push the smp consolidation patch for 2.6.22.
Without this patch, voyager won't even build, since the smp_ops broke
it, so it needs to be fixed *now*.
Sure, I suppose. But given that the patch
Hi,
I do have a device that's a multifunction device. Eventhough a MFD, it
just has one Interrupt which is shared by by a Configuration space for
each function. ie, INTA is shared between them functions.
In such a case, i am wondering, (since pci_probe returns a pointer to
one PCI function alone
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:29:04 -0600, Grant Likely wrote:
BTW, I've just left the driver in drivers/i2c/chips. It seems
sufficiently different from an rtc (and the interface is totally
difference) that putting it in drivers/rtc seems wrong. If you
disagree, I can change this.
That's fine with
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:38 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 498ff31..c5d7775 100644
--- a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
+++
Russell King wrote:
There may be some sense, however, in allowing DTR to be permanently
raised for serial consoles. However, I would err on caution since
DTR is used to reliably instruct modems to drop the line, so making
such a change would be undesirable for those folk.
please check
-Original Message-
From: Gerald Britton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, May 14, 2007 12:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED];
Miller, Mike (OS Dev); ISS StorageDev;
[EMAIL PROTECTED]; linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] cciss: Fix
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:40:48PM +0200, Michal Piotrowski wrote:
Hi Barry,
On 14/05/07, Barry Scott [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm testing the robustness of Xorg 1.3 server with intel 2.0 driver
by restarting the X and a set of apps every 30 seconds. After
about an hour this
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:23:17 +0200
Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Heiko Carstens [EMAIL PROTECTED]
All architectures that have an implementation of smp_call_function_single
let it return -EBUSY if it is asked to execute func on the current cpu.
Therefore the UP version must
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 11:58 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
Urgh, that was probably me trying to manage the maelstrom from a million
monkeys mucking in the same code for multiple months, sigh.
So what do broke and fix mean in this context? What are the
consequences of this bug, and of its fix?
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 12:06 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
NAK, the removal date is September 2007 so out of tree folks have some
time to fix their crap.
This might be a good example of targeting a specific kernel version
rather than a date, since anyone who can't fix this immediately
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:06:12PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
Thomas Gleixner wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 14:38 -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
diff --git a/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
b/Documentation/feature-removal-schedule.txt
index 498ff31..c5d7775 100644
On Mon, 14 May 2007 12:11:37 -0700
Andrew Morton [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This of course raises another question: it is not clear in which context
the smp_call_function* functions are supposed to be called. Should it be
with preemption disabled or is preemption enabled allowed as well?
If
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:04:44PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
Russell King wrote:
There may be some sense, however, in allowing DTR to be permanently
raised for serial consoles. However, I would err on caution since
DTR is used to reliably instruct modems to drop the line, so making
such a
On 5/14/07, Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Bharata B Rao wrote:
From: Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: tmpfs whiteout support
Introduce whiteout support to tmpfs.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 07:06:45PM -, Miller, Mike (OS Dev) wrote:
Please send the Oops output.
Sure, here it is, this was built from a clean 2.6.21.1 tree (despite the
-dirty in the kernel version).
-- Gerald
Unmounting local filesystems...umount: /: device
Remove the last two instances of the interrupt-related SA_ flags
from the tree, but leave the support for out-of-tree modules until the
scheduled removal date of September 2007.
Signed-off-by: Robert P. J. Day [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
drivers/misc/tifm_7xx1.c |2 +-
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:03:05PM +0200, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 14:57 -0400, Dave Jones a écrit :
(14:49:52:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
(14:49:56:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 / -t
Dave Jones wrote:
(14:49:52:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
(14:49:56:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount /dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 / -t
ext2 -o remount,rw
(14:50:37:[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~)# mount
/dev/mapper/VolGroup00-LogVol00 on / type ext3 (rw)
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
The time keeping code move to kernel/time/timekeeping.c broke the
clocksource resume logic patch. Fix it up and move the
clocksource_resume() call to the appropriate place.
Yeah, looks obvious enough. It had just enough context in the *wrong*
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
Sure, we don't allow that. Except for xfsprogs in 2.6.1, procps in
2.6.4, oprofile in 2.6.13 and udev in 2.6.19, of course.
And we really complained about it! The oprofile thing
Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 12:24 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge a écrit :
I don't think you can change filesystem types with remount. Doesn't
that just change flags on an existing mount?
