On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:01:39AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > index 0888a87..32b7301 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -233,6 +233,16 @@ void __switch_to_xtra(struct
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 08:01:39AM -0800, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > index 0888a87..32b7301 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -233,6 +233,16 @@ void __switch_to_xtra(struct
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:12:09PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >> There is a caveat, however. Certain applications running in virtual-8086
> >> mode, such as DOSEMU[1] and
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 5:16 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 10:12:09PM -0800, Ricardo Neri wrote:
> >> There is a caveat, however. Certain applications running in virtual-8086
> >> mode, such as DOSEMU[1] and Wine[2], want to
On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 08.11.2016 14:43, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > From 3a5859e696178e31a25e65de58c461046fc52beb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Richard Weinberger
> > Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:43:09 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] drbd: Fix
Hi Thomas,
2016-11-08 17:48 GMT+01:00 Thomas Petazzoni
:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:31:32 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>> Enabling SPI controllers, which are attached to different busses
>> inside an SoC, may result in overlapping enumeration and cause
On Tue, Nov 08 2016, Richard Weinberger wrote:
> On 08.11.2016 14:43, Lars Ellenberg wrote:
> > From 3a5859e696178e31a25e65de58c461046fc52beb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> > From: Richard Weinberger
> > Date: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 11:43:09 +0100
> > Subject: [PATCH] drbd: Fix kernel_sendmsg() usage -
Hi Thomas,
2016-11-08 17:48 GMT+01:00 Thomas Petazzoni
:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:31:32 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
>> Enabling SPI controllers, which are attached to different busses
>> inside an SoC, may result in overlapping enumeration and cause
>> sysfs registration failure.
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:07:40AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:59:58 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > No, none of this stands a chance of being accepted.
> >
> > This is making bad code worse.
>
> Peter,
>
> Instead of a flat out rejection,
Alan Stern writes:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 17:57 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>> >> Sometimes cdc_mbim failed to probe if runtime pm is
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:16:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:43:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > In order to support DRM_IOCTL_MODE_OBJ_SETPROPERTY for the rotation property
> > we need to have a ->set_property hook defined for the planes. Set the
> > plane's
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 09:07:40AM -0500, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 12:59:58 +0100
> Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> > No, none of this stands a chance of being accepted.
> >
> > This is making bad code worse.
>
> Peter,
>
> Instead of a flat out rejection, can you please provide
Alan Stern writes:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 7:02 PM, Oliver Neukum wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2016-11-04 at 17:57 +0800, Kai-Heng Feng wrote:
>> >> Sometimes cdc_mbim failed to probe if runtime pm is enabled:
>> >> [9.305626] cdc_mbim: probe
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:16:41PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:43:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > In order to support DRM_IOCTL_MODE_OBJ_SETPROPERTY for the rotation property
> > we need to have a ->set_property hook defined for the planes. Set the
> > plane's
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:09:09PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:44:37PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > (3) The test result in the Softiron and Juno-r1 boards:
> >
> >This detail test result shows below (both the "make func" & "make
> > stress"):
> >
> > 4KB
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:09:09PM +, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:44:37PM +0800, Huang Shijie wrote:
> > (3) The test result in the Softiron and Juno-r1 boards:
> >
> >This detail test result shows below (both the "make func" & "make
> > stress"):
> >
> > 4KB
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:33:44PM +, John Garry wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 16:12, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
> >>+static inline void arm64_set_extops(struct extio_ops *ops)
> >>+{
> >>+ if (ops)
> >>+
Hello,
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:31:32 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Enabling SPI controllers, which are attached to different busses
> inside an SoC, may result in overlapping enumeration and cause
> sysfs registration failure. Example log after enabling two
> controllers on Armada 8040 SoC with
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:33:44PM +, John Garry wrote:
> On 08/11/2016 16:12, Will Deacon wrote:
> >On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
> >>+static inline void arm64_set_extops(struct extio_ops *ops)
> >>+{
> >>+ if (ops)
> >>+
Hello,
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:31:32 +0100, Marcin Wojtas wrote:
> Enabling SPI controllers, which are attached to different busses
> inside an SoC, may result in overlapping enumeration and cause
> sysfs registration failure. Example log after enabling two
> controllers on Armada 8040 SoC with
On 11/08/2016 08:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:42:33PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:53:37AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Suresh
On 11/08/2016 08:55 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 05:42:33PM -0800, Olof Johansson wrote:
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 5:21 AM, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Mon, Nov 07, 2016 at 08:53:37AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
On Wed, Nov 2, 2016 at 11:48 AM, Suresh Mangipudi wrote:
Add
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Many embedded systems don't need the full POSIX timer support.
