On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 15:35 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> No. It is correct for of_find_by_name() to call of_node_put() for
> the from argument. The callers should be fixed.
I would argue that if everybody makes the same mistake then our
interface is wrong. In that case I wrote it so I think I
On Thu, 2016-04-21 at 15:35 -0700, Frank Rowand wrote:
> No. It is correct for of_find_by_name() to call of_node_put() for
> the from argument. The callers should be fixed.
I would argue that if everybody makes the same mistake then our
interface is wrong. In that case I wrote it so I think I
Hi,
I didn't look as deeply as Heiko, but a few comments...
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 11:58:12 schrieb Jianqun Xu:
>> This patch adds rk3399.dtsi for rk3399 found on Rockchip
>> RK3399 SoCs, also add
Hi,
I didn't look as deeply as Heiko, but a few comments...
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 3:02 PM, Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Hi Jay,
>
> Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 11:58:12 schrieb Jianqun Xu:
>> This patch adds rk3399.dtsi for rk3399 found on Rockchip
>> RK3399 SoCs, also add rk3399-evb.dts for
On Thu 31 Mar 18:47 PDT 2016, Andrew Duggan wrote:
> On 03/31/2016 12:14 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >On Thu 31 Mar 11:19 PDT 2016, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Bjorn,
> >>
> >>On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:57:29AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>>From: Bjorn Andersson
On Thu 31 Mar 18:47 PDT 2016, Andrew Duggan wrote:
> On 03/31/2016 12:14 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >On Thu 31 Mar 11:19 PDT 2016, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> >
> >>Hi Bjorn,
> >>
> >>On Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 09:57:29AM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> >>>From: Bjorn Andersson
> >>>
> >>>Support
On 4/19/2016 10:05 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Majority of the callers of of_find_node_by_name() do not expect that it
> will drop reference to the 'from' node if it was passed in, causing
> potential refcount underflows, etc, so let's stop doing this.
>
> Most of the callers that were handling
On 4/19/2016 10:05 AM, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
> Majority of the callers of of_find_node_by_name() do not expect that it
> will drop reference to the 'from' node if it was passed in, causing
> potential refcount underflows, etc, so let's stop doing this.
>
> Most of the callers that were handling
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 14:48:26 schrieb Brian Norris:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:15:50AM +0800, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> > This patch adds core dtsi file for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> > rk3399 SoCs, tested on rk3399 evb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
> >
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 14:48:26 schrieb Brian Norris:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:15:50AM +0800, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> > This patch adds core dtsi file for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> > rk3399 SoCs, tested on rk3399 evb.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
> > ---
> >
> >
Hi Linus,
A few fixes for the RTC subsystem. The documentation fix already missed
4.5 so I think it is worth taking it now.
Note that I'm now using a signing subkey so you may need to refresh my
GPG key.
The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca:
Linux
Hi Linus,
A few fixes for the RTC subsystem. The documentation fix already missed
4.5 so I think it is worth taking it now.
Note that I'm now using a signing subkey so you may need to refresh my
GPG key.
The following changes since commit f55532a0c0b8bb6148f4e07853b876ef73bc69ca:
Linux
On 04/18, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:50:52PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 02/17/2016 09:52 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> > > On the other hand this ABI is backwards compatible since if it is missing
> > > it
> > > will default to the configuration we right now have
On 04/18, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 06:50:52PM +0300, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
> > On 02/17/2016 09:52 PM, Peter Ujfalusi wrote:
>
> > > On the other hand this ABI is backwards compatible since if it is missing
> > > it
> > > will default to the configuration we right now have
Add registration APIs in the clk fractional divider code to
return struct clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers.
This way we hide the struct clk pointer from providers unless
they need to use consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
Add registration APIs in the clk mux code to return struct clk_hw
pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide the
struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-mux.c| 57
Add registration APIs in the clk fractional divider code to
return struct clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers.
