Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:39 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> If you can figure out how to change the command line, then you can

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:27 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:39 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >>> If you can figure out how to change the command line, then you can >>> just change the dtb. At least for how Android boot works,

[PATCH] da905x: Add const to da905x_regulator_info blocks

2016-09-08 Thread Joe Perches
Moving data to text is a good thing. Mark the regulator_info structs as const and change the pointers to const. $ size drivers/regulator/*.o* textdata bss dec hex filename 7455 100 075551d83 drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.o.new 21115392 0

[PATCH] da905x: Add const to da905x_regulator_info blocks

2016-09-08 Thread Joe Perches
Moving data to text is a good thing. Mark the regulator_info structs as const and change the pointers to const. $ size drivers/regulator/*.o* textdata bss dec hex filename 7455 100 075551d83 drivers/regulator/da9052-regulator.o.new 21115392 0

Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix update_min_vruntime() to get proper min_vruntime

2016-09-08 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:48:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:05:17PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > From 295895be8befbab040d6054bb8186c03daabcedd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Byungchul Park > > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:22:26 +0900 >

Re: [PATCH] sched/fair: Fix update_min_vruntime() to get proper min_vruntime

2016-09-08 Thread Byungchul Park
On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 10:48:39AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 02:05:17PM +0900, Byungchul Park wrote: > > From 295895be8befbab040d6054bb8186c03daabcedd Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Byungchul Park > > Date: Tue, 6 Sep 2016 12:22:26 +0900 > > Subject: [PATCH]

Re: [PATCHv2] of: Add generic handling for ePAPR 1.1 fail-sss states

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 09/08/16 06:38, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Frank Rowand [160831 13:51]: On 08/29/16 15:35, Tony Lindgren wrote:

Re: [PATCHv2] of: Add generic handling for ePAPR 1.1 fail-sss states

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 09/08/16 06:38, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Wed, Aug 31, 2016 at 4:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote: >>> * Frank Rowand [160831 13:51]: On 08/29/16 15:35, Tony Lindgren wrote: > if (of_device_is_incomplete(pdev->dev.of_node, status))

RE: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf/annotate: Add branch stack / basic block information

2016-09-08 Thread Jin, Yao
Hi, The idea of my patch is a little bit different. It targets to associate the branch coverage percentage and branch mispredict rate with the source code then user can see them directly in perf annotate source code / assembly view. The screenshot to show the branch%.

RE: [RFC][PATCH 7/7] perf/annotate: Add branch stack / basic block information

2016-09-08 Thread Jin, Yao
Hi, The idea of my patch is a little bit different. It targets to associate the branch coverage percentage and branch mispredict rate with the source code then user can see them directly in perf annotate source code / assembly view. The screenshot to show the branch%.

Re: [lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread chengchao
Hi xiaolong, OK, I found it : https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2 but this patch have already updated later. the logic is on when CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y the latest patch review is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/7/819 thanks, Cheng on

Re: [lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread chengchao
Hi xiaolong, OK, I found it : https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2 but this patch have already updated later. the logic is on when CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE=y the latest patch review is here: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/9/7/819 thanks, Cheng on

Re: [PATCH] dt-binding: remoteproc: Document generic properties

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 09/08/2016 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: >>> On 08/12/2016 05:42 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Fri 12 Aug 11:34 PDT 2016, Rob Herring wrote:

Re: [PATCH] dt-binding: remoteproc: Document generic properties

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 1:32 PM, Suman Anna wrote: > Hi Rob, > > On 09/08/2016 11:50 AM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Fri, Sep 02, 2016 at 04:45:45PM -0500, Suman Anna wrote: >>> On 08/12/2016 05:42 PM, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Fri 12 Aug 11:34 PDT 2016, Rob Herring wrote: > On Wed, Aug

Re: [lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Hi, cheng hao, On 09/09, chengchao wrote: >Hi, xiaolong > > where can I find the commit 3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2? This is the commit by 0Day bot for your original email patch sent on Sep 05 where both CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE and CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY will turn the logic on.

Re: [lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread Ye Xiaolong
Hi, cheng hao, On 09/09, chengchao wrote: >Hi, xiaolong > > where can I find the commit 3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2? This is the commit by 0Day bot for your original email patch sent on Sep 05 where both CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE and CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY will turn the logic on.

