On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 15:20 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Add a test for reuse of macro arguments to highlight any possible
> side-effects from this reuse.
>
> Avoid this check on token name pasting and when the
> argument is used in a typeof or a __builtin.
>
> Add a test for macro arguents that
On Sat, 2016-09-03 at 15:20 -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> Add a test for reuse of macro arguments to highlight any possible
> side-effects from this reuse.
>
> Avoid this check on token name pasting and when the
> argument is used in a typeof or a __builtin.
>
> Add a test for macro arguents that
On 01/09/16 15:05, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> The Allwinner SoCs all have an ADC that can also act as a touchscreen
> controller and a thermal sensor. For now, only the ADC and the thermal
> sensor drivers are probed by the MFD, the touchscreen controller support
> will be added later.
>
>
On 01/09/16 15:05, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> The Allwinner SoCs all have an ADC that can also act as a touchscreen
> controller and a thermal sensor. For now, only the ADC and the thermal
> sensor drivers are probed by the MFD, the touchscreen controller support
> will be added later.
>
>
On 01/09/16 15:05, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> The Allwinner SoCs all have an ADC that can also act as a touchscreen
> controller and a thermal sensor. This patch adds the ADC driver which is
> based on the MFD for the same SoCs ADC.
>
> This also registers the thermal adc channel in the iio map
On 01/09/16 15:05, Quentin Schulz wrote:
> The Allwinner SoCs all have an ADC that can also act as a touchscreen
> controller and a thermal sensor. This patch adds the ADC driver which is
> based on the MFD for the same SoCs ADC.
>
> This also registers the thermal adc channel in the iio map
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Said that, I'm not sure why mount_pseudo() would be returning any errors;
> rejection should happen in the caller (due to MS_NOUSER in the flags), but
> I don't understand what would trigger it on mount_pseudo() level...
I see what's
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 03:06:06PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> Said that, I'm not sure why mount_pseudo() would be returning any errors;
> rejection should happen in the caller (due to MS_NOUSER in the flags), but
> I don't understand what would trigger it on mount_pseudo() level...
I see what's
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 18:52:51 +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote:
> If vxlan_build_skb return err < 0, tx_errors should be also increased.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan
> ---
> drivers/net/vxlan.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016 18:52:51 +0800, Haishuang Yan wrote:
> If vxlan_build_skb return err < 0, tx_errors should be also increased.
>
> Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan
> ---
> drivers/net/vxlan.c | 1 +
> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
>
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
reprod
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
reprod
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following program triggers GPF in bd_mount:
>
>
> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
>
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 12:43:28PM +0200, Dmitry Vyukov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> The following program triggers GPF in bd_mount:
>
>
> // autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
> #include
>
> int main()
> {
>
>> I am just curious on how much further software development "fun" the recent
>> update
>> by a topic like "CodingStyle: Clarify and complete chapter 7" will trigger.
>
> I don't want to drag this thread onwards for (way) too long, but clearly "it
> is
> advised to indent labels with a single
>> I am just curious on how much further software development "fun" the recent
>> update
>> by a topic like "CodingStyle: Clarify and complete chapter 7" will trigger.
>
> I don't want to drag this thread onwards for (way) too long, but clearly "it
> is
> advised to indent labels with a single
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
> config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .c
ub.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
> config: i386-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
> compiler: gcc-6 (Debian 6.1.1-9) 6.1.1 20160705
> reproduce:
> # save the attached .config to linux b
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 07:33:29AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Calling 'list_splice' followed by 'INIT_LIST_HEAD' is equivalent to
> 'list_splice_init'.
It is not 100% accurate
list_splice(y, z)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(y)
==>
if (!list_empty(y))
__list_splice(y, z, z>next);
On Sat, Sep 03, 2016 at 07:33:29AM +0200, Christophe JAILLET wrote:
> Calling 'list_splice' followed by 'INIT_LIST_HEAD' is equivalent to
> 'list_splice_init'.
It is not 100% accurate
list_splice(y, z)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(y)
==>
if (!list_empty(y))
__list_splice(y, z, z>next);
Hi Dave,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
master
head: 28e68154c5e2793123b248d38cf17b34dcb16d87
commit: ab9d1e4f7b0217948a3b35a64178602ab30ff45d Merge branch
'xfs-misc-fixes-4.6-3' into for-next
date: 6 months
Hi Dave,
FYI, the error/warning still remains.
