Hi
Please CC me on reply, i am not subscribed to list.
I did small test, and notice that if nmi_watchdog is enabled
mpstat 1
06:11:00 CPU %user %nice%sys %iowait%irq %soft %steal
%idleintr/s
06:11:01 all0.000.000.000.000.000.000.00
I'm seeing errors in dmesg and the like. It appears to be somewhat
similar to the issue reported here:
http://kerneltrap.org/mailarchive/linux-kernel/2007/8/25/164711 except
that my machine doesn't freeze, and everything seems normal --
hopefully nothing like silent corruption is going on. Also
With kernel 2.6.24-rc6, volanoMark has much regression.
1) On 8-core stoakley: 17%;
2) On 16-core tigerton: 24%.
I bisected it down to patch fbdcf18df73758b2e187ab94678b30cd5f6ff9f9. It is
to fix the bad cpu number in /proc/cpuinfo. As a matter of fact, this issue
is already fixed by other 2
I wish to be personally CC'ed the answers/comments posted to the list in
response to my posting.
I have 2 ports(eth0, eth1) in my device. I use kernel(2.6.23) bonding driver
v3.1.3 (June 13, 2007) to bond 2 ports to one aggregator and use the
following commands to setup the environment:
Hi All,
what is the relation between mmc_request , mmc_data and mmc_command .
(I am new SD driver development, and I am working on 2.6.22.1)
when mmc core layer calls Host controllers request function (member
of struct mmc_host_ops), it passes mmc_request structure to
driver's request
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 03:16:24PM -0500, Loic Prylli wrote:
...
> I just realized one thing: the bar sizing code in pci_read_bases() (that
> writes 0x in the bars) does not seem to disable the
> PCI_COMMAND_MEM/PCI_COMMAND_IO bits in the cmd register before
> manipulating the BARs. And it
On Thu, Dec 20, 2007 at 02:40:06PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> Sure, I realize this, but it solves the problem in one way for broken
> hardware, such that it at least allows it to work, right? It also
> provides a better incentive for the manufacturer to fix their bios,
> which as you are on-site at
I feel it's dangerous to set the En bit on Intel platform, If the HT MSI
En is set, the MSI should be expected to transform to HT INT message
format. It may cause interrupt lost or hardware internal state machine
failed depend on the hardware design.
BRs
Peer Chen
-Original Message-
On Sunday 23 December 2007, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> On 23/12/2007, Adrian McMenamin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > This patch adds support for the CD-Rom (the so-called "GD-Rom") on the
> > SEGA Dreamcast.
> >
> > The GD-Rom is based on the ATA-3 standard but implements a proprietary
> > packet
Joe Perches wrote:
Signed-off-by: Joe Perches <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Acked-by: Greg Ungerer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---
include/asm-m68knommu/bitops.h |2 +-
include/asm-m68knommu/commproc.h|2 +-
include/asm-m68knommu/delay.h |2 +-
include/asm-m68knommu/m5249sim.h
"Peer Chen" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I feel it's dangerous to set the En bit on Intel platform, If the HT MSI
> En is set, the MSI should be expected to transform to HT INT message
> format. It may cause interrupt lost or hardware internal state machine
> failed depend on the hardware
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 02:04:41 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> >> 3) mmconfig might or might not be enabled, depending on which
> >> driver is loaded, whether it called an API or not.
> >>
> >>Even LESS testing by hw vendors than #2. Maybe even
> >>
Arjan van de Ven wrote:
I can see the point of having a sysfs attribute to enable MMCONF from
userspace, so
that userland diagnostics tools can turn it on if they really really want to.
(I'd make that printk a nice warning "application XYZ is enabling extended config
space for devize ABC" so
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 06:54:30 -0500
Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> > I can see the point of having a sysfs attribute to enable MMCONF
> > from userspace, so that userland diagnostics tools can turn it on
> > if they really really want to. (I'd make that printk a
Hi,
Just hit this on sched-devel. (not sure how to reproduce it yet, can't
try now. I believe i can hit it on mainline as well as there is nothing
scheduler specific).
