On Friday 15 June 2007 00:15, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> How about the patch below instead?
>
And one more time without warnings...
--
Dmitry
Subject: Input: xpad - add support for leds on xbox 360 pad
From: Jan Kratochvil <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Input: xpad - add support for leds on xbox 360 pad
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 01:14:49AM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> I'm not trying to impose anything. I'm not pushing anything. I'm
> defending the GPLv3 from accusations that it's departing from the GPL
> spirit, and I'm trying to find out in what way Tivoization promotes
> the goals you perceiv
Willy Tarreau wrote:
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:48:36PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
Hi to all,
a simple question the answer to witch I didn't find in CodingStyle.
Look for a code snip:
err = foo(arg_a, arg_b, arg_c,
arg_d);
the second line contains 'd' arg aligned wi
> Well, it can be uninterruptible sleep, but why?
> It is not allowed to return to userspace until transaction is completed,
> so having uninterruptible sleep will result in exactly same lost of
> signals.
Delay, not loss.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" i
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:39:50 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You're making an artificial distinction based on whether the
> > *SOFTWARE* has a certain license or not.
>
> What matters to me is that, when the GPL says you can't impose fur
Hi,
Historically we did not trust PNP data on i386 because of all the
issues with data put into BIOS by BIOS writers. However there are
bunch of boxes that get really unhappy if we try to poke AUX port
when they don't have mouse attached and BIOS disabled AUX port when
booting. Our keyboard/mouse
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 08:20:19PM -0300, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>
> So, you see, your statement above, about wanting to be able to use
> other people's improvements, cannot be taken without qualification.
No. Linus and other Linux kernels might *want* to take other people's
improvements, but th
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:04:37 Michael Poole wrote:
> Daniel Hazelton writes:
> > On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:13:13 Michael Poole wrote:
> >> The fundamental reason for this is that neither the executable code
> >> nor the digital signature serves the desired function alone. The user
> >> recei
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:54:31 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2007, Daniel Hazelton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thursday 14 June 2007 22:21:59 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> Consider egg yolk and egg shells.
> >>
> >> I produce egg yolk. I give it to you under terms that say "if you
> >
On Jun 15, 2007, Bron Gondwana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> #define Dell CFG_FAVOURITE_VENDOR
> A Dell desktop machine is a piece of hardware. The manufacturer has the
> source code (hypothetically) to the BIOS. The BIOS is required for the
> machine to boot and run Linux.
> Riddle me this (es
On Wednesday 13 June 2007 10:09, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> On Wed, June 13, 2007 10:18, Pavel Machek wrote:
> >> Well, as I said before, I've the "stuck key"/repeated output too (as well
> >> as a warping PS/2 mouse), but no blinking led problem, so I believe the
> >> two things are totally unrelated
On Friday 15 June 2007 00:14:49 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2007, Linus Torvalds <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> case 2'': tivo provides source, end user tries to improve it, realizes
> >> the hardware won't let him use the result of his effor
On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:10:07PM -0700, Roland McGrath ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> > Well, it can be uninterruptible sleep, but why?
> > It is not allowed to return to userspace until transaction is completed,
> > so having uninterruptible sleep will result in exactly same lost of
> > signals.
On Thursday 14 June 2007 23:19:24 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 14, 2007, Florin Malita <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 06/14/2007 05:39 PM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> >> Back when GPLv2 was written, the right to run was never considered an
> >> issue. It was taken for granted, because copyright
On Fri, Jun 15 2007, dave young wrote:
> Hi,
> >Better to use the email address in the MAINTAINERS file than
> >the one in the driver source file.
>
> Really? I searched the list, found axboe use the address
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], same as what andrew said. does the MAINTAINERS
> file be updated?
He
On Friday 15 June 2007 01:38:41 Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Jun 15, 2007, Bron Gondwana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > #define Dell CFG_FAVOURITE_VENDOR
> >
> > A Dell desktop machine is a piece of hardware. The manufacturer has the
> > source code (hypothetically) to the BIOS. The BIOS is requir
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007, Balbir Singh wrote:
malc wrote:
On Thu, 14 Jun 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
[..snip..]
Now integral load matches the one obtained via the "accurate" method.
However the report for individual cores are of by around 20% percent.
I think I missed some of the context, is t
Stephen,
Thank you for your interests and comment.
I'm beginning to feel that you might be misunderstanding
my message. Let me explain.
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:13 +0900, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
A couple of years ago, we tried to build a tool to generate
SELinux policy (
On Thu, Jun 14 2007, Carsten Otte wrote:
> This patch removes xip_file_sendfile, the sendfile implementation for
> xip without replacement. Those customers that use xip on s390 are not
> using sendfile() as far as we know, and so far s390 is the only platform
> this could potentially be used on so
On Fri, 15 Jun 2007 01:24:32 -0400
Theodore Tso <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> No. Linus and other Linux kernels might *want* to take other people's
> improvements, but thanks to Richard Stallman's choices for GPLv3, they
> can *not* legally take other people's improvements without violating
> the
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
that GPL3 is just GPL3 improved.
So - just throwing out the idea that if Linus is
unhappy with GPL3 that Linux lose the GPLx license a
As a simple matter of fact, the *only* activities covered by the GPLv2
are "copying, distributing and modifying". It says so in the license itself.
Unless I have explicitly installed linux myself in the box, I have
received the binary from them, so it can fall in the distribution
case.
--
Glaube
Hi,
>On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 07:58:47AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> Hey, no point in CC'ing me twice! [EMAIL PROTECTED] works just fine as
> well.
>
I'm sorry for it , jens. Now I resend the patch after remove some checkpatch.pl
warnings(line breaking trailing space).
If user have many cdrom dri
Hi,
I have the following strange behaviour with rtc_cmos:
$ echo 1181934240 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
bash: echo: write error: Device or resource busy
$ rmmod rtc_cmos
$ modprobe rtc_cmos
$ echo 1181934240 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
$ echo 1181934240 > /sys/class/rtc/rtc0/wakealarm
bas
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
that GPL3 is just GPL3 improved.
So - just throwing out the idea that if Linus is
On Fri, Jun 15, 2007 at 02:16:46AM -0400, Sean wrote:
> There's no problem with people voicing honest disagreement with the v3,
> but please lighten up a bit on FSF bashing and the Greek tragedy talk.
Would you prefer a reference to Resistible Rise of Arturo Ui?
-
To unsubscribe from this list:
Stephen Smalley wrote:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 23:22 +0900, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
2007/6/13, Stephen Smalley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Wed, 2007-06-13 at 17:13 +0900, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
Here are examples:
/bin/bash process invoked from mingetty: /sbin/mingetty /bin/bash
/bin/bash process in
Hi,
The Documentation/CodingStyle says:
Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
Regards
dave
2007/6/15, Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 14, 2007 at 10:48:36P
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
> and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
> nothing like GPL2 and the GPLx leads people to believe
> that GPL3
On 6/15/07, dave young <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
The Documentation/CodingStyle says:
Outside of comments, documentation and except in Kconfig, spaces are never
used for indentation, and the above example is deliberately broken.
Regards
dave
2007/6/15, Kok, Auke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Will
On 6/15/07, Kevin Bowling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 6/14/07, Glauber de Oliveira Costa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 6/15/07, Marc Perkel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've been somewhat following the GPL2 vs. GPL3 debate
> > and the problem is that it leads to confusion. GPL3 is
> > nothi
Hi,
2007/6/15, debian developer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
And *Please* do not top-post!
I know gmail directly goes to the top while replying, but think of
other mail clients out there.
Yes, it go to the top directly, and tabs of pasted code will be
converted to white spaces, so I need use mutt to
On Friday 15 June 2007 02:29:32 Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > As a simple matter of fact, the *only* activities covered by the GPLv2
> > are "copying, distributing and modifying". It says so in the license
> > itself.
>
> Unless I have explicitly installed linux myself in the box, I have
> r
Hello,
I ran into some compilations problems with UML on the 2.6.22-rc4 kernel.
The problem turns up because "paravirt.h" is included in a couple of
headers in asm-i386 without being protected by a "#ifdef CONFIG_PARAVIRT".
I've attached a patch to fix this (i.e. UML compiles and runs fine for
me
601 - 634 of 634 matches
Mail list logo