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git
master
head: 28e68154c5e2793123b248d38cf17b34dcb16d87
commit: ab9d1e4f7b0217948a3b35a64178602ab30ff45d Merge branch
'xfs-misc-fixes-4.6-3' into for-next
date: 6 months
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andy-Yan/One-fix-and-some-improvements-for-RK3288-Popmetal-board/20160904-164007
base:
ht
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Andy-Yan/One-fix-and-some-improvements-for-RK3288-Popmetal-board/20160904-164007
base:
ht
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
config: i
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
config: i
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:05:26PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:44:03AM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon 2016-07-18 23:27:49, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > > > The user space API is achieved via two synchronous IOCTL.
> > > > >
>
> On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 08:05:26PM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> >
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 07, 2016 at 09:44:03AM +, Winkler, Tomas wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > On Mon 2016-07-18 23:27:49, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> > > > > > The user space API is achieved via two synchronous IOCTL.
> > > > >
>
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
con
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
con
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
con
ord what (public, well-known) commit your patch series was
built on]
[Check https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch for more information]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Amit-Ghadge/Staging-comedi-ni_daq_dio24-c-Fix-block-comments-use-on-subsequent-lines/20160904-170303
con
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Replace duplicated macros in each DTSI file with a common macro coming
from header. Include the header in each pinctrl DTSI so further changes
could use it.
Although PIN_FUNC_SPC_2 does not bring much information about the
function itself, it
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Replace duplicated macros in each DTSI file with a common macro coming
from header. Include the header in each pinctrl DTSI so further changes
could use it.
Although PIN_FUNC_SPC_2 does not bring much information about the
function itself, it still is more descriptive
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier
to read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down
or specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier
to read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down
or specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
The pinctrl pull up/down register on exynos4210 is 2-bit wide for each
pin and it accepts only values of 0, 1 and 3. The pins sd4-bus-width8
were configured with value of 4. The driver does not validate the value
so this overflow effectively
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier
to read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down
or specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
The pinctrl pull up/down register on exynos4210 is 2-bit wide for each
pin and it accepts only values of 0, 1 and 3. The pins sd4-bus-width8
were configured with value of 4. The driver does not validate the value
so this overflow effectively set a bit 1 in adjacent
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier
to read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down
or specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Replace duplicated macros in each DTSI file with a common macro coming
from header. Include the header in each pinctrl DTSI so further changes
could use it.
Although PIN_FUNC_SPC_2 does not bring much information about the
function itself, it
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
The pinctrl drive strength register on exynos4415 is 2-bit wide for each
pin. The pins for SD2 were configured with value of 4. The driver does
not validate the value so this overflow effectively set a bit 1 in
adjacent pins thus configuring
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier
to read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down
or specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Replace duplicated macros in each DTSI file with a common macro coming
from header. Include the header in each pinctrl DTSI so further changes
could use it.
Although PIN_FUNC_SPC_2 does not bring much information about the
function itself, it still is more descriptive
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
The pinctrl drive strength register on exynos4415 is 2-bit wide for each
pin. The pins for SD2 were configured with value of 4. The driver does
not validate the value so this overflow effectively set a bit 1 in
adjacent pins thus configuring them to drive strength 2x.
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier
to read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down
or specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by:
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Usage of DTS macros instead of hard-coded numbers makes code easier to
read. One does not have to remember which value means pull-up/down or
specific driver strength.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Hard-coded pinctrl configuration values are scattered through DTS files.
The numbers are difficult to decode by human, especially without the
datasheet. Additionally the drive strength differs between S3C64xx,
S5PV210 and Exynos SoC families
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Update examples in Samsung pinctrl dt-bindings with new macros coming
from header file.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Changes since v1:
1. Add
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Hard-coded pinctrl configuration values are scattered through DTS files.
The numbers are difficult to decode by human, especially without the
datasheet. Additionally the drive strength differs between S3C64xx,
S5PV210 and Exynos SoC families increasing the confusion.
