On Fri, 4 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:38:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > (Me, I would run rcutorture scenario TREE03 for an extended time period
> > > on b4abf91047cf with your patch applied.
>
> And with lockdep enabled, which TREE03 does not do by
Hi Eric,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on slave-dma/next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20180504]
[cannot apply to linus/master v4.17-rc3]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url
On Fri, 4 May 2018, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:38:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> > > (Me, I would run rcutorture scenario TREE03 for an extended time period
> > > on b4abf91047cf with your patch applied.
>
> And with lockdep enabled, which TREE03 does not do by
Hi Eric,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on slave-dma/next]
[also build test WARNING on next-20180504]
[cannot apply to linus/master v4.17-rc3]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url
Ping,
On 2018/4/27 10:55, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> Missed this patch, or any problem in it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 2018/4/26 17:05, Chao Yu wrote:
>> For extreme case:
>> 10 section, op = 10%, no_fggc_threshold = 90%
>> All section usage: 85% 85% 85% 85% 90% 90% 95% 95% 95% 95%
>>
>>
Ping,
On 2018/4/27 10:55, Chao Yu wrote:
> Hi Jaegeuk,
>
> Missed this patch, or any problem in it?
>
> Thanks,
>
> On 2018/4/26 17:05, Chao Yu wrote:
>> For extreme case:
>> 10 section, op = 10%, no_fggc_threshold = 90%
>> All section usage: 85% 85% 85% 85% 90% 90% 95% 95% 95% 95%
>>
>>
Ping,
On 2018/4/27 10:37, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/4/27 0:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 04/26, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2018/4/26 23:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 04/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> Thread A Thread B
> - f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write
> - commit_inmem_pages
Ping,
On 2018/4/27 10:37, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2018/4/27 0:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>> On 04/26, Chao Yu wrote:
>>> On 2018/4/26 23:48, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
On 04/26, Chao Yu wrote:
> Thread A Thread B
> - f2fs_ioc_commit_atomic_write
> - commit_inmem_pages
Hi Xiaotong,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504]
[cannot apply to j.anaszewski-leds/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve
Hi Xiaotong,
Thank you for the patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on robh/for-next]
[also build test WARNING on v4.17-rc3 next-20180504]
[cannot apply to j.anaszewski-leds/for-next]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:35:42PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:51:14PM +, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> I don't have an objection to moving this to it's own tag. It will make
>> my scripts somewhat simpler for sure.
>
>It's not a matter "moving this it's own tag", but
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:35:42PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:51:14PM +, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> I don't have an objection to moving this to it's own tag. It will make
>> my scripts somewhat simpler for sure.
>
>It's not a matter "moving this it's own tag", but
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:38:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:08:40PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 11:38:37PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>
> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:08:40PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> >>
> >> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:03:04PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> >> >> "Paul
Tony Wallace writes:
> On 02/05/18 01:35, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Top-quoting is evil BTW.
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 00:17 +1200, Tony Wallace wrote:
>>> Two issues here:
>>> 1) Use case (which I have)
>>> 2) Permissions
>>>
>>> 1) Use case
>>>
>>> I am
Tony Wallace writes:
> On 02/05/18 01:35, Bernd Petrovitsch wrote:
>> Hi all!
>>
>> Top-quoting is evil BTW.
>>
>> On Wed, 2018-05-02 at 00:17 +1200, Tony Wallace wrote:
>>> Two issues here:
>>> 1) Use case (which I have)
>>> 2) Permissions
>>>
>>> 1) Use case
>>>
>>> I am trying to build a
Willy Tarreau writes:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:35:42PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:51:14PM +, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > I don't have an objection to moving this to it's own tag. It will make
>> > my scripts somewhat simpler for sure.
>>
>>
Willy Tarreau writes:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:35:42PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
>> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:51:14PM +, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> > I don't have an objection to moving this to it's own tag. It will make
>> > my scripts somewhat simpler for sure.
>>
>> It's not a
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Introduce helper:
> int fork_usermode_blob(void *data, size_t len, struct umh_info *info);
> struct umh_info {
>struct file *pipe_to_umh;
>struct file *pipe_from_umh;
>pid_t pid;
> };
>
> that
On Thu, May 3, 2018 at 12:36 AM, Alexei Starovoitov wrote:
> Introduce helper:
> int fork_usermode_blob(void *data, size_t len, struct umh_info *info);
> struct umh_info {
>struct file *pipe_to_umh;
>struct file *pipe_from_umh;
>pid_t pid;
> };
>
> that GPLed kernel
On 05/04/2018 06:12 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
>> That new line boils down to:
>>
>> [ilog2(0)] = "",
>>
>> on x86. It wasn't *obvious* to me that it is OK to do that. The other
>> possibly undefined bits (VM_SOFTDIRTY for instance) #ifdef themselves
>> out of this array.
>>
>> I would
On 05/04/2018 06:12 PM, Ram Pai wrote:
>> That new line boils down to:
>>
>> [ilog2(0)] = "",
>>
>> on x86. It wasn't *obvious* to me that it is OK to do that. The other
>> possibly undefined bits (VM_SOFTDIRTY for instance) #ifdef themselves
>> out of this array.
>>
>> I would
"Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:08:40PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:03:04PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> "Paul E. McKenney"
"Paul E. McKenney" writes:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 03:08:40PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>>
>> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:03:04PM -0500, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
>> >> "Paul E. McKenney" writes:
>> >>
>> >> > On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 12:17:20PM -0500,
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:46:46PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:08:23PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > The number of permutations for our various allocation function is
> > rather huge. Currently, it is:
> >
> > system or wrapper:
> > kmem_cache_alloc, kmalloc, vmalloc,
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 08:46:46PM -0700, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:08:23PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > The number of permutations for our various allocation function is
> > rather huge. Currently, it is:
> >
> > system or wrapper:
> > kmem_cache_alloc, kmalloc, vmalloc,
A patch for this specific report is ready. I don't know whether other
"dup" reports will be solved by this patch. Thus, I "undup" this report.
#syz undup
>From eed54c6ae475860a9c63b37b58f34735e792eef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa
Date: Sat, 5
A patch for this specific report is ready. I don't know whether other
"dup" reports will be solved by this patch. Thus, I "undup" this report.
#syz undup
>From eed54c6ae475860a9c63b37b58f34735e792eef7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Tetsuo Handa
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 12:59:12 +0900
Subject:
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following crash on:
HEAD commit:cdface520934 Merge tag 'for_linus_stable' of git://git.ker..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=136c8ee780
kernel config:
syzbot has found a reproducer for the following crash on:
HEAD commit:cdface520934 Merge tag 'for_linus_stable' of git://git.ker..
git tree: upstream
console output: https://syzkaller.appspot.com/x/log.txt?x=136c8ee780
kernel config:
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> and if you're counting f2fs_*alloc, there's a metric tonne of *alloc
> wrappers out there.
Yeah. *sob*
> That's a little revisionist ;-) We had kmalloc before we had the slab
> allocator (kernel 1.2, I think?). But I
On Fri, May 4, 2018 at 8:46 PM, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> and if you're counting f2fs_*alloc, there's a metric tonne of *alloc
> wrappers out there.
Yeah. *sob*
> That's a little revisionist ;-) We had kmalloc before we had the slab
> allocator (kernel 1.2, I think?). But I see your point, and
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:35:42PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:51:14PM +, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > I don't have an objection to moving this to it's own tag. It will make
> > my scripts somewhat simpler for sure.
>
> It's not a matter "moving this it's own tag",
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 07:35:42PM -0400, Theodore Y. Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 09:51:14PM +, Sasha Levin wrote:
> > I don't have an objection to moving this to it's own tag. It will make
> > my scripts somewhat simpler for sure.
>
> It's not a matter "moving this it's own tag",
In uhid_event_from_user(), if it is in_compat_syscall(), the 'type' of the
event is first fetched from the 'buffer' in userspace and checked. If the
'type' is UHID_CREATE, it is a messed up request with compat pointer, which
could be more than 256 bytes, so it is better allocated from the heap, as
In uhid_event_from_user(), if it is in_compat_syscall(), the 'type' of the
event is first fetched from the 'buffer' in userspace and checked. If the
'type' is UHID_CREATE, it is a messed up request with compat pointer, which
could be more than 256 bytes, so it is better allocated from the heap, as
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm feeling a bit hostile toward lib/percpu_ida.c in general ;) It has
> very few users and seems rather complicated (what's with that
> schedule() in percpu_ida_alloc?). I'm suspecting and hoping that if
> someone can figure out
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 04:22:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> I'm feeling a bit hostile toward lib/percpu_ida.c in general ;) It has
> very few users and seems rather complicated (what's with that
> schedule() in percpu_ida_alloc?). I'm suspecting and hoping that if
> someone can figure out
Yeah sure Stephen.
On 5/5/2018 8:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
Hello Stephen,
I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Hi Maxime,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on ]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Maxime-Ripard/drm-panel-Add-Ilitek-ILI9881c-controller-driver/20180505-104031
base:
config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler:
Yeah sure Stephen.
On 5/5/2018 8:21 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
Hello Stephen,
I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
--
QUALCOMM INDIA, on behalf of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Hi Maxime,
I love your patch! Perhaps something to improve:
[auto build test WARNING on ]
url:
https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Maxime-Ripard/drm-panel-Add-Ilitek-ILI9881c-controller-driver/20180505-104031
base:
config: sh-allmodconfig (attached as .config)
compiler:
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:08:23PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The number of permutations for our various allocation function is
> rather huge. Currently, it is:
>
> system or wrapper:
> kmem_cache_alloc, kmalloc, vmalloc, kvmalloc, devm_kmalloc,
> dma_alloc_coherent, pci_alloc_consistent,
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 06:08:23PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> The number of permutations for our various allocation function is
> rather huge. Currently, it is:
>
> system or wrapper:
> kmem_cache_alloc, kmalloc, vmalloc, kvmalloc, devm_kmalloc,
> dma_alloc_coherent, pci_alloc_consistent,
Fixed format/style issues found with checkpatch. No code changes.
Corrected alignment of variables after open parenthesis and line breaks.
Checkpatch now returns clean except for "line over 80 char" warnings.
Signed-off-by: Efstratios Gavas
---
v2(unlabeled): changed title info
v3:
Fixed format/style issues found with checkpatch. No code changes.
Corrected alignment of variables after open parenthesis and line breaks.
Checkpatch now returns clean except for "line over 80 char" warnings.
Signed-off-by: Efstratios Gavas
---
v2(unlabeled): changed title info
v3: improved
Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-05-03 04:57:37)
> On 2018-05-02 13:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-04-30 09:20:08)
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void clk_rcg2_shared_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >> +{
> >> + struct clk_rcg2 *rcg = to_clk_rcg2(hw);
> >> + struct
Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-05-03 04:57:37)
> On 2018-05-02 13:15, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-04-30 09:20:08)
> >
> >> +}
> >> +
> >> +static void clk_rcg2_shared_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> >> +{
> >> + struct clk_rcg2 *rcg = to_clk_rcg2(hw);
> >> + struct
Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-05-04 03:45:12)
> On 2018-05-02 12:53, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-04-30 09:20:10)
> >> +
> >> +static struct clk_branch gcc_disp_gpll0_clk_src = {
> >> + .halt_reg = 0x52004,
> >> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_DELAY,
> >
> > What about
Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-05-04 03:45:12)
> On 2018-05-02 12:53, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Amit Nischal (2018-04-30 09:20:10)
> >> +
> >> +static struct clk_branch gcc_disp_gpll0_clk_src = {
> >> + .halt_reg = 0x52004,
> >> + .halt_check = BRANCH_HALT_DELAY,
> >
> > What about
Quoting Akshu Agrawal (2018-05-04 10:07:18)
> Stoney SoC provides oscout clock. This clock can support 25Mhz and
> 48Mhz of frequency.
> The clock is available for general system use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal
> ---
> v2: config change, added SPDX tag and used
Quoting Akshu Agrawal (2018-05-04 10:07:18)
> Stoney SoC provides oscout clock. This clock can support 25Mhz and
> 48Mhz of frequency.
> The clock is available for general system use.
>
> Signed-off-by: Akshu Agrawal
> ---
> v2: config change, added SPDX tag and used clk_hw_register_.
> v3: Fix
Quoting Anson Huang (2018-04-20 00:38:10)
> i.MX6SX has lvds2 (analog clock2), an I/O clock like lvds1.
> And this lvds2, along with lvds1, can be used to provide
> external clock source to the internal pll, such as pll4_audio
> and pll5_video.
>
> This patch mainly adds the lvds2 to the clock
Quoting Anson Huang (2018-04-20 00:38:10)
> i.MX6SX has lvds2 (analog clock2), an I/O clock like lvds1.
> And this lvds2, along with lvds1, can be used to provide
> external clock source to the internal pll, such as pll4_audio
> and pll5_video.
>
> This patch mainly adds the lvds2 to the clock
On 2018-05-03 07:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 04:12:02PM -0400, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
Previously, one could assume the firmware name from the preceding
message: "Direct firmware load for {name} failed with error %d".
However, with the new
On 2018-05-03 07:42 PM, Luis R. Rodriguez wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2018 at 04:12:02PM -0400, Andres Rodriguez wrote:
Previously, one could assume the firmware name from the preceding
message: "Direct firmware load for {name} failed with error %d".
However, with the new
Quoting Stefan Agner (2018-04-18 05:52:54)
> According to the data sheet the 3rd choice is the bypass clock
> of pll2. This should not have any effect in practice as this
> selection is not used currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Quoting Stefan Agner (2018-04-18 05:52:54)
> According to the data sheet the 3rd choice is the bypass clock
> of pll2. This should not have any effect in practice as this
> selection is not used currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Stefan Agner
> ---
Applied to clk-next
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
> Hello Stephen,
>
> I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
Quoting Taniya Das (2018-05-03 02:09:57)
> Hello Stephen,
>
> I have tested the below patch & didn't see any issues.
Alright. Thanks! Can I take that as a "Tested-by"?
Quoting Alexandre Torgue (2018-05-04 00:54:16)
> Stephen
>
> On 05/03/2018 08:40 AM, gabriel.fernan...@st.com wrote:
> > From: Gabriel Fernandez
> >
> > Clock driver is mandatory if the machine is selected.
> > Then don't use 'bool' and 'depends on' commands, but
Quoting Alexandre Torgue (2018-05-04 00:54:16)
> Stephen
>
> On 05/03/2018 08:40 AM, gabriel.fernan...@st.com wrote:
> > From: Gabriel Fernandez
> >
> > Clock driver is mandatory if the machine is selected.
> > Then don't use 'bool' and 'depends on' commands, but 'def_bool'
> > with the
On Fri, 4 May 2018 12:06:42 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 00:48:28 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > So the syntax will be
> >
> > p[:EVENT] SYM[(CAST)|+OFFS] [FETCHARG]
> >
> > And here is an example;
> >
> > p:myevent
On Fri, 4 May 2018 12:06:42 -0400
Steven Rostedt wrote:
> On Sat, 5 May 2018 00:48:28 +0900
> Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>
> > So the syntax will be
> >
> > p[:EVENT] SYM[(CAST)|+OFFS] [FETCHARG]
> >
> > And here is an example;
> >
> > p:myevent vfs_read(void *file, char *buf, size_t count,
On 05/03/2018 01:04 PM, Michael Chan wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
On 2018年05月03日 01:32, Michael Chan wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
On 2018年05月02日 13:12, Michael Chan wrote:
On Tue, May 1,
On 05/03/2018 01:04 PM, Michael Chan wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
On 2018年05月03日 01:32, Michael Chan wrote:
On Wed, May 2, 2018 at 3:27 AM, Zumeng Chen wrote:
On 2018年05月02日 13:12, Michael Chan wrote:
On Tue, May 1, 2018 at 5:42 PM, Zumeng Chen
wrote:
diff
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:38:28PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: Enric Balletbo i Serra
>
> commit b5d0ebc99bf5d0801a5ecbe958caa3d68b8eaee8 upstream
>
> The suspend/resume behavior of the TPM can be controlled by setting
> "powered-while-suspended" in the
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 05:38:28PM +0300, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote:
> From: Enric Balletbo i Serra
>
> commit b5d0ebc99bf5d0801a5ecbe958caa3d68b8eaee8 upstream
>
> The suspend/resume behavior of the TPM can be controlled by setting
> "powered-while-suspended" in the DTS. This is useful for the
Quoting Akshu Agrawal (2018-05-03 01:30:26)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
> index 1367afb..2aee002 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> clk-x86-lpss-objs := clk-lpt.o
>
Quoting Akshu Agrawal (2018-05-03 01:30:26)
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
> index 1367afb..2aee002 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/clk/x86/Makefile
> @@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
> clk-x86-lpss-objs := clk-lpt.o
>
In fact the driver depends on EXTCON only when it's configed as
USB_MTU3_DUAL_ROLE, so make USB_MTU3_DUAL_ROLE depend on EXTCON but
not USB_MTU3.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/Kconfig | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff
The variable of 'count' is declared as u8, this will cause an issue
due to value truncated when works in SS or SSP mode and data length
is greater than 255, so change it as u32.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c | 2 +-
1 file changed,
There is an error dialog popped up in PC when test TEST_J/K
by EHSETT tool, due to not waiting for the completion of
control transfer. Here fix it by entering test mode after
Status Stage finish.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c | 10
In fact the driver depends on EXTCON only when it's configed as
USB_MTU3_DUAL_ROLE, so make USB_MTU3_DUAL_ROLE depend on EXTCON but
not USB_MTU3.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/Kconfig | 3 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
The variable of 'count' is declared as u8, this will cause an issue
due to value truncated when works in SS or SSP mode and data length
is greater than 255, so change it as u32.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
There is an error dialog popped up in PC when test TEST_J/K
by EHSETT tool, due to not waiting for the completion of
control transfer. Here fix it by entering test mode after
Status Stage finish.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget_ep0.c | 10 ++
1 file changed,
When boot on the platform with the USB cable connected to Win7,
the Win7 will pop up an error dialog: "USB Device not recognized",
but finally the Win7 can enumerate it successfully.
The root cause is as the following:
When the xHCI driver set PORT_POWER of the OTG port, and if both
IDPIN and
When boot on the platform with the USB cable connected to Win7,
the Win7 will pop up an error dialog: "USB Device not recognized",
but finally the Win7 can enumerate it successfully.
The root cause is as the following:
When the xHCI driver set PORT_POWER of the OTG port, and if both
IDPIN and
On 2018/5/5 2:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/02, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/4/28 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/27, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2018/4/27 0:03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Thread A Thread BThread C
>> - f2fs_remount
The usb_add_gadget_udc() will set the gadget state as
USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED, so we needn't set it again.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git
On 2018/5/5 2:59, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 05/02, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2018/4/28 10:36, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> On 04/27, Chao Yu wrote:
On 2018/4/27 0:03, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 04/24, Chao Yu wrote:
>> Thread A Thread BThread C
>> - f2fs_remount
The usb_add_gadget_udc() will set the gadget state as
USB_STATE_NOTATTACHED, so we needn't set it again.
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c | 8 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/usb/mtu3/mtu3_gadget.c
Support XS-PHY for MediaTek SoCs with USB3.1 GEN2 controller
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig |9 +
drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile|1 +
drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-xsphy.c | 600 ++
3
Support XS-PHY for MediaTek SoCs with USB3.1 GEN2 controller
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
drivers/phy/mediatek/Kconfig |9 +
drivers/phy/mediatek/Makefile|1 +
drivers/phy/mediatek/phy-mtk-xsphy.c | 600 ++
3 files changed, 610
Add a DT binding documentation of XS-PHY for MediaTek SoCs
with USB3.1 GEN2 controller
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-mtk-xsphy.txt | 110
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
Add a DT binding documentation of XS-PHY for MediaTek SoCs
with USB3.1 GEN2 controller
Signed-off-by: Chunfeng Yun
---
.../devicetree/bindings/phy/phy-mtk-xsphy.txt | 110
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
>From a0814ad7725587a06d273997e0fdf5161f916fd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chunfeng Yun
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 09:56:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add MediaTek XS-PHY driver
This patch series support the SuperSpeedPlus XS-PHY transceiver for
USB3.1 GEN2 controller
>From a0814ad7725587a06d273997e0fdf5161f916fd8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Chunfeng Yun
Date: Sat, 5 May 2018 09:56:59 +0800
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/2] Add MediaTek XS-PHY driver
This patch series support the SuperSpeedPlus XS-PHY transceiver for
USB3.1 GEN2 controller on MediaTek chips. The
> On Fri 04-05-18 14:52:09, Huaisheng Ye wrote:
> > realtotalpages is calculated by taking off absent_pages from
> > spanned_pages in every zone.
> > Debug message of calculate_node_totalpages shall accurately
> > indicate that it is real totalpages to avoid ambiguity.
>
> Is the printk actually
> On Fri 04-05-18 14:52:09, Huaisheng Ye wrote:
> > realtotalpages is calculated by taking off absent_pages from
> > spanned_pages in every zone.
> > Debug message of calculate_node_totalpages shall accurately
> > indicate that it is real totalpages to avoid ambiguity.
>
> Is the printk actually
Hi Linus,
Please pull some Kbuild fixes.
Thanks!
The following changes since commit 6da6c0db5316275015e8cc2959f12a17584aeb64:
Linux v4.17-rc3 (2018-04-29 14:17:42 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git
Hi Linus,
Please pull some Kbuild fixes.
Thanks!
The following changes since commit 6da6c0db5316275015e8cc2959f12a17584aeb64:
Linux v4.17-rc3 (2018-04-29 14:17:42 -0700)
are available in the git repository at:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/masahiroy/linux-kbuild.git
On 5/4/18 6:35 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to bisect a pktgen related performance regression that appears to
> be between the 4.13 and 4.14 kernels. But, my system keeps crashing due to
> part_in_flight
> oops so bisecting is not going well.
>
> It looks like this oops was
On 5/4/18 6:35 PM, Ben Greear wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I am trying to bisect a pktgen related performance regression that appears to
> be between the 4.13 and 4.14 kernels. But, my system keeps crashing due to
> part_in_flight
> oops so bisecting is not going well.
>
> It looks like this oops was
From: Stephen Boyd
The following changes since commit 60cc43fc888428bb2f18f08997432d426a243338:
Linux 4.17-rc1 (2018-04-15 18:24:20 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git
tags/clk-fixes-for-linus
for
From: Stephen Boyd
The following changes since commit 60cc43fc888428bb2f18f08997432d426a243338:
Linux 4.17-rc1 (2018-04-15 18:24:20 -0700)
are available in the Git repository at:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/clk/linux.git
tags/clk-fixes-for-linus
for you to fetch
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:24:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> To handle that, I imagined an additional adapter callback like
> 'master_xfer_irqless' to be used for such special I2C messages. These
> kind of special messages could be tagged with a new I2C_M_something
> flag.
> And maybe this
On Fri, May 04, 2018 at 02:24:47PM +0200, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> To handle that, I imagined an additional adapter callback like
> 'master_xfer_irqless' to be used for such special I2C messages. These
> kind of special messages could be tagged with a new I2C_M_something
> flag.
> And maybe this
On 05/04/2018 06:13 PM, Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) wrote:
> When memfd test is skipped because of unmet dependencies and/or unsupported
> configuration, it returns non-zero value which is treated as a fail by the
> Kselftest framework. This leads to false negative result even when the test
> could
On 05/04/2018 06:13 PM, Shuah Khan (Samsung OSG) wrote:
> When memfd test is skipped because of unmet dependencies and/or unsupported
> configuration, it returns non-zero value which is treated as a fail by the
> Kselftest framework. This leads to false negative result even when the test
> could
1 - 100 of 1778 matches
Mail list logo