> Configuring them out provides a nice kernel image size reduction.
>
> When POSIX timers are configured out, the PTP clock subsystem should be
> left out as well. However a bunch of
On Mon, 7 Nov 2016, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> Many embedded systems don't need the full POSIX timer support.
> Configuring them out provides a nice kernel image size reduction.
>
> When POSIX timers are configured out, the PTP clock subsystem should be
> left out as well. However a bunch of
Use the managed gpio CS pin request so that we avoid having trouble
in the cleanup code.
In fact, if module was configured with DT, cleanup code released
invalid pin. Since resource wasn't freed, module cannot be reinserted.
This require to extract the gpio request call from the "setup" function
Use the managed gpio CS pin request so that we avoid having trouble
in the cleanup code.
In fact, if module was configured with DT, cleanup code released
invalid pin. Since resource wasn't freed, module cannot be reinserted.
This require to extract the gpio request call from the "setup" function
On 08/11/2016 16:12, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
For arm64, there is no I/O space as other architectural platforms, such as
X86. Most I/O accesses are achieved based on MMIO. But for some arm64 SoCs,
such as Hip06, when accessing some legacy
On 08/11/2016 16:12, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
For arm64, there is no I/O space as other architectural platforms, such as
X86. Most I/O accesses are achieved based on MMIO. But for some arm64 SoCs,
such as Hip06, when accessing some legacy
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 19:43:25 +0530
Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> On 11/8/2016 2:33 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:43 +0530
> > Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >
>
> ...
>
> >> static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >>
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 19:43:25 +0530
Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> On 11/8/2016 2:33 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:43 +0530
> > Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >
>
> ...
>
> >> static int vfio_dma_do_map(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
> >> struct
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:06:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Since Will and me have rewritten and heavily extended the atomic*_t
> infrastructure over the past few years, claim ownership of it.
>
> We would also like to add Boqun as he helped out with PowerPC and has shown
> good
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:06:03PM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
>
> Since Will and me have rewritten and heavily extended the atomic*_t
> infrastructure over the past few years, claim ownership of it.
>
> We would also like to add Boqun as he helped out with PowerPC and has shown
> good
The TSE-850 is an FM Transmitter Station Equipment, designed to generate
baseband signals for FM, mainly the DARC subcarrier, but other signals
are also possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
.../bindings/sound/axentia,tse850-pcm5142.txt | 88 ++
The TSE-850 is an FM Transmitter Station Equipment, designed to generate
baseband signals for FM, mainly the DARC subcarrier, but other signals
are also possible.
Signed-off-by: Peter Rosin
---
.../bindings/sound/axentia,tse850-pcm5142.txt | 88 ++
MAINTAINERS
On 8 November 2016 at 16:21, Karol Herbst wrote:
> 2016-11-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:07:01 PM CET Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:52:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> > The underlying problem is
On 8 November 2016 at 16:21, Karol Herbst wrote:
> 2016-11-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann :
>> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:07:01 PM CET Lukas Wunner wrote:
>>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:52:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> > The underlying problem is that we already have a number of
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:49:05PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The newly added assert_kernel_context_is_current introduces a warning
> > when built with W=1:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function
> >
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:49:05PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 02:58:17PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> > The newly added assert_kernel_context_is_current introduces a warning
> > when built with W=1:
> >
> > drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c: In function
> >
On Nov 8 15:06, Cao jin wrote:
> When running as guest, under certain condition, it will oops as following.
> writel() in igb_configure_tx_ring() results in oops, because hw->hw_addr
> is NULL. While other register access won't oops kernel because they use
> wr32/rd32 which have a defense against
On Nov 8 15:06, Cao jin wrote:
> When running as guest, under certain condition, it will oops as following.
> writel() in igb_configure_tx_ring() results in oops, because hw->hw_addr
> is NULL. While other register access won't oops kernel because they use
> wr32/rd32 which have a defense against
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 19:25:35 +0530
Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> On 11/8/2016 1:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:39 +0530
> > Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >
> ...
> >> +int vfio_pin_pages(struct device *dev, unsigned long *user_pfn,
>
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016 19:25:35 +0530
Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> On 11/8/2016 1:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:39 +0530
> > Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >
> ...
