On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:58:02AM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzkaller hit the following crash on
> 72bca2084a21edda74b802bc076083d5951f67b4
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/master
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
> .config is attached
> Raw console
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:58:02AM -0800, syzbot wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzkaller hit the following crash on
> 72bca2084a21edda74b802bc076083d5951f67b4
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/davem/net-next.git/master
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
> .config is attached
> Raw console
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 03:40:37PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Lina Iyer
>
> Update DT bindings to represent hierarchical CPU and CPU domain idle states
> for PSCI. Also update the PSCI examples to clearly show how flattened and
> hierarchical idle states can be
On Thu, Dec 28, 2017 at 03:40:37PM +0100, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> From: Lina Iyer
>
> Update DT bindings to represent hierarchical CPU and CPU domain idle states
> for PSCI. Also update the PSCI examples to clearly show how flattened and
> hierarchical idle states can be represented in DT.
>
>
On 01/03, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Thanks for your review comments,
>
> On 03/01/18 17:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>+
> >>+ return ret;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static int msm_snd_apq8096_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>+{
> >>+ int ret;
> >>+ struct snd_soc_card *card;
> >>+
> >>+
On 01/03, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Thanks for your review comments,
>
> On 03/01/18 17:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >>+
> >>+ return ret;
> >>+}
> >>+
> >>+static int msm_snd_apq8096_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> >>+{
> >>+ int ret;
> >>+ struct snd_soc_card *card;
> >>+
> >>+
On 12/26/2017 09:43 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>AMD processors are not subject to the types of attacks that the kernel page
>table isolation
feature protects against.
There is no doubt this is a serious flaw. This thread reminded me - about a
year ago we
discovered a software code that bricked
On 12/26/2017 09:43 PM, Tom Lendacky wrote:
>AMD processors are not subject to the types of attacks that the kernel page
>table isolation
feature protects against.
There is no doubt this is a serious flaw. This thread reminded me - about a
year ago we
discovered a software code that bricked
On Wed 03 Jan 08:26 PST 2018, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Thanks for your review comments.
>
> On 02/01/18 05:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 14 Dec 09:33 PST 2017, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
[..]
> > > +int q6asm_unmap_memory_regions(unsigned int dir, struct audio_client *ac)
On Wed 03 Jan 08:26 PST 2018, Srinivas Kandagatla wrote:
> Thanks for your review comments.
>
> On 02/01/18 05:48, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> > On Thu 14 Dec 09:33 PST 2017, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
[..]
> > > +int q6asm_unmap_memory_regions(unsigned int dir, struct audio_client *ac)
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 19:18:52 +0530
Gaurav Kohli wrote:
> There can be a race, if receive_buf call comes before
> tty initialization completes in n_tty_open and tty->disc_data
> may be NULL.
This makes no sense. If the race exists then the check you do isn't good
enough
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 19:18:52 +0530
Gaurav Kohli wrote:
> There can be a race, if receive_buf call comes before
> tty initialization completes in n_tty_open and tty->disc_data
> may be NULL.
This makes no sense. If the race exists then the check you do isn't good
enough because the ldsic dsta
Hi Fabio,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:14:35PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:37 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
>
> >> Initially the rest GPIO was doing:
> >>
> >> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 0);
> >> - mdelay(10);
> >> -
Hi Fabio,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:14:35PM -0200, Fabio Estevam wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:37 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
>
> >> Initially the rest GPIO was doing:
> >>
> >> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 0);
> >> - mdelay(10);
> >> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 1);
> >> -
From: Lucas Stach
The system has an external watchdog in the environment processor
so the internal watchdog is of no use.
Cc: Sascha Hauer
Cc: Fabio Estevam
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Mark Rutland
From: Lucas Stach
The system has an external watchdog in the environment processor
so the internal watchdog is of no use.
Cc: Sascha Hauer
Cc: Fabio Estevam
Cc: Rob Herring
Cc: Mark Rutland
Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org
Cc: devicet...@vger.kernel.org
Cc:
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:45 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
>>> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>>>
>>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>>
>> What is the issue with this message?