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.24-rc6 #1
Linus,
Please pull from:
ssh://master.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/v4l-dvb.git
master
For two trivial driver fixes:
- A fix at Kconfig to DVB_LGDT330X be selected on cx23885;
- Some ivtv boards requres a longer i2c udelay for they to work.
Cheers,
Mauro.
---
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 04:56:14PM +, Adrian McMenamin wrote:
> Could someone here help settle this argument?
>
> I have written a driver (for the CD Rom on the Sega Dreamcast). I have
> marked various initialisation functions - including probe() and the
> functions that it, and only it,
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 06:13:03AM -0500, Jeff Garzik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Another year, another update! :)
>
> The kernel hacker's guide to git has received some updates:
>
> http://linux.yyz.us/git-howto.html
one minor note:
i would suggest using:
$ git shortlog master..HEAD
Hello.
Serge E. Hallyn wrote:
> I apologize if I'm commiting a faux pas by asking this, but any chance
> of renaming this to something like strictdev or sdev, or at least with
> 'dev' in it somewhere?
You are not commiting a faux pas. But, this naming is my personal feeling. ;-)
You can see the
On Monday, 24 of December 2007, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
> On Monday 24 December 2007 01:14:34 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Side note: we could obviously undo the commit that triggered this for you
> > [..]
> > In other words, we'd have to go back to our original ordering, which Len
> > said was
At Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:50:03 -0800,
Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > although it still is a
> > bit flaky (it takes well more than 5 seconds to suspend and the sound
> > adapter
> > doesn't work right after the resume, but it starts to work again about 10s
> > later).
>
> hm. There have been some
On Monday, 24 of December 2007, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Sun, 23 Dec 2007 14:50:03 -0800,
> Andrew Morton wrote:
> >
> > > although it still is a
> > > bit flaky (it takes well more than 5 seconds to suspend and the sound
> > > adapter
> > > doesn't work right after the resume, but it starts to
Hello,
If you need a little network to test some of the kernel's
networking functions, there is a simple virtual network
available at http://clownix.net (uml_clownix_net).
Vincent Perrier
Regards
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message
commit 528a572daea90aa41db92683e5a8756acef514c4 ("ide: add ->chipset field
to ide_pci_device_t") broke hwif->chipset setup (it is now set to ide_cmd646
for CMD648 instead of CMD646). It seems that the breakage happend while
I was moving patches around (cmd64x_chipsets[] entries for CMD646 and
On Sat, 2007-12-22 at 02:06 -0800, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Mon, 17 Dec 2007 12:13:22 + richard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > fix lockup in when calling drop_caches
> >
> > calling /proc/sys/vm/drop_caches can hang due to a AB/BA lock dependency
> > between j_list_lock
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:46:37 -0800, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I noticed you also have a spinlock held in usu_probe_thread(), the
> usu_lock.. That spinlock would preclude anything inside request_module()
> from sleeping..
The usu_lock is not held across request_module. In fact,
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Dieter Ries wrote:
> Could you perhaps publish your reference list as kind of a christmas
> gift to all basic users like me?
FYI, i'm typing in my own reference list as we speak here:
http://www.crashcourse.ca/wiki/index.php/Git
still quite a bit to go, but you can get
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
cmd64x regression bugfix, few obvious ide-cd fixes from the "redux" patch
peries and ide-cd MAINTAINERS entry update (Borislav, welcome on board!).
Oh yes, I would forget...
Merry Christmas!
Linus, please pull from:
master.kernel.org:/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bart/ide-2.6.git/
to receive
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
A simplified version of the semantic patch making this change is as follows:
(http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
//
@
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:47:32 +0100 (CET)),
Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 13:22:12 -0800
Andrew Morton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 20 Dec 2007 15:57:45 -0500
> Rik van Riel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > 2.6.24-rc5-mm1 seems to have a hang related to the SCSI or block
> > device probing code.