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:39 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 7:39 PM, John Stultz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >>> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: What problem(s) are you trying to solve with this? >>> >>> Currently the

[PATCH v3 3/3] intel-mid: Move boundry check to the start of init code

2016-09-08 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Moved the instance boundary check to the start of the pcal9555a platform init code. This will prevent unnecessary initialization on instance boundary error. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan ---

[PATCH v3 3/3] intel-mid: Move boundry check to the start of init code

2016-09-08 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Moved the instance boundary check to the start of the pcal9555a platform init code. This will prevent unnecessary initialization on instance boundary error. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan --- arch/x86/platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_pcal9555a.c | 12 ++-- 1 file

[PATCH v3 1/3] intel-mid: Fix sfi get_platform_data() return value issues

2016-09-08 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
According to the intel_mid_sfi_get_pdata() definition, get_platform_data() should return NULL on no platform data scenario and return ERR_PTR on platform data initialization failures. But current device platform initialization code does not follow this requirement. This patch fixes the return

[PATCH v3 2/3] intel-mid: Add valid error messages on init failure

2016-09-08 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Added valid error/warning messages to platform data initalization failures in SFI device libs code. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan --- .../intel-mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c| 18 ++

[PATCH v3 1/3] intel-mid: Fix sfi get_platform_data() return value issues

2016-09-08 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
According to the intel_mid_sfi_get_pdata() definition, get_platform_data() should return NULL on no platform data scenario and return ERR_PTR on platform data initialization failures. But current device platform initialization code does not follow this requirement. This patch fixes the return

[PATCH v3 2/3] intel-mid: Add valid error messages on init failure

2016-09-08 Thread Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan
Added valid error/warning messages to platform data initalization failures in SFI device libs code. Signed-off-by: Kuppuswamy Sathyanarayanan --- .../intel-mid/device_libs/platform_emc1403.c| 18 ++ .../platform/intel-mid/device_libs/platform_ipc.c | 5 -

[PATCH] sbs-battery: make writes to ManufacturerAccess optional

2016-09-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
According to the Smart Battery Data Specification, the use of ManufacturerAcess (register 0x0) is implementation-defined. It appears that some batteries use writes to this register in order to implement certain functionality, but others may simply NAK all writes to it. As a result, write failures

[PATCH] sbs-battery: make writes to ManufacturerAccess optional

2016-09-08 Thread Guenter Roeck
According to the Smart Battery Data Specification, the use of ManufacturerAcess (register 0x0) is implementation-defined. It appears that some batteries use writes to this register in order to implement certain functionality, but others may simply NAK all writes to it. As a result, write failures

Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa

2016-09-08 Thread Leizhen (ThunderTown)
On 2016/9/8 19:01, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:54:51PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> v7 -> v8: >> Updated patches according to Will Deacon's review comments, thanks. >> >> The changed patches is: 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 >> Patch 3 requires an ack from Rob Herring. >> Patch

Re: [PATCH v8 00/16] fix some type infos and bugs for arm64/of numa

2016-09-08 Thread Leizhen (ThunderTown)
On 2016/9/8 19:01, Will Deacon wrote: > On Thu, Sep 01, 2016 at 02:54:51PM +0800, Zhen Lei wrote: >> v7 -> v8: >> Updated patches according to Will Deacon's review comments, thanks. >> >> The changed patches is: 3, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 15 >> Patch 3 requires an ack from Rob Herring. >> Patch

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Add disconnect checking when changing function dynamically

2016-09-08 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Felipe, On 8 September 2016 at 20:00, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Baolin Wang writes: >> When we change the USB function with configfs dynamically, we possibly met >> this >> situation: one core is doing the control transfer, another core is

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: gadget: Add disconnect checking when changing function dynamically

2016-09-08 Thread Baolin Wang
Hi Felipe, On 8 September 2016 at 20:00, Felipe Balbi wrote: > > Hi, > > Baolin Wang writes: >> When we change the USB function with configfs dynamically, we possibly met >> this >> situation: one core is doing the control transfer, another core is trying to >> unregister the USB gadget from