> >> +int vfio_pin_pages(struct device *dev, unsigned long *user_pfn,
> >> + int npage, int prot,
On 11/08/16 00:45, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Commit 540eb1eef 'scsi: libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset calculation'
> removed the use of 'struct timespec' from fc_get_host_stats(). This broke the
> output of 'fcoeadm -s' after kernel 4.8-rc1 as lport->boot_time - jiffies
> could become
On 11/08/16 00:45, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Commit 540eb1eef 'scsi: libfc: fix seconds_since_last_reset calculation'
> removed the use of 'struct timespec' from fc_get_host_stats(). This broke the
> output of 'fcoeadm -s' after kernel 4.8-rc1 as lport->boot_time - jiffies
> could become
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Axel Haslam wrote:
> The purpose of this patch series is to add DT support for the davinci
> ohci driver.
>
To make it easier to review. I will split the arch/arm and driver
patches into separate series.
Regards
Axel
> To be able to
Hi,
On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 9:39 PM, Axel Haslam wrote:
> The purpose of this patch series is to add DT support for the davinci
> ohci driver.
>
To make it easier to review. I will split the arch/arm and driver
patches into separate series.
Regards
Axel
> To be able to use device tree to
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:59:41AM +, Eric Hyeung Dong Jeong wrote:
> Thank you for the comments.
> There was an internal request to release driver based on Kernel 3.18 for GPIO
> and MFD support.
> After that, the code has been kept. I will send a patch again after changes.
Please don't
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:59:41AM +, Eric Hyeung Dong Jeong wrote:
> Thank you for the comments.
> There was an internal request to release driver based on Kernel 3.18 for GPIO
> and MFD support.
> After that, the code has been kept. I will send a patch again after changes.
Please don't
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > >
> > > Which you don't in this patch:
> >
> > True. We will always in the end, but the split isn't right,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 05:27:52PM +0100, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> > >
> > > Which you don't in this patch:
> >
> > True. We will always in the end, but the split isn't right,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 06:26:09PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> From: Alexander Usyskin
>
> Tell the FW that we are running a sane OS and TPM2_ChangeEPS()
> is supported. This workaround was added to support other broken OS
> and we need to follow here. The command
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 06:26:09PM +0200, Tomas Winkler wrote:
> From: Alexander Usyskin
>
> Tell the FW that we are running a sane OS and TPM2_ChangeEPS()
> is supported. This workaround was added to support other broken OS
> and we need to follow here. The command is sent just once at the boot
This patch adds support to PM8821 PMIC and interrupt support.
PM8821 is companion device that supplements primary PMIC PM8921 IC.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
Tested this patch for MPP and IRQ functionality on IFC6410 and SD600 EVAL
board with mpps
This patch adds support to PM8821 PMIC and interrupt support.
PM8821 is companion device that supplements primary PMIC PM8921 IC.
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
Tested this patch for MPP and IRQ functionality on IFC6410 and SD600 EVAL
board with mpps PM8821 and PM8921.
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >
> > Which you don't in this patch:
>
> True. We will always in the end, but the split isn't right, we'll
> need to pass the non-NULL argument starting in this patch.
No, in the
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 03:59:16PM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> >
> > Which you don't in this patch:
>
> True. We will always in the end, but the split isn't right, we'll
> need to pass the non-NULL argument starting in this patch.
No, in the
Enabling SPI controllers, which are attached to different busses
inside an SoC, may result in overlapping enumeration and cause
sysfs registration failure. Example log after enabling two
controllers on Armada 8040 SoC with same identifiers:
[3.740415] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
Enabling SPI controllers, which are attached to different busses
inside an SoC, may result in overlapping enumeration and cause
sysfs registration failure. Example log after enabling two
controllers on Armada 8040 SoC with same identifiers:
[3.740415] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
index 1dbe697..fde006c 100644
Signed-off-by: Srinivas Kandagatla
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi | 28
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
b/arch/arm/boot/dts/qcom-apq8064.dtsi
index 1dbe697..fde006c 100644
---
On 11/07/2016 03:14 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 07/11/16 13:05, gabriel.fernan...@st.com wrote:
From: Gabriel Fernandez
This patch introduces I2S clock for stm32f4 soc.
The I2S clock could be derived from an external clock or from pll-i2s
Signed-off-by: Gabriel
On 11/07/2016 03:14 PM, Daniel Thompson wrote:
On 07/11/16 13:05, gabriel.fernan...@st.com wrote:
From: Gabriel Fernandez
This patch introduces I2S clock for stm32f4 soc.