This way we hide the struct clk pointer from providers unless
they need to use consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-fractional-divider.c |
Add registration APIs in the clk mux code to return struct clk_hw
pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide the
struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-mux.c| 57
Add registration APIs in the clk divider code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-divider.c
Add registration APIs in the clk divider code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-divider.c| 91
Now that we've converted the only caller over to another clkdev
API, remove this one.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko
Cc: Russell King
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 27
Add registration APIs in the clk fixed-rate code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
Add registration APIs in the clk fixed-factor code to return
struct clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way
we hide the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to
use consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
Now that we've converted the only caller over to another clkdev
API, remove this one.
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko
Cc: Russell King
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clkdev.c | 27 ---
include/linux/clkdev.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 28 deletions(-)
diff
Add registration APIs in the clk fixed-rate code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-fixed-rate.c | 44
Add registration APIs in the clk fixed-factor code to return
struct clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way
we hide the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to
use consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-fixed-factor.c | 42
Add registration APIs in the clk gpio code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c |
Add registration APIs in the clk gpio code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-gpio.c | 52
We've largely split the clk consumer and provider APIs along
struct clk and struct clk_hw, but clk_register() still returns a
struct clk pointer for each struct clk_hw that's registered.
Eventually we'd like to only allocate struct clks when there's a
user, because struct clk is per-user now, so
We've mostly split the clk API between consumers and providers
along struct clk and struct clk_hw, but the registration and
clkdev/DT code is still struct clk focused. This series
lays the foundation for changing that design by making
clk_register() return an int instead of a struct clk and
Add registration APIs in the clk composite code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c
Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already
operates on struct clk_hw pointers, except for the
We've largely split the clk consumer and provider APIs along
struct clk and struct clk_hw, but clk_register() still returns a
struct clk pointer for each struct clk_hw that's registered.
Eventually we'd like to only allocate struct clks when there's a
user, because struct clk is per-user now, so
We've mostly split the clk API between consumers and providers
along struct clk and struct clk_hw, but the registration and
clkdev/DT code is still struct clk focused. This series
lays the foundation for changing that design by making
clk_register() return an int instead of a struct clk and
Add registration APIs in the clk composite code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-composite.c | 45
Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
pointers with a struct clk_lookup. Luckily, clkdev already
operates on struct clk_hw pointers, except for the
Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to
give us a struct clk pointer for some clkspec,
Now that we have a clk registration API that doesn't return
struct clks, we need to have some way to hand out struct clks via
the clk_get() APIs that doesn't involve associating struct clk
pointers with an OF node. Currently we ask the OF provider to
give us a struct clk pointer for some clkspec,
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-regmap.c | 5 ++--
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-regmap.h | 3 +--
drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 58 +++--
drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c | 9 +++
drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8996.c
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-regmap.c | 5 ++--
drivers/clk/qcom/clk-regmap.h | 3 +--
drivers/clk/qcom/common.c | 58 +++--
drivers/clk/qcom/gcc-msm8996.c | 9 +++
drivers/clk/qcom/mmcc-msm8996.c | 9 +++
5 files
Add registration APIs in the clk gate code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-gate.c |
Add registration APIs in the clk gate code to return struct
clk_hw pointers instead of struct clk pointers. This way we hide
the struct clk pointer from providers unless they need to use
consumer facing APIs.
Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd
---
drivers/clk/clk-gate.c | 43
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> When I was fixing up const recommendations from checkpatch.pl, I went
> overboard. This fixes the warning (during a W=1 build):
>
> include/linux/fs.h:2627:74: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function
> return type
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:53 PM, Kees Cook wrote:
> When I was fixing up const recommendations from checkpatch.pl, I went
> overboard. This fixes the warning (during a W=1 build):
>
> include/linux/fs.h:2627:74: warning: type qualifiers ignored on function
> return type [-Wignored-qualifiers]
>
On 04/19, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of other clock patches that need this, so I guess it
> would be easier if applied it directly with your acked-by, or if you
> could apply it and give a stable branch I can base my future PR on.
Ok. I pushed it to stable branch
On 04/19, Maxime Ripard wrote:
>
> I have a bunch of other clock patches that need this, so I guess it
> would be easier if applied it directly with your acked-by, or if you
> could apply it and give a stable branch I can base my future PR on.