> It could be a scsi problem, or it could be
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:18:56 +0100 (CET)),
Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff -r -u -p a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/xpc_main.c
> b/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/xpc_main.c
> --- a/arch/ia64/sn/kernel/xpc_main.c 2007-11-12 10:35:56.0 +0100
> +++
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:28:42 +0100 (CET)),
Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff -r -u -p a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_mad.c
> b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_mad.c
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_mad.c 2007-10-22 11:25:09.0
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
The old code was actually correct I think, but the
On Tue, 25 Dec 2007, YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / µÈÆ£±ÑÌÀ wrote:
> In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:28:42 +0100 (CET)),
> Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
>
> > diff -r -u -p a/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_mad.c
> > b/drivers/infiniband/hw/ipath/ipath_mad.c
> > ---
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (at Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:40:06 +0100 (CET)),
Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> says:
> diff -r -u -p a/drivers/net/cassini.c b/drivers/net/cassini.c
> --- a/drivers/net/cassini.c 2007-10-22 11:25:14.0 +0200
> +++ b/drivers/net/cassini.c 2007-12-23
First step towards unifying these files.
- Checkpatch trailing whitespace fixes
- Checkpatch indentation of switch statement fixes
- Checkpatch single statement ifs need no braces fixes
- Checkpatch consistent spacing after comma fixes
- Introduce defines for pagefault error bits from X86_64 and
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 02:22:10AM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
> The phrase "all or none" specifically describes the current practice in
> arch/x86/pci/mmconfig_{32,64}.c whereby a PCI bus always has one, and only
> one, access method.
>
> So the problems you describe are unrelated to "all or
[ added Linus to Cc: ]
On Monday 24 December 2007, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> cmd64x regression bugfix, few obvious ide-cd fixes from the "redux" patch
> peries and ide-cd MAINTAINERS entry update (Borislav, welcome on board!).
>
> Oh yes, I would forget...
>
> Merry Christmas!
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Some device drivers register CPU hotplug notifiers and use them to destroy
> device objects when removing the corresponding CPUs and to create these
> objects
> when adding the CPUs back.
>
> Unfortunately, this is not the right thing to
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Andi Kleen wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 03:23:19PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> > are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
>
>
On Mon, 2007-12-24 at 06:12 -0800, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Sun, 23 Dec 2007 08:46:37 -0800, Daniel Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I noticed you also have a spinlock held in usu_probe_thread(), the
> > usu_lock.. That spinlock would preclude anything inside request_module()
> > from
Please ignore this patch, in which I have found an error.
julia
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Julia Lawall wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
>
> A
Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Carlos Corbacho wrote:
Fix suspend-to-RAM on nForce 4 (CK804) boards by increasing
PCIBIOS_MIN_IO.
Fixes kernel bugzilla #9528
Problem:
Linus' patch (52ade9b3b97fd3bea42842a056fe0786c28d0555) to re-order
suspend (and fix fall out from Rafael's
Loic Prylli wrote:
I just realized one thing: the bar sizing code in pci_read_bases() (that
writes 0x in the bars) does not seem to disable the
PCI_COMMAND_MEM/PCI_COMMAND_IO bits in the cmd register before
manipulating the BARs. And it seems nobody else ensures they are
disabled at this
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007 15:45:32 +0100 (CET)
Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> From: Julia Lawall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> The functions time_before, time_before_eq, time_after, and time_after_eq
> are more robust for comparing jiffies against other values.
>
> A simplified version of the
On Sunday 23 December 2007, Jochen Friedrich wrote:
> This patch adds device tree source, default config and setup code for
> DBox2 devices.
Cool stuff. I used to have one of these boxes myself, maybe I should
get one again when it's hitting mainline.
Is this already a complete port, or do you
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>
> Well, having considered that for a longer while, I think the AML code is
> referring to a device that we have suspended already, and since it's in a low
> power state, it just can't handle the reference.
>
> If that is the case, we'll have to
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Jeff Garzik wrote:
>
> Definitely. So, two questions:
>
> What's the preferred way to deal with the desire to view extended config space
> with "lspci -vvvxxx"?