The I2S clock could be derived from an external clock or from pll-i2s
Signed-off-by: Gabriel Fernandez
---
On 11/8/2016 5:15 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:45 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>
...
>>
>> +int vfio_register_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *nb)
>
> Is the expectation here that this is a generic notifier for all
>
On 11/8/2016 5:15 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:45 +0530
> Kirti Wankhede wrote:
>
...
>>
>> +int vfio_register_notifier(struct device *dev, struct notifier_block *nb)
>
> Is the expectation here that this is a generic notifier for all
> vfio->mdev signaling? That
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:47:09 AM CET zhichang.yuan wrote:
> + /*
> +* The first PCIBIOS_MIN_IO is reserved specifically for indirectIO.
> +* It will separate indirectIO range from pci host bridge to
> +* avoid the possible PIO conflict.
> +* Set the
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:47:09 AM CET zhichang.yuan wrote:
> + /*
> +* The first PCIBIOS_MIN_IO is reserved specifically for indirectIO.
> +* It will separate indirectIO range from pci host bridge to
> +* avoid the possible PIO conflict.
> +* Set the
Commit-ID: f5e886ef9b45a3dbfd42b054a13c755894ea8402
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f5e886ef9b45a3dbfd42b054a13c755894ea8402
Author: Yinghai Lu
AuthorDate: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:23:25 -0700
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov
Commit-ID: f5e886ef9b45a3dbfd42b054a13c755894ea8402
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/f5e886ef9b45a3dbfd42b054a13c755894ea8402
Author: Yinghai Lu
AuthorDate: Fri, 16 Sep 2016 13:23:25 -0700
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:12 +0100
x86/MCE: Do not look at
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 09:31 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
> > > [0.016335] topology_update_package_map: apicid 0 pkg 0 cpu 0
> > > [0.016398] smpboot: APIC(0) Converting physical 0 to
On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 09:31 AM, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> > On Tue, 8 Nov 2016, Charles (Chas) Williams wrote:
> > > [0.016335] topology_update_package_map: apicid 0 pkg 0 cpu 0
> > > [0.016398] smpboot: APIC(0) Converting physical 0 to
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > index 272427700d48..71bc348736bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static struct
> >
> >
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > index 272427700d48..71bc348736bd 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> > @@ -669,7 +669,7 @@ static struct
Commit-ID: c09a8c40e0a0b4994925ac8eba91b85d76f440a3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c09a8c40e0a0b4994925ac8eba91b85d76f440a3
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:12:33 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:49:53 AM CET Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:08AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
> > +Hisilicon Hip06 low-pin-count device
> > + Usually LPC controller is part of PCI host bridge, so the legacy ISA
> > ports
> > + locate on LPC bus can be
Commit-ID: a9a1c0ee04aa771e5523ae33e458c702261ab547
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a9a1c0ee04aa771e5523ae33e458c702261ab547
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:24:47 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 11:49:53 AM CET Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:08AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
> > +Hisilicon Hip06 low-pin-count device
> > + Usually LPC controller is part of PCI host bridge, so the legacy ISA
> > ports
> > + locate on LPC bus can be
Commit-ID: a9a1c0ee04aa771e5523ae33e458c702261ab547
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/a9a1c0ee04aa771e5523ae33e458c702261ab547
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 13:24:47 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:14 +0100
x86/RAS: Rename
Commit-ID: c09a8c40e0a0b4994925ac8eba91b85d76f440a3
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/c09a8c40e0a0b4994925ac8eba91b85d76f440a3
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Thu, 3 Nov 2016 21:12:33 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:15 +0100
x86/RAS: Hide SMCA
2016-11-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:07:01 PM CET Lukas Wunner wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:52:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > The underlying problem is that we already have a number of other
>> > symbols that either have "depends
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> So I definitely approve of the change, but I wonder if we should go
> one step further:
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> extern int
Commit-ID: 1ce9cd7f9f0b71af7c496b816734bc2dc699363a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1ce9cd7f9f0b71af7c496b816734bc2dc699363a
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:48:01 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016
2016-11-08 17:12 GMT+01:00 Arnd Bergmann :
> On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:07:01 PM CET Lukas Wunner wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:52:49PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>> > The underlying problem is that we already have a number of other
>> > symbols that either have "depends on LEDS_CLASS"
On Tue, Nov 8, 2016 at 8:16 AM, Linus Torvalds
wrote:
> So I definitely approve of the change, but I wonder if we should go
> one step further:
>
> On Mon, Nov 7, 2016 at 1:26 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
>>
>> extern int task_current_syscall(struct task_struct *target, long *callno,
>> -
Commit-ID: 1ce9cd7f9f0b71af7c496b816734bc2dc699363a
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/1ce9cd7f9f0b71af7c496b816734bc2dc699363a
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Wed, 2 Nov 2016 12:48:01 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:14 +0100
x86/RAS: Simplify
Commit-ID: cd9c57cad3fe89ea949b9266cddc947c0838f7af
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cd9c57cad3fe89ea949b9266cddc947c0838f7af
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 12:52:27 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016
Commit-ID: cd9c57cad3fe89ea949b9266cddc947c0838f7af
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/cd9c57cad3fe89ea949b9266cddc947c0838f7af
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 12:52:27 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:13 +0100
x86/MCE: Dump MCE to
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 12:03:23 PM CET Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
> > For arm64, there is no I/O space as other architectural platforms, such as
> > X86. Most I/O accesses are achieved based on MMIO. But for some arm64 SoCs,
> > such
On 11/08/2016 09:52 AM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
2016-11-08 9:35 GMT+01:00 Gabriel Fernandez :
Hi Radosław
Many thanks for reviewing.