Ok. I pushed it to stable branch
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
> Very common ethernet. Already enabled in i386_defconfig
Noticed by disappearing same commit in my local tree, thanks.
FWIW:
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Andy Shevchenko
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Konstantin Khlebnikov
wrote:
> Very common ethernet. Already enabled in i386_defconfig
Noticed by disappearing same commit in my local tree, thanks.
FWIW:
Reviewed-and-tested-by: Andy Shevchenko
>
> Signed-off-by: Konstantin Khlebnikov
> ---
>
Hi Jay,
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 11:58:12 schrieb Jianqun Xu:
> This patch adds rk3399.dtsi for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> RK3399 SoCs, also add rk3399-evb.dts for Rockchip RK3399
> Evaluation Board.
>
> Patch is tested on RK3399 evb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
Hi Jay,
Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 11:58:12 schrieb Jianqun Xu:
> This patch adds rk3399.dtsi for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> RK3399 SoCs, also add rk3399-evb.dts for Rockchip RK3399
> Evaluation Board.
>
> Patch is tested on RK3399 evb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
please split this into
On 21 April 2016 at 10:10, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 12/04/16 18:54, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>
>> This patch implement the AUX area interfaces required to
>> use the TMC (configured as an ETR) from the Perf sub-system.
>>
>> The heuristic is heavily borrowed from the
On 21 April 2016 at 10:10, Suzuki K Poulose wrote:
> On 12/04/16 18:54, Mathieu Poirier wrote:
>>
>> This patch implement the AUX area interfaces required to
>> use the TMC (configured as an ETR) from the Perf sub-system.
>>
>> The heuristic is heavily borrowed from the ETB10 and TMC-ETF
>>
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, David Wu wrote:
> From: David Wu
>
> - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399:
> There was an timing issue about "repeated start" time at the I2C
> controller of version0, controller appears to drop SDA at
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 4:55 PM, David Wu wrote:
> From: David Wu
>
> - new method to caculate i2c timings for rk3399:
> There was an timing issue about "repeated start" time at the I2C
> controller of version0, controller appears to drop SDA at .875x (7/8)
> programmed clk high. On
From: Roderick Colenbrander
Many devices use userspace bluetooth stacks like BlueZ or Bluedroid in
combination
with uhid. If any of these stacks is used with a HID device for which the driver
performs a HID request as part .probe (or technically another HID
From: Roderick Colenbrander
Many devices use userspace bluetooth stacks like BlueZ or Bluedroid in
combination
with uhid. If any of these stacks is used with a HID device for which the driver
performs a HID request as part .probe (or technically another HID operation),
this results in a
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:15:50AM +0800, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> This patch adds core dtsi file for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> rk3399 SoCs, tested on rk3399 evb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1744
>
Hi,
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 11:15:50AM +0800, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> This patch adds core dtsi file for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> rk3399 SoCs, tested on rk3399 evb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
> ---
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi | 1744
> ++
> 1 file
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
Hi Andy and thanks for the review!
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Octavian Purdila
> wrote:
> > This patch adds supports for I2C device enumeration and removal via
> > ACPI
On Fri, Apr 22, 2016 at 12:27 AM, Andy Shevchenko
wrote:
>
Hi Andy and thanks for the review!
> On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Octavian Purdila
> wrote:
> > This patch adds supports for I2C device enumeration and removal via
> > ACPI reconfiguration notifications that are send as a result of
RNDIS_STATUS_NETWORK_CHANGE event is handled as two "half events" --
media disconnect & connect. The second half should be added to the list
head, not to the tail. So all events are processed in normal order.
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang
Reviewed-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
RNDIS_STATUS_NETWORK_CHANGE event is handled as two "half events" --
media disconnect & connect. The second half should be added to the list
head, not to the tail. So all events are processed in normal order.
Signed-off-by: Haiyang Zhang
Reviewed-by: K. Y. Srinivasan
---
> I would like to disable SMBUS_QUICK. It never worked for the read case.