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Update examples in Samsung pinctrl dt-bindings with new macros coming
from header file.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Reviewed-by: Javier Martinez Canillas
---
Changes since v1:
1. Add Javier's reviewed-by.
2. Include necessary header in example (pointed by
Hi,
Changes since v2
1. Combine separate patchsets into one. Previously I sent separately the fixes
and changes for S3C platforms.
2. Fix issues pointed during review.
3. Add review tags.
Changes since v1
1. Follow Arnd's suggestion about moving the macros
Hi,
Changes since v2
1. Combine separate patchsets into one. Previously I sent separately the fixes
and changes for S3C platforms.
2. Fix issues pointed during review.
3. Add review tags.
Changes since v1
1. Follow Arnd's suggestion about moving the macros
This patch removes the pointless `else if` test.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Beyer
Reported-by: David Binderman
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_bt-coexist.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
This patch removes the pointless `else if` test.
Signed-off-by: Matthias Beyer
Reported-by: David Binderman
---
drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_bt-coexist.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/rtl8723au/hal/rtl8723a_bt-coexist.c
Re-sending as
On 01-09-2016 17:54:47, Greg KH wrote:
> There is no patch here :(
8<
As reported by David Binderman, this test is useless as of
if (a < 3) {
/* ... */
} else if (a >= 3) {
/* ... */
}
so this patch removes the second check.
Matthias Beyer
Re-sending as
On 01-09-2016 17:54:47, Greg KH wrote:
> There is no patch here :(
8<
As reported by David Binderman, this test is useless as of
if (a < 3) {
/* ... */
} else if (a >= 3) {
/* ... */
}
so this patch removes the second check.
Matthias Beyer
If vxlan_build_skb return err < 0, tx_errors should be also increased.
Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index f605a36..2c72dcd 100644
---
If vxlan_build_skb return err < 0, tx_errors should be also increased.
Signed-off-by: Haishuang Yan
---
drivers/net/vxlan.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/drivers/net/vxlan.c b/drivers/net/vxlan.c
index f605a36..2c72dcd 100644
--- a/drivers/net/vxlan.c
+++
Hello,
The following program triggers GPF in bd_mount:
// autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
int fd;
unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER);
unshare(CLONE_NEWNS);
mkdir("./bus",
Hello,
The following program triggers GPF in bd_mount:
// autogenerated by syzkaller (http://github.com/google/syzkaller)
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
#include
int main()
{
int fd;
unshare(CLONE_NEWUSER);
unshare(CLONE_NEWNS);
mkdir("./bus",
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Liav Rehana wrote:
> >> The root of the problem is that in case the multiplication of delta
> >> and
> >> tkr->mult in the line that I've changed is too big that the MSB of the
> >> result is set, then the shift will cause an unwanted sign extension.
>
> > I completely
On Sun, 4 Sep 2016, Liav Rehana wrote:
> >> The root of the problem is that in case the multiplication of delta
> >> and
> >> tkr->mult in the line that I've changed is too big that the MSB of the
> >> result is set, then the shift will cause an unwanted sign extension.
>
> > I completely
I will be send individual patches.
I was try,
make M=drivers/staging/comedi/
No issue generated, Is there have any other option to test these changes?
Amit G
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:41:03AM +0530, Amit Ghadge
I will be send individual patches.
I was try,
make M=drivers/staging/comedi/
No issue generated, Is there have any other option to test these changes?
Amit G
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Greg KH wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 01:41:03AM +0530, Amit Ghadge wrote:
>> Fixes checkpatch
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> There are many nominally incorrect macro definitions
> in linux-kernel source where parentheses are not used
> for various macros arguments with calculations.
>
> Does coccinelle or smatch have the ability to detect
> potential macro misuse where
On Sat, 3 Sep 2016, Joe Perches wrote:
> There are many nominally incorrect macro definitions
> in linux-kernel source where parentheses are not used
> for various macros arguments with calculations.
>
> Does coccinelle or smatch have the ability to detect
> potential macro misuse where
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Alexey Khoroshilov
wrote:
> There is skb_clone(skb, GFP_KERNEL) in spinlock context
> in rxe_rcv_mcast_pkt().