>
> * Is it redundant?
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 12:45 AM, SF Markus Elfring
wrote:
>>> Omit an extra message for a memory allocation failure in this function.
>>>
>>> This issue was detected by using the Coccinelle software.
>>>
>> What is the issue with this message?
>
> * Is it redundant?
>
> * Would a Linux allocation
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> (emailing the folks listed from running `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> -f` on arch/x86/kernel/process.c, arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h,
> and include/linux/percpu-defs.h)
>
> Clang emits the following warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:50:11:
On Tue, 2 Jan 2018, Nick Desaulniers wrote:
> (emailing the folks listed from running `./scripts/get_maintainer.pl
> -f` on arch/x86/kernel/process.c, arch/x86/include/asm/processor.h,
> and include/linux/percpu-defs.h)
>
> Clang emits the following warning:
>
> arch/x86/kernel/process.c:50:11:
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Lars Wendler wrote:
> > Am Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:05:38 +0100 (CET)
> > schrieb Thomas Gleixner :
> > > Also can you please try Linus v4.15-rc6 with PTI enabled so we can see
> > > whether that's a backport issue or
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Lars Wendler wrote:
> > Am Wed, 3 Jan 2018 13:05:38 +0100 (CET)
> > schrieb Thomas Gleixner :
> > > Also can you please try Linus v4.15-rc6 with PTI enabled so we can see
> > > whether that's a backport issue or a general one?
> >
On 01/03/2018 08:50 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> From: Vinod Koul
>
> Helps in finding if endings
That partial sentence is confusing. I couldn't decode it without
reading the entire patch. That shouldn't be necessary.
How about:
Help in finding (matching) if/endif
On 01/03/2018 08:50 AM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> From: Vinod Koul
>
> Helps in finding if endings
That partial sentence is confusing. I couldn't decode it without
reading the entire patch. That shouldn't be necessary.
How about:
Help in finding (matching) if/endif pairs.
or
Help in
We got into the current situation for performance reasons, avoiding the costly
reload of CR3 that a hardware task switch would cause. It seems we'll be
loading CR3 now anyway, so it might be time to reconsider hardware
task switches.
The recent patches leave kernel entry/exit code mapped.
We got into the current situation for performance reasons, avoiding the costly
reload of CR3 that a hardware task switch would cause. It seems we'll be
loading CR3 now anyway, so it might be time to reconsider hardware
task switches.
The recent patches leave kernel entry/exit code mapped.
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:52 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2018 11:09 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 10:50 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > Couple of nitpicks and seems patch 9 missed some (all?) comments to
> > be
> > addressed.
> >
> > So, after
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 12:52 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
> On 01/03/2018 11:09 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
> > On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 10:50 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > Couple of nitpicks and seems patch 9 missed some (all?) comments to
> > be
> > addressed.
> >
> > So, after
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:24 AM, Greentime Hu wrote:
> From: Greentime Hu
>
> This patch adds support for device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen
> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu
> ---
>
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 2:24 AM, Greentime Hu wrote:
> From: Greentime Hu
>
> This patch adds support for device tree.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vincent Chen
> Signed-off-by: Greentime Hu
> ---
> arch/nds32/boot/dts/Makefile |8 +
> arch/nds32/boot/dts/ae3xx.dts | 73
>
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 22:02 +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> This commit adds GPIO driver for Winbond Super I/Os.
>
> Currently, only W83627UHG model (also known as Nuvoton NCT6627UD) is
> supported but in the future a support for other Winbond models, too,
> can
> be added to the driver.
>
>
On Sat, 2017-12-30 at 22:02 +0100, Maciej S. Szmigiero wrote:
> This commit adds GPIO driver for Winbond Super I/Os.
>
> Currently, only W83627UHG model (also known as Nuvoton NCT6627UD) is
> supported but in the future a support for other Winbond models, too,
> can
> be added to the driver.