Fine with me.
> Could we break something by disabling the quick-write case or is
> the quick-write emulated by a larger write if the feature bit is not
> set?
No emulation. It is simply not supported then. It is actually
> I would like to disable SMBUS_QUICK. It never worked for the read case.
Fine with me.
> Could we break something by disabling the quick-write case or is
> the quick-write emulated by a larger write if the feature bit is not
> set?
No emulation. It is simply not supported then. It is actually
Hi!
> > CONFIG_HSI breaks power management completely, so power management
> > with modem will be another topic.
>
> Sebastian, any idea why power management does not work for HSI?
>
> > > > > In the meantime, I found what is causing the rention mode to break for
> > > > > me: CONFIG_HSI (aka
Hi!
> > CONFIG_HSI breaks power management completely, so power management
> > with modem will be another topic.
>
> Sebastian, any idea why power management does not work for HSI?
>
> > > > > In the meantime, I found what is causing the rention mode to break for
> > > > > me: CONFIG_HSI (aka
Please ignore this revision of the patch, there was a small merge
conflict on my end.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:15 PM, kbuild test robot <l...@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on hid/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc4 next-20160421]
> [if
Please ignore this revision of the patch, there was a small merge
conflict on my end.
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:15 PM, kbuild test robot wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [auto build test WARNING on hid/for-next]
> [also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc4 next-20160421]
> [if your patch is applied t
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Octavian Purdila
wrote:
> This patch adds supports for I2C device enumeration and removal via
> ACPI reconfiguration notifications that are send as a result of an
> ACPI table load or unload operation.
>
>
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:39 AM, Octavian Purdila
wrote:
> This patch adds supports for I2C device enumeration and removal via
> ACPI reconfiguration notifications that are send as a result of an
> ACPI table load or unload operation.
>
> acpi_dev_free_resource_list(_list);
>
> +
On 04/18, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add Oxford Semiconductor OXNAS SoC Family Standard Clocks support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
> ---
Applied to clk-next + the two line removal discussed.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a
On 04/18, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Acked-by: Rob Herring
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
On 04/18, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Add Oxford Semiconductor OXNAS SoC Family Standard Clocks support.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
> ---
Applied to clk-next + the two line removal discussed.
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation
On 04/18, Neil Armstrong wrote:
> Acked-by: Rob Herring
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
> ---
Applied to clk-next
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
Hi,
[auto build test WARNING on hid/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc4 next-20160421]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/roderick-gaikai-com/HID-uhid-Fixes-a-bug
Hi,
[auto build test WARNING on hid/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.6-rc4 next-20160421]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/roderick-gaikai-com/HID-uhid-Fixes-a-bug
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on hid/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc4 next-20160421]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/roderick-gaikai-com/HID-uhid-Fixes-a-bug
Hi,
[auto build test ERROR on hid/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.6-rc4 next-20160421]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improving the system]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/roderick-gaikai-com/HID-uhid-Fixes-a-bug
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> + /*
>> +* The following resources are optional
>> +* - ISPDRIVER_IPC BASE_DATA
>> +* - ISPDRIVER_IPC BASE_IFACE
>> +* - GTDRIVER_IPC BASE_DATA
>> +
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 8:05 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
>> + /*
>> +* The following resources are optional
>> +* - ISPDRIVER_IPC BASE_DATA
>> +* - ISPDRIVER_IPC BASE_IFACE
>> +* - GTDRIVER_IPC BASE_DATA
>> +* - GTDRIVER_IPC
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:24:09 +0200
Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 12:30:18 schrieb Marc Zyngier:
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:47:20 +0800
> >
> > "Huang, Tao" wrote:
> > > Hi, Mark:
> > >
> > > On 2016年04月21日 18:19, Mark Rutland
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 22:24:09 +0200
Heiko Stübner wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 21. April 2016, 12:30:18 schrieb Marc Zyngier:
> > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 18:47:20 +0800
> >
> > "Huang, Tao" wrote:
> > > Hi, Mark:
> > >
> > > On 2016年04月21日 18:19, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:46:48PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2016/4/10 21:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Aubrey Li
>> > wrote:
>> >> Currently the
On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 3:32 AM, Darren Hart wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 09:46:48PM +0800, Li, Aubrey wrote:
>> On 2016/4/10 21:17, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Thu, Mar 31, 2016 at 10:28 PM, Aubrey Li
>> > wrote:
>> >> Currently the optional IPC resources prevent telemetry driver from
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
> After booting the wireless subsystem and uploading the NV blob to the
> WCNSS_CTRL service the remote continues to do things and will not start
> servicing wlan-requests for another 2-5 seconds (measured).