+1
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 10:57 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 09:29 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Matt Mackall wrote:
privileged thread unprivileged greedy process
On Mon, 14 May 2007 08:56:52 -0500
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
This patch fixes the following Section mismatch warnings when
build powerpc platforms.
-
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jan Blunck wrote:
On 5/14/07, Hugh Dickins [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
/* Pretend that each entry is of this size in directory's i_size */
-#define BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE 20
+#define BOGO_DIRENT_SIZE 1
Why would that change be needed for whiteout support?
Good
I've reached the point where I've grown tired of trying to figure out who has
hardware for what. I intend to commit the following in a few days so if you care
about the quality of the drivers it's time to step up to the plate.
There's a rather long list of cc here, but I've included everyone that
On Fri, 2007-05-11 10:06:17 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jesper Juhl jesper.juhl () gmail ! com wrote:
On 10/05/07, Shahbaz Khan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
All the experts on this list plz let me know of any good cross
referencing tool for source code navigation. I have
On 05/13, Tejun Heo wrote:
Oleg Nesterov wrote:
Heh. I thought about another bit-in-pointer too. I can't explain this,
but I personally hate these bits even more than barriers.
I'm the other way around but it's like saying I like donkey poo better
than horse poo. Let's accept that we
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:12:24 -0500
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand this correctly:
privileged thread unprivileged greedy process
kmem_cache_alloc(...)
adds new slab page from lowmem pool
do_io()
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:13:12AM +0800, Jeff Chua wrote:
Attached is my patch for vpnclient-linux-x86_64-4.8.00.0490-k9 to make
it run on Linux-2.6.22-rc1.
Can you please stop it now? This is not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] after all.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe
Russell King wrote:
Still wrong, and unfortunately you haven't understood what I was saying
at all because this is worse. ;(
Do not put the code in serial8250_set_termios. It is the wrong place.
I don't want to put that there. the problem is serial8250_set_mctrl
called by will clear DTR
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:46:27PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
Russell King wrote:
Still wrong, and unfortunately you haven't understood what I was saying
at all because this is worse. ;(
Do not put the code in serial8250_set_termios. It is the wrong place.
I don't want to put that
Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
Sure, we don't allow that. Except for xfsprogs in 2.6.1, procps in
2.6.4, oprofile in 2.6.13 and udev in 2.6.19, of course.
And we really complained about it! The
On May 14 2007 19:06, Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Christian Hesse wrote:
Hello everybody,
I have ext3 filesystems with labels on devicemapper crypted devices. These
do not show up in /dev/disk/by-label/, in contrast to filesystems of my
real partitions. Is this the expected behaviour or
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
You can pull the big switch (only on a SLUB slab I fear) to switch
off the fast path. Do SetSlabDebug() when allocating a precious
allocation that should not be gobbled up by lower level processes.
Then you can do whatever you want in the
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:16:22AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:03 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
Following patch sitting for a long time in our handhelds.org tree.
kogiidena, I'm almost sure you'll find it useful, just apply patch,
and implement .is_led_supported
On Mon, 14 May 2007 10:10:48 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [VOYAGER] fix build broken by shift to smp_ops
This adds an smp_ops for voyager, and hooks things up appropriately.
This is the
On May 14 2007 19:40, Lars K.W. Gohlke wrote:
hallo,
after searching the mailing list and searching the web, I still don't
know how to access correctly the serial port (in user space known as
/dev/ttyS01)
http://kernelnewbies.org/FAQ/WhyWritingFilesFromKernelIsBad
This thread ends
Hi!
Serge E. Hallyn [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Following are two patches which have been sitting for some time in -mm.
Where some time == nearly six months.
We need help considering, reviewing and testing this code, please.
I did quick scan, and it looks ok. Plus, it means we can
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:44:51PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:12:24 -0500
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand this correctly:
privileged thread unprivileged greedy process
kmem_cache_alloc(...)
adds new slab page from
Andrew Morton wrote:
Does that have name? I can find no patch in -mm which appears to have
anything to do with SMP consolidation, and this patch applies cleanly to
the current -mm lineup.