On 11/07/2016 03:57 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
+static struct clk_hw *clk_register_pll_div(const char *name,
+ const
Commit-ID: 79349f529ab1a629b9e43e81b4a5b2c22d1e9a65
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/79349f529ab1a629b9e43e81b4a5b2c22d1e9a65
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:33:00 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016
On 11/08/2016 09:52 AM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
2016-11-08 9:35 GMT+01:00 Gabriel Fernandez :
Hi Radosław
Many thanks for reviewing.
On 11/07/2016 03:57 PM, Radosław Pietrzyk wrote:
+static struct clk_hw *clk_register_pll_div(const char *name,
+ const char *parent_name,
Commit-ID: 79349f529ab1a629b9e43e81b4a5b2c22d1e9a65
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/79349f529ab1a629b9e43e81b4a5b2c22d1e9a65
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 17:33:00 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:14 +0100
x86/RAS: Simplify
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 12:03:23 PM CET Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 11:47:07AM +0800, zhichang.yuan wrote:
> > For arm64, there is no I/O space as other architectural platforms, such as
> > X86. Most I/O accesses are achieved based on MMIO. But for some arm64 SoCs,
> > such
Commit-ID: 8c203dbb78ca7a9aed4e2570c866b0f43c752e41
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8c203dbb78ca7a9aed4e2570c866b0f43c752e41
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:04:41 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016
Commit-ID: 8c203dbb78ca7a9aed4e2570c866b0f43c752e41
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/8c203dbb78ca7a9aed4e2570c866b0f43c752e41
Author: Borislav Petkov
AuthorDate: Tue, 1 Nov 2016 13:04:41 +0100
Committer: Thomas Gleixner
CommitDate: Tue, 8 Nov 2016 17:10:13 +0100
x86/RAS: Add TSC
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:20:14 +0800
Jike Song wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 07:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:44 +0530
> > Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >
> >> VFIO IOMMU drivers are designed for the devices which are IOMMU capable.
>
On Tue, 08 Nov 2016 10:20:14 +0800
Jike Song wrote:
> On 11/08/2016 07:16 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 5 Nov 2016 02:40:44 +0530
> > Kirti Wankhede wrote:
> >
> >> VFIO IOMMU drivers are designed for the devices which are IOMMU capable.
> >> Mediated device only uses IOMMU APIs,
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:48 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e806402130c9 ("block: split out request-only flags into a new
> namespace")
>
> from the block tree
On Tue, 2016-11-08 at 16:48 +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi James,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the scsi tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>
> between commit:
>
> e806402130c9 ("block: split out request-only flags into a new
> namespace")
>
> from the block tree
On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 01:43:25PM +, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> In order to support DRM_IOCTL_MODE_OBJ_SETPROPERTY for the rotation property
> we need to have a ->set_property hook defined for the planes. Set the
> plane's ->set_property hook to drm_atomic_helper_plane_set_property()
>
>
On Tuesday, November 8, 2016 5:09:59 PM CET Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>
> I don't see a better alternative. I earlier suggested having these
> out of line so we don't grow the object code too much when it is
> enabled.
>
On second look, I see that they are all done out of line, I would
just move
901 - 1000 of 1918 matches
Mail list logo