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov
>
On Fri, Sep 2, 2016 at 11:46 PM, Alexey Khoroshilov
wrote:
> There is skb_clone(skb, GFP_KERNEL) in spinlock context
> in rxe_rcv_mcast_pkt().
>
> Found by Linux Driver Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Khoroshilov
> ---
> drivers/infiniband/sw/rxe/rxe_recv.c |
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Giedrius Statkevičius
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Amit Ghadge wrote:
>> This is a patch to the ni_daq_dio24.c that fixes checkpatch warning:
>> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>>
Nicolai Stange writes:
> +static u32 __clockevents_calc_adjust_freq(u32 mult_ce_raw, u32 mult_cs_mono,
> + u32 mult_cs_raw)
> +{
> + u64 adj;
> + int sign;
> +
> + if (mult_cs_raw >= mult_cs_mono) {
> + sign = 0;
>
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 3:12 PM, Giedrius Statkevičius
wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Amit Ghadge wrote:
>> This is a patch to the ni_daq_dio24.c that fixes checkpatch warning:
>> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Amit Ghadge
>> ---
> [...]
>
> Why
Nicolai Stange writes:
> +static u32 __clockevents_calc_adjust_freq(u32 mult_ce_raw, u32 mult_cs_mono,
> + u32 mult_cs_raw)
> +{
> + u64 adj;
> + int sign;
> +
> + if (mult_cs_raw >= mult_cs_mono) {
> + sign = 0;
> + adj =
On 09/04/2016 09:20 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/Documentation/CodingStyle?id=865a1caa4b6b886babdd9d67e7c3608be4567a51
[ + Jonathan for above commit in linux-next ]
You seem to lack understanding of the difference
On 09/04/2016 09:20 AM, SF Markus Elfring wrote:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/commit/Documentation/CodingStyle?id=865a1caa4b6b886babdd9d67e7c3608be4567a51
[ + Jonathan for above commit in linux-next ]
You seem to lack understanding of the difference
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 08:35:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
> dev.2016.08.19a
> commit 8052ce2d9771ab5a818307f3abbaf33bba82a631 ("list: Split list_add()
> debug checking
On Sun, Sep 04, 2016 at 08:35:40AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> FYI, we noticed the following commit:
>
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
> dev.2016.08.19a
> commit 8052ce2d9771ab5a818307f3abbaf33bba82a631 ("list: Split list_add()
> debug checking
In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do
In commit 311b21774f13 ("sctp: simplify sk_receive_queue locking"), a call
to 'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' has been made explicit. Previously it was
hidden in 'sctp_skb_list_tail()'
Now, the code around it looks redundant. The '_init()' part of
'skb_queue_splice_tail_init()' should alreday do
Hi guys,
here's one more fix for builtin microcode with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
for tip/x86/urgent. In the builtin case, we don't need to add the
randomization offset because the builtin address gets relocated
automatically.
I know Ingo is not a big fan of all that adding of offsets and
Hi guys,
here's one more fix for builtin microcode with CONFIG_RANDOMIZE_MEMORY
for tip/x86/urgent. In the builtin case, we don't need to add the
randomization offset because the builtin address gets relocated
automatically.
I know Ingo is not a big fan of all that adding of offsets and
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Amit Ghadge wrote:
> This is a patch to the ni_daq_dio24.c that fixes checkpatch warning:
> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Ghadge
> ---
[...]
Why are you sending so many copies
On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 12:08 PM, Amit Ghadge wrote:
> This is a patch to the ni_daq_dio24.c that fixes checkpatch warning:
> WARNING: Block comments use * on subsequent lines
>
> Signed-off-by: Amit Ghadge
> ---
[...]
Why are you sending so many copies of the same patch?
Linus,
please pull the latest timers-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
timers-urgent-for-linus
Two fixlet from the timers departement:
- A fix for scheduler stalls in the tick idle code affecting NOHZ_FULL
kernels
- A
Linus,
please pull the latest timers-urgent-for-linus git tree from:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git
timers-urgent-for-linus
Two fixlet from the timers departement:
- A fix for scheduler stalls in the tick idle code affecting NOHZ_FULL
kernels
- A
401 - 500 of 580 matches
Mail list logo