>
>
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:21:16 -0800
Kees Cook wrote:
> The more interesting thing here is that secureexec is set for a
> process that ISN'T actually setuid. (ptrace of a setuid process). I
> think tha'ts the real bug, but not something I'm going to be able to
> fix quickly. So, for now, I want to
On Wed, 3 Jan 2018 09:21:16 -0800
Kees Cook wrote:
> The more interesting thing here is that secureexec is set for a
> process that ISN'T actually setuid. (ptrace of a setuid process). I
> think tha'ts the real bug, but not something I'm going to be able to
> fix quickly. So, for now, I want to
On 01/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/1/3 10:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch allows root to reserve some blocks via mount option.
> >
> > "-o reserve_root=N" means N x 4KB-sized blocks for root only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > ---
> >
> > Change log from v4:
On 01/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/1/3 10:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch allows root to reserve some blocks via mount option.
> >
> > "-o reserve_root=N" means N x 4KB-sized blocks for root only.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > ---
> >
> > Change log from v4:
> > - fix f_bfree
On 1/3/2018 10:51 AM, Mohamed Ghannam wrote:
The fix : https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/854723/
Cool. Thanks Mohamed for following it up.
Regards,
Santosh
On 1/3/2018 10:51 AM, Mohamed Ghannam wrote:
The fix : https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/854723/
Cool. Thanks Mohamed for following it up.
Regards,
Santosh
On 01/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/1/3 11:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch gives a flag to disable GC on given file, which would be useful,
> > when
> > user wants to keep its block map. It also conducts in-place-update for
> > dontmove
> > file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
On 01/03, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/1/3 11:21, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > This patch gives a flag to disable GC on given file, which would be useful,
> > when
> > user wants to keep its block map. It also conducts in-place-update for
> > dontmove
> > file.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
> > ---
Let's show precise # of blocks that user/root can use through bavail and bfree
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index
Let's show precise # of blocks that user/root can use through bavail and bfree
respectively.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/super.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
index 0a820ba55b10..4c1c99cf54ef 100644
---
This patch allows root to reserve some blocks via mount option.
"-o reserve_root=N" means N x 4KB-sized blocks for root only.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 26 ++
fs/f2fs/super.c | 29 ++---
fs/f2fs/sysfs.c
This patch allows root to reserve some blocks via mount option.
"-o reserve_root=N" means N x 4KB-sized blocks for root only.
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim
---
fs/f2fs/f2fs.h | 26 ++
fs/f2fs/super.c | 29 ++---
fs/f2fs/sysfs.c | 3 ++-
3 files
Document what ->pde_unload_lock actually does.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan
---
fs/proc/internal.h |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct proc_dir_entry {
atomic_t
Document what ->pde_unload_lock actually does.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan
---
fs/proc/internal.h |3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/proc/internal.h
+++ b/fs/proc/internal.h
@@ -38,7 +38,8 @@ struct proc_dir_entry {
atomic_t in_use;
atomic_t
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:58 PM, syzbot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzkaller hit the following crash on
> 61233580f1f33c50e159c50e24d80ffd2ba2e06b
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/master
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1
On Tue, Jan 2, 2018 at 3:58 PM, syzbot
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> syzkaller hit the following crash on
> 61233580f1f33c50e159c50e24d80ffd2ba2e06b
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/master
> compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
> .config is attached
> Raw console output is
On 01/03/2018 11:09 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 10:50 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
The first patch solves issues reported by 0day with non-ACPI platforms
The second patch implements what Linus, Takashi and Mark
requested: a top-level selector defaulting to 'y' to
On 01/03/2018 11:09 AM, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 10:50 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
The first patch solves issues reported by 0day with non-ACPI platforms
The second patch implements what Linus, Takashi and Mark
requested: a top-level selector defaulting to 'y' to
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:16 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> [ +wei...@google.com ]
>
> On 1/2/18 3:58 PM, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzkaller hit the following crash on
>> 61233580f1f33c50e159c50e24d80ffd2ba2e06b
>>
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 8:16 AM, David Ahern wrote:
> [ +wei...@google.com ]
>
> On 1/2/18 3:58 PM, syzbot wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> syzkaller hit the following crash on
>> 61233580f1f33c50e159c50e24d80ffd2ba2e06b
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/master
>> compiler:
/proc/self inode numbers, value of proc_inode_cache and st_nlink of
/proc/$TGID are fixed constants.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan
---
fs/proc/base.c|5 +++--
fs/proc/inode.c |3 ++-
fs/proc/self.c|3 ++-
fs/proc/thread_self.c |3 ++-
/proc/self inode numbers, value of proc_inode_cache and st_nlink of
/proc/$TGID are fixed constants.
Signed-off-by: Alexey Dobriyan
---
fs/proc/base.c|5 +++--
fs/proc/inode.c |3 ++-
fs/proc/self.c|3 ++-
fs/proc/thread_self.c |3 ++-
4 files changed, 9
On 1/3/2018 12:58 AM, syzbot wrote:
Hello,
syzkaller hit the following crash on
ad036b63ee57df9ab802a4eb20cbbbec66aa4520
git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmots.git/master
compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
.config is attached
Raw console output is attached.
C reproducer is attached
syzkaller
On 1/3/2018 12:58 AM, syzbot wrote:
Hello,
syzkaller hit the following crash on
ad036b63ee57df9ab802a4eb20cbbbec66aa4520
git://git.cmpxchg.org/linux-mmots.git/master
compiler: gcc (GCC) 7.1.1 20170620
.config is attached
Raw console output is attached.
C reproducer is attached
syzkaller
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee
---
Changes since v2:
* Splitted dt bindings to the separated patch
* Changed 'interelave-mode' device property from u32 to boolean
Changes since v1:
* Removed 'codec' from 'max98373_priv' structure
:
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee
---
Changes since v2:
* Splitted dt bindings to the separated patch
* Changed 'interelave-mode' device property from u32 to boolean
Changes since v1:
* Removed 'codec' from 'max98373_priv' structure
: Now 'max98373_set_clock'
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee
---
Changes since v2:
* Splitted dt bindings to the separated patch
* Changed 'interelave-mode' device property from u32 to boolean
.../devicetree/bindings/sound/max98373.txt | 40 ++
1 file
Signed-off-by: Ryan Lee
---
Changes since v2:
* Splitted dt bindings to the separated patch
* Changed 'interelave-mode' device property from u32 to boolean
.../devicetree/bindings/sound/max98373.txt | 40 ++
1 file changed, 40 insertions(+)
create
>-Original Message-
>From: Rob Herring [mailto:r...@kernel.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 3:33 PM
>To: Ryan Lee
>Cc: lgirdw...@gmail.com; broo...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
>pe...@perex.cz; ti...@suse.com; a...@arndb.de; a...@ti.com;
>-Original Message-
>From: Rob Herring [mailto:r...@kernel.org]
>Sent: Tuesday, December 26, 2017 3:33 PM
>To: Ryan Lee
>Cc: lgirdw...@gmail.com; broo...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com;
>pe...@perex.cz; ti...@suse.com; a...@arndb.de; a...@ti.com;
>robert.jarz...@free.fr;
Thanks for your review comments,
On 03/01/18 17:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 12/14/2017 09:34 AM, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c b/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c
new file mode 100644
index
Thanks for your review comments,
On 03/01/18 17:20, Stephen Boyd wrote:
On 12/14/2017 09:34 AM, srinivas.kandaga...@linaro.org wrote:
From: Srinivas Kandagatla
diff --git a/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c b/sound/soc/qcom/apq8096.c
new file mode 100644
index ..5b2036317f71
---
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:27:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Continuing investigation...
>
> After applying the fallback patch to allow new tools to work with older
> kernels:
>
> [root@felicio ~]# perf test bpf
> 39: BPF filter:
>
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 03:27:01PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> > Continuing investigation...
>
> After applying the fallback patch to allow new tools to work with older
> kernels:
>
> [root@felicio ~]# perf test bpf
> 39: BPF filter:
>
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:58:44PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:58:26PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > And please check if the kprobe created by
> >
> > $ perf probe -v SyS_epoll_wait
>
> [root@seventh ~]# perf probe -v SyS_epoll_wait
>
> Sorry, I find this very confusing.
>
> It seems we have some people telling me that when there's no PHY described
> in DT, we use this link interrupt, and have a functional network interface
> (presumably at whatever speed.)
I give you couple of examples when we have functional network
Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:58:44PM -0300, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo escreveu:
> Em Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 12:58:26PM +0800, Wangnan (F) escreveu:
> > And please check if the kprobe created by
> >
> > $ perf probe -v SyS_epoll_wait
>
> [root@seventh ~]# perf probe -v SyS_epoll_wait
>
> Sorry, I find this very confusing.
>
> It seems we have some people telling me that when there's no PHY described
> in DT, we use this link interrupt, and have a functional network interface
> (presumably at whatever speed.)
I give you couple of examples when we have functional network
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 02:28:00PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > This driver creates various const structures that it stores in the
> > > data field of an of_device_id
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 01:38:27PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 3 Jan 2018, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Jan 02, 2018 at 02:28:00PM +0100, Julia Lawall wrote:
> > > This driver creates various const structures that it stores in the
> > > data field of an of_device_id
On 03/01/18 18:13, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 03/01/18 11:20, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 03/01/18 09:35, Ganapatrao Kulkarni
On 03/01/18 18:13, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>> On 03/01/18 11:20, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
On 03/01/18 09:35, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
> Hi Marc,
>
> On Wed, Jan
Some devices have the control dlci stay in ADM mode instead of the UA
mode. This can seen at least on droid 4 when trying to open the ts
27.010 mux port. Enabling n_gsm debug mode shows the control dlci
always respond with DM to SABM instead of UA:
# modprobe n_gsm debug=0xff
# ldattach -d
Some devices have the control dlci stay in ADM mode instead of the UA
mode. This can seen at least on droid 4 when trying to open the ts
27.010 mux port. Enabling n_gsm debug mode shows the control dlci
always respond with DM to SABM instead of UA:
# modprobe n_gsm debug=0xff
# ldattach -d
Russell,
2018-01-03 18:54 GMT+01:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:00:47PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>> > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > Hi Russell,
>> > > >
>> > > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
>>
Russell,
2018-01-03 18:54 GMT+01:00 Russell King - ARM Linux :
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 05:00:47PM +, Stefan Chulski wrote:
>> > > > -Original Message-
>> > > > Hi Russell,
>> > > >
>> > > > Indeed. RGMII MAC behaves same way, although it shouldn't be named
>> > > > as 'in- band' to
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:37 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
>> Initially the rest GPIO was doing:
>>
>> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 0);
>> - mdelay(10);
>> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 1);
>> - mdelay(10); /* wait to let chip come out of reset */
>
> And that's
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:37 PM, jacopo mondi wrote:
>> Initially the rest GPIO was doing:
>>
>> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 0);
>> - mdelay(10);
>> - gpio_set_value(GPIO_PTT3, 1);
>> - mdelay(10); /* wait to let chip come out of reset */
>
> And that's what my driver code
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 03/01/18 11:20, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 03/01/18 09:35, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 5:06 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On 03/01/18 11:20, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
>>> On 03/01/18 09:35, Ganapatrao Kulkarni wrote:
Hi Marc,
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 2:17 PM, Marc Zyngier wrote:
> On
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 10:50 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> This patch fixes a number of issues:
> 1. IOSF_MBI is only needed for byt-cr detection, which is only
> supported
> on Baytrail/Cherrytrail, move to HiFi2 config
>
> tristate "Intel ASoC SST driver for ACPI HiFi2 platforms
>
On Wed, 2018-01-03 at 10:50 -0600, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> This patch fixes a number of issues:
> 1. IOSF_MBI is only needed for byt-cr detection, which is only
> supported
> on Baytrail/Cherrytrail, move to HiFi2 config
>
> tristate "Intel ASoC SST driver for ACPI HiFi2 platforms
>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:17:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Assuming that the subject line wanted to say v4.16, not v4.15 (which would be
> really scary set of changes so late in the v4.15 cycle), I have pulled these
>
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 02:17:17PM +0100, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Paul E. McKenney wrote:
[ . . . ]
> Assuming that the subject line wanted to say v4.16, not v4.15 (which would be
> really scary set of changes so late in the v4.15 cycle), I have pulled these
> into
> tip:core/rcu, thanks
Clean up the ifdefs which conditionally defined the io{read|write}64
functions in favour of the new common io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi header.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Cc: Jon Mason
---
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c | 30
Clean up the ifdefs which conditionally defined the io{read|write}64
functions in favour of the new common io-64-nonatomic-lo-hi header.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Cc: Jon Mason
---
drivers/ntb/hw/mscc/ntb_hw_switchtec.c | 30 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+),
In order to provide non-atomic functions for io{read|write}64 that will
use readq and writeq when appropriate. We define a number of variants
of these functions in the generic iomap that will do non-atomic
operations on pio but atomic operations on mmio.
These functions are only defined if readq
In order to provide non-atomic functions for io{read|write}64 that will
use readq and writeq when appropriate. We define a number of variants
of these functions in the generic iomap that will do non-atomic
operations on pio but atomic operations on mmio.
These functions are only defined if readq
Subsequent patches in this series makes use of the readq and writeq
defines in iomap.h. However, as is, they get missed on the powerpc
platform seeing the include comes before the define. This patch
moves the include down to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Acked-by:
Subsequent patches in this series makes use of the readq and writeq
defines in iomap.h. However, as is, they get missed on the powerpc
platform seeing the include comes before the define. This patch
moves the include down to fix this.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:53:11PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:20:36PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > @@ -4612,6 +4616,9 @@ static int mvpp22_comphy_init(struct mvpp2_port
> > > > *port)
Hi Andrew,
On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:53:11PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:32:27PM +0100, Antoine Tenart wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 03, 2018 at 04:20:36PM +0100, Andrew Lunn wrote:
> > > > @@ -4612,6 +4616,9 @@ static int mvpp22_comphy_init(struct mvpp2_port
> > > > *port)
This patch adds generic io{read|write}64[be]{_lo_hi|_hi_lo} macros if
they are not already defined by the architecture. (As they are provided
by the generic iomap library).
The patch also points io{read|write}64[be] to the variant specified by the
header name.
This is because new drivers are
This patch adds generic io{read|write}64[be]{_lo_hi|_hi_lo} macros if
they are not already defined by the architecture. (As they are provided
by the generic iomap library).
The patch also points io{read|write}64[be] to the variant specified by the
header name.
This is because new drivers are
Now that ioread64 and iowrite64 are available in io-64-nonatomic,
we can remove the hack at the top of ntb_hw_intel.c and replace it
with an include.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko
Acked-by: Dave Jiang
These functions will be introduced into the generic iomap.c so
they can deal with PIO accesses in hi-lo/lo-hi variants. Thus,
the powerpc version of iomap.c will need to provide the same
functions even though, in this arch, they are identical to the
regular io{read|write}64 functions.
Now that ioread64 and iowrite64 are available in io-64-nonatomic,
we can remove the hack at the top of ntb_hw_intel.c and replace it
with an include.
Signed-off-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko
Acked-by: Dave Jiang
Acked-by: Allen Hubbe
Acked-by: Jon Mason
# Please enter the
These functions will be introduced into the generic iomap.c so
they can deal with PIO accesses in hi-lo/lo-hi variants. Thus,
the powerpc version of iomap.c will need to provide the same
functions even though, in this arch, they are identical to the
regular io{read|write}64 functions.
901 - 1000 of 1912 matches
Mail list logo