>
>
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 2:09 PM, Bjorn Andersson
wrote:
> After booting the wireless subsystem and uploading the NV blob to the
> WCNSS_CTRL service the remote continues to do things and will not start
> servicing wlan-requests for another 2-5 seconds (measured).
>
> The downstream code does not
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > I don't think it makes sense as the compiler won't support MIPSr6 code
> > anyway, so first it'll bail out on `-march=mips32r6', and if we go even
> > further and disable that too, then GAS will probably break somewhere on
> > inline asm and GCC
On Thu, 21 Apr 2016, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> > I don't think it makes sense as the compiler won't support MIPSr6 code
> > anyway, so first it'll bail out on `-march=mips32r6', and if we go even
> > further and disable that too, then GAS will probably break somewhere on
> > inline asm and GCC
After booting the wireless subsystem and uploading the NV blob to the
WCNSS_CTRL service the remote continues to do things and will not start
servicing wlan-requests for another 2-5 seconds (measured).
The downstream code does not have any special handling for this case,
but has a timeout of 10
After booting the wireless subsystem and uploading the NV blob to the
WCNSS_CTRL service the remote continues to do things and will not start
servicing wlan-requests for another 2-5 seconds (measured).
The downstream code does not have any special handling for this case,
but has a timeout of 10
Hi Rafael,
On Thursday 21 Apr 2016 23:02:06 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 Apr 2016 21:52:56 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 02:52:55 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> The pm_runtime_force_suspend()
Hi Rafael,
On Thursday 21 Apr 2016 23:02:06 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Thursday 21 Apr 2016 21:52:56 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 02:52:55 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> The pm_runtime_force_suspend()
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> This patch adds rk3399.dtsi for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> RK3399 SoCs, also add rk3399-evb.dts for Rockchip RK3399
> Evaluation Board.
>
> Patch is tested on RK3399 evb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 10:58 PM, Jianqun Xu wrote:
> This patch adds rk3399.dtsi for rk3399 found on Rockchip
> RK3399 SoCs, also add rk3399-evb.dts for Rockchip RK3399
> Evaluation Board.
>
> Patch is tested on RK3399 evb.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jianqun Xu
> ---
>
From: Roderick Colenbrander
Many devices use userspace bluetooth stacks like BlueZ or Bluedroid in
combination
with uhid. If any of these stacks is used with a HID device for which the driver
performs a HID request as part .probe (or technically another HID
From: Roderick Colenbrander
Many devices use userspace bluetooth stacks like BlueZ or Bluedroid in
combination
with uhid. If any of these stacks is used with a HID device for which the driver
performs a HID request as part .probe (or technically another HID operation),
this results in a
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thursday 21 Apr 2016 21:52:56 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 02:52:55 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > The pm_runtime_force_suspend() and
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:57 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
>
> On Thursday 21 Apr 2016 21:52:56 Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
>> On Thursday, April 21, 2016 02:52:55 AM Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>> > The pm_runtime_force_suspend() and pm_runtime_force_resume() helpers are
>> > designed to
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 4/21/2016 2:22 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Babu Moger
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 12:39 PM, Babu Moger wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> On 4/21/2016 2:22 PM, Alexander Duyck wrote:
>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:13 AM, Alexander Duyck
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 10:21 AM, Babu Moger wrote:
Current code writes the tx/rx relaxed order without reading
201 - 300 of 1732 matches
Mail list logo