Re: [lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread chengchao
Hi, xiaolong where can I find the commit 3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2? config-4.8.0-rc5-1-g3d26b76: # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set the patch ("sched/core: simpler function for sched_exec migration") only is on if

Re: [lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread chengchao
Hi, xiaolong where can I find the commit 3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2? config-4.8.0-rc5-1-g3d26b76: # CONFIG_PREEMPT_NONE is not set CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y # CONFIG_PREEMPT is not set the patch ("sched/core: simpler function for sched_exec migration") only is on if

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev

2016-09-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:59:19PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 09/08/2016 03:28 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:17:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 12:43:06 PM CEST Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> Arnd Bergmann writes: >

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev

2016-09-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 03:59:19PM +0300, Grygorii Strashko wrote: > On 09/08/2016 03:28 PM, Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:17:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > >> On Thursday, September 8, 2016 12:43:06 PM CEST Felipe Balbi wrote: > >>> Arnd Bergmann writes: > On

[lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread kernel test robot
FYI, we noticed the following commit: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux cheng-chao/sched-core-simpler-function-for-sched_exec-migration/20160905-142452 commit 3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2 ("sched/core: simpler function for sched_exec migration") in testcase: trinity with following

[lkp] [sched/core] 3d26b7622f: BUG: unable to handle kernel NULL pointer dereference at 00000001

2016-09-08 Thread kernel test robot
FYI, we noticed the following commit: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux cheng-chao/sched-core-simpler-function-for-sched_exec-migration/20160905-142452 commit 3d26b7622f3bab689696900ffd33c6dd7849d7c2 ("sched/core: simpler function for sched_exec migration") in testcase: trinity with following

Re: [PATCH] autofs - use dentry flags to block walks during expire

2016-09-08 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, Sep 01 2016, Ian Kent wrote: > Somewhere along the way the autofs expire operation has changed to > hold a spin lock over expired dentry selection. The autofs indirect > mount expired dentry selection is complicated and quite lengthy so > it isn't appropriate to hold a spin lock over the

Re: [PATCH] autofs - use dentry flags to block walks during expire

2016-09-08 Thread NeilBrown
On Thu, Sep 01 2016, Ian Kent wrote: > Somewhere along the way the autofs expire operation has changed to > hold a spin lock over expired dentry selection. The autofs indirect > mount expired dentry selection is complicated and quite lengthy so > it isn't appropriate to hold a spin lock over the

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev

2016-09-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:52:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 8:28:10 PM CEST Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:17:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 12:43:06 PM CEST Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > Arnd Bergmann

Re: [PATCH] usb: dwc3: host: inherit dma configuration from parent dev

2016-09-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:52:29PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 8:28:10 PM CEST Peter Chen wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 12:17:21PM +0200, Arnd Bergmann wrote: > > > On Thursday, September 8, 2016 12:43:06 PM CEST Felipe Balbi wrote: > > > > Arnd Bergmann

[PATCH] gpu: Remove depends on RESET_CONTROLLER when not a provider

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
These GPU drivers only depend on the RESET_CONTROLLER config option to fix build issues that existed when there weren't stub reset APIs for reset controller consumers. Given that these drivers aren't providing any reset controllers themselves, they don't actually depend on the API to build (just

[PATCH] gpu: Remove depends on RESET_CONTROLLER when not a provider

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
These GPU drivers only depend on the RESET_CONTROLLER config option to fix build issues that existed when there weren't stub reset APIs for reset controller consumers. Given that these drivers aren't providing any reset controllers themselves, they don't actually depend on the API to build (just

[PATCH] sched,numa,mm: revert to checking pmd/pte_write instead of VMA flags

2016-09-08 Thread Rik van Riel
Commit 4d9424669946 ("mm: convert p[te|md]_mknonnuma and remaining page table manipulations") changed NUMA balancing from _PAGE_NUMA to using PROT_NONE, and was quickly found to introduce a regression with NUMA grouping. It was followed up by these changesets: 53da3bc2ba9e ("mm: fix up numa