Well, there's two issues right now with MMCONFIG
- we've hit various bugs in it. The bugs are admittedly
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Pekka, i stuck your patch into the x86.git random-test-grid, and it
> found the following build error after a few iterations:
>
> mm/slub.c: In function 's_show':
> mm/slub.c:4188: error: implicit declaration of function 'count_partial'
>
> find
On Sun, Dec 23, 2007 at 08:49:12PM -0800, Greg KH wrote:
> > Hi Greg, do you even build with your patches applied?
>
> For the power architecture, no, I do not. I used to, but my cross-build
> box died and I haven't taken the time to set it all up again.
Crosstool makes it really easy. It's
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Theodore Tso wrote:
> > tends to work reasonably well for a quick overview, but yes
> > cat was nicer for humans.
>
> Until you start to wonder what the heck :a-136 is:
>
> /sys/slab/:a-136/objs_per_slab: 30
>
> Sigh...
That is why there is a slabinfo tool that
On Sat, 22 Dec 2007, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> Christoph, i'd like to apologize for all overly harsh words i said. (and
> i said quite a few :-/ )
Looks like a bad interaction due to overload, vacation, flu epidemic
hitting me and family and also Christmas coming up so that I could not do
my usual
On Sun, 23 Dec 2007, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > What did you intend here? s/&//, perhaps?
>
> I think that thing is bogus in other ways. It plays games with
> "needs_flush", just because it seems to want the generic code to then call
> "check_pgt_cache()", not because it actually wants any
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote, On 12/24/2007 07:18 PM:
> Hello again.
> Its bug depend to
> http://git.kernel.org/?p=linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux-2.6.git;a=commit;h=4aae07025265151e3f7041dfbf0f529e122de1d8
> ?
Hello Vyacheslav!
I wonder why do you think there is such a dependency, and why do you
Hello
In fs/cifs/cifssmb.c, in CIFSSMBSetEA (...) function wrong counting of
var exists.
EXISTING CODE:
pSMB->DataCount = sizeof(*parm_data) + ea_value_len + name_len + 1;
MUST BE:
pSMB->DataCount = sizeof(*parm_data) + ea_value_len + name_len;
REASON:
"sizeof(*parm_data)" counts 1 byte from
On Dec 24, 2007 9:12 PM, Christoph Lameter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hmmm... What is the combination of config variables that causes this? I
> moved the count_partial function in mm in order to make the merge of slab
> defrag easier.
I think it's CONFIG_PROC_FS without CONFIG_SYSFS.
--
To
From: Kay Sievers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PNP: add all PNP card device id's as individual aliases
The current PNP combined card + devices module aliase can
never ever match anything, because all these values are never
available all at the same time to match a module.
Instead of adding the
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 10:51:22AM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> The *second* problem is entirely a kernel internal issue. It's the one
> that causes us the biggest issues right now, but it's also the one that
> will not impact user space at all once if is fixed. So once we do the
> *early*
On Monday 24 December 2007 18:34:21 Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Well, having considered that for a longer while, I think the AML code is
> > referring to a device that we have suspended already, and since it's in a
> > low power state, it just can't
Carlos Corbacho wrote:
On Monday 24 December 2007 18:34:21 Linus Torvalds wrote:
On Mon, 24 Dec 2007, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
Well, having considered that for a longer while, I think the AML code is
referring to a device that we have suspended already, and since it's in a
low power state, it
Setting: ltp-full-20071031, dio01 test on ext3 with Linus's latest tree.
Kernel w/ SMP, preemption, and lockdep configured.
Cheers,
Erez.
===
[ INFO: possible circular locking dependency detected ]
2.6.24-rc6 #83
On Mon, Dec 24, 2007 at 11:21:14AM -0800, Christoph Lameter wrote:
>
> That is why there is a slabinfo tool that does all the nice formatting.
>
> Do a
>
> gcc -o slabinfo Documentation/vm/slabinfo.c
>
> Then run slabinfo instead of doing cat /proc/slabinfo
So two questions: why isn't -f the
101 - 200 of 208 matches
Mail list logo
