The patch numbering due looks odd due to the combination of the
two series. But otherwise this looks good to me modulo the one
minor nitpick.
在 2022/5/10 13:45, Christoph Hellwig 写道:
+#ifdef CONFIG_FS_DAX
+int
+xfs_dax_fault(
+ struct vm_fault *vmf,
+ enum page_entry_sizepe_size,
+ boolwrite_fault,
+ pfn_t *pfn)
+{
+ return dax_iomap_fault(vmf, pe_size,
From: Minghao Chi
Use kobj_to_dev() instead of open-coding it.
Reported-by: Zeal Robot
Signed-off-by: Minghao Chi
---
drivers/dax/bus.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/dax/bus.c b/drivers/dax/bus.c
index 1dad813ee4a6..f0f45962005d 100644
---
On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> This is a combination of two patchsets:
> 1.fsdax-rmap:
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
> 2.fsdax-reflink:
>
In fsdax mode, WRITE and ZERO on a shared extent need CoW performed.
After that, new allocated extents needs to be remapped to the file.
So, add a CoW identification in ->iomap_begin(), and implement
->iomap_end() to do the remapping work.
Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong
On Tue, 10 May 2022 19:43:01 -0700 "Darrick J. Wong" wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> > On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > > really matters where
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:03:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > This is a combination of two patchsets:
> > 1.fsdax-rmap:
> > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-xfs/20220419045045.1664996-1-ruansy.f...@fujitsu.com/
> >
[ add Andrew ]
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:49 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:03:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > This is a combination of two patchsets:
> > > 1.fsdax-rmap:
> > >
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 06:55:50PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> [ add Andrew ]
>
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 6:49 PM Dave Chinner wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 05:03:52PM -0700, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > > On Sun, May 08, 2022 at 10:36:06PM +0800, Shiyang Ruan wrote:
> > > > This is a
On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
wrote:
> > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > really matters where al long as it's merged into the xfs for-next
> > tree so it gets filesystem test coverage...
>
> So how about let the notify_failure() bits go
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 07:28:53PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> wrote:
>
> > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > really matters where al long as it's merged into the xfs for-next
> > > tree so it gets
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:29 PM Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> wrote:
>
> > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > really matters where al long as it's merged into the xfs for-next
> > > tree so it gets filesystem
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 09:20:57PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 7:29 PM Andrew Morton
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 10 May 2022 18:55:50 -0700 Dan Williams
> > wrote:
> >
> > > > It'll need to be a stable branch somewhere, but I don't think it
> > > > really matters where al
13 matches
Mail list logo