[PATCH] sched,numa,mm: revert to checking pmd/pte_write instead of VMA flags

2016-09-08 Thread Rik van Riel
Commit 4d9424669946 ("mm: convert p[te|md]_mknonnuma and remaining page table manipulations") changed NUMA balancing from _PAGE_NUMA to using PROT_NONE, and was quickly found to introduce a regression with NUMA grouping. It was followed up by these changesets: 53da3bc2ba9e ("mm: fix up numa

Re: [PATCH] [media] VPU: mediatek: fix null pointer dereference on pdev

2016-09-08 Thread andrew-ct chen
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 18:10 +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > pdev is being null checked, however, prior to that it is being > dereferenced by platform_get_drvdata. Move the assignments of > vpu and run to after the pdev null check to avoid a

Re: [PATCH] [media] VPU: mediatek: fix null pointer dereference on pdev

2016-09-08 Thread andrew-ct chen
On Wed, 2016-09-07 at 18:10 +0100, Colin King wrote: > From: Colin Ian King > > pdev is being null checked, however, prior to that it is being > dereferenced by platform_get_drvdata. Move the assignments of > vpu and run to after the pdev null check to avoid a potential > null pointer

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] firmware: Move umh locking code into fw_load_from_user_helper()

2016-09-08 Thread Ming Lei
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:37:54PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote: >> > From: Daniel Wagner >> > >> > When we load the

Re: [PATCH v4 1/4] firmware: Move umh locking code into fw_load_from_user_helper()

2016-09-08 Thread Ming Lei
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 4:11 AM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 11:37:54PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote: >> On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 4:45 PM, Daniel Wagner wrote: >> > From: Daniel Wagner >> > >> > When we load the firmware directly we don't need to take the umh >> > lock. >> >> I am

[PATCH v3] qed: mark symbols static where possible

2016-09-08 Thread Baoyou Xie
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_l2.c:112:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_sp_vport_start' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_sriov.c:110:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_iov_is_valid_vfid'

[PATCH v3] qed: mark symbols static where possible

2016-09-08 Thread Baoyou Xie
We get a few warnings when building kernel with W=1: drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_l2.c:112:5: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_sp_vport_start' [-Wmissing-prototypes] drivers/net/ethernet/qlogic/qed/qed_sriov.c:110:6: warning: no previous prototype for 'qed_iov_is_valid_vfid'

Re: [PATCH 3/5] nbd: use flags instead of bool

2016-09-08 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 17:12 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > In preparation for some future changes, change a few of the state bools over > to > normal bits to set/clear properly. [] > diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c [] > @@ -41,8 +41,12 @@ > > #include > > +#define

Re: [PATCH 3/5] nbd: use flags instead of bool

2016-09-08 Thread Joe Perches
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 17:12 -0400, Josef Bacik wrote: > In preparation for some future changes, change a few of the state bools over > to > normal bits to set/clear properly. [] > diff --git a/drivers/block/nbd.c b/drivers/block/nbd.c [] > @@ -41,8 +41,12 @@ > > #include > > +#define

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add helper to call /sbin/bridge-stp

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:50:43 -0400 Vivien Didelot wrote: > If /sbin/bridge-stp is available on the system, bridge tries to execute > it instead of the kernel implementation when starting/stopping STP. > > If anything goes wrong with /sbin/bridge-stp, bridge

Re: [PATCH net-next] net: bridge: add helper to call /sbin/bridge-stp

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016 12:50:43 -0400 Vivien Didelot wrote: > If /sbin/bridge-stp is available on the system, bridge tries to execute > it instead of the kernel implementation when starting/stopping STP. > > If anything goes wrong with /sbin/bridge-stp, bridge silently falls back > to kernel STP,

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Prevent deletion of a bond, or the last slave from a bond, with active usage.

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 06 Sep 2016 08:08:59 -0700 Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Kaur, Jasminder wrote: > > >From: "Kaur, Jasminder" > > > >If a bond is in use such as with IP address configured, removing it > >can result in application

Re: [PATCH] bonding: Prevent deletion of a bond, or the last slave from a bond, with active usage.

