This is the documentation for the Generic Trace Setup and Control
patchset, first submitted a couple of weeks ago. See
http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernelm=118214274912586w=2
for a more detailed description.
I've updated this patch to incorporate the suggestions made by Alexey
Dobriyan in that
The Generic Tracing and Control Interface (GTSC) code.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: David Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
include/linux/gtsc.h | 104 +
lib/Kconfig | 10
lib/Makefile |2
lib/gtsc.c | 558
This patch converts blktrace to use the Generic Trace Setup and
Control (GTSC) interface. Also attached is a small patch to the
blktrace user code, needed for the ioctl change.
Signed-off-by: Tom Zanussi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: David Wilder [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
block/Kconfig
Put WARN_ON and fixed all callers of unregister_blkdev().
Now we can make unregister_blkdev return void.
Cc: Jens Axboe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Signed-off-by: Akinobu Mita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
block/genhd.c |7 +--
include/linux/fs.h |2 +-
2 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 7
On 6/30/07, Satyam Sharma [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On 6/30/07, Kok, Auke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
an easier way to implement this is to add an extra field in the MAINTAINERS
file, something like below. All the contact info would stay the same, closely
where applicable and it would
How do I turn on dev_dbg messaging in the kernel? I can get
printk(KERN_DEBUG ...) to work just fine, but I don't know how to
enable dev_dbg.
Thanks,
Jay
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line unsubscribe linux-kernel in
the body of a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
More majordomo info at
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:29:33PM -0500, Jay Cliburn wrote:
How do I turn on dev_dbg messaging in the kernel? I can get
printk(KERN_DEBUG ...) to work just fine, but I don't know how to
enable dev_dbg.
Defining DEBUG before including linux/device.h enables dev_dbg to work.
-
To unsubscribe
On Friday 29 June 2007 17:27:34 Rene Herman wrote:
On 06/29/2007 11:05 PM, Bodo Eggert wrote:
Alan Cox [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Indeed if its public domain you may have almost no rights at all
depending what you were given. Once you get the source code you can do
stuff but I don't have to
On Sat, Jun 30, 2007 at 05:34:51AM +0300, Dan Aloni wrote:
...
Basically, instead of manually figuring out who to add to CC
when sending a patch to LKML by looking at MAINTAINERS, a
script can look at '.maintainers' files spread across the
source tree and automatically generate a proper list
Treating ordinary use as a copyright privilege leads to
nonsensical results
no matter what you do. For example, you get that I can drop copies of my
poem from an airplane and then sue anyone who reads it.
Who was talking about reading?
They are both ordinary use. It is crazy to treat
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Anyway, the patch which introduces the problem is the aptly named 3ebad:
3ebad59056: [PATCH] x86: Save and restore the fixed-range MTRRs of the BSP when
suspending
2.6.22-rc6 plus that one commit reverted successfully does APM suspend
(and resume) for me.
Okay, I
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:01:30 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:50:30 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Odd - just for grins, I checked what 'make oldconfig' did when handed a
.config
from 22-rc4-mm2, and it behaved just fine, much to my surprise.
That's probably because
On Sat, 30 Jun 2007 00:17:46 -0400 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 14:01:30 PDT, Andrew Morton said:
On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 10:50:30 -0400
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Odd - just for grins, I checked what 'make oldconfig' did when handed a
.config
from 22-rc4-mm2, and it
On Fri, 2007-06-29 at 18:21 -0700, Florin Andrei wrote:
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
But it's running a Web service which is a combination of C code and
Tomcat/Java. I have no clue how to determine which portions specify a
noexec stack and which don't.
like this:
$ eu-readelf -l
601 - 614 of 614 matches
Mail list logo