Sorry, I thought you'd picked this up:
Subject: i386: move common parts of smp into their own file
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise
this reuse within the ext4 patches.
otoh2, PageLazyFree() could have reused
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 12:56 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
You can pull the big switch (only on a SLUB slab I fear) to switch
off the fast path. Do SetSlabDebug() when allocating a precious
allocation that should not be gobbled up by lower
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 12:44 -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:12:24 -0500
Matt Mackall [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If I understand this correctly:
privileged thread unprivileged greedy process
kmem_cache_alloc(...)
adds new slab page from lowmem
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hmmm.. Maybe we could do that But what I had in mind was simply to
set a page flag (DebugSlab()) if you know in alloc_slab that the slab
should be only used for emergency allocation. If DebugSlab is set then the
fastpath will not be called.
Russell King wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:46:27PM -0700, Yinghai Lu wrote:
I don't want to put that there. the problem is serial8250_set_mctrl
called by will clear DTR bit.
We're at a stalemate then.
How about put that line into
serial8250_console_setup
or
On Monday 14 May 2007 21:03, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
James Bottomley wrote:
No, I'm proposing this for 2.6.22-rc1 ... Andi has already said he won't
push the smp consolidation patch for 2.6.22.
Without this patch, voyager won't even build, since the smp_ops broke
it, so it needs to
On May 14, 2007, at 2:30 PM, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 08:56:52 -0500
Kumar Gala [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 14, 2007, at 6:06 AM, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 06:53:32PM +0800, Li Yang wrote:
This patch fixes the following Section mismatch warnings when
On May 14 2007 20:06, Stefan Richter wrote:
On 14 May, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
I've had a quick look at it...
* Copyright (C) 2004 Nokia Corporation
* Written by Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- * Major cleanups by Juha YrjXlX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
+ * Major cleanups by Juha Yrjölä [EMAIL
On May 14 2007 19:46, Alan Cox wrote:
On May 13 2007 12:48, James Bottomley wrote:
Why does ATA select SCSI anyway? Surely PATA doesn't require it?
That's a bit offtopic and to the wrong list.
libata-pata does require SCSI ...
And in the long run, that SCSI parts which are actually used
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 13:06 -0700, Christoph Lameter wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
Hmmm.. Maybe we could do that But what I had in mind was simply to
set a page flag (DebugSlab()) if you know in alloc_slab that the slab
should be only used for emergency
On Mon, 14 May 2007 12:26:08 +0200, Thomas Gleixner said:
Broken out version is available here:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.22-rc1/linux-2.6.22-rc1-x86_64-highres-v1.patches.tar.bz2
How unhappy am I likely to be if I try to apply this to a 21-mm2 kernel? It
doesn't *look* like any
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 09:59:24PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Tue, May 01, 2007 at 08:57:45PM -0700, Greg KH wrote:
Hm, I'm no longer the PCI Hotplug maintainer, so that's why I haven't
added them to my tree. It would probably be best for everyone involved
to send them to her
On May 14 2007 14:57, Dave Jones wrote:
I was curious why my firewall box never spins down its disk.
Given it rarely writes stuff to logs, it's odd that it always
seems to have something to write out.
killing syslogd, and enabling /proc/sys/vm/block_dump
gets me a periodic spew in /proc/kmsg
On May 14 2007 21:28, Xavier Bestel wrote:
Le lundi 14 mai 2007 à 12:24 -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge a écrit :
I don't think you can change filesystem types with remount. Doesn't
that just change flags on an existing mount?
+1
+2.
Hell, it'd be fun to switch from reiser to xfs by just
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:16:22AM +0100, Richard Purdie wrote:
On Wed, 2007-05-09 at 20:03 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
+ led_cdev-trigger = trigger;
if (trigger) {
write_lock_irqsave(trigger-leddev_list_lock, flags);
list_add_tail(led_cdev-trig_list,
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 11:43:45AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
Sure, we don't allow that. Except for xfsprogs in 2.6.1, procps in
2.6.4, oprofile in 2.6.13 and udev in 2.6.19, of course.
And we really complained about it! The oprofile thing
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:14 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
From: Bharata B Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: ext3 whiteout support
Introduce whiteout support for ext3.
Signed-off-by: Bharata B Rao [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
fs/ext3/dir.c |
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 09:28:07PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote:
And we really complained about it! The oprofile thing should be fixed,
btw, and yeah,if udev breaks any more, I'll have to stop taking patches
from Greg. That thing has been a disaster, and everybody involved should
be
On May 14, 2007 15:14 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_JOURNAL_DEV0x0008 /* Journal device */
#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG0x0010
+#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_WHITEOUT 0x0020
Is this flag reserved with Ted? It isn't
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 03:53:21PM -0400, Jeff Garzik wrote:
Jean Delvare wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 11:43:45 -0700 (PDT), Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Jean Delvare wrote:
Sure, we don't allow that. Except for xfsprogs in 2.6.1, procps in
2.6.4, oprofile in 2.6.13 and udev in
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 16:10 -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 14 May 2007 12:26:08 +0200, Thomas Gleixner said:
Broken out version is available here:
http://www.tglx.de/projects/hrtimers/2.6.22-rc1/linux-2.6.22-rc1-x86_64-highres-v1.patches.tar.bz2
How unhappy am I likely to be if
On May 12 2007 07:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
You should not assume alphabetical order. Filesystems may be free to
reorder things and return them (1) randomly like in a hash (2) by
creation time during readdir().
There is no assumption. Mercurial explicitly visits files in
alphabetical order
William Lee Irwin III wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:52:59PM +0530, Srivatsa Vaddagiri wrote:
Doesn't EEVDF have the same issue? From the paper:
V(t) = 1/(w1 + w2 + ...wn)
Who knows what I was smoking, then. I misremembered the scale factor
as being on the other side of
On May 11 2007 19:14, H. Peter Anvin wrote:
David Miller wrote:
All ports above and including 1024 are non-privileged and available to
anyone.
Applications which have some requirements in this area need to work
those things out themselves.
However, there are a large number of
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 15:10 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
From: Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Introduce union stack.
Adds union stack infrastructure to the dentry structure and provides
locking routines to walk the union stack.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Sun, 13 May 2007 16:25:17 +0300, Dan Aloni said:
Kernel developers might find it useful for quickly getting out from some
rough debugging scenarios.
Signed-off-by: Dan Aloni [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think I (and everybody else who tests kernels with 3rd-party binary or
out-of-tree modules)
On May 12 2007 22:12, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 00:07:18 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
What's eating the battery life of my laptop? Why isn't it many more
hours? Which software component causes the most power to be burned?
These are important questions without a good
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Andrew Morton wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007 12:28:23 +0200 (CEST) Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL
PROTECTED] wrote:
On Mon, 2 Apr 2007, Davide Libenzi wrote:
--- /dev/null 1970-01-01 00:00:00.0 +
+++ linux-2.6.21-rc5.fds/fs/signalfd.c2007-04-02
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
The thing is; I'm not needing any speed, as long as the machine stay
alive I'm good. However others are planing to build a full reserve based
allocator to properly fix the places that now use __GFP_NOFAIL and
situation such as in
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:10:20PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 14 2007 20:06, Stefan Richter wrote:
On 14 May, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
I've had a quick look at it...
* Copyright (C) 2004 Nokia Corporation
* Written by Tony Lindgren [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- * Major cleanups by
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jan Engelhardt schrieb:
On May 14 2007 19:40, Lars K.W. Gohlke wrote:
hallo,
after searching the mailing list and searching the web, I still don't
know how to access correctly the serial port (in user space known as
/dev/ttyS01)
m68k: implement __clear_user(), which is needed by fs/signalfd.c
Since we always let the MMU do all checking, clear_user() and __clear_user()
are identical. The old clear_user() is renamed to __clear_user() for
consistency.
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 12 2007 07:46, Matt Mackall wrote:
You should not assume alphabetical order. Filesystems may be free to
reorder things and return them (1) randomly like in a hash (2) by
creation time during readdir().
There is no assumption. Mercurial explicitly
On May 14 2007 19:32, Stefan Richter wrote:
As for NETDEV_1000 and _1, I really wonder if we need anymore
help text than the option. I do not know what the minimum level
of user knowledge is that kconfig help texts need to support,
but maybe you can tell?
The text Ethernet (1 Mbit)
On Monday 14 May 2007 2:57 pm, Dave Jones wrote:
Why did the kernel ignore what I told it to do ?
I'm sure it thinks it knows better than me for a reason, but
I'd like to know what it is.
Remount doesn't switch filesystem drivers, it tells the existing filesystem
driver to accept new flags
ALSA support for the SEGA Dreamcast Yamaha AICA sound device (pcm)
This patch adds ALSA sound support for pcm playback on two channels on
the SEGA Dreamcast built-in sound device (the Yamaha AICA)
Add driver for the AICA sound device built into the SEGA Dreamcast
Hook it all up with the build
On Tue, 2007-05-15 at 00:12 +0400, Anton Vorontsov wrote:
This change needed for two purposes:
1. When somebody sets trigger, and that trigger would setup
brightness in its activate() function, and led driver would check
if that trigger supported (used by hwtimer trigger and drivers
On May 14 2007 20:01, Tilman Schmidt wrote:
Patches welcome ;-)
Sure. Just tell me exactly what those options are intended to do
and I'll happily write up a patch adding help texts trying to
express that in bad English. :-)
They are just a menu that can be switched on or off.
It is for those
On Mon, 14 May 2007 12:25:02 -0700 (PDT)
Linus Torvalds [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't think re-generating the diff is wrong, and in fact I think you
have to do it, but I think Andrew should use --fuzz=0 or at least
--fuzz=1 instead of the default 2. Yeah, it obviously causes more patch
On 5/14/07, Andreas Dilger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On May 14, 2007 15:14 +0530, Bharata B Rao wrote:
#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_JOURNAL_DEV0x0008 /* Journal device */
#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_META_BG0x0010
+#define EXT3_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_WHITEOUT
On Mon, 14 May 2007 13:02:42 -0700
Jeremy Fitzhardinge [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Andrew Morton wrote:
Does that have name? I can find no patch in -mm which appears to have
anything to do with SMP consolidation, and this patch applies cleanly to
the current -mm lineup.
Sorry, I
On May 14 2007 22:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=116828781409931
I checked.
Now that kinda sucks, everyone does the same job over and over,
I did a ton of utf8 fixes and they did not get applied. (Granted,
I did not cc Andrew, Linus or trivial).
If you had
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 10:36:00PM +0200, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 14 2007 22:25, Adrian Bunk wrote:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=116828781409931
I checked.
Now that kinda sucks, everyone does the same job over and over,
I did a ton of utf8 fixes and they did not get
On May 14 2007 15:09, Bharata B Rao wrote:
A white-out stops the VFS from further lookups of the white-outs name and
returns -ENOENT. This is the same behaviour as if the filename isn't
found. This can be used in combination with union mounts to virtually
delete (white-out) files by creating a
Thanks, applied 1-6.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
On Monday 14 May 2007 21:22:50 Jan Engelhardt wrote:
On May 12 2007 22:12, Alistair John Strachan wrote:
On Saturday 12 May 2007 00:07:18 Arjan van de Ven wrote:
What's eating the battery life of my laptop? Why isn't it many more
hours? Which software component causes the most power to be
On May 14 2007 15:09, Bharata B Rao wrote:
Introduce MNT_UNION, MS_UNION and FS_WHT flags. There are the necessary flags
for doing
mount /dev/hda3 /mnt -o union
You need additional patches for util-linux for that to work.
Signed-off-by: Jan Blunck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Bharata
2007/5/14, Tejun Heo [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Okay, the patch made upstream and webpage posted.
http://linux-ata.org/shutdown.html
--
tejun
Ubuntu [1] ang Gentoo [2] bugs opened. Sent a mail to Miquel van
Smoorenburg, dev of sysvinit.
[1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/upstart/+bug/114683
[2]
On Mon, 14 May 2007 14:06:19 -0400
Theodore Tso [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:46:30PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
otoh, the intersection between pages which are PageBooked() and pages which
are PageLazyFree() should be zreo, so it'd be good to actually formalise
this
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 04:28:35PM -0400, Rob Landley wrote:
On Monday 14 May 2007 2:57 pm, Dave Jones wrote:
Why did the kernel ignore what I told it to do ?
I'm sure it thinks it knows better than me for a reason, but
I'd like to know what it is.
Remount doesn't switch filesystem
Andrew Morton wrote:
Confused. This patch conflicts a lot with James's one (which I named
voyager-fix-build-broken-by-shift-to-smp_ops.patch).
If your i386: move common parts of smp into their own file also fixes
Voyager and is preferred then cool, but a) the changelog should tell us
that
On May 14 2007 15:10, Bharata B Rao wrote:
+struct union_info * union_alloc(void)
Ultimate nitpick: try s/\* /*/; (also elsewhere)
+static inline void union_lock(struct dentry *dentry)
+{
+ if (unlikely(dentry dentry-d_union)) {
+ struct union_info *ui = dentry-d_union;
+
+
On May 14 2007 13:23, Badari Pulavarty wrote:
+static inline void union_lock_fs(struct fs_struct *fs)
+{
+int locked;
+
+while (fs) {
+locked = union_trylock(fs-root);
+if (!locked)
+goto loop1;
+locked =
301 - 400 of 1078 matches
Mail list logo