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Hemminger
On Tue, 06 Sep 2016 08:08:59 -0700 Jay Vosburgh wrote: > Kaur, Jasminder wrote: > > >From: "Kaur, Jasminder" > > > >If a bond is in use such as with IP address configured, removing it > >can result in application disruptions. If bond is used for cluster > >communication or network file system

Re: lockdep warning in btrfs in 4.8-rc3

2016-09-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:58:48AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On 09/08/2016 07:50 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 01:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> Chris, > >> > >> with 4.8-rc3 I get the following on an s390 box: > > > > Sorry for the noise, just saw the fix

Re: lockdep warning in btrfs in 4.8-rc3

2016-09-08 Thread Dave Jones
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 08:58:48AM -0400, Chris Mason wrote: > On 09/08/2016 07:50 AM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > > On 09/08/2016 01:48 PM, Christian Borntraeger wrote: > >> Chris, > >> > >> with 4.8-rc3 I get the following on an s390 box: > > > > Sorry for the noise, just saw the fix

Re: [LKP] [writeback] 8bc4ad9498: INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]

2016-09-08 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 09/08, Jens Axboe wrote: >On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote: >>On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>>Hi Jens and Tejun, >>> The command line was in the original email: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was

Re: [LKP] [writeback] 8bc4ad9498: INFO: suspicious RCU usage. ]

2016-09-08 Thread Ye Xiaolong
On 09/08, Jens Axboe wrote: >On 09/07/2016 08:04 PM, Ye Xiaolong wrote: >>On 09/08, Fengguang Wu wrote: >>>Hi Jens and Tejun, >>> The command line was in the original email: $ qemu-system-x86_64 -enable-kvm -cpu Westmere -m 512M And agree, in general it'd be nice if there was

Re: [PATCH v4 00/22] Support qcom's HSIC USB and rewrite USB2 HS support

2016-09-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:13:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-09-07 19:06:45) > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Stephen Boyd > > wrote: > > > The state of USB ChipIdea support on Qualcomm's platforms is not great. > > > The DT description of

Re: [PATCH v4 00/22] Support qcom's HSIC USB and rewrite USB2 HS support

2016-09-08 Thread Peter Chen
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:13:28PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote: > Quoting Peter Chen (2016-09-07 19:06:45) > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:34 AM, Stephen Boyd > > wrote: > > > The state of USB ChipIdea support on Qualcomm's platforms is not great. > > > The DT description of these devices requires up

Re: [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to perf_regs structure

2016-09-08 Thread Madhavan Srinivasan
On Tuesday 06 September 2016 02:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:55:43AM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: On Thursday 01 September 2016 12:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:30:46AM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: It's a perennial request from

Re: [PATCH 01/13] perf/core: Add perf_arch_regs and mask to perf_regs structure

2016-09-08 Thread Madhavan Srinivasan
On Tuesday 06 September 2016 02:40 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Tue, Sep 06, 2016 at 09:55:43AM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: On Thursday 01 September 2016 12:56 PM, Peter Zijlstra wrote: On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 02:30:46AM +0530, Madhavan Srinivasan wrote: It's a perennial request from

[PATCH] cpuset: handle race between CPU hotplug and cpuset_hotplug_work

2016-09-08 Thread Joonwoo Park
Discrepancy between cpu_online_mask and cpuset's effective CPU masks on cpuset hierarchy is inevitable since cpuset defers updating of effective CPU masks with workqueue while nothing prevents system from doing CPU hotplug. For that reason guarantee_online_cpus() walks up the cpuset hierarchy

[PATCH] cpuset: handle race between CPU hotplug and cpuset_hotplug_work

2016-09-08 Thread Joonwoo Park
Discrepancy between cpu_online_mask and cpuset's effective CPU masks on cpuset hierarchy is inevitable since cpuset defers updating of effective CPU masks with workqueue while nothing prevents system from doing CPU hotplug. For that reason guarantee_online_cpus() walks up the cpuset hierarchy

[PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: update f2fs entry

2016-09-08 Thread Chao Yu
This patch includes below modifications: 1. change my maintainership from reviewer to maintainer. 2. remove maintainership of Changman Lee since he is not active about one and a half year. 3. change website of f2fs from wiki to kernel one. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu --- v2:

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>> What problem(s) are you trying to solve with this? >> >>

[PATCH v2] MAINTAINERS: update f2fs entry

2016-09-08 Thread Chao Yu
This patch includes below modifications: 1. change my maintainership from reviewer to maintainer. 2. remove maintainership of Changman Lee since he is not active about one and a half year. 3. change website of f2fs from wiki to kernel one. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu --- v2: gather more modification

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:33 PM, Rob Herring wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>> What problem(s) are you trying to solve with this? >> >> Currently the Linux kernel doesn't provide a way for boot time >>

Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable

2016-09-08 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:56:28PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:19:24PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > Small embedded systems typically don't

Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable

2016-09-08 Thread Josh Triplett
On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 07:56:28PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:19:24PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > > Small embedded systems typically don't need them. This

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 09/08/16 13:35, dimitr...@google.com wrote: >>> From e14eb45fa5a93c1bff8a6dfe7b6756e4ad72c579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Dmitry

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread Rob Herring
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:15 PM, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 09/08/16 13:35, dimitr...@google.com wrote: >>> From e14eb45fa5a93c1bff8a6dfe7b6756e4ad72c579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Dmitry Shmidt >>> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:25:52

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > Introduction > > The patchset brings new entity: clock controller representing a hardware > block. The clock controller comes with its own prepare lock which >

Re: [RFC 00/17] clk: Add per-controller locks to fix deadlocks

2016-09-08 Thread Stephen Boyd
On 08/16, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > Hi, > > RFC, please, do not apply, maybe except patch #1 which is harmless. > > > Introduction > > The patchset brings new entity: clock controller representing a hardware > block. The clock controller comes with its own prepare lock which >

[PATCH] [media] platform: constify vb2_ops structures

2016-09-08 Thread Julia Lawall
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures that have this property can be declared as const also. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @r

[PATCH] [media] platform: constify vb2_ops structures

2016-09-08 Thread Julia Lawall
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures that have this property can be declared as const also. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @r

[PATCH] [media] pci: constify vb2_ops structures

2016-09-08 Thread Julia Lawall
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures that have this property can be declared as const also. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @r

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: hikey: Add pstore support for HiKey

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:48 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> This patch reserves some memory in the DTS and sets up a >> pstore device tree node to enable pstore support on HiKey. >> >> Cc: Kees Cook

[PATCH] [media] pci: constify vb2_ops structures

2016-09-08 Thread Julia Lawall
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures that have this property can be declared as const also. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @r

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: hikey: Add pstore support for HiKey

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:12 PM, Kees Cook wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:48 PM, John Stultz wrote: >> This patch reserves some memory in the DTS and sets up a >> pstore device tree node to enable pstore support on HiKey. >> >> Cc: Kees Cook >> Cc: Guodong Xu >> Cc: Haojian Zhuang >> Cc:

[PATCH] [media] usb: constify vb2_ops structures

2016-09-08 Thread Julia Lawall
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures that have this property can be declared as const also. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @r

[PATCH] [media] usb: constify vb2_ops structures

2016-09-08 Thread Julia Lawall
Check for vb2_ops structures that are only stored in the ops field of a vb2_queue structure. That field is declared const, so vb2_ops structures that have this property can be declared as const also. The semantic patch that makes this change is as follows: (http://coccinelle.lip6.fr/) // @r

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: hikey: Add pstore support for HiKey

2016-09-08 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:48 PM, John Stultz wrote: > This patch reserves some memory in the DTS and sets up a > pstore device tree node to enable pstore support on HiKey. > > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Guodong Xu > Cc: Haojian

Re: [PATCH 4/4] arm64: dts: hikey: Add pstore support for HiKey

2016-09-08 Thread Kees Cook
On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 3:48 PM, John Stultz wrote: > This patch reserves some memory in the DTS and sets up a > pstore device tree node to enable pstore support on HiKey. > > Cc: Kees Cook > Cc: Guodong Xu > Cc: Haojian Zhuang > Cc: Wei Xu > Cc: Rob Herring > Cc: Mark Rutland > Cc: Catalin

Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier

2016-09-08 Thread Benjamin Serebrin
Sorry for the delay, I was eaten by a grue. I found that my initial study did not actually measure the number of TLB shootdown IPIs sent per TLB shootdown. I think the intuition was correct but I didn't actually observe what I thought I had; my original use of probe points was incorrect.

Re: [PATCH RFC v6] x86,mm,sched: make lazy TLB mode even lazier

2016-09-08 Thread Benjamin Serebrin
Sorry for the delay, I was eaten by a grue. I found that my initial study did not actually measure the number of TLB shootdown IPIs sent per TLB shootdown. I think the intuition was correct but I didn't actually observe what I thought I had; my original use of probe points was incorrect.

Re: [PATCH v2 33/33] x86/Makefile: Build intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c

2016-09-08 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote: > Build the user interface file intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c. > +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RDT) += intel_rdt.o intel_rdt_rdtgroup.o > intel_rdt_schemata.o This is garbage. Complete and utter garbage. First of all this changelog is wrong because this adds not only

Re: [PATCH v2 33/33] x86/Makefile: Build intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c

2016-09-08 Thread Thomas Gleixner
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Fenghua Yu wrote: > Build the user interface file intel_rdt_rdtgroup.c. > +obj-$(CONFIG_INTEL_RDT) += intel_rdt.o intel_rdt_rdtgroup.o > intel_rdt_schemata.o This is garbage. Complete and utter garbage. First of all this changelog is wrong because this adds not only

Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional

2016-09-08 Thread Leo Li
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2016-09-06 15:40, Leo Li wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Stefan Agner wrote: >>> On 2016-09-06 13:06, Leo Li wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Uwe Kleine-König

Re: [PATCH v5] i2c: imx: make bus recovery through pinctrl optional

2016-09-08 Thread Leo Li
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 5:39 PM, Stefan Agner wrote: > On 2016-09-06 15:40, Leo Li wrote: >> On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 4:51 PM, Stefan Agner wrote: >>> On 2016-09-06 13:06, Leo Li wrote: On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 1:58 PM, Uwe Kleine-König wrote: > On Fri, Aug 19, 2016 at 05:05:22PM

Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable

2016-09-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:19:24PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Small embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > > > 16KB from the kernel binary size on

Re: [RFC/PATCH] posix-timers: make them configurable

2016-09-08 Thread Nicolas Pitre
On Thu, 8 Sep 2016, Josh Triplett wrote: > On Thu, Sep 08, 2016 at 02:19:24PM -0700, John Stultz wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:05 PM, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > > Small embedded systems typically don't need them. This removes about > > > 16KB from the kernel binary size on ARM when

Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/2] Align mmap address for DAX pmd mappings

2016-09-08 Thread Kani, Toshimitsu
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 07:48 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 13:57 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:00:43PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:  : > > > > > > Looking further, these shmem_huge handlings only check pre- > > > conditions.  So, we 

Re: [PATCH v4 RESEND 0/2] Align mmap address for DAX pmd mappings

2016-09-08 Thread Kani, Toshimitsu
On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 07:48 -0600, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote: > On Thu, 2016-09-08 at 13:57 +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote: > > > > On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 10:00:43PM +, Kani, Toshimitsu wrote:  : > > > > > > Looking further, these shmem_huge handlings only check pre- > > > conditions.  So, we 

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 09/08/16 14:15, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>> On 09/08/16 13:35, dimitr...@google.com wrote: From

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread John Stultz
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 4:33 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: > On 09/08/16 14:15, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >>> On 09/08/16 13:35, dimitr...@google.com wrote: From e14eb45fa5a93c1bff8a6dfe7b6756e4ad72c579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Dmitry

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread Frank Rowand
On 09/08/16 14:15, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 09/08/16 13:35, dimitr...@google.com wrote: >>> From e14eb45fa5a93c1bff8a6dfe7b6756e4ad72c579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Dmitry Shmidt >>>

Re: [PATCH] of: Overlay manager

2016-09-08 Thread Frank Rowand
On 09/08/16 14:15, Dmitry Shmidt wrote: > On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Frank Rowand wrote: >> On 09/08/16 13:35, dimitr...@google.com wrote: >>> From e14eb45fa5a93c1bff8a6dfe7b6756e4ad72c579 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Dmitry Shmidt >>> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2016 13:25:52 -0700 >>>

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >